Short-term outcomes of the supine muscle-sparing anterolateral versus direct lateral approach to primary total hip arthroplasty

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Reveals Superior Gluteus Medius Muscle Vitality After Total Hip Arthroplasty in a Minimally Invasive Anterolateral Versus Lateral Surgical Approach

OBJECTIVE

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is essential for treating severe osteoarthritis. With various surgical approaches available, there has been a shift toward techniques that offer quicker recovery and fewer complications. In this study, contrast-enhanced ultrasound was used to evaluate the impact of the minimally invasive anterolateral versus conventional lateral approach in THA on the gluteus medius muscle, focusing on muscle vitality and functional outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of 64 patients who underwent unilateral THA (26 lateral and 38 anterolateral) was conducted. Muscle strength was measured alongside joint flexibility and patient-reported outcome measures. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) examinations were conducted to visualize gluteus medius microperfusion. CEUS data were analyzed using VueBox 7.1 software and microperfusion parameters were calculated using peak enhancement (PE), wash-in perfusion index (WiPI) and rise time for muscle vitality evaluation.

RESULTS

Patients from the anterolateral group exhibited higher relative muscle strength in the operated hip compared with the healthy side (96 ± 23% vs. 86 ± 23%, p = 0.048). CEUS revealed superior gluteus medius microperfusion in the anterolateral group (PE 36,300 ± 42,000 arbitrary units [a.u.] vs. 20,400 ± 20,200 a.u., p = 0.024; WiPI 23,600 ± 27,300 a.u. vs. 13,500 ± 13,300 a.u., p = 0.027). A positive Trendelenburg sign was evident in 2 out of 26 patients in the lateral group compared with none in the anterolateral group (χ2 = 0.082), indicating higher rates of gluteal insufficiency in the lateral approach group.

CONCLUSION

Significantly higher muscle perfusion parameters in the anterolateral group, alongside improved muscle strength recovery, hint at a subtle but important advantage regarding post-operative recovery of the anterolateral approach. These findings support the ongoing trend toward minimally invasive surgical approaches in THA.

Minimally Invasive Intermuscular Approaches Versus Conventional Approaches in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

To date, the literature has not yet revealed superiority of Minimally Invasive (MI) approaches over conventional techniques. We performed a systematic review to determine whether minimally invasive approaches are superior to conventional approaches in total hip arthroplasty for clinical and functional outcomes. We performed a meta-analysis of level 1 evidence to determine whether minimally invasive approaches are superior to conventional approaches for clinical outcomes.

METHODS

All studies comparing MI approaches to conventional approaches were eligible for analysis. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were adhered to throughout this study. Registries were searched using the following MeSH terms: 'minimally invasive', 'muscle-sparing', 'THA', 'THR', 'hip arthroplasty' and 'hip replacement'. Locations searched included PubMed, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, the European Union (EU) clinical trials register and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (World Health Organisation).

RESULTS

Twenty studies were identified. There were 1,282 MI total hip arthroplasty (THAs) and 1,351 conventional THAs performed. There was no difference between MI and conventional approaches for all clinical outcomes of relevance including all-cause revision (P = .959), aseptic revision (P = .894), instability (P = .894), infection (P = .669) and periprosthetic fracture (P = .940). There was also no difference in functional outcome at early or intermediate follow-up between the two groups (P = .38). In level I studies exclusively, random-effects meta-analysis demonstrated no difference in aseptic revision (P = .461) and all other outcomes between both groups.

CONCLUSION

Intermuscular MI approaches are equivalent to conventional THA approaches when considering all-cause revision, aseptic revision, infection, dislocation, fracture rates and functional outcomes. Meta-analysis of level 1 evidence supports this claim.

Anterior-Based Approaches to Total Hip Arthroplasty: Beyond the Learning Curve

BACKGROUND

Anterior-based approaches for total hip arthroplasty (THA) have gained popularity over the last decade. At our institution, anterior-based approaches are preferentially utilized, including both anterior-based muscle-sparing (ABMS) and direct anterior (DA) for primary THA. As there are higher complication rates during the transition to an anterior approach, we compared the outcomes and complications between ABMS and DA approaches beyond the learning curve.

METHODS

A retrospective study of all ABMS and DA primary THA patients performed at a single institution was performed, excluding the first 100 anterior cases done by any surgeon. In total, 813 DA and 378 ABMS THA cases were included. Demographics, complications, and patient-reported outcomes (PROMIS and HOOS) were obtained for each patient.

RESULTS

There was a 4.5% overall complication rate (4.1% in DA and 5.6% in ABMS, P = .248), with the most common complication being infection at 1.7% (1.5% vs 2.1%, P = .423). A revision was performed in 3.4% of cases overall (1.8% aseptic, 1.6% septic). There was no difference in complication rates between approaches. Length of surgery was shorter for ABMS (94.5 vs 116.0 minutes, P < .001). Both DA and ABMS had significant improvements in PROMIS and HOOS Jr. scores, without any significant difference between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Anterior-based approaches for primary THA demonstrated excellent clinical results and low complication rates overall. Beyond the learning curve, excellent results can be obtained with either ABMS or DA approach for primary THA.

