Management of the Ascending Aorta in Routine Cardiac Surgery

Pathophysiological Basis of CNS Injury in Cardiac Surgical Patients: Detection and Prevention

The current understanding of adverse central nervous system (CNS) events following cardiac surgery involves several identifiable, evidence-based mechanisms: athero-sclerotic emboli, microgaseous and microparticulate emboli, and hypoperfusion.1 Secondary factors, including patient co-morbidities and inherent genetic susceptibilities, as well as systemic inflammatory processes and a suboptimal metabolic milieu may interact to potentiate the extent of injury.2 In this review a number of these factors and their potential interactions will be explored with a view towards developing a comprehensive management strategy to minimize CNS injury.

Outcomes of cardiac surgery in the elderly

The elderly represent a rapidly growing and substantially under-treated sector in industrialized countries, with coronary artery disease and degenerative aortic stenosis rampant. The proportion of elderly patients undergoing cardiac surgery is rising steadily and outcomes continue to improve with the refinement of operative techniques and perioperative care. Advanced risk stratification models, such as the logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation now offer validated prediction of operative mortality in these high-risk patients. Current trends towards off-pump coronary artery surgery, hybrid revascularization and mitral repair may have advantages in the elderly, who often have more diffuse cardiovascular disease and a lower tolerance to intervention. Recent advances may also provide surgical options for the emerging epidemics of cardiovascular disease affecting the elderly, atrial fibrillation and heart failure.

Using an automated emboli detection device in a porcine cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) model: feasibility and considerations

The significant risk of cerebral embolism during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) makes monitoring of embolic events advisable already when developing new operation and coagulation management strategies for example in CPB animal models. The present study therefore evaluated in a porcine CPB model the feasibility of bilateral epicarotid Doppler signal recording and the quality of manual or automatic emboli detection. A total of 42 recordings (e.g. right carotid artery (n = 20), left carotid artery (n = 22)) were evaluated. The frequency of emboli counts was comparable for both carotid arteries. Automatic emboli detection, however, found significantly more embolic events per pig than did post-hoc manual off-line analysis of the recordings (172 +/- 217 vs. 13 +/-10). None of the brains, however, showed any emboli or infarction area either in cross-examination or in histological evaluation. In conclusion, the present study showed the feasibility of using an epicarotid Doppler device for bilateral emboli detection in a porcine CPB model. Automatic on-line emboli detection, however, reported more embolic events than did post hoc, off-line manual analysis. Possible reasons for this discrepancy are discussed.