Intraocular Pressure, Safety and Quality of Life in Glaucoma Patients Switching to Latanoprost from Adjunctive and Monotherapy Treatments

Supportive care for toxicities in children undergoing radiation therapy

Radiation therapy (RT) is an integral part of the management of many pediatric tumors; however, it is associated with both acute and permanent adverse events that can significantly impact a child's quality of life, lead to treatment delays, and potentially affect outcomes of cancer therapy. Prevention, early detection, and optimal management of these adverse effects will help reduce their impact on the patients' quality of life and overall well-being. Unfortunately, there has not been a coordinated effort to study the etiology, evaluate risk factors, and explore novel treatments for these conditions. Studies of supportive care for children undergoing RT are often small and uncontrolled. This review will focus on the impact of irradiation on the different organ systems and their current management. Further studies are required to improve our understanding of the contributing factors and explore novel treatment options for these adverse effects and to enable children and their families to better cope with some of the unavoidable toxicities following multimodality therapy.

Headaches related to latanoprost in open-angle glaucoma

Clinical relevance: The existing notion that topical latanoprost can lead to symptoms of headaches by reporting three cases of headache symptoms that developed following instillation of latanoprost prescribed as first-line therapy for newly diagnosed primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) is explored in this case series.Background: Prostaglandin analogues (PGAs) are often used as first-line treatment in the treatment of POAG. An uncommon and infrequently reported side effect of PGAs is headaches.Methods: A retrospective review of patient records was conducted on patients seen at the Centre for Eye Health between April 2016 and August 2017. Clinical findings, including outcomes following interventions such a punctal occlusion, as well as the proposed pharmacological mechanism underlying this phenomenon are presented and discussed.Results: Case 1 is a 62-year-old Caucasian male diagnosed with POAG and prescribed latanoprost in both eyes. At the follow-up visit, he reported waking up in with a dull throbbing headache following instillation of the eye drops the night before. Case 2 is a 58-year-old Asian male with POAG prescribed latanoprost to both eyes. Within a week, he developed symptoms of recurrent progressively worsening headaches post-instillation which persisted into the morning. Case 3 is a 75-year-old Caucasian male with POAG prescribed latanoprost for both eyes. He developed latanoprost sensitivity as well as headache symptoms associated with the eye drops which resolved followed its cessation. All patients reported initial symptoms of headaches associated with latanoprost use however the headaches were not persistent with intermittent punctal occlusion (cases 1 and 2) or intra-class drug rechallenge (case 3).Conclusion: Although there may be a yet-undiscovered link between a headache response and latanoprost, these cases call to question the pharmacological relationship between latanoprost and headache symptoms. A systemic approach to critically examine the pathophysiological link between pharmacological therapy and potential adverse effects is proposed.

Latanoprostene bunod ophthalmic solution 0.024% in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma: design, development, and place in therapy

Latanoprostene bunod (LBN) 0.024%, a modified prostaglandin analog, was approved on November 2, 2017, for the reduction of IOP in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT). LBN works by combining the IOP-lowering effects of the prostaglandin analogs (through the uveoscleral pathway) with nitric oxide-induced relaxation of the trabecular meshwork and Schlemm’s canal. Nitric oxide-induced relaxation of the trabecular meshwork and Schlemm’s canal leads to increased outflow through the trabecular meshwork and thus lowering of IOP. LBN has now been shown in multiple clinical studies to be effective and safe. In this article, we summarize the clinical trials that led to LBN’s approval as well as the comparative studies that have been done to evaluate the efficacy of this drug as compared to other US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved therapies for OAG and OHT. We then review the side effects of treatment that were seen in each of these studies. Finally, we will attempt to discuss the place of this drug in therapy for patients with OAG.

The impact of topical intraocular pressure lowering medications on the ocular surface of glaucoma patients: A review

Purpose

To assess the literature on the effects of topical intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering medications on the ocular surface. Ocular surface assessment in these patients is seldom a priority for most clinicians since the ultimate goal of management is to preserve vision.

Methods

A literature search of articles (English only) on the subject matter was conducted and their findings summarized.

