Accidental guide wire migration and late percutaneous externalization after central venous catheterization

A 70-year-old man was admitted to the emergency department with recent spontaneous externalization of a metallic device from his right inner thigh. He had been experiencing mild local pain for 2 weeks and had a recent hospitalization due to cardiogenic hemodynamic instability, requiring a central venous catheter placement in his right internal jugular vein 3 months earlier. Doppler ultrasound confirmed the intravascular foreign body hypothesis as a guidewire was identified inside the right femoral vein, associated with femoropopliteal venous thrombosis. The guidewire was successfully removed percutaneously through simple manual traction guided by radioscopy. The patient was discharged the following day on oral anticoagulation with rivaroxaban. On outpatient follow-up 4 weeks post discharge, he had no complaints in the right lower limb except for slight swelling. Central venous catheterization is a common invasive procedure that, although unquestionably safe and well stablished in medical practice, can lead to serious complications when performed without proper technique.

A Patient Centered Decision Making Dialysis Access Algorithm

Much controversy surrounds the establishment of proper planning, placement and management (the best practice pattern) of dialysis access. These include the dialysis type and modality selection, timing of access placement and who places the access. The lack of and the difficulty of performing randomized studies with multiple confounding factors, in an extremely heterogeneous and rapidly changing ESRD population demographics, only partly explains the dialysis access conundrum. Add to this the rapidly developing and competing technologies, the wide spectrum of the professional experience, bias and socio-economic forces to make the ESRD problems as multivariate and complex as life itself.

This overview describes a dialysis access algorithm approach to the patient needing renal replacement therapy, considering long-term improved patient outcome as the ultimate objective.

Duplex Ultrasound Evaluation for Dialysis access Selection and Maintenance: A Practical Guide

Detailed case directed history and examination is the mainstay of dialysis access modality selection, ie site and type of access, as well as for maintenance of dialysis access for longevity. As a logical step following history and physical examination, duplex ultrasound evaluation (DUE) is the most cost effective and non-invasive screening tool for evaluation for access placement and for assessment of an established access. Pre-operative vascular mapping allows selection of the optimal dialysis access modality and site. In established accesses, duplex ultrasound testing will diagnose the majority of vascular access complications and direct proper surgical or interventional radiology management. This review outlines a practical decision-making algorithm using DUE for choosing and managing the dialysis access.

Real-Time Ultrasound and Endocavitary Electrocardiography for Venous Catheter Placement

The authors report on their experience with internal jugular vein catheterization with temporary and tunnelled cuffed hemodialysis catheters in 527 patients from 1991 to 2001, using ultrasound guidance and monitoring of catheter placement by endocavitary electrocardiography. The incidence of successful puncture and cannulation using ultrasound was 99.62%. The majority of patients had catheters inserted on the first pass (93%) and fewer attempts were required (range, 2 to 5). In the first year of the procedure in 1991, we observed two cases of accidental puncture of the carotid artery because of an error in ultrasound localization of the neck vessel.

Arrhythmias were not observed during this procedure. Right atrial electrocardiography was successful on 504 occasions (96.83%), and correct catheter placement was confirmed by plain chest-X-ray in the first 100 patients. The results confirm that real-time ultrasound guidance for catheter insertion is superior to traditional techniques relying on anatomic landmarks and should be adopted as the standard of care. Ultrasound guidance and EC-ECG improves both the success and the safety of internal jugular catheter insertion. The authors propose that EC-ECG be validated as a technique in compliance with recent Food and Drug Administration guidelines regarding the location of central venous catheter tips.

How to avoid and manage a pneumothorax

Pneumothorax is one of the most frequent complications during percutaneous central vascular cannulation. When choosing a site for central vascular access, the internal jugular vein is preferable to other vessels, for the lower frequency of related complications, including pneumothorax. This review intends to summarize the current state of the art on how to avoid and, if it occurs, to manage this rare but relevant complication. In order to prevent pneumothorax, as well as other relevant complications of central vein cannulation, it is advisable to use ultrasound guidance whenever possible. If pneumothorax occurs, it is important to recognize its signs and symptoms. To exclude the presence of asymptomatic pneumothorax, in the normal clinical routine a chest X-ray should be obtained within 4 hours from the procedure of central vein cannulation of subclavian and internal jugular veins. If promptly recognized, pneumothorax can be managed quickly and in a relatively easy way. Depending on its size and symptoms, and in particular when a tension pneumothorax is supected, treatment can vary from simple observation to a chest tube insertion or, in the latter case, to an emergency thoracentesis needle insertion in the pleural space.

