Modified Harris Hip Score as patient-reported outcome measure in osteoarthritic patients: psychometric properties of the Greek version

Activity Level Maintenance at 10-Year Minimum Follow-up Among Active Patients Undergoing Periacetabular Osteotomy

BACKGROUND

Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) can treat pain, dysfunction, and decreased activity secondary to hip dysplasia. Patients' pre- and postoperative activity can be measured using the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score, a validated questionnaire. Understanding return to and maintenance of activity at long-term follow-up after PAO is a priority for active patients.

PURPOSE

To provide long-term follow-up of a previously published cohort that will help examine maintenance of activity after PAO, guide treatment decision-making, and inform patient counseling.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

This prospective longitudinal cohort consisted of patients undergoing PAO between 2006 and 2013. Inclusion criteria included lateral center-edge angle <25°, highly active individuals (UCLA score ≥7), and 10-year minimum follow-up. UCLA, modified Harris Hip Score, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index scores and descriptive information were obtained. P values <.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS

The cohort included 68 hips (86.1% follow-up; 61 patients), with 7 (10.3%) having additional surgery (4 total hip arthroplasty, 3 osteochondroplasty) at a mean 9.8 years (range, 6.0-15.8). Reoperated hips were excluded; the remaining 61 were analyzed. Mean age at PAO was 24.7 years (range, 14.7-44.8) with female predominance (74.1%). Mean follow-up was 12.5 years (range, 10.2-17.1). Of 61 hips, 54 (88.5%) either maintained high activity with a UCLA score ≥7 (n = 43; 70.5%) or had lower activity unrelated to the surgical hip (n = 11; 18.0%). When compared with preoperative values, the mean UCLA score decreased from 8.9 to 8.1 (P = .009); the modified Harris Hip Score improved from 64.6 to 88.8 (P < .001), with 49 of 61 hips (80.3%) achieving the minimal clinically important difference; and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index pain score improved from 68.2 to 89.0 (P < .001), with 35 of 51 hips (68.7%) achieving the minimal clinically important difference. Hips with PAO before age 25 years were more likely to be in higher activity groups at follow-up (P = .030).

CONCLUSION

Patients with hip dysplasia can be treated with PAO to help maintain activity and preserve the native hip. At long-term follow-up (mean, 12.5 years), 54 of 68 (79.4%) hips did not have additional surgery and either remained in the high activity group or had lower activity levels unrelated to the hip. PAO appears to be a durable hip preservation technique at 12.5-year follow-up for highly active patients.

Comparison of the efficacy of the modified S-P approach and the Ganz method for surgical hip dislocation in Pipkin I fractures: an early follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Femoral head fractures result from high-energy trauma and may be associated with posterior dislocation of the hip joint. An appropriate surgical approach is essential for improving clinical outcomes and preventing complications. This study aims to compare the clinical efficacy of the modified Smith-Peterson (mS-P) approach and Ganz surgical dislocation (GSD) approach in the treatment of Pipkin I fractures.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with Pipkin I fractures at Pidu District People's Hospital from June 2010 to May 2020. Of these, 11 cases were treated with the mS-P approach and 12 cases were treated with the GSD approach. All patients were followed for 12-55 months, with a mean duration of 37.7 months. Basic demographic information, perioperative-related records, postoperative complications, and outcomes at the final follow-up were compared. Functional evaluations included the Thompson-Epstein Score, the Modified Harris Hip Score (MHHS), and the Vail Hip Score (VHS).

RESULTS

Overall, 21 patients were included in the study. We found that the mS-P approach was associated with a smaller incision, shorter operative time, and reduced intraoperative blood loss compared to the GSD approach (P < 0.05). The mean MHHS was 83.5 ± 9.14 and 75 ± 9.22 in the mS-P group and GSD group, respectively, P = 0.048. The mean VHS was 83.9 ± 7.4 and 74.4 ± 11.28 in the mS-P group and GSD group, respectively, P = 0.034. Thompson-Epstein scores in the mS-P group were excellent (6 patients), good (3 patients), and fair (1 patient). In the GSD group, the scores were excellent (3 patients), good (5 patients), and fair (2 patients). Among the postoperative complications, avascular necrosis (AVN) occurred in 1 patient in each of the mS-P and GSD groups. Heterotopic ossification (HO) occurred in 5 patients in each of the mS-P and GSD groups. 2 patients in the mS-P group developed post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA), compared to 5 patients in the GSD group. One patient in the GSD group developed a sciatic nerve injury (SNI).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that the mS-P approach offers advantages over the GSD approach in terms of surgical efficiency and surgical trauma. However, longer-term follow-up is required to fully assess complications and functional outcomes.