Results

This review assesses the prevalence of dry eye symptoms in glaucoma patients on topical IOP-lowering medications. We extensively reviewed the effects of the preservatives and active ingredients in these medications on the ocular surface. In particular, the effects of benzalkonium chloride (BAK), a widely used preservative, on meibomian glands are explored. Also mentioned in this review is the association between duration of therapy and severity of dry eye symptoms. The role of the pH of medications in the development of ocular surface disease is also reviewed. Finally, we probed the occurrences of ocular allergic reactions with the use of topical IOP-lowering medications.

Conclusions

The preservatives and active agents in most topical glaucoma medications are implicated in the prevalence of ocular surface discomfort. Whilst clinicians involved in glaucoma care are encouraged to assess the ocular surface routinely, further studies are needed to demonstrate the contributions of other physiochemical properties of these medications to the development of ocular surface disease in these patients.

Developing an Item Bank to Measure Quality of Life in Individuals With Glaucoma, and the Results of the Interview With Patients: The Effect of Visual Function, Visual Field Progression Rate, Medical, and Surgical Treatments on Quality of Life

PURPOSE

To construct a new item bank to measure quality of life (QOL) in glaucoma patients and to evaluate glaucoma patients' QOL using the item bank.

METHODS

An item bank of questions was generated through a literature review of QOL instruments useful for glaucoma patients. Using this item bank, a cognitive survey was performed on 203 patients with glaucoma (112 males and 91 females, 61.9±11.9 y old; mean±SD). The results were then analyzed using the Rasch analysis, and the Rasch-derived disability scores were predicted using linear modelling and the following clinical parameters: age, mean total deviation (mTD) in superior and inferior visual field (mTDsup/mTDinf), mTD progression rate, better visual acuity, worse visual acuity, number of eye drops administered per day, number of trabeculectomy procedures experienced in both eyes.

RESULTS

A total of 23 questionnaires of QOL in glaucoma patients were identified resulting in an item bank of 187 questions related to the following tasks: reading/writing, walking, going out, eating and driving (direct disability) as well as questions concerned with worry/anxiety, social participation, and physical symptoms (indirect disability). In the optimal model for direct disability, age and mTDinf were identified as significant predictors, whereas number of eye drops administered per day and number of trabeculectomy experienced were included in the optimal model for indirect disability.

CONCLUSIONS

A new item bank to measure QOL in glaucoma patients was developed and evaluated. Age and mTDinf were found to be related to direct disability while medical and surgical treatments were related to indirect disability.

Latanoprost in the treatment of glaucoma

Prostaglandins are approved by the European Glaucoma Society guidelines as first-line treatment for glaucoma. This review focuses on latanoprost, an ester prodrug of prostaglandin (PG) F_2α, which was the first of the currently available topical PGF_2α analogs to be launched for glaucoma or ocular hypertension and which still accounts for the majority of prescriptions. It is better absorbed than the parent compound through the cornea, and peak concentration of the active drug is in the aqueous humor 1–2 hours after topical dosing (15–30 ng/mL). Metabolism occurs mainly in the liver. Latanoprost (0.005%) has been very well studied in clinical trials and meta-analyses that show it to be generally as effective as the other PG analogs (bimatoprost, travoprost, and tafluprost) and more effective than timolol, dorzolamide, and brimonidine. Latanoprost has good short- and long-term safety and tolerability profiles. In common with other prostaglandins, it lacks systemic effects, but can cause ocular adverse events such as conjunctival hyperemia, pigmentation of the iris, periocular skin or eyelashes, hypertrichosis, and ocular surface effects or irritation. Latanoprost is significantly better tolerated than either bimatoprost or travoprost. Patients treated with latanoprost have better compliance and persist with therapy longer than those that are given other drugs. An improved formulation of latanoprost without the preservative benzalkonium chloride has recently been developed. It is as effective as conventional latanoprost, has a lower incidence of hyperemia, and can be stored at room temperature. In conclusion, latanoprost has the best efficacy–tolerability ratio of the PG analogs available for glaucoma treatment, and has good compliance and persistence. These factors should be improved further by the recent development of preservative-free latanoprost.

Effect of 3 years of treatment with a dorzolamide/timolol (1%/0.5%) combination on intraocular pressure

Purpose

We aimed to evaluate the effect on the intraocular pressure (IOP) of a dorzolamide/timolol (1%/0.5%) fixed combination (DTFC) ophthalmic agent for 3 years.

