Dislocation rate increases with bariatric surgery before total hip arthroplasty

Effect of Prior Bariatric Surgery on the Outcomes of Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Obesity is a risk factor for joint arthroplasty complications. With this systematic review and meta-analysis, we assessed whether a positive history of bariatric surgery influences postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing various types of joint arthroplasty.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search database such as Scopus, PubMed, Medline Ovid, CNKI, and CENTRAL for studies comparing outcomes between patients undergoing arthroplasty with and without a history of bariatric surgery. We extracted data on short-term medical complications, venous thromboembolism (VTE), periprosthetic infections, superficial wound infections, hospital stay length, and operative time. We used the data to conduct meta-analyses using random-effects models and subgroup analyses based on the type of arthroplasty.

RESULTS

Overall, 15 studies with nearly 150,000 participants were included. The analysis showed that prior bariatric surgery did not significantly affect overall medical complications post-arthroplasty, with OR of 0.968 (95%CI, 0.706-1.327). For VTE, the results similarly indicated no substantial difference, with an OR of 0.912 (95%CI, 0.644-1.291). In assessing periprosthetic infections, the OR was 0.754 (95%CI, 0.535-1.064), showing comparable rates between patients with and without a history of bariatric surgery.Regarding superficial wound infections, the analysis produced an OR of 2.390 (95%CI, 0.723-7.897), indicating variability but not statistical significance. Hospital stay length was reduced in patients with a history of bariatric surgery, reflected by SMD of -0.113 (95%CI, -0.221 to -0.005). Lastly, operative time also showed a significant reduction, with an SMD of -0.462 (95%CI, -0.865 to -0.059).

CONCLUSIONS

Prior bariatric surgery does not reduce the risk of short-term complications post-arthroplasty, but it seems to reduce the hospital stay length and operative time. The effects vary significantly across different types of joint arthroplasty, suggesting a need for tailored preoperative assessments and care protocols.

PROTOCOL REGISTRATION

This systematic review and meta-analysis was registered at PROSPERO, with the number: CRD42024539052.

Association between bariatric surgery and outcomes of total joint arthroplasty: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) alongside bariatric surgery (BS) is frequently operated on in obese arthritis patients. The controversy persists regarding BS before TJA, and the extent of its impact on the prognosis of TJA patients remains uncertain. To explore this, we conducted a meta-analysis.

METHODS

As of 1 October 2023, the latest search on PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted to compare outcomes between patients who underwent preoperative BS and those who did not. The analysis focused on parameters such as length of stay (LOS), infection risk, venous thromboembolism, revision, transfusions, dislocations, periprosthetic fractures, knee stiffness, medical complications, and all-cause mortality in the eligible studies.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis included 18 trials with a total of 292 196 patients. Pooled findings indicated that preoperative BS significantly shortened the LOS (MD, -0.16; 95% CI, -0.25 to 0.07; I2 =58%; P =0.0004) and increased the risk of dislocation within 90 days (OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.20- 2 .42; I2 =21%; P =0.003) and all-cause mortality within 30 days (OR, 3.69; 95% CI, 1.81-7.49; I2 = 0%; P  =0.0003) for TJA, in comparison with patients without BS. In the total hip arthroplasty (THA) subgroup, BS was more favorable, exhibiting significantly reduced risk of short-term revision (OR, 0.77; 95% C I , 0.61-0.99; I2 =0%; P =0.04) and long-term infection (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.61-0.85; I2 =0%; P ≤0.0001). For total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients, no significant benefit was identified. In addition, there was no statistically significant correlation between preoperative or postoperative BS and the occurrence of complications in TJA patients.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Compared with the control group without BS, preoperative BS can shorten the LOS, increase the risk of dislocation within 90 days and all-cause mortality within 30 days in TJA, and reduce the risk of specific surgical complications in the THA subgroup but shows no significant difference in the TKA subgroup. There are no differences in clinical outcomes whether BS is performed before or after TJA. More high-quality trials are needed to further clarify the impact of BS on obese patients undergoing TJA.

Scientific Evidence for the Updated Guidelines on Indications for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (IFSO/ASMBS)

The 2022 American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) and International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) updated the indications for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (MBS), replacing the previous guidelines established by the NIH over 30 years ago. The evidence supporting these updated guidelines has been strengthened to assist metabolic and bariatric surgeons, nutritionists, and other members of multidisciplinary teams, as well as patients. This study aims to assess the level of evidence and the strength of recommendations compared to the previously published criteria.