The Effect of Preoperative Information and Education on the Clinical Outcome of Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomized Trial

Introduction Preoperative patient information and education is an essential aspect of modern surgical care, particularly for patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). This prospective, randomized trial aimed to assess the effects of structured preoperative education and information on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing THA. Materials and methods A total of 102 patients were randomized into two groups: the intervention group (n = 51) receiving standardized preoperative information and education, and the control group (n = 51) receiving standard preoperative care without a formal educational component. Postoperative outcomes, including functionality, mobility, length of hospital stay (LOS), patient satisfaction, health-related quality of life, anxiety, depression and fear for surgery, were compared between the two groups. Results Both groups were comparable in baseline characteristics, including age, sex, body mass index (BMI), smoking status and alcohol consumption. The mean age was 66.3 years, mean BMI was 29.05 and 70.6% of participants were female. Patients in the intervention group had a shorter mean hospital stay (mean 4.9 days vs. 6.2 days, p=0.031). Mean preoperative modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) was similar between the two groups (p = 0.866). However, one month postoperatively, mHHS was significantly higher in the intervention group compared to controls (74.06 versus 67.81, p = 0.046). The absolute change in European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Index and EQ-5D-5L Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score before and after THA was statistically significant (p = 0.021 and p = 0.042). Preoperative and postoperative depression was significantly lower in the intervention group, one day preoperatively, one day before discharge and one month postoperatively, as shown by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) (p = 0.026, p = 0.027 and p = 0.018 respectively). Conclusions This prospective, randomized trial demonstrated that preoperative education and information significantly improve clinical outcomes, duration of hospitalization, health-related quality of life and postoperative anxiety in patients undergoing THA. These findings underline the importance of incorporating structured educational programs into preoperative care protocols prior to THA for enhancing patient recovery and optimizing postoperative results.

Increased asphericity of the femoral head-neck junction in professional breakers compared to hobby athletes - a retrospective case-control study

OBJECTIVE

Breaking has gained public attention as a form of sports activity. The associated intense movements of the hip joints are possibly linked to the development of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Therefore, this study aimed to assess clinical and radiographic FAI measures in professional breakers compared to hobby athletes.

METHODS

The study cohort consisted of professional breakers with persisting hip pain who were 1:1 matched to a cohort of FAI patients without professional sports careers from our outpatient clinic. The primary endpoint assessed on standardized plain radiographs was the alpha angle (AA). Further measures were the acetabular index (AI), lateral center-edge angle (LCEA), crossover sign, ischial spine sign, and femoral head extrusion index (FHEI). The modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score were used to obtain patient-reported measures.

RESULTS

We recruited ten professional breakers and matched them to ten hobby athletes. The median AA was significantly higher in the breakers compared with the hobby athletes (73° [IQR 66.5°, 84.2°]) vs. 61.8° [IQR 59.5°, 64.8°], p = 0.0004). There was a significant reduction in weekly training hours in breakers after diagnosis (13.0 hours [interquartile range [IQR] 9.5, 32.4] to 1.5 hours [IQR 0, 4.8], p = 0.0039). There were no inter-group differences regarding mHHS, WOMAC, and additional radiographic measurements.

CONCLUSION

Breakers have higher AA in cam-type FAI compared to nonprofessional athletes. The corresponding hip pain significantly reduced training hours and caused the end of their breaking career. The potentially high prevalence of FAI in breakers and the corresponding consequences need to be considered early when athletes present with hip pain.

[Translated article] Validation of the Spanish version of the modified Harris score

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Modified Harris Hip Score (HHS) is one of the most used scales in the assessment of patients with hip pathology. Although a Spanish cross-cultural adaptation has been recently published, there are many studies supporting its validity yet. Therefore, the aim of this study is to validate the newly adapted Spanish version of the HHS (ES-EHM), comparing it with the WOMAC scale.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The ES-EHM scale was applied to 100 patients who underwent a total hip replacement, in three different situations: (1) prior to surgery (pre-surgical ES-EHM), (2) after surgery, with at least 2 years of follow up (after surgery ES-EHM), and (3) 6 months after the postsurgical registration (final ES-EHM). WOMAC questionnaire was also applied once. We analysed data of scale main score, pain score, function-related score as well as the mean of pre-surgical, postsurgical and final postsurgical ES-EHM scale, in both the ES-EHM and the WOMAC scales. Parameters of reliability, validity and sensitivity to change were obtained.

RESULTS

Clinically relevant improvement was observed (46.55 points) when comparing pre-surgical and post-surgical ES-EHM scores. However, no differences between postsurgical and final ES-EHM were detected. Even so, strong correlation was obtained between the following: (1) postsurgical ES-EHM and final ES-EHM scores, (2) ES-EHM and WOMAC scores, and (3) pain and function-related parameters of ES-EHM and WOMAC scores. Standardised response mean (SRM) was 2.99, test-retest reliability expressed by the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.90 and Cronbach index 0.95.

CONCLUSIONS

The Spanish cross-cultural adaptation of the EHM scale shows to be reliable, valid and sensitive to change. Thus, the Spanish medical staff will be able to apply the ES-EHM scale with good scientific support.

Validation of the Spanish version of the modified Harris score

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Modified Harris Hip Score (HHS) is one of the most used scales in the assessment of patients with hip pathology. Although a Spanish cross-cultural adaptation has been recently published, there are many studies supporting its validity yet. Therefore, the aim of this study is to validate the newly adapted Spanish version of the HHS (ES-EHM), comparing it with the WOMAC scale.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The ES-EHM scale was applied to 100 patients who underwent a total hip replacement, in three different situations: (1) prior to surgery (pre-surgical ES-EHM), (2) after surgery, with at least 2 years of follow up (after surgery ES-EHM), and (3) 6 months after the postsurgical registration (final ES-EHM). WOMAC questionnaire was also applied once. We analyzed data of scale main score, pain score, function-related score as well as the mean of pre-surgical, postsurgical and final postsurgical ES-EHM scale, in both the ES-EHM and the WOMAC scales. Parameters of reliability, validity and sensitivity to change were obtained.