Participants

A total of 19 consecutive patients who had previously been treated with mono-therapy or any combination of a beta-blocker, carbonic anhydrase inhibitor, or prostaglandin analog, for primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) (n=5) or normal tension glaucoma (N=14) were enrolled.

Methods

Patients were switched to DTFC from their prior glaucoma therapy. The IOP was measured at intervals of 4–6 weeks for 3 years. Treatment failure was defined as an increase of IOP by ≥10% from baseline after switching to DTFC.

Results

The average IOP decreased significantly from 14.1±2.9 mmHg at baseline to 12.2±2.2, 11.8±2.4, 12.1±2.5, 11.6±1.8, and 12.1±2.7 mmHg at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively, after switching therapy (all P<0.05). The mean percent decrease of IOP was 12.0%±13.0%, 14.5%±14.2%, 12.2%±18.7%, 16.0%±12.8%, and 12.8%±15.2% at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively, after switching. Univariate or multivariate analysis revealed the percent decrease of IOP was associated with the type of glaucoma (POAG) at 3 and 12 months, and with the baseline IOP at 3, 12, 24, and 36 months. Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated that the percentage of patients who remained on treatment with DTFC was 94.7%, 94.7%, 84.2%, 78.9%, and 78.9% at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively. Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that the type of glaucoma (POAG) was associated with an increased risk of failure to control the IOP.

Conclusion

The IOP-lowering effect of DTFC was demonstrated for 3 years in this study. The baseline IOP had an important influence on the reduction of IOP achieved by DTFC.

Antiglaucoma drugs: The role of preservative-free formulations

Hypersensitive reactions to eyedrops are a common finding in clinical practice and represent a frequent cause of discontinuation of the therapy. Moreover, experimental and clinical studies show that long term use of topical drugs may induce ocular surface changes causing discomfort and potentially negatively affecting the compliance to the treatment as well as the success rate of filtering procedures. The exact mechanism involved and the roles of the active compound and the preservatives in inducing such detrimental effects of ophthalmic solutions are unclear. During the last years several antiglaucoma agents have been marketed as either preservative-free or benzalkonium chloride-free formulations in an attempt to reduce the adverse effects related to preservatives. This paper summarizes the body of evidence from existing studies about preservatives in antiglaucoma eyedrops, focusing on the latest compounds commercially available. A systematic review of the literature was performed. Current research is focusing not only on the efficacy of the drugs but also on their tolerability. Based on the existing data, there is a rationale to support the use of benzalkonium-free solutions whenever possible, especially in patients suffering from concomitant ocular surface diseases, experiencing local side effects and in those expected to need multiple and prolonged topical treatments.

Choosing appropriate patient-reported outcomes instrument for glaucoma research: a systematic review of vision instruments

PURPOSE

To identify vision Patient-Reported Outcomes instruments relevant to glaucoma and assess their content validity.

METHODS

MEDLINE, MEDLINE in Process, EMBASE and SCOPUS (to January 2009) were systematically searched. Observational studies or randomised controlled trials, published in English, reporting use of vision instruments in glaucoma studies involving adults were included. In addition, reference lists were scanned to identify additional studies describing development and/or validation to ascertain the final version of the instruments. Instruments' content was then mapped onto a theoretical framework, the World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Two reviewers independently evaluated studies for inclusion and quality assessed instrument content.

RESULTS

Thirty-three instruments were identified. Instruments were categorised into thirteen vision status, two vision disability, one vision satisfaction, five glaucoma status, one glaucoma medication related to health status, five glaucoma medication side effects and six glaucoma medication satisfaction measures according to each instruments' content. The National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25, Impact of Vision Impairment and Treatment Satisfaction Survey-Intraocular Pressure had the highest number of positive ratings in the content validity assessment.

CONCLUSION

This study provides a descriptive catalogue of vision-specific PRO instruments, to inform the choice of an appropriate measure of patient-reported outcomes in a glaucoma context.

