An excellent 5-year survival rate despite a high incidence of distal femoral cortical hypertrophy in a short hip stem

Survival and radioclinical evaluation of the Optimys™ short stem at more than 6years' mean follow-up: A retrospective study of 108 cases

INTRODUCTION

The short stems developed in recent years offer an interesting alternative to standard long stems. The Optimys™ short stem has been widely studied, but not according to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) criteria. We therefore conducted a retrospective study of Optimys™ at a minimum 5years' follow-up, to assess: (1) survival on NICE criteria, (2) complications, (3) functional results, and (4) subsidence, restoration of offset and bone remodeling.

HYPOTHESIS

Optimys™ shows survival comparable to that of other non-cemented standard and short stems, with a<0.5% per year revision rate or<2.5% at 5years on NICE criteria.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A single-center retrospective study included 108 Optimys™ stems at a mean 76.5months' follow-up (range: 60-112months). Clinical [Harris, Oxford-12 and forgotten hip (French version: SHO-12) scores] and radiologic data were collected pre- and postoperatively. Analysis focused on implant survival, complications, functional results and radiological results (restoration of offset, bone remodeling, subsidence and osseointegration) and risk factors for stem migration.

RESULTS

At a mean 76.5months' follow-up (range: 60-112months), Optimys™ survival was 97.7% (95% CI: 0.945-1). Oxford and Harris scores improved significantly: respectively, 16.1 vs. 44.7 [Δ=28.598; 95% CI: 27.410-29.785 (p<0.001)] and 45.3 vs. 95 [Δ=49.662; 95% CI: 47.442-51.882 (p<0.001)]. Mean forgotten hip score (SHO-12) at last follow-up was 82.7±19.6 (range: 35.4-100.0). There was 1 case of aseptic revision at 11months for femoral osseointegration defect. Mean subsidence was 1.64mm (range: 0-20.63mm); no predisposing factors could be identified. Femoral offset increased by a mean 2.41±4.53mm (range: -10.10 to 14.70mm).

CONCLUSION

The present study reports good survival for the Optimys™ stem, which meets NICE criteria. Radiologic and clinical results were encouraging, with a low rate of subsidence, comparable to other series, but with increased femoral offset.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; retrospective cohort study.

Distal femoral cortical hypertrophy not associated with thigh pain using a short stem femoral implant

BACKGROUND

Thigh pain following a well-fixed total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains problematic and a source of patient dissatisfaction. The purpose of this study is to evaluate if the development of distal femoral cortical hypertrophy (DFCH) is associated with postoperative thigh pain after THA.

METHODS

All patients who underwent an uncomplicated primary THA via a direct anterior approach with the Taperloc Microplasty (Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, IN, USA) implant between 2011 and 2015 were mailed a pain drawing questionnaire. Radiographs were reviewed at 1 year minimum to determine cortical thickness change from immediate post-op. Thigh pain was compared to DFCH. 293 patients were included in the study.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 3.2 years. A total of 218 hips (74%) had cortical hypertrophy in Gruen zone 3 and 165 hips (56%) had cortical hypertrophy in Gruen zone 5. 52 hips (18%) had ⩾25% cortical hypertrophy in zone 3 and 91 hips (31%) had ⩾25% cortical hypertrophy in zone 5. A total of 44 patients (15%) reported anterior thigh pain and 43 patients (15%) reported lateral thigh pain. Development of DFCH in either Gruen zone 3 or 5 was not associated with anterior or lateral thigh pain. Stem size was positively correlated with zone 3 hypertrophy and inversely related to zone 5 hypertrophy. Thigh pain was not associated with patient age, gender, activity level or stem size.

CONCLUSIONS

The development of distal femoral cortical hypertrophy after THA with a short stem implant was high, but not associated with patient-reported anterior or lateral thigh pain.

Malalignment and distal contact of short tapered stems could be associated with postoperative thigh pain in primary total hip arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Short tapered stem placement has been extensively employed in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Suboptimal fixation tends to cause postoperative complications, such as thigh pain. However, it remains unclear whether poor seating/alignment of short tapered stems contributes to thigh pain. In this study, we retrospectively examined the factors that might be associated with thigh pain.

METHODS

Medical records of 230 patients who had undergone THAs at our hospital were reviewed retrospectively. All patients received the same mediolateral (ML) short tapered femoral stems. The association between thigh pain and patients' demographics, radiographic findings, or the type of fitting of the femoral stems was investigated.

RESULTS

In our cohort, 68 patients (27.8%) presented with thigh pain. Among 203 type I fit patients, 62 (30.5%) developed thigh pain, while only 6 out of 43 (12.2%) type II fit patients had thigh pain, with the differences being statistically significant (x² = 6.706, p = 0.01). In addition, hip anteroposterior radiographs exhibited that the stem angulation (mean 2.52°), the variation in angulation (mean 1.32°), and the extent of femoral stem subsidence (mean 0.29 cm) were greater in patients with thigh pain than in their counterparts without thigh pain (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Malalignment and improper seating of short tapered stems could be at least one of the reasons for post-THA thigh pain. The distal contact between the stem tip and the medial femoral cortex might result in thigh pain. Our study suggested that distal implant contact should be avoided, and stem alignment should be meticulously performed in the placement of ML short tapered femoral stems for THA.

Total hip replacement using MINIMA® short stem: A short-term follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Total hip replacement has become one of the most successful orthopaedic procedures. The length of the femoral stem constitutes one of the most important geometrical and mechanical features of the prosthesis. Several different implants are currently available but data are limited concerning the clinical results for some of these implants.

AIM

To report the short-term clinical and radiological results of a novel squared section, tapered design – with four conicity - short stem in total hip replacement.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of a prospectively collected data using of MINIMA^® short stem in 61 consecutive patients with at least 1 year follow-up. The collected data included patients’ demographics, type of arthritis, bone morphology, perioperative data, clinical results using Harris Hip Score, EuroQol (EQ-5D), pain score and satisfaction rate, complications and radiological results.

RESULTS

Total 61 patients were included in our study with a mean age of 56 years of age (range 25-73 years). The majority of them (68.6%) were women, thirty seven patients (56.9%) were less than 60 years of age and almost half of patients (45.1%) suffered from secondary osteoarthritis (hip dysplasia, osteonecrosis, etc.). The mean time of follow-up examination was 33.4 mo (2.8 years) with a range of 12-57 months (1-4.8 years). In 35 patients (56.9%) the follow-up examination was more than 3 years. No major complications such as revision, periprosthetic fracture, dislocation or infection were presented. Re-admission 90 d postoperatively or laterwas deemed unnecessary for any reason regarding the operation. Respectively, the mean pain score, mean Harris hip score, and mean EQ-5D were improved from 6.3, 58.7 and 77.3 preoperatively to 0.1, 95.1, and 79.8 postoperatively. The Satisfaction rate at the final follow-up was 9.9 (SD 0.3, range 8.0-10.0). All stems were classified as stable bone ingrowth and no radiolucent lineswere revealed in any of the modified Gruens’ zone at the postoperative X-rays. Stem subsidence was within acceptable limits and the incidence of distal cortical hypertrophy was relatively low.

CONCLUSION

The clinical and radiological results concerning the MINIMA^® short stem are excellent according to this first report of this specific design of the short femoral stems. Because of the small number of cases and short-term follow-up of this study, a longer follow up time and more patients’ enrollment is required.