RESULTS

Clinically relevant improvement was observed (46.55 points) when comparing pre-surgical and post-surgical ES-EHM scores. However, no differences between postsurgical and final ES-EHM were detected. Even so, strong correlation was obtained between the following: (1) postsurgical ES-EHM and final ES-EHM scores, (2) ES-EHM and WOMAC scores, and (3) pain and function-related parameters of ES-EHM and WOMAC scores. Standardized response mean (SRM) was 2.99, test-retest reliability expressed by the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.90 and Cronbach index 0.95.

CONCLUSIONS

The Spanish cross-cultural adaptation of the EHM scale shows to be reliable, valid and sensitive to change. Thus, the Spanish medical staff will be able to apply the ES-EHM scale with good scientific support.

Correlation between Harris hip score and gait analysis through artificial intelligence pose estimation in patients after total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Recently, open pose estimation using artificial intelligence (AI) has enabled the analysis of time series of human movements through digital video inputs. Analyzing a person's actual movement as a digitized image would give objectivity in evaluating a person's physical function. In the present study, we investigated the relationship of AI camera-based open pose estimation with Harris Hip Score (HHS) developed for patient-reported outcome (PRO) of hip joint function.

METHOD

HHS evaluation and pose estimation using AI camera were performed for a total of 56 patients after total hip arthroplasty in Gyeongsang National University Hospital. Joint angles and gait parameters were analyzed by extracting joint points from time-series data of the patient's movements. A total of 65 parameters were from raw data of the lower extremity. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to find main parameters. K-means cluster, X-squared test, Random forest, and mean decrease Gini (MDG) graph were also applied.

RESULTS

The train model showed 75% prediction accuracy and the test model showed 81.8% reality prediction accuracy in Random forest. "Anklerang_max", "kneeankle_diff", and "anklerang_rl" showed the top 3 Gini importance score in the Mean Decrease Gini (MDG) graph.

CONCLUSION

The present study shows that pose estimation data using AI camera is related to HHS by presenting associated gait parameters. In addition, our results suggest that ankle angle associated parameters could be key factors of gait analysis in patients who undergo total hip arthroplasty.

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Persian Version of the Harris Hip Score

BACKGROUND

The Persian language, also known as Farsi, is a pluricentric language spoken in Iran, Afghanistan, and Tajikistan by about 140 million people. This study aims to translate the Harris hip score (HHS) into Persian with cross-cultural adaptation and to evaluate its validity and reliability.

METHODS

One hundred fifty-six total hip arthroplasty patients completed the Persian version of the HHS, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Forgotten Joint Score, and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and satisfaction postoperatively. Using Cronbach's alpha (α) coefficient, internal consistency was evaluated. Correlations (Spearman's Rho) were used to assess validity. A test-retest reliability assessment of the Persian HHS was conducted (n = 47) using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Content validity was evaluated using the floor and ceiling effects of the HHS.

RESULTS

The final translation of the Persian HHS was approved to be used. The preoperative and postoperative Cronbach's alpha were 0.71 and 0.70, respectively, and showed acceptable internal consistency. The intraclass correlation coefficient was excellent (0.869, P < .001). Insignificant ceiling effects (13.5%) and no floor effects (0) were observed. The HHS score was significantly and strongly correlated with Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (r = 0.696, P < .001), VAS pain (r = 0.654, P < .001), VAS satisfaction (r = 0.634, P < .001), and Forgotten Joint Score (r = 0.648, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The Persian HHS demonstrated excellent reliability and validity properties. Accordingly, Persian HHS may be a helpful tool for assessing patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty.

The reliability and validity of the Norwegian version of the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment for gluteal tendinopathy questionnaire (VISA-G-Norwegian) for patients with greater trochanteric pain syndrome

BACKGROUND

Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome (GTPS) is a common chronic musculoskeletal condition that may affect physical function, quality of life and sleep. The Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Gluteal questionnaire (VISA-G) has been developed as a Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement (PROM) to address pain, everyday activities, physical activities, and difficulty with weight bearing activities. The aim of the study was to test the reliability, validity and floor and ceiling effects of the Norwegian version of the VISA-G (VISA-G-Norwegian) in a population with GTPS in a specialist health care setting.

METHODS

This psychometric evaluation of the VISA-G-Norwegian questionnaire were conducted with a prospective observational design. The VISA-G was translated into Norwegian following recommended guidelines. A subgroup repeated the VISA-G-Norwegian a week after the initial submission. For the reliability, the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC2.1), Standard Error of the Measurement (SEM) and the Smallest Detectable Change (SDC95%) were calculated. Internal consistency was measured using a Cronbach´s alpha. Floor and ceiling effects were evaluated, and construct validity was assessed with three a priori hypotheses.

RESULTS

78 participants were included in the study of which 47 stable participants undertook the test-retest reliability arm of the study. The ICC2.1 for the total score was 0.85 (95% CI 0.68, 0.92), SEM was 6.6 points and SDC95% 18.4 points. Cronbach`s alpha was 0.77 (95% CI 0.69, 0.84). No floor or ceiling effects were found in the total score, but ceiling effect was found in three of the eight items. For construct validity, one of the three hypotheses were confirmed. VISA-G-Norwegian correlated to the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODI) and Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), 0.64, -0.75 and - 0.63 respectively.