Clinical utility and differential effects of prostaglandin analogs in the management of raised intraocular pressure and ocular hypertension

Prostaglandin analogs (PGA) are powerful topical ocular hypotensive agents available for the treatment of elevated intraocular pressure (IOP). Latanoprost 0.005% and travoprost 0.004% are prodrugs and analogs of prostaglandin F2α. Bimatoprost 0.03% is regarded as a prostamide, and debate continues as to whether it is a prodrug. The free acids of all 3 PGAs reduce IOP by enhancing uveoscleral and trabecular outflow via direct effects on ciliary muscle relaxation and remodeling of extracellular matrix. The vast majority of clinical trials demonstrate IOP-lowering superiority of latanoprost, bimatoprost and travoprost compared with timolol 0.5%, brimonidine 0.2%, or dorzolamide 2% monotherapy. Bimatoprost appears to be more efficacious in IOP-lowering compared with latanoprost, with weighted mean difference in IOP reduction documented in one meta-analysis of 2.59% to 5.60% from 1- to 6-months study duration. PGAs reduce IOP further when used as adjunctive therapy. Fixed combinations of latanoprost, bimatoprost or travoprost formulated with timolol 0.5% and administered once daily are superior to monotherapy of its constituent parts. PGA have near absence of systemic side effects, although do have other commonly encountered ocular adverse effects. The adverse effects of PGA, and also those found more frequently with bimatoprost use include ocular hyperemia, eyelash growth, and peri-ocular pigmentary changes. Iris pigmentary change is unique to PGA treatment. Once daily administration and near absence of systemic side effects enhances tolerance and compliance. PGAs are often prescribed as first-line treatment for ocular hypertension and open-angle glaucoma.

Safety and efficacy of changing to the travoprost/timolol maleate fixed combination (DuoTrav) from prior mono- or adjunctive therapy

Purpose:

To assess the safety and efficacy of changing to the travoprost/timolol fixed combination (TTFC) from other mono- or adjunctive therapies.

Patients and methods:

A prospective, open-label, observational cohort of primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertensive patients whose intraocular pressure (IOP) was uncontrolled on prior therapy or was not on target. Patients were changed from prior mono- or adjunctive treatment at Day 0 to TTFC dosed every evening and underwent active treatment efficacy and safety evaluations at Week 12.

Results:

In 474/522 (91%) patients who completed this trial an IOP (mm Hg) of 21.9 ± 2.0 on prior treatment was reduced by TTFC at Month 3: from all prior treatments 5.6 ± 2.6; from monotherapy 5.9 ± 2.3; from adjunctive treatments 4.5 ± 2.9; and from several of the most frequent individual treatments: timolol 5.7 ± 2.2; latanoprost 6.3 ± 2.6; and latanoprost/timolol fixed combination 4.4 ± 1.9. Ocular hyperemia was the most frequent adverse effect (n = 21, 4%). Both patients and physicians preferred TTFC compared to all prior and common individual treatments. The solicited symptom survey showed, following a modified Bonferroni correction (α/5), a reduced incidence with TTFC of ocular pain (P = 0.01) while the prior medicine had a lower incidence of burning on instillation (P < 0.001).

Conclusions:

Changing patients from prior mono- or adjunctive therapy to TTFC can provide on average a further reduction in IOP while demonstrating a favorable safety profile and a high patient preference.

Midterm Response with Latanoprost Therapy in German Ocular Hypertension Patients

PURPOSE

The purpose of this prospective observational trial was to report the analysis of the midterm efficacy, safety, and discontinuation rates of a cohort of ocular hypertensive patients treated with latanoprost in Germany.

METHODS

A subanalysis of patients with ocular hypertension who were previously treated on latanoprost monotherapy and continued within the study on this same medication for at least 6 months.

RESULTS

353 patients with ocular hypertension were included and treated with latanoprost monotherapy historically (1.4 +/- 1.3 years) and within the observational period of the study for a mean of 2.2 +/- 1.1 years. On latanoprost only, the average intraocular pressure at study entry was 18.4 +/- 2.7 mm Hg, and at 6 months the intraocular pressure was 18.3 +/- 2.3 mmHg (p = 0.54). During the observational period, the most common ocular side effect was conjunctival hyperemia (20.7%), and the most common systemic side effect was fatigue (3.1%). Nineteen patients (5.4%) discontinued latanoprost with the most common reason being insufficient efficacy (3.1%). Physician assessments of latanoprost monotherapy were "very good" to "excellent" for patient efficacy (75.2%), tolerability (83.8%), and patient satisfaction (82.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

The study suggests that patients with ocular hypertension already treated with latanoprost monotherapy will continue to have, on average, at least midterm stable pressures, low incidence of side effects and discontinuations, as well as "very good" to "excellent" physician ratings of efficacy, tolerability, and patient satisfaction.

