Comorbidity and Therapeutic Approaches in Patients with Necrobiosis Lipoidica

BACKGROUND

Necrobiosis lipoidica (NL) is a rare granulomatous disorder of unknown aetiology. Randomized controlled studies are not available due to it being an orphan disease.

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated patients in 2 dermatological centres to cluster data about epidemiology, the therapeutic approaches for NL, and their efficacy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Comorbidity and the efficacy of the applied treatment was assessed for 98 patients.

RESULTS

We identified 54% of patients with concomitant diabetes and 19% with thyroidal disorders. Topical steroids (85.7%) were predominantly used followed by calcineurin inhibitors (31%) and phototherapy (41.8%). Systemically, fumaric acid esters were more frequently applied (26.8%) than steroids (24.4%) and dapsone (24.4%). Steroids, compression therapy, calcineurin inhibitors, phototherapy, fumaric acid esters, and dapsone showed remarkable efficacy.

CONCLUSION

Therapeutic options were chosen individually in accordance with the severity of NL and presence of ulceration. Topical calcineurin inhibitors, systemic application of fumaric acid esters, and dapsone represent effective alternatives to the use of steroids.

[Wound treatment in diabetes patients and diabetic foot ulcers]

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a paramount and rising medical challenge in both industrial and emerging nations. For Germany, 6.9 million out of 64.9 million insured persons in 2010 were reported to suffer from DM and approximately 5.8 million suffered from type 2 DM. The prevalence of diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) or diabetic foot syndrome (DFS) is 2-10% and the incidence is 2-6%. In addition, patients with DM present associated skin disorders with chronic wound healing, e.g., pyoderma gangrenosum or lecrobiosis lipoidica. Knowledge of the pathogenesis and skills for treatment of chronic wounds in diabetic patients are important for dermatologists. Patients with diabetes and wound healing disorders and accompanied unspecific skin disorders like eczema, cellulitis or contact dermatitis are often primarily or secondarily treated by dermatologists. In this article, practical hints for the treatment of DFS and other chronic wound in patients with DM are presented.

Update: Treatment of necrobiosis lipoidica

Necrobiosis lipoidica (NL) is a rare granulomatous disease of hitherto unclear etiology frequently seen in patients with diabetes. Characterized by its potential for ulcerations, it often presents a serious burden for those affected. There are currently neither German nor European guidelines for the treatment of NL. At the same time, standard treatment with topical or intralesional corticosteroids does not always show satisfactory results. We therefore set out to evaluate whether the various treatment regimens published since 2000 have actually expanded the therapeutic armamentarium in a relevant manner. Included were all publications that described more than one patient being treated with any given therapeutic modality. Overall, we analyzed data for 16 different treatment regimens reported in 49 publications. The largest amount of data exists for topical PUVA therapy, photodynamic therapy (PDT), and systemic treatment with fumaric acid esters. Remarkably, our analysis showed that with an increase in the number of documented patients treated with a given therapeutic modality, the proportion of those achieving a complete or partial response actually decreased. This was interpreted as publication bias. Thus, no clear recommendation can be given for second-line therapy in case topical or intralesional corticosteroids fail.

Update: Therapie der Necrobiosis lipoidica

Die Necrobiosis lipoidica ist eine seltene granulomatöse Erkrankung von bisher unzureichend geklärter Ätiologie. Häufig stellt die bei Diabetikern gehäuft zu beobachtende und zur Ulzeration neigende Dermatose eine starke Belastung für die Patienten dar. Bezüglich der Therapie existieren aktuell keine deutschen oder europäischen Leitlinien. Gleichzeitig lässt sich unter der aktuellen Standardtherapie, der lokalen oder intraläsionalen Anwendung von Glukokortikoiden, nicht immer ein zufriedenstellendes Ansprechen beobachten. Daher wurde untersucht, ob seit dem Jahr 2000 publizierte Therapiemodalitäten das Therapiespektrum relevant und erfolgversprechend erweitern. Es erfolgte eine Betrachtung aller Arbeiten im oben genannten Zeitraum, bei denen mehr als ein Einzelfallbericht je Therapiemodalität publiziert wurde. Insgesamt wurden in einem systematischen Review die Daten von 16 verschiedenen, seit 2000 publizierten Therapieverfahren in 49 Publikationen analysiert. Im Ergebnis zeigte sich, dass die meisten Erfahrungen bezüglich der topischen PUVA-Therapie, der photodynamischen Therapie (PDT) und der systemischen Therapie mit Fumarsäureestern vorliegen. Allerdings ist auffällig, dass mit steigender Zahl der pro Behandlungsmodalität behandelten Patienten der Anteil der Patienten, bei denen eine Abheilung bzw. eine teilweise Abheilung berichtet wurde, sinkt. Wir interpretieren diese Beobachtung als Publikationsbias. Daher kann für keines der besprochenen Verfahren eine klare Empfehlung als Therapie der zweiten Wahl nach Versagen der lokalen bzw. intraläsionalen Steroidtherapie gegeben werden.