CONCLUSION

The VISA-G-Norwegian has acceptable reliability and validity, despite ceiling effect of individual items. The large SDC95% should be considered when measuring change in similar cohorts with GTPS. For a potential future version, it would be recommended to consider response options for questions with ceiling effect and the comprehensibility of question eight.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov the 28/02/2020 (NCT04289922).

Mid-term functional and radiological outcomes after total hip replacement performed for complications of acetabular fractures

OBJECTIVE

Acetabular fractures can lead to serious complications such as avascular necrosis of the femoral head (AVN), osteoarthritis, non-union. Total hip replacement (THR) is a treatment option for these complications. The purpose of this study was to assess the functional and radiological outcomes of THR at least 5 years after the primary implantation.

METHODS

This retrospective study analysed clinical data from 77 patients (59 males, 18 females) who were treated from 2001 to 2022. Data was collected on the incidence of AVN of the femoral head, complications, interval from fracture to THR, reimplantation. The modified Harris Hip Score (MHHS) was used to evaluate outcome.

RESULTS

The mean age at the time of fracture was 48 years. Avascular necrosis developed in 56 patients (73%), with 3 cases of non-union. Osteoarthritis without AVN developed in 20 patients (26%), non-union without AVN in one patient (1%). The mean time from fracture to THR was 24 months for AVN with non-union, 23 months for AVN alone, 22 months for AVN with arthritis, 49 months for hip osteoarthritis without AVN. The time interval was significantly shorter for cases of AVN than for cases of osteoarthritis without AVN (p = 0.0074). Type C1 acetabular fracture was found to be a risk factor for femoral head AVN (p = 0.0053). Common complications of acetabular fractures included post-traumatic sciatic nerve paresis (17%), deep venous thrombosis (4%), infections (4%). Hip dislocation was the most common complication of THR (17%). There were no cases of thrombosis following THR. According to Kaplan-Meier analysis, the proportion of patients without revision surgery within 10-year period was 87.4% (95% CI 86.7-88.1). The results of the MHHS after THR: 59.3% of patients had excellent results, 7.4% good, 9.3% satisfactory results, and 24.0% had poor results. The mean MHHS was 84 points (95% CI 78.5-89.5). Paraarticular ossifications were observed in 69.4% of patients in the radiological evaluation.

CONCLUSION

Total hip replacement is an effective treatment for serious complications of acetabular fracture treatment. Its results are comparable to THR peformed for other indications, although it is associated with a higher number of paraarticular ossifications. Type C1 acetabular fracture was found to be a significant risk factor for early femoral head AVN.

Stair Climbing Ability and Identification of the Nine Stairs Ascent and Descent Test Cut-Off Points in Hip Osteoarthritis Patients: A Retrospective Study

Objectives As the prevalence and incidence of hip osteoarthritis (hip OA) continue to rise, measuring the impact of hip OA severity on a patient's functionality is essential. Stair walking is a particularly relevant task to assess hip OA patients, as difficulty with stair ascent is one of the driving factors in deciding to undergo a total hip arthroplasty. Although stairs tests often arise in post-arthroplasty measures, there is a lack of reported stairs performance time in hip OA patients. Therefore, this retrospective study aimed to report the stair performance time of hip OA patients categorized by disease severity and determine cut-off points that differentiate between severity grades. Materials and methods The patient selection was based on the review of de-identified data from our research laboratory database. 254 hip OA patients (aged ≥ 50 years) were divided according to the Kellgren-Lawrence classification system into three groups: Grade 2 (n=68), Grade 3 (n=109), and Grade 4 (n= 68). The stair-walking ability was evaluated using the 9S-A/D test. The time taken to ascend and descend the stairs was measured separately, and the total time (9S-A/D) was also recorded. The one-way ANOVA model, Welch test, Games-Howell posthoc test, Chi-Square tests, and Two-Way ANOVA model were used for the statistical analysis of the data. The cut-off points were obtained by receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis. The statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Results Homogeneity was found between the three groups regarding demographic and clinical characteristics, except age and gender (p<0.001). The comparison of the variables (9S-ascent, 9S-descent, and 9S-A/D) between groups, adjusted for gender and age, showed significant differences: Grade 2 individuals had shorter performance times compared to those in Grade 3 and Grade 4 (p<0.005). Simultaneously, patients with Grade 3 hip OA have a shorter performance time than those with Grade 4 hip OA (p<0.005). Regarding ROC analysis of Grade 2 versus Grade 3: The AUCs of 9S-ascend, 9S-descent, and 9S-A/D were 0.742 (95%CI 0.67-0.81), 0.734 (95%CI 0.66-0.81), and 0.745 (95%CI 0.54-0.90), respectively (all p values <0.005). The cut-off points of 9S-ascend, 9S-descent, and 9S-A/D were 8.7 s (sensitivity 56%, specificity 88%), 7.1 s (sensitivity 58%, specificity 80%), and 16.25 s (sensitivity 54%, specificity 90%), respectively. Concerning ROC analysis of Grade 3 versus Grade 4: The AUCs of 9S-ascend, 9S-descent, and 9S-A/D were 0.702 (95%CI 0.62-0.78), 0.711 (95%CI 0.63-0.79), and 0.715 (95%CI 0.64-0.80), respectively (all p values <0.005). The cut-off points of 9S-ascend, 9S-descent, and 9S-A/D were 11.5 s (sensitivity 66%, specificity 65%), 8.3 s (sensitivity 71%, specificity 62%), and 19.05 s (sensitivity 71%, specificity 61%), respectively. Conclusions The study provides evidence that the progression of hip OA affected stair walking; the performance time of 9S-ascent, 9S-ascent, and 9S-A/D tests was significantly longer as the severity of hip OA worsened. ROC analysis results show tests' ability to distinguish the cut-off point between different hip OA grades. However, further research is required for the reporting and classification of stair performance time values in hip OA patients and to further investigate the ability of 9S-ascent, 9S-descent, and 9S-A/D tests to predict the grade of hip OA.