Association between Hip Center Position and Isokinetic Hip Muscle Performance after Anterolateral Muscle-Sparing Total Hip Arthroplasty

Background and objectives: The superior placement of the acetabular cup induced the delayed recovery of abductor muscle moment after total hip arthroplasty (THA) with a conventional posterior approach. The anterior-based muscle-sparing (ABMS) THA effectively reduces soft tissue damage, including muscles. The influence of hip center position on anterior-based muscle-sparing (ABMS) total hip arthroplasty (THA) for post-operative hip muscle strength was unclear. We evaluate whether the hip center position affects the recovery of hip muscle strength after ABMS THA. Materials and Methods: The study was performed as a retrospective cohort study, and included 38 hips in 38 patients that underwent primary ABMS THA. Muscle strength was measured using isokinetic dynamometry before the operation, and at 6 and 12 months after surgery. The horizontal and vertical centers of rotation (H-COR and V-COR), vertical shift (V-shift), leg length, and global femoral offset were determined radiographically in reference to a previous report. Results: A weak negative correlation was observed between abduction muscle strength at 6 months and V-shift; a V-shift more than 15 mm demonstrated significantly decreased abductor muscle strength at 6 months. Conclusions: The superior placement of the hip center caused delayed recovery of abductor muscle strength in hips with anterolateral minimally invasive THA. There seems to exist no biomechanical reason why the same should not also be the case for the muscle-sparing approach.

Outcomes of Revision Hip Arthroplasty Using the Supine Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach

Background

In the United States, the number of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) cases is projected to grow from 50,000 in 2014 to 85,000 by 2030. The anterior-based muscle sparing approach (ABMS) has been described as a viable approach for primary THA, but little has been written in the revision setting. This study compares the supine ABMS approach to alternative approaches in revision THA.

Material and methods

A retrospective review was performed on 149 revision THAs from 2016 to 2019. The ABMS, modified Müller Hardinge (MMH), and posterolateral (PL) approaches were studied. Age, reason for arthroplasty, length of operation, length of stay, blood loss, and complications were extracted. Clinical outcomes were measured by the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Modified Harris Hip Score, University of California Los Angeles activity score, and Veterans RAND 12 Mental/Physical scores.

Results

Approaches included 52 ABMS (33.8%), 58 MHH (37.7%), and 39 PL (25.3%). Complexity of cases and patient demographics were equivalent for each cohort. Extensile approaches were used in 12 of the 52 ABMS, 26 of the 58 MMH, and 13 of the 39 PL revisions, including acetabular cages, open reduction internal fixation for periprosthetic fracture, extended trochanteric osteotomy, hardware removal, and/or pelvic discontinuity. There were no differences for blood loss, length of stay, complications, and outcome scores between approaches.

Conclusion

We found no difference in complications or clinical outcome scores between the ABMS, MMH, and PL approaches for revision THA. The supine ABMS approach provides adequate extensile exposure of the femur and acetabulum for complex revisions and is a reliable approach for revision THA.

Outcomes of the Supine Anterior-based Muscle-sparing Approach for Primary and Revision Hip Arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Risks and outcomes of total hip arthroplasty (THA) are believed to vary relative to the surgical approach. This study compares the supine anterior-based muscle-sparing (ABMS) approach with its modern-day counterparts.

METHODS

A retrospective review was done on 550 patients undergoing primary or revision THA from 2016 to 2018. Surgical modalities included direct anterior (DAA), ABMS, posterolateral, and Müller modified Hardinge approaches. Surgical data were collected, and clinical outcomes were measured by the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Modified Harris Hip Score, UCLA, and VR-12 Mental/Physical scores preoperatively and compared clinical outcomes among approaches.

RESULTS

A total of 550 patients were included (447 primaries, 103 revisions). The average age was 64 years (231 men, 319 women). Approaches included 79 DAA (14%), 212 ABMS (39%), 180 modified Müller-Hardinge (33%), and 79 posterolateral (14%). The incidence of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve injury was more common with the DAA (P = 0.008), but no other clinically significant differences were noted among the groups.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study showed no clinically notable differences between the supine ABMS and other approaches. The supine ABMS approach is an acceptable approach in modern day THA when used by an experienced surgeon well-versed in the approach.

Limited effects on patient outcomes of conjoint tendon release in anterolateral muscle-sparing total hip arthroplasty

Background

The anterolateral muscle-sparing total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the supine position is advantageous owing to the very low-dislocation rate and excellent leg length discrepancy control. However, femur exposure is challenging. Although the conjoined external rotators tendon (CERT) release is effective in improving femoral access, the effects on clinical outcomes remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic results of CERT release in the anterolateral muscle-sparing THA approach.

Methods

The study was performed as a retrospective cohort study and included 85 hips in 85 patients who underwent primary anterolateral THA. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were investigated 6 months and 1 year after THA (CERT-preserved and non-released patients). The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) hip score, JOA Hip-disease Evaluation Questionnaire (JHEQ), forgotten joint score (FJS), and the 36 short-form questionnaires (SF-36 mental and physical) were evaluated. The leg length discrepancy, cup inclination and stem orientation were evaluated with radiographs.

Results

Among all the included hips, 37 patients (43.5%) retained the CERT, and 48 patients (56.5%) included the released CERT. There were no significant differences in the JOA hip scores, JHEQ, FJF-12 and SF-36 between the released and non-released groups. There were significant differences in sagittal stem alignments between groups.

Conclusion

The CERT release in anterolateral muscle-sparing THA has a limited effect on post-operative clinical outcomes. The CERT release improved the femur exposure and is more invasive than the preserved CERT. We infer that the CERT should be maintained in patients with a wide range of motions, and release the CERT in inadequate femur canal preparation cases.