Obesity in pregnancy. What every nurse needs to know

Titration of Intravenous Oxytocin Infusion for Postdates Induction of Labor Across Body Mass Index Groups

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether oxytocin titration for postdates labor induction differs among women who are normal weight, overweight, and obese and whether length of labor and birth method differ by oxytocin titration and body mass index (BMI).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

U.S. university-affiliated hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Of 280 eligible women, 21 were normal weight, 134 were overweight, and 125 were obese at labor admission.

METHODS

Data on women who received oxytocin for postdates induction between January 1, 2013 and June 30, 2013 were extracted from medical records. Oxytocin administration and labor outcomes were compared across BMI groups, controlling for potential confounders. Data were analyzed using χ², analysis of variance, analysis of covariance, and multiple linear and logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Women who were obese received more oxytocin than women who were overweight in the unadjusted analysis of variance (7.50 units compared with 5.92 units, p = .031). Women who were overweight had more minutes between rate changes from initiation to maximum than women who were obese (98.19 minutes compared with 83.39 minutes, p = .038). Length of labor increased with BMI (p = .018), with a mean length of labor for the normal weight group of 13.96 hours (standard deviation = 8.10); for the overweight group, 16.00 hours (standard deviation = 7.54); and for the obese group, 18.30 hours (standard deviation = 8.65). Cesarean rate increased with BMI (p = .001), with 4.8% of normal weight, 33.6% of overweight, and 42.4% of obese women having cesarean births.

CONCLUSION

Women who were obese and experienced postdates labor induction received more oxytocin than women who were non-obese and had longer length of labor and greater cesarean rates.

Developing a clinical care pathway for obese pregnant women: A quality improvement project

PROBLEM

Obesity in pregnancy is associated with an increased incidence of maternal and foetal morbidity and mortality, from conditions like preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, preterm birth and stillbirth. Between 20% and 25% of pregnant women in Australia are presenting to their first antenatal appointment with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m(2), defined as obesity in pregnancy. These figures are concerning for midwifery and obstetric staff directly involved in the clinical care of these women and their families. In the absence of national or state clinical practice guidelines for managing the risks for obese pregnant women, a local quality improvement project was conducted.

AIM

To plan, implement, and evaluate the impact of an alternative clinical care pathway for pregnant women with a BMI ≥ 35 kg/m(2) at their first antenatal visit.

PROJECT SETTING

The project was undertaken in the antenatal clinic of a rural referral hospital in NSW, Australia.

SUBJECTS

Eighty-two women with a BMI ≥ 35 kg/m(2) were eligible for the alternative care pathway, offered between January and December 2010.

INTERVENTION

The alternative care pathway included the following options, in addition to usual care: written information on obesity in pregnancy, referral to a dietitian, early plus repeat screening for gestational diabetes, liver and renal function pathology tests, serial self-weighing, serial foetal growth ultrasounds, and a pre-labour anaesthetic consultation.

FINDINGS

Despite being educated on the risk associated with obesity in pregnancy, women did not take up the offers of dietetic support or self-weighing at each antenatal visit. Ultrasounds were well received and most women underwent gestational diabetes screening.