Pre- and Postoperative Exercise Effectiveness in Mobility, Hemostatic Balance, and Prognostic Biomarkers in Hip Fracture Patients: A Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Hip fractures are a major health concern, particularly for older adults, as they can reduce life quality, mobility loss, and even death. Current evidence reveals that early intervention is recommended for endurance in patients with hip fractures. To our knowledge, preoperative exercise intervention in patients with hip fractures remains poorly researched, and no study has yet applied aerobic exercise preoperatively. This study aims to investigate the short-term benefits of a supervised preoperative aerobic moderate-intensity interval training (MIIT) program and the added effect of an 8-week postoperative MIIT aerobic exercise program with a portable upper extremity cycle ergometer. The work-to-recovery ratio will be 1-to-1, consisting of 120 s for each bout and four and eight rounds for the pre- and postoperative programs, respectively. The preoperative program will be delivered twice a day. A parallel group, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial (RCT) was planned to be conducted with 58 patients each in the intervention and control groups. This study has two primary purposes. First, to study the effect of a preoperative aerobic exercise program with a portable upper extremity cycle ergometer on immediate postoperative mobility. Second, to investigate the additional effect of an 8-week postoperative aerobic exercise program with a portable upper extremity cycle ergometer on the walking distance at eight weeks after surgery. This study also has several secondary objectives, such as ameliorating surgical and keeping hemostatic balance throughout exercise. This study may expand our knowledge of preoperative exercise effectiveness in hip fracture patients and enhance the current literature about early intervention benefits.

Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Is Not as Responsive as Legacy Scores in Detecting Patient Outcomes in Hip Preservation: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To evaluate publication trends of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) in hip preservation literature, assess the usage of PROMIS as an outcome measure, and evaluate correlations of all available published PROMIS domains with legacy patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

METHODS

The PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar databases were queried for articles evaluating PROMIS scores among hip preservation populations. Inclusion criteria consisted of studies with Level IV evidence or above (per the Sackett et al. levels of evidence), such as case series and cohort studies, reporting on perioperative use of hip PROMIS scores. Exclusion criteria consisted of arthroplasty and trauma studies. Patient demographics, PROMIS usage, and PROMIS Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients to historic PROs were recorded for each study.

RESULTS

Fifteen articles published between 2017 and 2021 were included in the analysis, with the majority (75%) published between 2020 and 2021. Studies assessing postoperative outcomes had follow-up periods ranging from 6 months to 5 years. The most common PROMIS domain reported was Physical Function (PF), and there was varying usage of other domains including Pain Intensity, Anxiety, and Depression. PROMIS validity was most often assessed in comparison to the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) by calculating the Pearson coefficient, which assumes normal data distribution, or Spearman coefficient, which is rank-based and does not require normal data distribution. Studies comparing PROMIS-PF with mHHS reported Pearson coefficients ranging from 0.49 to 0.72 and Spearman coefficients ranging from 0.67 to 0.71.

CONCLUSIONS

There has been a chronologic increase in PROMIS usage in hip preservation literature. PROMIS demonstrates moderate-to-strong correlations with legacy PROs, but there is substantial heterogeneity in follow-up periods, PROMIS domains used, and statistical methodology. The current data show that PROMIS is not as responsive as historically used, validated PROs in quantitatively assessing function and pain in hip preservation patients.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Surgeons using PROMIS solely should be aware that the score may not be as responsive as legacy PROs in closely assessing improvements or deterioration in patient performance after hip preservation surgery. Rather than being used alone, PROMIS may be useful as a replacement for a group of legacy PROs. Thus, when used alongside select legacy PROs, overall questionnaire burden can be reduced while maintaining a high level of accuracy in assessing health status.

Validity and Reliability of the Thai Version of the Modified Harris Hip Score for Patients With Hip Abnormalities

Background:

The modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) is one of the more commonly used patient-reported outcome measures to evaluate and monitor treatment in patients with hip abnormalities and has been translated into several languages.

Purpose:

To develop a Thai version of the mHHS (TH-mHHS) and evaluate the validity and reliability of the measure.

Study Design:

Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

The TH-mHHS was developed using the forward-backward translation method. Patients who presented with hip pain during the first clinic visit completed the Thai version of questionnaires including the mHHS, 36-item Short Form Health Survey (TH-SF36), and Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (TH-HOOS). The validity between the measures was tested using the Spearman correlation coefficient. The test-retest reliability of the TH-mHHS was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient, and internal consistency was assessed using the Cronbach alpha.