Scientific evidence for the updated guidelines on indications for metabolic and bariatric surgery (IFSO/ASMBS)

The 2022 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) and International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) updated the indications for metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS), replacing the previous guidelines established by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) over 30 years ago. The evidence supporting these updated guidelines has been strengthened to assist metabolic and bariatric surgeons, nutritionists, and other members of multidisciplinary teams (MDTs), as well as patients. This study aims to assess the level of evidence and the strength of recommendations compared to the previously published criteria.

Comparative risk of fracture for bariatric procedures in patients with obesity: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Bariatric surgery (malabsorptive [i.e., biliopancreatic diversion, BPD], restrictive [i.e., sleeve gastrectomy, SG; adjustable gastric banding, AGB] and mixed [i.e., gastric bypass, GB] procedures) has been reported to be associated with an increased risk of fracture; however, which procedure poses the greatest risk of fracture is still controversial. The aim of the current meta-analysis was to investigate the degree of fracture risk after different bariatric procedures.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Electronic databases, including Medline/PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane library, were systematically searched from inception to July 11, 2019 with no language restrictions to retrieve randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or cohort studies evaluating the impact of any kind of bariatric surgery on postoperative fractures in patients with obesity. Pairwise meta-analysis and Bayesian network meta-analysis were performed to pool the outcome estimates of interest, including fracture incidence and fracture risk. The values of the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) probability for fracture risk were calculated and sorted according to the different surgical procedures.

RESULTS

A total of twelve studies published between 2010 and 2019, comprising 159,916 participants with obesity were identified for the analysis. The incidence of fracture increased from 3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2-4%) in patients with non-surgical intervention (drug treatment, alteration in life style and diet control) to 5% (95% CI 4-7%) in those who had undergone bariatric surgery (pooled relative risk [RR] = 1.41 95% CI: 1.22-1.63). Network meta-analysis revealed that based on the SUCRA ranking of the different surgical procedures, the malabsorptive procedure had the highest possibility of increased fracture risk in patients with obesity (74.75%), followed by the mixed procedures (73.85%), nonsurgical intervention (43.55%) and the restrictive procedure (7.85%); for different surgery types. The BPD group had the highest possibility of increased fracture risk (99.49%), followed by the GB (74.92%), nonsurgical intervention (44.49%), AGB (26.64%) and SG (4.45%) groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant differences exist among different bariatric surgeries impacting on fracture risk. The malabsorptive and mixed procedures, but not the restrictive procedure, increase the postoperative risk of fracture. Considering the weight-reduction effects and fracture risk, the sleeve gastrectomy procedure may be the best choice for patients with obesity, especially those who are susceptible to osteoporosis.

Does Prior Bariatric Surgery Improve Outcomes Following Total Joint Arthroplasty in the Morbidly Obese? A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

There remains a controversy regarding the risks in subsequent total joint arthroplasty (TJA) with and without previous bariatric surgery (BS). We performed a meta-analysis based on the current evidence-based study to determine the influences of prior BS on the short-term and long-term outcomes following TJA.

METHODS

From the inception to July 2018, the EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library electronic databases were searched for all relevant English language trials. The primary outcome measures were complications and revision, whereas the secondary outcomes included length of stay and operative time. Short-term follow-up was defined as that from hospital discharge to 90 days, and long-term follow-up was defined as more than 1 year.

RESULTS

A total of 9 studies with 38,728 patients were included. Overall, medical comorbidities were higher in the BS group compared with the control morbid obesity group before TJA. Our meta-analysis revealed that BS prior to TJA was associated with reduced short-term medical complications, length of stay, and operative time. However, BS did not reduce the short-term risks for superficial wound infection or venous thromboembolism, and the long-term risks for dislocation, periprosthetic infection, periprosthetic fracture, and revision. Subgroup analysis identified a significant reduction in the risk of short-term periprosthetic infection in the BS group after total knee arthroplasty, but not after total hip arthroplasty.

CONCLUSION

BS prior to TJA was associated with partially improved short-term outcomes after TJA. However, BS did not improve the risks for long-term outcomes. Limited by relatively higher comorbidities burden, the short-term benefits of BS should be further revealed by high-quality, controlled study in the future.