Contemporary outcomes of distal radial artery ligation for access related hand ischemia

OBJECTIVES

Access related hand ischemia (ARHI) is a rare albeit morbid complication of hemodialysis access creation. Distal radial artery ligation (DRAL) has been described as a strategy to improve perfusion to the hand while maintaining the access. The objective of this study was to report longitudinal outcomes of DRAL for ARHI.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study (2015-2021) of all patients who underwent DRAL for ARHI at a tertiary care vascular center. Subjects were identified using the Mass General Brigham clinical data warehouse and data collection was supplemented with chart adjudication. Outcomes captured included 30-day complications and improvement in ARHI-related symptoms at 1 year.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients were included. Mean (SD) age was 59.9 (14.5) and 67.7% were male. Wrist radial-cephalic (74.2%) and proximal radial-cephalic (9.7%) configurations were most common. ARHI severity was: 9.7% stage 1 (retrograde flow without symptoms); 38.7% stage 2 (pain during exercise or dialysis); 41.9% stage 3 (pain at rest); and 9.7% stage 4 (tissue loss). High flow was present in 35.5% of patients at baseline with median (IQR) flow of 1670 ml/min (1478-1954). After DRAL, median (IQR) flow reduction in the high flow group was 953 ml/min (645-993); concurrent precision banding was performed in 29% to reduce flow. The 30-day risk of complication was 3.2% (n = 1 access thrombosis). During follow-up, 82.1% showed improvement in symptoms and 3.6% of patients needed an additional procedure for ARHI. Carpal tunnel surgery was required for improvement in 7.1% of patients and was suspected as the culprit of symptoms in 7.1%.

CONCLUSION

Distal radial artery ligation for ARHI is safe and can improve ischemic symptoms in most patients while salvaging access function. Precision banding can serve as a useful adjunct in high flow accesses. Carpal tunnel syndrome should be considered as part of the differential diagnosis of hand pain in this population.

Staged autogenous to prosthetic hemodialysis access creation strategy to maximize forearm options

OBJECTIVE

When an adequate cephalic vein is not available for fistula construction, surgeons often turn to basilic vein or prosthetic constructions. Single-stage forearm prosthetic hemodialysis accesses are associated with poor durability, and upper arm non-autogenous access options are often limited by axillary outflow failure, which inevitably drives transition to the contralateral arm or lower extremity. We hypothesized that initial creation of a modest flow proximal forearm arterial-venous anastomosis to dilate ("develop") inflow and outflow vessels, followed by a planned second-stage procedure to create a cannulation zone with a prosthetic graft in the forearm, would result in reliable and durable hemodialysis access in patients with limited options.

METHODS

We performed an institutional cohort study from 2017 to 2021 using a prospectively maintained database supplemented with adjudicated chart review. Patients without traditional autogenous hemodialysis access options in the forearm underwent an initial non-wrist arterial-venous anastomosis creation in the forearm as a first stage, followed by a second-stage interposition graft sewn to the existing inflow and venous outflow segments to create a useable cannulation zone in the forearm while leveraging vascular development. Outcomes included time from second-stage access creation to loss of primary and secondary patency, frequency of subsequent interventions, and perioperative complications.

RESULTS

The cohort included 23 patients; first-stage radial artery-based (74%) configurations were more common than brachial artery-based (26%). Mean age was 63 years (standard deviation, 14 years), and 65% were female. Median follow-up was 340 days (interquartile range [IQR], 169-701 days). Median time to cannulation from second-stage procedure was 28 days (IQR, 18-53 days). Primary, primary assisted, and secondary patency at 1 year was 16.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.3%-45.8%), 34.6% (95% CI, 15.2%-66.2%), and 95.7% (95% CI, 81.3%-99.7%), respectively. Subsequent interventions occurred at a rate of 3.02 (IQR, 1.0-4.97) per person-year, with endovascular thrombectomy with or without angioplasty/stenting (70.9%) being the most common. There were no cases of steal syndrome. Infection occurred in two cases and were managed with antibiotics alone.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients without adequate distal autogenous access options, staged prosthetic graft placement in the forearm offers few short-term complications and excellent durability with active surveillance while strategically preserving the upper arm for future constructions.