Results:

A total of 64 patients were enrolled who had a mean age of 52.8 ± 16.6 years (range, 17-80 years). There were 64% female and 36% male participants. The TH-mHHS showed a moderate correlation with all subscales of the TH-HOOS and the total TH-HOOS ( r = 0.50-0.65; P < .01) and a high correlation with the physical functioning subscale and physical component summary of the TH-SF36 ( r = 0.73 and 0.75, respectively; P < .01). The test-retest reliability was excellent, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.92-0.97; P < .001). The internal consistency was acceptable, with a Cronbach alpha of .71. No floor or ceiling effects were observed.

Conclusion:

The TH-mHHS showed a moderate to high correlation with the TH-SF36 and TH-HOOS, excellent test-retest reliability, and acceptable internal consistency. This measure can be effectively used for evaluating Thai patients with hip disorders, especially an older and arthritic population.

The efficacy of dynamic compression locking system vs. dynamic hip screw in the treatment of femoral neck fractures: a comparative study

Background

There is still a lack of consensus on which internal fixation method can better maintain the stability of femoral neck fractures (FNF), promote fracture healing, and reduce postoperative complications such as femoral head necrosis and nonunion. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of the novel dynamic compression locking system (DCLS) versus dynamic hip screw (DHS) in the treatment of FNF.

Methods

Fifty cases of FNF from July 2018 to February 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. According to different treatment methods, they were divided into DCLS group (26 cases) and DHS group (24 cases). Baseline data, intraoperative and postoperative clinical data, reoperation rate, and Harris score were collected to evaluate the clinical efficacy.

Results

All patients were followed up for 24 months. All “fractures” were caused by fall. The baseline data of the two groups were comparable (P > 0.05). There weren’t significant differences in the length of hospital stay and mobility after two years postoperatively between the two groups (P > 0.05). The operation time, blood loss, incision length, fluoroscopy times and the degree of femoral neck shortening after two years postoperatively in the DCLS group were significantly less than those in the DHS group (all P < 0.05). Harris score after two years postoperatively in the DCLS group was significantly higher than that in the DHS group (P < 0.05). Although the reoperation rate in the DHS group was slightly higher than that in the DCLS group, it wasn’t statistical significance (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

Compared with DHS, DCLS in the treatment of FNF had less surgical trauma, shorter incision length, shorter operation time, lower radiation dose and higher Harris scores. Although the reoperation rate in the DHS group was slightly higher than that in the DCLS group, it wasn’t statistical difference. Further research is needed.

Morbidity and Mortality After Second Hip Fracture With and Without Nursing Care Program

Background

Hip fractures are an increasingly common injury among older people who usually experience significantly worse mobility, independence in function, health, quality of life, and high rates of institutionalization. Studies have shown that only 40-60% of participants recover their pre-fracture level of mobility and ability to perform instrumental activities of daily living, while for those who are independent in self-care prior to the fracture, 20-60% still require assistance for various tasks one or two years after the fracture. As the cumulative incidence of a second hip fracture has been estimated to reach 8.4%, prevention of the second hip fracture is a major concern of the health system and the society focused mainly on lifestyle modifications, osteoporotic treatment, and fall-prevention strategies. The aim of the present study was to compare morbidity/mortality, functional results, and type of recovery between the first and second hip fractures in elderly patients.

Methods

Patients with a contralateral hip fracture were prospectively recruited during a three-year period (2016-2019). Level of independence, gait aids, type of rehabilitation, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status, Harris Hip Score (HHS), and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) scale were evaluated at admission for the second fracture and at the last reexamination.

Results

Twenty-seven out of 33 patients, aged 87.93±6.6, underwent surgery for contralateral hip fracture and followed up for 42.52±16.46 months; the mean interval between the two fractures was 39.63 months. The HHS averaged 86.19±12.18 and 59.01±32.83 and the WOMAC 86.37±12.09 and 68.22±26.18 before and after the second fracture, respectively. The mortality rate was 37.03%, 14.8±12.93 months after the second operation, with a significant relationship between the mortality time and the interval between fractures (p=0.028). Twelve and 14 of the patients received geriatric nursing care after the first and second fracture, respectively, without significant improvement in their functional results compared to home care. Mobility of nursing care patients after the second fracture was significantly improved (p=0.019).

Conclusions

Mortality is higher in the second year after the second hip fracture and strongly correlated with the time interval between fractures. A higher possibility to return in previous mobility status occurs after geriatric nursing care. 

Total hip arthroplasty through the direct anterior approach in morbidly obese patients

Aims

There is evidence that morbidly obese patients have more intra- and postoperative complications and poorer outcomes when undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) with the direct anterior approach (DAA). The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of DAA for THA, and compare the complications and outcomes of morbidly obese patients with nonobese patients.

Methods

Morbidly obese patients (n = 86), with BMI ≥ 40 kg/m² who underwent DAA THA at our institution between September 2010 and December 2017, were matched to 172 patients with BMI < 30 kg/m². Data regarding demographics, set-up and operating time, blood loss, radiological assessment, Harris Hip Score (HHS), International Hip Outcome Tool (12-items), reoperation rate, and complications at two years postoperatively were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

No significant differences in blood loss, intra- and postoperative complications, or implant position were observed between the two groups. Superficial wound infection rate was higher in the obese group (8.1%) compared to the nonobese group (1.2%) (p = 0.007) and relative risk of reoperation was 2.59 (95% confidence interval 0.68 to 9.91). One periprosthetic joint infection was reported in the obese group. Set-up time in the operating table and mean operating time were higher in morbidly obese patients. Functional outcomes and patient-related outcome measurements were superior in the obese group (mean increase of HHS was 52.19 (SD 5.95) vs 45.1 (SD 4.42); p < 0.001), and mean increase of International Hip Outcome Tool (12-items) was 56.8 (SD 8.88) versus 55.2 (SD 5.85); p = 0.041).

