Femoro-acetabular impingement: can indirect MR arthrography be considered a valid method to detect endoarticular damage? A preliminary study

The imaging evaluation of acetabular labral lesions

The acetabular labrum is an important structure that contributes to hip joint stability and function. Diagnosing labral tears involves a comprehensive assessment of clinical symptoms, physical examinations, imaging examinations, and arthroscopic confirmation. As arthroscopy is an invasive surgery, adjuvant imaging of the acetabular labrum is increasingly imperative for orthopedists to diagnose and assess labral lesions prior to hip arthroscopy for surgical management. This article reviews the current imaging strategies for the evaluation of labrum lesions.

[MR and CT arthrography in cartilage imaging : Indications and implementation]

BACKGROUND

The imaging of chondral pathologies is an essential part in the work-up of acute and chronic joint diseases. Besides conventional MR imaging, CT and MR arthrography are well-established methods in evaluating articular cartilage. The application of these techniques requires knowledge of indications and safe injection procedures by the performing radiologist.

PURPOSE

Our goal is to describe the techniques of cross-sectional arthrographies of different joints, give an overview of general and joint-specific considerations for practical application as well as provide typical indications for cartilage imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A selective PubMed literature search concerning "arthrography", "CT arthrography", "MR arthrography", "arthrography cartilage", "arthrography wrist", "arthrography elbow", "arthrography shoulder", "arthrography hip", "arthrography knee", "arthrography ankle", "arthrography complications", "arthrography imaging guidance" "osteochondral lesion", "cartilage imaging" and "cartilage lesion" was performed.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

CT and MR arthrography are valuable and safe tools in cartilage imaging. They are useful to verify and specify chondral pathologies, usually after conventional MR imaging, and have an important role in evaluating the stability and therefore in therapeutic decision making of osteochondral lesions. CT arthrography is not only a substitute technique in case of MR contraindications, it can be advantageous in small joints (wrist, elbow, ankle) compared to MR arthrography due to its higher image resolution. Fluoroscopic guided joint puncture is still the most commonly used image guidance method, but the role of ultrasound is steadily increasing. Joint traction in MR arthrography is a promising technique to improve cartilage visualization, though it is not yet used in clinical routine imaging.

Postarthroscopy Imaging in Femoroacetabular Impingement: Persistent Pain May Be Due to an Insufficient Correction of Preoperative Abnormalities

Purpose  The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of correction of abnormal radiographic parameters on postoperative pain in a group of patients treated arthroscopically for femoracetabular impingement (FAI).

Methods  A retrospective study was performed on 23 patients affected by mixed-type FAI and treated arthroscopically. There were 11 males and 12 females with a mean age of 46.5 (range: 28–67) years. Center-edge (CE) and α angles were measured on preoperative and postoperative radiographic and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies and were correlated with persistent pain at follow-up.

Results  The mean preoperative CE and α angles were 38.6 ± 5.2 and 67.3 ± 7.2 degrees, respectively. At follow-up, in the 17 pain-free patients, the mean pre- and postoperative CE angle were 38.1 ± 5.6 and 32.6 ± 4.8 degrees, respectively, whereas the mean pre- and postoperative α angles at MRI were 66.3 ± 7.9 and 47.9 ± 8.9 degrees, respectively. In six patients with persistent hip pain, the mean pre- and postoperative CE angles were 39.8 ± 3.6 and 35.8 ± 3.1 degrees, respectively, whereas the mean pre- and postoperative α angles were 70.0 ± 3.9 and 58.8 ± 2.6 degrees, respectively. Mean values of all the analyzed radiological parameters, except CE angle in patients with pain, improved significantly after surgery. On comparing patient groups, significantly lower postoperative α angles and lower CE angle were observed in patients without pain.

Conclusion  In case of persistent pain after arthroscopic treatment of FAI, a new set of imaging studies must be performed because pain may be related to an insufficient correction of preoperative radiographic abnormalities.

Level of Evidence  Level IV, retrospective case series.

Labral and cartilage abnormalities in young patients with hip pain: accuracy of 3-Tesla indirect MR arthrography

