Arteriovenous fistula creation by nephrologist and its outcomes: a prospective cohort study from Vietnam

BACKGROUND

Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the gold standard vascular access for effective hemodialysis. There is a growing interest in AVF creations performed by nephrologists to help reduce vascular surgeons' workload and enhance the timely treatment of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). However, little is known about the feasibility and effectiveness of this approach in the low-resource settings. We examined the AVF surgical success and failure rates and associated predictors as well as early complications of AVF creations by a trained nephrologist with supports from vascular surgeons in Vietnam.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was conducted on all adult ESRD patients at the Hemodialysis Department of Thong Nhat Hospital between April 2018 and October 2020. Information on demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and AVF creations was collected using a standardized questionnaire. All patients were followed up until 18 weeks post-surgery.

RESULTS

Among 100 patients with a mean age of 61.22 ± 17.11 years old, male accounted for 54%. Common causes of ESRD included hypertension (57%) and diabetes (32%). Just more than half (52%) of them reported having an AVF creation prior to ESRD. The successful first-time AVF creation rate was 98% (13/99, 95%CI: 8.74-21.18%). The primary and secondary AVF failure rates were 13.13% (13/99, 95%CI: 8.74-21.18%) and 16.87% (14/83, 95%CI: 10.32-26.25%), respectively. Early complications included bleeding (1%) and early thrombosis of the anastomosis (2%). There was a statistically significant association between age and primary AVF failure (P = 0.005) and between operation time and secondary AVF failure (P = 0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

AVF creations performed by well-trained and skilled interventional nephrologists with supports from vascular surgeons can result in favorable short- and long-term outcomes. It is important to follow up older patients and those with a long operation time to detect AVF failures. A standardized AVF creation training program and practice for nephrologists is needed to increase successful rates.

Cost-Effectiveness of Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Compared With Conventional Balloon Angioplasty for Arteriovenous Access Flow Dysfunction

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty compared with conventional balloon angioplasty (cPTA) in patients with arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) and arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) dysfunction from a Singapore healthcare perspective.

METHODS

Existing cost-effectiveness studies comparing DCB and cPTA have not incorporated AVF/AVG abandonment costs. This Markov model-based economic evaluation incorporated AVF/AVG creation and maturation costs on top of routine intervention costs to model a hypothetical cohort of 60-year-old AVF/AVG flow dysfunction patients. Effectiveness was measured in quality-adjusted life-years. Cost-effectiveness was assessed using incremental net monetary benefit (NMB) at a Singapore willingness-to-pay threshold of Singapore dollar (S$)87 000. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to examine parameter uncertainty. To test hypotheses regarding cost-effectiveness, intervention counts per patient, cumulative incidence functions of AVF/AVG abandonment, and survival curves of death were compared between DCB and cPTA.

RESULTS

DCB was not cost-effective at 3-year horizon (NMB = -S$1424), but was cost-effective at 1- and 6-year horizons (NMB = S$356 and S$3738, respectively). At 3 years, there was a 34.5% probability of DCB being cost-effective, but at 1- and 6-year horizons there was, respectively, 58.6% and 59.9% probability of DCB being cost-effective. DCB had graphically less AVF/AVG-abandonments, but this was not statistically significant (P = .21). Differences in other parameters were neither graphically nor statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

With AVF/AVG abandonment considered, DCB may be weakly cost-effective compared with cPTA in treating AVF/AVG flow dysfunction. AV access creation and maturation costs could have important explanatory value in assessing DCB cost-effectiveness.

Single Asian Center Experience Using the Flixene™ Early Cannulation Graft for Hemodialysis Access Creation

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to review the efficacy of the Flixene™ (Atrium™, Hudson, NH, USA) hemodialysis arterio-venous graft (AVG) in a multiethnic Asian cohort of patients with end-stage renal failure (ESRF). Primary outcome was graft primary patency rate and secondary end points included graft usability, time to cannulation, reinterventions required for access salvage, complications, and patient mortality.

METHODS

Single-center, single-arm, multi-investigator nonrandomized retrospective study. Patients with ESRF who underwent Flixene™ graft implantation over a two-year period (January 2017 - December 2018) were included to allow at least one-year follow-up. Demographics, procedural and follow-up data were collected from the hospital electronic medical records.

RESULTS

About 48 patients (49 AVG) were included. There were 24 (50%) men; mean age 63.7 (IQR 58.2-71.3) years. Technical success rate was 45/49 (91.8%); 4/49 (8.2%) AVG created did not reach cannulation. 11/49 (22.4%) and 28/49 (57.1%) achieved cannulation within 1 and 2 weeks, respectively. 6- and 12- month primary patencies were 33.5% and 19.6%, respectively. Primary-assisted patency rates were 46.6% and 29.6% at the same time intervals. Secondary patency rate was 77.6% and 63.9% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. There were 6 (12.2%) graft infections requiring explant and one-year mortality was 14%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience with the Flixene™ early cannulation graft is comparable with other AVGs in terms of patency and infection rates. However, early cannulation rates are lower than in other case series.

Efficacy of the transjugular approach in endovascular intervention for hemodialysis access comparing with conventional approach

PURPOSE

Compared with the conventional approach, the benefits of the transjugular approach in endovascular intervention for hemodialysis access avoids complications due to direct puncture and reduces direct radiation exposure to the hands of operator. The aim of this non-inferiority study was to evaluate the efficacy of the transjugular approach in endovascular intervention for hemodialysis access comparing with conventional approach.

METHODS

We retrospectively assessed endovascular intervention for hemodialysis access performed in our hospital from 2012 to 2016, divided into the conventional approach group and the transjugular approach group. The hemodialysis access survival rate, re-intervention survival rate, and lesion characteristics were comparatively evaluated.

RESULTS

We included 223 cases in 118 patients (146 cases with conventional approaches and 77 cases with transjugular approaches). There was a higher incidence of thrombosis with the conventional approach (p < 0.001), however, no significant difference in the hemodialysis access type or main lesion location. The transjugular approach showed either a better hemodialysis access survival rate (p = 0.017) and a trend toward improved re-intervention survival rate (p = 0.098) than the conventional approach. Following classification according to the presence of thrombus, there was no significant difference in either the hemodialysis access survival rate or the re-intervention survival rate between the approaches with or without thrombus.

CONCLUSION

The transjugular approach could be performed in most cases and was similar to the conventional approach in terms of outcomes. The transjugular approach should be considered as an alternative to either replace or use in combination with the conventional approach in endovascular intervention for hemodialysis access.