Conclusion

Our results suggest that THA in morbidly obese patients can be safely and effectively performed via the DAA by experienced surgeons.

Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(1):4–11.

Direct anterior approach vs Hardinge in obese and nonobese osteoarthritic patients: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The increased prevalence of obesity has resulted in orthopedic surgeons being likely to face many patients with a high body mass index (BMI) who warrant total hip arthroplasties (THAs) over the coming years. Studies' findings considered the postoperative clinical, and functional outcomes in these patients are controversial, and selecting the most appropriate surgical approach remains debatable.

AIM

To compare pain-levels, functionality, and quality-of-life in obese and nonobese osteoarthritic patients who have undergone primary total hip arthroplasty through either direct-anterior-approach (DAA) or Hardinge-approach.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty participants (> 50 years) were divided into four groups according to the surgical approach (DAA or Hardinge) and patients' BMI (nonobese < 30 kg/m² vs obese ≥ 30 kg/m²). Outcomes were measured preoperatively and postoperatively (6^th and 12^th week). Pain was measured with Face Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R). Functionality was measured with Timed Up & Go (TUG) test and Modified Harris Hip Score-Greek version (MHHS-Gr). Quality-of-life was evaluated with the 12-item-International Hip Outcome Tool-Greek version (iHOT12-Gr) (Clinical Trial Identifier: ISRCTN15066737).

RESULTS

DAA vs Hardinge: (week 6) DAA-patients showed 12.2% less pain, more functionality (14.8% shorter TUG-performance time, 21.5% higher MHHS-Gr), and 38.16% better quality-of-life (iHOT12-Gr) compared to Hardinge-patients (all P values < 0.001). These differences were further increased on week 12 (all P values ≤ 0.05)]. DAA-obese vs Hardinge–obese: (week 6) DAA-obese patients had less pain, shorter TUG-performance time, better MHHS-Gr and iHOT12-Gr scores than Hardinge-obese (all P values < 0.01). (Week 12) Only the TUG-performance time of DAA-obese was significantly shortened (22.57%, P < 0.001). DAA-nonobese vs DAA-obese: no statistically significant differences were observed comparing the 6^th and 12^th weeks' outcomes.

CONCLUSION

DAA-groups reported less pain, more functionality and better quality-of-life, compared to the Hardinge-groups. The DAA benefited obese and nonobese patients, similarly yet faster, suggesting that it should be the more preferred choice for obese patients, instead of Hardinge. However, more comparative studies with more extended follow-up periods are needed to confirm our results and better evaluate all patients' long-term outcomes.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) Relevant to Musculoskeletal Conditions Translated and Validated in the Greek Language: A COSMIN-Based Systematic Review of Measurement Properties

BACKGROUND

The use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) constitutes a valuable tool in evaluating the quality of care offered in orthopaedic surgery. The aim of this review is to identify the PROMs that have been translated into and validated in the Greek language, summarise their measurement properties, and evaluate their methodological quality according to the COSMIN Risk of Bias Checklist.

METHODS

A structured literature search was conducted using the databases PubMED/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library in order to identify PROMs relevant to musculoskeletal conditions translated and validated in the Greek language. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed according to the COSMIN Risk of Bias Checklist, and the quality of measurement properties according to the COMSIN criteria.

RESULTS

Literature search yielded 6743 articles. After removal of duplicates and screening of the articles, 32 studies including PROMs related to musculoskeletal conditions were identified. The studies included 31 PROMs and reported 171 measurement properties. Methodological quality was adequate for 81 of them (47.3%). The most commonly reported measurement properties were internal consistency, reliability, construct validity and responsiveness.

CONCLUSION

The majority of PROMs translated into Greek involves the lower extremity and especially knee pathologies. The search revealed that there are areas of Musculoskeletal Medicine such as skeletal trauma, musculoskeletal oncology, and paediatric orthopaedics in which patient reported-outcome measures have not been translated into Greek. Translation and validation of new outcome measures is encouraged, using studies designed in compliance with the COSMIN guidelines, and further validation of the translated instruments.

Cultural Adaptation and Validation of an Arabic Version of the Modified Harris Hip Score

Context

Although the Modified Harris Hip Score (MHHS) is used worldwide, it has not been translated into Arabic or validated for use among Arabic populations.

Aim

This study aimed to translate the MHHS into Arabic and to culturally adapt and validate the Arabic version.

Design

A cross-sectional study of the MHHS was performed.

Methods

The MHHS was translated into Arabic using forward-backward translation. A total of 183 adults who could speak and read Arabic completed the questionnaire. Cronbach’s alpha was used to assess internal consistency with respect to the total and subscale scores. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to evaluate associations between the total scores, and the subscales and intersubscales. Test-retest reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin value was determined before principal component analysis to evaluate the validity of the construct and the reliability of the data, and correlations among the score items were estimated.