OBJECTIVE

Assess the diagnostic accuracy of 3-T indirect magnetic resonance arthrography (iMRA) for hip cartilage and labral pathology detection using arthroscopy as the reference standard and compare it to the published performance of direct magnetic resonance arthrography (dMRA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2009 and 2011, 290 patients suspected of having femoroacetabular impingement underwent iMRA. Our study group consisted of 41 of these patients (17 males, mean age 35 years; 24 females, mean age 33 years) who did not have a prior history of hip surgery and who subsequently underwent arthroscopy. Two experienced musculoskeletal radiologists separately evaluated the randomized and anonymized studies for the presence and quadrant location of labral and cartilage pathology. These recorded data were compared to arthroscopic reports.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients had labral pathology, 34 patients had acetabular and 5 patients had femoral cartilage pathology at arthroscopy. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, negative- and positive-predictive values for labral lesion detection were respectively 98, 99, 99, 99 and 98 %; for acetabular cartilage lesion detection they were 69, 98, 89, 87 and 95 %; for femoral cartilage lesion detection they were 69, 95, 93 and 39 %. Sensitivities of iMRA by quadrant (anteroinferior, anterosuperior, posteroinferior, posterosuperior) for the labrum were 100.0, 95.0, NA and 85.7 %, for acetabular cartilage were NA, 58.8, NA and 39.5 % and for femoral cartilage were 50.0, 33.3, 75.0 and 75.0 %). NA indicates results not available because of the absence of findings in those quadrants. Specificities of iMRA by quadrant (anteroinferior, anterosuperior, posteroinferior, posterosuperior) for the labrum (95.0, 100.0, 95.1, 67.5 %), acetabular (100.0, 85.7, 92.6, 79.5 %) and femoral cartilage (100.0, 94.7, 96.2, 85.9 %).

CONCLUSION

iMRA at 3 T is accurate in detecting labral pathology suggesting that it is a viable alternative to dMRA.

Demystifying radial imaging of the hip

The hip joint poses unique challenges at magnetic resonance (MR) imaging because of its shape and anatomic position. When conventional imaging planes are used, partial-volume averaging effects may substantially hamper the depiction of cartilage and labral damage at MR imaging. Such effects are most prevalent when the imaging plane is not perpendicular to the curvature of the joint and result in images that poorly depict or fail to depict cartilage and labral conditions. Partial-volume averaging, along with the inherently thin and closely apposed articular cartilage, may be partly to blame for the seemingly disparate reported sensitivities of MR imaging for depicting cartilage damage in the literature, which vary widely depending on whether arthrography was used. Fortunately, the multiplanar capability of MR imaging is not limited to standard anatomic planes. Radial sections, which are obtained perpendicular to the surfaces of the hip joint, provide a true cross section of the cartilage and labrum that conventional planes do not. Radial imaging is a reproducible technique that enhances the morphologic assessment of the articular cartilage and labrum. The additional information it provides is important because early damage occurs in the anterosuperior region of the hip in patients with femoroacetabular impingement.

Imaging evaluation of developmental hip dysplasia in the young adult

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to review the clinical and imaging features as well as the potential complications of hip dysplasia in the young adult. Hip dysplasia is an important cause of secondary osteoarthrosis, which accounts for a significant proportion of patients requiring total hip arthroplasty. The radiographic diagnosis of mild hip dysplasia in the young adult may be subtle and is primarily based on the detection of deficient coverage of the femoral head by the acetabulum.

CONCLUSION

Cross-sectional imaging, including CT and MRI, afford improved detection and characterization by providing morphologic information about acetabular deficiency. MRI also allows evaluation of potential associated injuries to the articular cartilage, the labrum, and the ligamentum teres. Familiarity with the radiographic and cross-sectional imaging findings of mild hip dysplasia in the young adult may allow a timely diagnosis and implementation of treatment strategies, which may prevent or delay the development of early osteoarthritis.

Magnetic resonance imaging of hip joint cartilage and labrum

Hip joint instability and impingement are the most common biomechanical risk factors that put the hip joint at risk to develop premature osteoarthritis. Several surgical procedures like periacetabular osteotomy for hip dysplasia or hip arthroscopy or safe surgical hip dislocation for femoroacetabular impingement aim at restoring the hip anatomy. However, the success of joint preserving surgical procedures is limited by the amount of pre-existing cartilage damage. Biochemically sensitive MRI techniques like delayed Gadolinium Enhanced MRI of Cartilage (dGEMRIC) might help to monitor the effect of surgical or non-surgical procedures in the effort to halt or even reverse joint damage.

Magnetic resonance imaging of acetabular labral tears

The acetabular labrum plays an important role in hip biomechanical function and stability. Labral tears can result in appreciable clinical symptoms and joint dysfunction and may predispose the hip to chondral damage and osteoarthritis. Magnetic resonance imaging is an effective tool for detecting and characterizing labral tears. Direct magnetic resonance arthrography is the most commonly used and validated technique for evaluating the labrum. However, indirect magnetic resonance arthrography and non-arthrographic magnetic resonance imaging are two less invasive and less resource-intensive techniques that should also be considered. Orthopaedic surgeons and radiologists should strive to develop and implement minimally and noninvasive diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging protocols for the investigation of labral pathology.