Central Venous Catheter and the Hemodialysis Patient: A Difficult Symbiosis

In the last ten years, tunneled central venous catheters (pCVCs) have been increasingly utilized in chronic hemodialysis patients, sometimes in the place of fistulas. They have gained popularity for their unquestioned advantages, such as the possibility for immediate use. However, several problems have emerged following their diffusion. In this paper we review the main complications of pCVCs. Complications connected with insertion are generally due to an inaccurate approach to the vein. Ultrasonographic guidance has partially solved this problem and EC-ECG (endocavitary ECG) allows an accurate positioning of the tip. Infections, venous and/or pCVCs) thrombosis and dysfunctions are the most important catheter-related complications. Infections may occur with and without symptoms of systemic illness. Early diagnosis and appropriate antibiotic treatment are essential for saving the catheter. The pathogenesis of infections and strategies for prevention are discussed. Thrombosis and stenosis are well known complications of subclavian and jugular catheterization. In uremic patients, for temporary use, we suggest using the femoral position. Protocols for application of thrombolytic agents in pCVCs are considered. Dysfunction, defined as the failure to maintain a blood flow of at least 250 ml/min, remains the Achilles’ heel of the system. Adequate look therapy and tip position are only two basic aspects. In conclusion, a pessimistic outlook on the matter could lead us to consider that the advantages of catheter use are far outweighed by the disadvantages. However, we cannot avoid using central venous catheters in our dialysis units and a great challenge awaits both physicians and manufactures in the coming years.

Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy Update: An Emphasis on Safe and High-Quality Care

Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) was introduced more than 40 years ago as a renal support option for critically ill patients who had contraindications to intermittent hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Despite being the most common renal support therapy used in intensive care units today, the tremendous variability in CRRT management challenges the interpretation of findings from CRRT outcome studies. The lack of standardization in practice and training of clinicians along with the high risk of CRRT-related adverse events has been the impetus for the recent expert consensus work on identifying quality indicators for CRRT programs. This article summarizes the potential complications that establish CRRT as a high-risk therapy and also the recently published best-practice recommendations for providing high-quality CRRT.

Femoral Arteriovenous Fistula Associated With Leg Swelling 6 Months After Removal of a Hemodialysis Catheter: A Case Report

Double-lumen catheters have been used widely to obtain temporary access in patients who are in need of acute hemodialysis (HD) because of acute renal failure. Several complications are associated with the insertion of these catheters, including bleeding, infection, injuries to arteries, and deep venous thrombosis. An arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is a rare but significant complication following catheterization for temporary HD. Herein, we present a case of AVF associated with leg swelling 6 months after the removal ofa double-lumen HD catheter. We describe a special case of a 42-year-old man who experienced acute renal failure secondary to diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). A 12-Fr dialysis catheter was inserted in the right femoral vein. Six months after catheter removal, the patient was admitted for pain and swelling in the right leg. Color Doppler ultrasound and three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) revealed an AVF between the right femoral vein and the right femoral superficial artery. The fistula was repaired successfully by vascular surgeons. This case highlights that an AVF is a rare but significant complication after catheterization for temporary HD. The nephrologist should be wary of the potential of this complication and perform clinical and medical examinations at the insertion and removal of temporary HD catheters.

Central venous catheters: legal issues

In dialysis patients, both central venous catheter (CVC) insertion and CVC use during the dialysis procedure pose important legal issues, because of potentially severe, even fatal, complications. The first issue is the decision of the kind of vascular access that should be proposed to patients: an arteriovenous (AV) fistula, a graft, or a CVC. The second issue, when choosing the CVC option, is the choice of CVC: nontunneled versus tunneled. Leaving a temporary nontunneled CVC for a prolonged time increases the risk of complications and could raise a liability issue. Even when choosing a long-term tunneled CVC, nephrologists should systematically explain its potential harms, presenting them as "unsafe for long-term use" unless there is a clear contraindication to an AV native or prosthetic access. Another critical issue is the preparation of a complete, informative, and easy-to-understand consent form. The CVC insertion procedure has many aspects of legal interest, including the choice of CVC, the use of ECG monitoring, the use of ultrasound guidance for cannulation, and the use of fluoroscopy for checking the position of the metal guidewire during the procedure as well as the CVC tip before the end of the procedure. Use of insertion devices and techniques that can prevent complications should obviously be encouraged. Complications of CVC use are mainly thrombosis and infection. These are theoretically expected as pure complications (and not as malpractice effects), but legal issues might relate to inappropriate catheter care (in both the inpatient and outpatient settings) rather than to the event per se. Thus, in the individual case it is indeed very difficult to establish malpractice and liability with a catheter-related infection or thrombosis. In conclusion, we cannot avoid complications completely when using CVCs, but reducing them to a minimum and adopting safe approaches to their insertion and use will reduce legal liability.