Success rates for switching to dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination in timolol responders who are insufficiently controlled by latanoprost monotherapy

PURPOSE

We aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination (DTFC) in timolol responders with ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma who switched to DTFC because of insufficient control on latanoprost.

METHODS

We carried out a prospective, open-label cohort study with an active-historical control in which qualifying patients must have been treated with latanoprost monotherapy for at least 4 weeks, must have demonstrated insufficiently controlled intraocular pressure (IOP) (> or = 19 mmHg at 08.00 hours), and must have shown a decrease in IOP at 2 hours after timolol instillation of > or = 3 mmHg or > or = 15%. Patients then began DTFC dosed at 08.00 hours and 20.00 hours and discontinued latanoprost. Patients were evaluated again after 4 and 12 weeks.

RESULTS

In 57 patients IOP was further reduced by 2.4 +/- 3.3 mmHg at 08.00 hours (p < 0.0001) and by 3.5 +/- 3.3 mmHg at 10.00 hours (p < 0.0001) after switching to DTFC. Responses to the Comparison of Ophthalmic Medications for Tolerability (COMTol) questionnaire showed no difference between DTFC and latanoprost for in terms of overall preference, typical daily activities, limitation of activities, compliance, satisfaction or quality of life (p > 0.05). However, greater frequency in burning and/or stinging (p < 0.0001) and bitter taste (p < 0.0001) were observed with DTFC, whereas unusual taste (p = 0.02) and itchy eyes (p = 0.05) were associated with latanoprost.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that patients who are insufficiently controlled on latanoprost monotherapy, and who are timolol responders, can generally achieve further IOP reduction and similar tolerance levels when changed to DTFC.

Tolerability, quality of life, and persistency of use in patients with glaucoma who are switched to the fixed combination of latanoprost and timolol

This study was undertaken to assess tolerability, quality of life, and persistency of use and to monitor changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) during the first 6 mo after a switch to fixed combination latanoprost/timolol. In Germany, 271 general ophthalmology practices enrolled patients who were switched from previous ocular hypotensive therapies to latanoprost/timolol for medical reasons. Usual care routines were followed, and IOP was measured at baseline and approximately 6 mo later. Adverse events were recorded throughout. Immediately before switching and at follow-up, patients completed a 29-item quality-of-life questionnaire. Of 1052 patients who met analysis criteria, 748 (71%) switched from combination therapy and 304 (29%) from monotherapy. An insufficient IOP reduction with the previous therapy was a reason for switching in 71% of patients; the desire to simplify to once-daily administration was cited in 66%. Ocular adverse events were reported in 19 patients after the switch, and 97% remained on therapy throughout the follow%up period. After switching, patients were less likely to forget to instill their eyedrops or to feel that their drops had adverse effects; they found it easier to include eyedrop administration in their routine; they were more satisfied with the frequency of instillation; and they were more likely to want to continue with the drops. Across all previous therapies, mean IOP decreased from 20.6+/-3.7 mm Hg to 17.2+/-2.8 mm Hg after the switch (P<.001)-a 14.8% difference. Fixed combination latanoprost/timolol is well tolerated and effective in patients who are switched from other monotherapies or combination therapies for medical reasons. Such a switch may be associated with improved quality of life.

Allergic reaction to topical eyedrops

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To examine recently published papers dealing with drug-induced allergic reactions. As allergy is only one possible mechanism, this review was extended to all reports or studies describing allergic, inflammatory or toxic effects related to eyedrops since 2004.

RECENT FINDINGS

These studies were first classified into clinical reports or surveys, experimental works and biological studies showing drug-induced effects on the ocular surface or eyelids. Studies aimed at determining the role of preservatives or comparing preservative-free and preserved eyedrops were further analysed separately.

SUMMARY

Reports on allergic or toxic reactions of eyedrops are published repeatedly. The reports raising the most important issues are those concerning antiglaucoma drugs. They consistently describe inflammatory reactions at the conjunctival level, with strong evidence that preservative is a major source of toxicity for the ocular surface.