Initial experience in self-monitoring of intraocular pressure

Portable devices for diagnosis and monitoring of glaucoma: a scoping review protocol

INTRODUCTION

Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness in the world. The need to diagnose glaucoma early in its natural history before extensive sight loss occurs cannot be overemphasised. However, glaucoma is largely asymptomatic in the early stages of the disease making it complex to diagnose clinically and requires the support of technology. The objective of this scoping review is to determine the nature and extent of the evidence for use of portable devices in the diagnosis of glaucoma.

METHODS

We will consider studies conducted in all healthcare settings using portable devices for the detection of all type of adult glaucoma. We will also include any systematic reviews or scoping reviews, which relate to this topic. Searches will be conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL on the Cochrane Library and Global Health databases, from their inception to the present. Reference lists from publications identified in the searches will also be reviewed. Two authors will independently screen titles and abstracts, followed by full-text screening to assess studies for inclusion. Any disagreements will be discussed and resolved with a third author. Tables accompanied by narrative descriptions will be employed to discuss results and show how it relates to review questions.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is not required in this review. Only published and publicly accessible data will be used. We will publish our findings in an open-access, peer-reviewed journal and develop an accessible summary of results and recommendations.

Clinical utility, feasibility of home tonometry using iCare HOME by glaucoma patients

Purpose

To determine agreement between diurnal variation testing (DVT) of intraocular pressure (IOP) with Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) and iCare HOME (IH) by an optometrist (OP) and home monitoring by participants (PT).

Methods

Patients (18-80 years) with glaucoma and suspects were enrolled. IH IOP and GAT were taken by an OP at 2 h intervals from 8 AM to 4 PM on Day 1 and PT between 6 AM and 9 PM, for the next 2 days. IOP, date, and time were viewed via iCare LINK software.

Results: In total,

72.9.

(

51/70) PT trained were able to take reliable readings. One hundred two eyes (51 patients, age 53 ± 16 yrs) were analyzed. Correlation between optometrist (OP) and participants (PT) was strong and positive {IH OP-IH PT- r = 0.90, p-0.0001;IH PT-GAT- r = 0.79, p-0.0001}. Agreement by Bland Altman plots was limited {IH OP-IH PT mean 0.1 mmHg (95% LOA -5.3 to 5.5), IH PT-GAT 2.2 mmHg (-5.7 to 10.1)}. Intraclass correlation coefficient for IH OP-IH PT was 1.18 (95% CI 1.37-1.09). Intradevice {0.95 (95% CI 0.94-0.97)} and interrater repeatability {0.91 (0.79-0.96)} were good. 37% of eyes had a synchronous peak on GAT and IH during the day DVT.

Conclusion

Home tonometry by iCare HOME is easy, feasible, but due to limited agreement cannot substitute GAT DVT.

Impact of self-tonometry on glaucoma treatment decision

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to examine the impact of self-tonometry on clinicians' decision in glaucoma treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Medical records of 133 patients who had performed self-tonometry using iCare^® Home between January and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria were as follows: age over 18 years, all types of glaucoma, as well as ocular hypertension and glaucoma suspect, compliance with tonometer manufacturer's recommendations and monitoring over at least 2 days. The data consisted of age, gender, diagnosis, visual field index, rate of progression and type of treatment pre- and post-intraocular pressure (IOP) phasing. The following IOP measurements were used to calculate the mean and maximum IOP, and range over each day and consecutive days: Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) measurements from referral and training visits and iCare^® Home measurements made by the trainers and the patients themselves. A total of 90 patients were included.

RESULTS

Clinicians were satisfied with the actual treatment in 54.4% of the cases. There was a statistically significant difference between the clinicians' decision to maintain same treatment or to escalate therapy for all the mean and maximum IOPs measured on each single day and over a 2- or 3-day period (p < 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that the presence of high IOP values obtained with self-tonometry supports an intensification of glaucoma treatment. Self-tonometry provides clinicians with an important complement for clinical decision-making, and under- or over-treatment may be avoided for the benefit of patients.

Deployment of the Water Drinking Test and iCare HOME Phasing for Intraocular Pressure Profiling in Glaucoma Evaluation

SIGNIFICANCE

Intraocular pressure (IOP) profiling is an important component of the glaucoma examination. Two techniques for profiling are the water drinking test (WDT) and iCare HOME phasing, but the correlations between techniques and their ease of deployment have not been studied. These questions are important in determining suitability for clinical deployment.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the IOP results of the WDT and iCare HOME phasing in patients with suspected or newly diagnosed glaucoma.