Ultrasound-Guided Central Venous Catheter Placement by Surgical Trainees: A Safe Procedure?

Background

Central venous catheters (CVCs) are widely used to create a temporary or long-term access to the central venous system. A variety of treatments require a functional central venous access, including hemodialysis, administration of drugs, plasmapheresis and parenteral nutrition. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of CVC placement performed by surgical trainees, according to a strict protocol of ultrasound-guided puncture and fluoroscopy-guided catheter insertion in a large teaching hospital in an outpatient setting.

Methods

Between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2008, 539 CVCs were placed, of which 486 were primary inserted by surgical trainees. All placements were ultrasound- and fluoroscopy-guided. After every placement operators recorded type of catheter, type of anesthesia, subcutaneous tunneling, technique of insertion and complications.

Results

The study population consisted of 52% males. Access sites of CVCs were the internal jugular vein (91%), subclavian vein (5%) and other veins (3%). Technical success rate was 96.5%. Complication rate was 8.4%, of which 93% were arterial punctures. Pneumothorax occurred in three patients.

Conclusions

CVC placement by surgical trainees is a safe procedure when using a strict protocol of ultrasound-guided vessel puncture and fluoroscopic-guided catheter placement.

Catheter-Related Central Venous Thrombosis: The Development of a Nationwide Consensus Paper in Italy

Catheter-related central venous thrombosis is a serious complication in patients who need long-term venous access. Though scientific data and clinical experience are steadily increasing, many uncertainties still exist about several aspects of this complication, including etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, management, and prevention of this complication. The GAVeCeLT (the Italian Study Group for Long Term Central Venous Access) promoted a nationwide consensus, and 12 experts reviewed systematically all the available literature. A preliminary document was presented and discussed during a specific Consensus Meeting, in front of a panel of more than 80 experts (representing different health professions and disciplines). This led to a prefinal document, which was presented to more than 800 health professionals. After peer review by an external board of experts, the final document was prepared. In this article, methodology and results of the consensus are presented.

Placement, performance and complications of the Ash Split Cath hemodialysis catheter

A tunneled catheter is the alternative vascular access for those patients in need of hemodialysis who cannot undergo dialysis through an arterio-venous fistula or a vascular graft. This study was undertaken to evaluate the performance of the Ash Split Cath, a 14 French chronic hemodialysis catheter with D-shaped lumens and a Dacron cuff. After tunneling through a transcutaneous portion the catheter enters the venous system, where it splits into two separate limbs. Data regarding catheter positioning, function and adequacy of dialysis were collected from two hemodialysis facilities. Twenty-eight Ash-split catheters were placed in 28 patients, with no complications, and immediate technical success was 100%. Patients were followed up for a total of 7,286 catheter days. No catheter-related infections were observed. Only one catheter failed after 15 days, with a primary catheter patency of 96% for the whole study length. Mean blood flow was 303 +/- 20 ml/min at 1 week after insertion, 306 +/- 17 ml/min at 3 months, 299 +/- 44 ml/min at 6 months, and 308 +/- 16 ml/min at 12 months. With a mean dialysis session duration of 234 +/- 25 minutes, adequate dialysis dose was observed for 96% of catheters, as reflected by a mean urea reduction ratio (URR) of 71% +/- 8 or a mean urea kinetic modeling, or Kt/V, value of 1.51 +/- 0.3 during follow up. In conclusion, compared with previous studies we report the best permanent catheter performance, confirming that the Ash-split catheter is a good alternative for vascular access in hemodialysis patients who are not candidates for surgical A-V fistula or graft placement.