Results

All the participants understood the questions. The ICCs for the total score, function subscale, and pain subscale were 0.936, 0.936 and 0.893, respectively. Cronbach’s alpha was acceptable for the total score (0.792) and good for the function subscale (0.895). The total score and the function (r = 0.976; p < 0.001) and pain (r = 0.971; p < 0.001) subscales correlated significantly. Regarding score validity, all the MHHS items correlated with the total score (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The reliability and validity of the Arabic version of the MHHS was demonstrated. The MHHS can be used to assess hip pathology among adults in Saudi Arabia.

Effect of Capsular Closure on Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopy for Femoracetabular Impingement: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Objective

To evaluate the effect of hip arthroscopy with or without capsular closure in femoracetabular impingement (FAI) by meta‐analysis.

Methods

Pertinent studies were identified by searching Pubmed, EMBASE databases with the last search update on 16 February 2020. Studies that reported hip arthroscopy for FAI were collected. Meta‐analysis was performed by the use of Review Manager 5.3 software. The odds ratios (OR) and mean differences (MD) were used to compare dichotomous and continuous variables. Additionally, the I² was used to assess heterogeneity among studies, and the fixed‐effects model or the random‐effects model was selected for the quantitative analysis. Outcomes were evaluated by forest plots. For statistical analysis, P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

There was no significant difference among the preoperative mHHS (MD = –2.66，95% CI [−7.25, 1.92], I² = 80%, P = 0.25), preoperative (MD = ‐4.94, 95% CI [−11.56, 1.67], I² = 50%, P = 0.14) and postoperative HOS‐SSS (MD = ‐1.00, 95% CI [−6.98, 4.98], I² = 66%, P = 0.74), patient satisfaction (MD = 0.03, 95% CI [−0.25, 0.31], I² = 19%, P = 0.84; OR = 0.94, 95% CI [0.59, 1.50], I² = 0%, P = 0.78), complications (OR = 1.23, 95%CI [0.56, 2.67], I² = 0%, P = 0.61), revisions (OR = 1.77, 95% CI [0.87, 3.60], I² = 36%, P = 0.11), and surgery time (SMD = –0.38, 95% CI [−1.16, 0.40], I² = 92%, P = 0.34) between the capsule closure group and the non‐closure group. For the comparison of postoperative mHHS (MD = –2.66, 95% CI [−7.25, 1.92], I² = 80%, P = 0.25) and HOS‐ADL (MD = ‐4.20, 95% CI [−5.75, −2.65], I² = 24%, P < 0.00001), the score of the non‐closure group was significantly better than that of the closure group.

Conclusions

Remain capsule unclosed after hip arthroscopy for FAI may, to some extent, has a better postoperative functional score than the non‐closure treatment.

International Hip Outcome Tool (12-items) as health-related quality-of-life measure in osteoarthritis: validation of Greek version

BACKGROUND

The 12-item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT12) is a patient-reported outcome (PRO) designed to evaluate quality of life. We assessed the psychometric properties of the Greek version (iHOT12-Gr) in hip osteoarthritic patients.

METHODS

Data from 124 patients aged > 50 years were used for factor analysis. Reliability evaluation included internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and interpretability. Content validity was examined by calculating the item-level content validity indices (I-CVI) and the scale-level content validity indices (S-CVI), using two methods: S-CVI Average (S-CVI/Ave), and the S-CVI Universal Agreement among experts (S-CVI/UA). Construct validity was tested against Greek versions of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS-Greek), Modified Harris Hip Score (MHHS-Gr), and the 30 s chair-to-stand, Timed Up & Go (TUG), and 9-stairs-ascend/descend (9S-A/D) tests. Known-groups validity was examined using LEFS-Greek (cut-off = 53 points) as estimate variable. Responsiveness was examined pre and post total hip arthroplasty (4 and 8 weeks).

RESULTS

Factor analysis revealed a two-factor model. Factor-1 (items 1-9) reflects "Symptoms and functionality", while Factor-2 (items 10-12) reflects "Hip disorder-related concerns". Reliability: Internal consistency and test-retest reliability of iHOT12-Gr-total were excellent: Cronbach's alpha > 0.92 and ICC(95% CI) > 0.976(0.96-0.99)(p < 0.001). Interpretability: There was no floor or ceiling effect; measurement error: 3.72 (Factor-1), 3.64 (Factor-2), and 3.22 (iHOT12-Gr-total); minimal detectable change: 10.3 (Factor-1), 10.1 (Factor-2), and 8.92 (iHOT12-Gr-total).

VALIDITY

Content validity: The I-CVI value of the 12 items ranged from 1.00 to 0.83, the S-CVI/Ave was 0.97 and the S-CVI/UA was 0.83. Construct validity: iHOT12-Gr correlated strongly with both LEFS-Greek and MHHS-Gr, and weakly but significantly with 30s chair-to-stand, TUG and 9S-A/D (p < 0.001). Known-groups validity showed that iHOT12-Gr well discriminated subgroups of patients (p < 0.001). ROC analysis cut-off points were 51.9 (Factor-1), 25 (Factor-2) and 45.2 (iHOT12-Gr-total) (p < 0.001). Responsiveness: Four and 8 weeks postoperatively, standardized response means of Factor-1, Factor-2, and iHOT12-Gr-total were > 0.8.

CONCLUSION

iHOT12-Gr showed excellent reliability properties. The content validity was excellent and significant weak-to-strong correlations were found regarding construct validity. The known-group validity was also significant, while the responsiveness was excellent. iHOT12-Gr could be a reliable and valid PRO for assessing quality of life in patients with hip osteoarthritis.