Contemporary outcomes of a "snuffbox first" hemodialysis access approach in the United States

OBJECTIVE

The Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines for permanent hemodialysis (HD) access creation recommend prioritizing the most distal possible autogenous access to minimize complications and preserve more proximal options. The "snuffbox" arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the most distal radial artery-cephalic vein AVF. Despite the theoretical benefits of the snuffbox approach, recent trends have been toward upper arm access. Our study sought to investigate the feasibility of a snuffbox-first strategy for HD access in all anatomically appropriate candidates.

METHODS

From January 2016 to August 2019, all patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) or pre-ESRD under consideration for HD access were evaluated for a snuffbox-first approach by a team of vascular surgeons and nephrologists at a single, urban academic medical center in the United States. Data were collected prospectively and supplemented by medical record review. A survival analysis was performed to evaluate primary unassisted and secondary patency and clinical and functional maturation. Patients were censored if they had received a kidney transplant or had died. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine the risk factors for prolonged clinical maturation and functional maturation.

RESULTS

A total of 55 snuffbox AVFs were created. The median patient age was 60 years (interquartile range [IQR], 52-70 years), and 52.7% of the patients were men. The median follow-up was 369 days (IQR, 166-509 days). The median survival for primary unassisted patency was 90 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 79-111). Secondary patency at 1 year was 92.3% (95% CI, 85.3%-99.9%). The clinical maturation rate at 1 year was 83.7% (n = 55; 95% CI, 66.8%-91.9%), and the functional maturation rate at 1 year was 85.6% (n = 40; 95% CI, 63.3%-94.4%). Of the patients who were pre-ESRD at AVF creation and had initiated HD during the study period, 87.5% had successfully received incident HD with their snuffbox AVF. Twenty-four patients were receiving HD via a catheter at snuffbox creation. Of those patients, the functional maturation rate at 1 year was 82.5% (95% CI, 44.8%-94.4%). The patients had undergone a median of two interventions (IQR, zero to seven interventions) in the first year. Of these, 46.9% were percutaneous angioplasty and 31.2% were side-branch ligation. Diabetes was associated with slower AVF clinical maturation (multivariate hazard ratio, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.15-0.82; P = .016). A larger artery diameter was associated with earlier AVF clinical maturation (multivariate hazard ratio, 6.64; 95% CI, 2.11-20.9).

CONCLUSIONS

A snuffbox-first approach to HD access is a viable option for distal access creation in a cohort of patients requiring HD in the United States. Subsequent ancillary interventions to facilitate access maturation were required for most patients.

Patient comprehension necessary for informed consent for vascular procedures is poor and related to frailty

OBJECTIVE

Informed consent is an essential principle of high-quality health care. A core component of surgical informed consent is patient comprehension of basic information such as the diagnosis, risks, benefits, and alternatives of the proposed surgery. We sought to assess informed consent among vascular surgery patients and the association between frailty, education, decisional conflict, and patient comprehension.

METHODS

We tested patient comprehension of basic information required for informed consent with a procedure-specific questionnaire in 102 consecutive patients undergoing selected vascular surgery procedures. Two patients who underwent open aortic aneurysm repair were excluded because of small sample size. All patients underwent assessment using the decisional conflict scale and the Frail/Nondisabled questionnaire. Analyses were performed to determine relationships between being informed and frailty, education level, and decisional conflict score. Patients included in this cohort had a median age of 71 years, and 25%, 14%, 28%, and 33% underwent carotid endarterectomy, endovascular aortic aneurysm repair, dialysis access creation, and percutaneous lower extremity procedures.

RESULTS

Overall, 14% of patients were classified as "informed" and correctly answered all questions. Procedure type (P = .001), consent obtained by the attending surgeon vs a trainee (P = .04), and frailty score (P = .005) were all associated with whether a patient was informed or not. However, after multivariable adjustment, only frailty score was independently associated with being informed (odds ratio, 0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.95; P = .03). The median decisional conflict scale score was 7.8, suggesting that patients feel well informed and supported in spite of poor understanding of procedural indications, risks, benefits, and alternatives.

CONCLUSIONS

As a group, patients have a poor comprehension of basic information related to surgical informed consent. These findings have potential ethical and clinical implications, and additional work is required to best determine causes of poor comprehension and strategies to mitigate the same.