Risk factors for necrobiosis lipoidica in Type 1 diabetes mellitus

AIMS

To compare the clinical and metabolic characteristics of patients with Type 1 diabetes and necrobiosis lipoidica with those of patients with Type 1 diabetes who do not have necrobiosis lipoidica. A multicentre analysis was performed.

METHODS

Clinical and laboratory data were obtained from 64 133 patients (aged 0-25 years) with Type 1 diabetes with and without necrobiosis lipoidica who were registered in the German/Austrian Diabetes Prospective Documentation Initiative registry. Data were analysed using multivariable regression modelling. Age, diabetes duration, treatment year and sex were considered as confounding factors.

RESULTS

Results adjusted for demographic variables are presented. In patients with necrobiosis lipoidica, metabolic control was worse (HbA_1c 72 vs. 67 mmol/mol, 8.7% vs. 8.3%; P = 0.0065) and the duration of diabetes was longer [6.24 (3.28-9.97) vs. 5.11 (2.08-8.83) years; P = 0.014; not adjusted]. Patients with necrobiosis lipoidica required higher insulin doses than those without (1.02 vs. 0.92 U/kg/day; P < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in the frequency of microvascular complications (microalbuminuria and retinopathy) between the groups. Furthermore, 24.8% and 17.5% of patients with Type 1 diabetes with and without necrobiosis lipoidica, respectively, had elevated thyroid antibodies (P = 0.051). Necrobiosis lipoidica was correlated with coeliac disease in patients with Type 1 diabetes (3.4% vs. 1.0%; P = 0.0035).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate a strong correlation between hyperglycaemia and the development of necrobiosis lipoidica. We postulate that the underlying pathogenic processes differ from those leading to microalbuminuria and retinopathy, and additional immunological mechanisms may play a role.

Lymphocytic panniculitis: an algorithmic approach to lymphocytes in subcutaneous tissue

The diagnosis of panniculitis is a relatively rare occurrence for many practising pathologists. The smaller subset of lymphocyte-predominant panniculitis is further complicated by the diagnostic consideration of T cell lymphoma involving the subcutaneous tissue, mimicking inflammatory causes of panniculitis. Accurate classification of the panniculitis is crucial to direct clinical management as treatment options may vary from non-medical therapy to immunosuppressive agents to aggressive chemotherapy. Many diseases show significant overlap in clinical and histological features, making the process of determining a specific diagnosis very challenging. However, with an adequate biopsy including skin and deep subcutaneous tissue, a collaborative effort between clinician and pathologist can often lead to a specific diagnosis. This review provides an algorithmic approach to the diagnosis of lymphocyte-predominant panniculitis, including entities of septal-predominant pattern panniculitis (erythema nodosum, deep necrobiosis lipoidica, morphea profunda and sclerosing panniculitis) and lobular-predominant pattern panniculitis (lupus erythematous panniculitis/lupus profundus, subcutaneous panniculitis-like T cell lymphoma, cutaneous γ-δ T cell lymphoma, Borrelia infection and cold panniculitis).

Necrobiosis Lipoidica

Necrobiosis lipoidica is a granulomatous condition presenting as indolent atrophic plaques, often on the lower extremities. There is a multitude of case reports suggesting possible associations and documenting different therapeutic alternatives with varied success. Important complications include ulceration and the development of squamous cell carcinoma. The disease course is often indolent and recurrent despite treatment. This article reviews the etiopathogenesis, clinical presentations, and evidence for treatment alternatives of this condition.

Dermatologic manifestations of diabetes mellitus: a review

Diabetes mellitus affects every organ of the body including the skin. Certain skin manifestations of diabetes are considered cutaneous markers of the disease, whereas others are nonspecific conditions that occur more frequently among individuals with diabetes compared with the general population. Diabetic patients have an increased susceptibility to some bacterial and fungal skin infections, which account, in part, for poor healing. Skin complications of diabetes provide clues to current and past metabolic status. Recognition of cutaneous markers may slow disease progression and ultimately improve the overall prognosis by enabling earlier diagnosis and treatment.