Outcomes of refractive error correction in pseudophakic patients using a sulcus piggyback intraocular lens

Supplemental Toric Intraocular Lenses in the Ciliary Sulcus for Correction of Residual Refractive Astigmatism: A Review

PURPOSE

This study conducted a critical review of the peer-reviewed literature on the use of supplemental toric intraocular lenses (STIOL) in the ciliary sulcus to correct residual refractive astigmatism.

METHODS

This review used PubMed as a database from 1 January 2010 to 13 March 2023. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria defined, 14 articles were selected for the current review.

RESULTS

The data of 155 eyes were analyzed. Most of the studies reviewed had a short follow-up and poor or limited design, including case reports, case series, and retrospective cohorts. The follow-up period ranged from 43 days to 4.5 years. STIOL rotation was the most frequently described complication in the literature, with a mean rotation of 30.48 ± 19.90°. These patients required repositioning in 50 of 155 eyes (32.25%). Moreover, four eyes (2.58%) required scleral fixation sutures and two eyes (1.29%) iris fixation. Other complications were high intraocular pressure (3 eyes, 1.93%), transient corneal edema (2 eyes, 1.29%), corneal decompensation (2 eyes, 1.29%), and pigment dispersion (1 eye, 0.64%). From the total, 57.41% of eyes (89 eyes from 155) achieved within ± 0.50D of target refractive astigmatism. It is important to highlight that at least 52 eyes out of the 155 (33.54%) had an abnormal cornea with irregular astigmatism.

CONCLUSION

STIOL seem to offer good visual and refractive outcomes. However, STIOL showed variable rotational stability, especially in some platforms. Further studies with a more robust design, methodology, and standardized analysis methods are needed to confirm these trends.

[Enhancement Options after Lens and Corneal Refractive Surgery]

BACKGROUND

 Modern preoperative diagnostics as well as current surgical techniques allow cataract and refractive surgery to deliver precise refractive results.Occasionally, unsatisfactory refractive and visual results occur despite all the care taken. In these cases, subsequent improvement is required to achieve the best final visual outcome. This article shows the therapeutic options for the treatment of residual refractive errors after lens and corneal refractive surgery.

KEY MESSAGES

 The causes of postoperative refractive errors after refractive laser- or lens-based procedures are very diverse and require extensive workup of the cause as well as an individual solution to achieve the desired result. Before any further surgical intervention, specific complications of the primary procedure as well as concomitant ocular diseases must be excluded or treated. The appropriate enhancement after keratorefractive surgery depends primarily on the type of primary surgery, residual stromal thickness, possible complications from the initial surgery, and the patient's personal preference. For enhancements using surface treatments, such as PRK, the use of mitomycin C is recommended for prophylaxis of haze formation. After lens surgery, for low-grade postoperative refractive errors (spherical and astigmatic), keratorefractive enhancements provide the most accurate results. For higher refractive errors, lens-based procedures can be used, with add-on IOLs being safer and more precise compared with one IOL exchange. Low astigmatisms can be successfully treated with LRI or keratorefractive surgery, but higher astigmatisms should be corrected with an IOL exchange in the early postoperative period and with an add-on IOL in the later postoperative period. IOL explantations should be performed very cautiously, especially in cases of pronounced capsular fibrosis, previous posterior capsulotomy, and existing weakness of the zonular apparatus.

Enhancement-Optionen nach Linsen- und refraktiver Hornhautchirurgie

Gelegentlich kommt es trotz aller Sorgfalt und präziser Operationstechnik in der Katarakt- und Refraktivchirurgie zu unbefriedigenden refraktiven und visuellen Ergebnissen. In diesen Fällen ist eine nachträgliche Korrektur erforderlich, um das beste endgültige visuelle Ergebnis zu erzielen. Dieser Beitrag zeigt die Möglichkeiten zur Behandlung residualer Refraktionsfehler nach Linsen- und refraktiver Hornhautchirurgie auf.

Refractive Management of Surgical-Induced Presbyopia in a Young Patient with Vision-Related Quality of Life Complaints: A Case Report

Visual difficulties can negatively impact life quality. Our purpose was to report the refractive surgical planning and outcomes of a young patient with mixed astigmatism and phacoemulsification-induced presbyopia due to congenital cataracts who was unsatisfied with her vision-related quality of life. A 32-year-old woman, submitted to phacoemulsification with implantation of a monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) and Nd:YAG laser posterior capsulotomy 3 years before, due to congenital cataracts, was referred to the Refractive Surgery Unit of Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António. She had mixed astigmatism (+1.00-4.00 × 10° in the right eye [RE] and +0.50-1.75 × 180° in the left eye [LE]) and surgical-induced presbyopia, was intolerant to contact lenses, and felt that her vision significantly impaired her life quality. A trifocal Sulcoflex® (Rayner) IOL was implanted to correct the spherical and near refractive errors. In a second surgical time, a photorefractive keratectomy was performed to correct the residual astigmatism (-3.50 × 10° in the RE and -1.50 × 170° in the LE). In the last visit, distance and near uncorrected visual acuity were 20/20 (Snellen) and Jaeger 1, respectively, in both eyes, and the patient was very satisfied. When assessing the surgical options of young, working-age patients, clinicians should, when possible, consider alternative solutions to monofocal IOLs. In this patient, the combination of corneal and intraocular procedures allowed the correction of both the distance and near refractive errors, with a subsequent significant improvement in the patient's quality of life.

Toric intraocular lens for astigmatism correction following keratoplasty in phakic and pseudophakic eyes

ABSTRACT

Residual astigmatism and anisometropia significantly impact patients' vision and quality of life even in clear grafts after corneal transplant. We reviewed and summarized the role of toric intraocular lens (IOL) in phakic and pseudophakic eyes after penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) in correcting residual astigmatism. We included 342 eyes from 20 studies with iris-clipped toric IOL, ciliary sulcus toric implantable collamer lens, piggyback sulcus toric IOL, or posterior chamber toric IOL implantations for phakic, pseudophakic, or eyes undergoing cataract surgery after keratoplasty. Visual, refractive, and predictability outcomes were encouraging. Secondary re-alignment rate and complications were low. Endothelial cell loss secondary to phakic toric IOL might be a concern over the long-term, particularly in iris-clipped IOL in PKP eyes. Toric IOL represent a viable option in the treatment of residual astigmatism in post-keratoplasty eyes, resulting in improved visual acuity and reduced anisometropia.