METHODS

Ninety-eight consecutive patients attending a glaucoma clinic underwent IOP profiling using both techniques. For the WDT, patients ingested 10 mL/kg body weight of water after a baseline applanation IOP measurement and then underwent serial IOP measurements approximately every 15 minutes, ceasing after 30 minutes of consecutive measurements within 3 mmHg of baseline. Patients successfully certified for self-administration of the iCare HOME were loaned the instrument for 1 week and instructed to take four measurements per day.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients (28%) successfully obtained four measurements per day using iCare HOME, and 96 patients (98%) were able to complete the WDT. Intraocular pressure profiles showed no difference between the time for peak IOP and across nearly all IOP parameters obtained from profiling except for the standard deviation of IOP measurements obtained using the iCare HOME (P = .005). There were moderate correlations between peak IOPs obtained using each technique (r = 0.67, P = .001, right eye; r = 0.66, P = .002, left eye) but no correlation between the daily range (iCare HOME) or peak-trough difference (WDT; r = 0.21, P = .28, right eye; r = 0.27, P = .02, left eye). Bland-Altman analysis returned similar results for peak and range.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraocular pressure profiling using both techniques can reveal the peak IOP, and these measurements are strongly correlated. Most patients were unable to complete the iCare HOME according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Clinicians should select the most appropriate technique for each patient.

The Future Is Now: Incorporating Telemedicine into Glaucoma Care

Purpose of Review

The field of teleglaucoma has expanded rapidly in recent years with several large-scale teleglaucoma screening programs in existence throughout the world. Additionally, teleglaucoma programs for use in disease management are under study. The limited access to care that resulted from the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need for expansion of such programs. This article reviews the literature on teleglaucoma for screening and management of glaucoma, discussing considerations for incorporating teleglaucoma into clinical practice.

Recent Findings

Teleglaucoma screening reduces the rate of false-positive referrals and can accurately screen at-risk populations with accuracy similar to in-person screening. The use of teleglaucoma for the management of glaucoma shows promise for low-risk patients with early disease. Furthermore, teleglaucoma is cost-effective and reduces travel burden for patients resulting in high patient satisfaction.

Summary

Teleglaucoma offers potential for improving access to glaucoma care, reducing the burden on patients and health care systems.

Home Self-tonometry Trials Compared with Clinic Tonometry in Patients with Glaucoma

PURPOSE

This study examined characteristics of intraocular pressure (IOP) as measured during home tonometry in comparison with in-clinic tonometry in patients with glaucoma.

DESIGN

Retrospective cross-sectional study of glaucoma patients who completed 1 week of self-tonometry at a single academic center.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with glaucoma who completed home tonometry trials with the iCare HOME tonometer (iCare USA) for any reason.

METHODS

Home IOP measurements were compared with in-clinic tonometry performed during the 5 visits preceding home tonometry. Maximum daily IOP was correlated to time of day. Generalized estimating equations were used to evaluate patient characteristics and clinic-derived variables that predicted differences between home and clinic IOP.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

IOP mean, maximum, minimum, range, standard deviation and coefficient of variation were compared between clinic and home tonometry. IOP mean daily maximum (MDM) and mean daily range were calulated to describe recurrent IOP spiking.

RESULTS

A total of 107 eyes from 61 patients were analyzed. Mean age was 63.2 years (standard deviation [SD], 14.0 years) and 59.0% were women. Mean clinic and home IOPs were 14.5 mmHg (SD, 4.7 mmHg) and 13.6 mmHg (SD, 5.1 mmHg). Home tonometry identified significantly higher maximum IOP, lower minimum IOP, and greater IOP range than clinic tonometry (P < 0.001). Maximum daily IOP occurred outside of clinic hours (8 am-5 pm) on 50% of days assessed and occurred between 4:30 am and 8 am on 24% of days. Mean daily maximum IOP exceeded maximum clinic IOP in 44% of patients and exceeded target IOP by 3 mmHg, 5 mmHg, or 10 mmHg in 31%, 15%, and 6% of patients, respectively. Patient characteristics that predicted significant deviations between MDM and mean clinic IOP or target IOP in multivariate models included younger age, male gender, and absence of prior filtering surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Self-tonometry provides IOP data that supplements in-clinic tonometry and would not be detectable over daytime in-clinic diurnal curves. A subset of patients in whom home tonometry was ordered by their glaucoma clinician because of suspicion of occult IOP elevation demonstrated reproducible IOP elevation outside of the clinic setting. Such patients tended to be younger and male and not to have undergone previous filtering surgery.