Intraocular mitomycin C use in the treatment and prophylaxis of proliferative vitreoretinopathy in severe traumatic retinal detachments

The effect of adjuvant Mitomycin C during vitrectomy on functional and anatomical outcomes in patients with severe diabetic tractional retinal detachment

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of adjuvant Mitomycin C (MMC) use on the anatomical and functional success of vitreoretinal surgery (VRS) in severe diabetic tractional retinal detachment (dTRD) patients.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing VRS due to severe dTRD was conducted. Patients were categorized into those who received 20 µg/0.1 mL MMC via MMC sandwich method (Group 1) and those who did not (Group 2). Demographics, surgical characteristics, visual outcomes, and complications that may related to MMC were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 25 eyes were included, 13 in Group 1 and 12 in Group 2. No statistical difference was observed in baseline characteristics between the groups. The mean best-corrected visual acuity was 1.90 ± 0.43 logMAR and 1.93 ± 0.41 logMAR preoperatively and 1.60 ± 0.78 logMAR and 1.56 ± 0.78 logMAR postoperatively in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.154). The postoperative mean intraocular pressure was 16.23 ± 2.55 mmHg and 13.08 ± 4.94 mmHg in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.225). The rate of re-surgery was significantly lower in Group 1 (0% vs. 41.7% in Group 2, p = 0.015). Retina was attached in all patients at the last visit. No MMC-related complication was recorded.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative adjuvant MMC application for severe dTRD significantly reduces re-surgery rates with good anatomical and functional outcomes safely.

Clinical therapeutics for proliferative vitreoretinopathy in retinal detachment

Proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) is an abnormal and prolonged healing response to retinal injury (retinal detachment, post retinal detachment surgery) characterised by: pre/subretinal membrane formation; retinal gliosis and retinal shortening, retinal pigment epithelium cell proliferation; and increased glial (mainly Mu¨ller cells), fibroblast and inflammatory cell (macrophage, lymphocyte) activity, leading to tractional retinal holes/breaks and multiple costly eye operations suffered by patients. PVR can cause retinal re-detachment following primary surgical intervention for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Vitrectomy and scleral buckling surgery are the main approaches for treating PVR complications of retinal detachment. Patients require many operations to remove the scar tissue but vision results are suboptimal, and do not meet patient expectations. Over the past 40 years, this has been one of the greatest challenges for vitreoretinal surgeons and patients. Despite previous large clinical trials of multiple candidate drug therapeutics, no proven adjunctive treatment currently exists to either prevent, reduce, or treat PVR formation in retinal detachment. Both cellular proliferation and the intraocular inflammatory response are realistic targets for adjunctive treatments in PVR. The cellular components of PVR periretinal membranes (retinal pigment epithelial, glial, inflammatory and fibroblastic cells) proliferate and are thus targets for antiproliferative agents. In recent years, several new therapeutics have been tested, and we present an updated review of the clinical therapeutics for PVR in retinal detachment.

Proliferative vitreoretinopathy: an update on the current and emerging treatment options

Proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) remains the main cause of failure in retinal detachment (RD) surgery and a demanding challenge for vitreoretinal surgeons. Despite the large improvements in surgical techniques and a better understanding of PVR pathogenesis in the last years, satisfactory anatomical and visual outcomes have not been provided yet. For this reason, several different adjunctive pharmacological agents have been investigated in combination with surgery. In this review, we analyze the current and emerging adjunctive treatment options for the management of PVR and we discuss their possible clinical application and beneficial role in this subgroup of patients.

Translational and clinical advancements in management of proliferative vitreoretinopathy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite advancement in the surgical instrumentation and techniques, proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) remains the most common cause for failure of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair. This review discusses ongoing translational and clinical advancements in PVR.

RECENT FINDINGS

PVR represents an exaggerated and protracted scarring process that can occur after RRD. The primary cell types involved are retinal pigment epithelium, glial, and inflammatory cells. They interact with growth factors and cytokines derived from the breakdown of the blood-retinal barrier that trigger a cascade of cellular processes, such as epithelial-mesenchymal transition, cell migration, chemotaxis, proliferation, elaboration of basement membrane and collagen and cellular contraction, leading to overt retinal pathology. Although there are currently no medical therapies proven to be effective against PVR in humans, increased understanding of the risks factors and pathophysiology have helped guide investigations for molecular targets of PVR. The leading therapeutic candidates are drugs that mitigate growth factors, inflammation, and proliferation are the leading therapeutic candidates.

SUMMARY

Although multiple molecular targets have been investigated to prevent and treat PVR, none have yet demonstrated substantial evidence of clinical benefit in humans though some show promise. Advancements in our understanding of the pathophysiology of PVR may help develop a multipronged approach for this condition.