Differential treatment effect on measures of neurologic exam, functional impairment and patient self-report in multiple sclerosis

The use of multi-domain patient reported outcome measures for detecting clinical disease progression in multiple sclerosis

OBJECTIVE

Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are especially relevant in times of increased interest in telehealth but little is known about their relation to functional disability measures.

METHODS

We assessed 248 people with MS at baseline and at > = 5-years follow-up. We investigated cross-sectional and longitudinal correlations between changes in the Guy's Neurological disability scale (GNDS), and the physical part of the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) and the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), 9-hole peg test (9-HPT) and timed 25-foot walk (T25FW).

RESULTS

The strongest cross-sectional correlations were found between the GNDS and EDSS in the complete cohort (r = 0.66, p <.001, n = 248) as well as in progressive patients (r = 0.72, p <.001, n = 35), and the GNDS and T25FW in progressive MS (r = 0.64, p <.001, n = 34). Longitudinal correlations were poor except for changes on the leg domain of the GNDS in relation to T25FW changes in progressive MS (r = 0.68, p <.001, n = 26). In the majority of cases a clinically significant deterioration on the EDSS also resulted in a clinically significant worsening of the GDNS and MSIS.

CONCLUSION

Both PROMs correlate well with physical disability outcomes, and seem suitable for detecting changes in lower limb function in progressive MS. The GNDS has a higher agreement with EDSS progression than the MSIS-physical.

Evaluation of the Expanded Disability Status Scale and the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite as clinical endpoints in multiple sclerosis clinical trials: quantitative meta-analyses

OBJECTIVES

This study compared the sensitivity of the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) as clinical endpoints in multiple sclerosis (MS) clinical trials.

METHODS

Medline (1946 through 12 September 2014) and Embase (1974 through 12 September 2014) databases searches were conducted using keywords and Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms related to MS, EDSS, and MSFC. Only studies that used the EDSS and MSFC as endpoints were assessed. All statistical analyses were conducted using comprehensive meta-analysis (CMA). The percentages of the overall changes in EDSS and MSFC were compared. The relative risks were calculated in randomized clinical trials (RCTs).

RESULTS

A total of 123 studies were identified. There were nine studies (6 case series and 3 RCTs) included in the analysis. In the case series, the EDSS change rate in MS patients was 33.5% (95% CI: 12.9-63.2%) and the MSFC change rate was 30.3% (95% CI: 9.2-65.2%). In RCTs, patients who take the drug would be 22.9 times as likely as patients who did not take the drug to experience a change in the EDSS scale (RR = 22.9, 95% CI = 0.996-1.517, p = 0.055). Patients who take the drug would be 48.9 times as likely as patients who did not take the drug to experience a change in the MSFC scale (RR = 48.9, 95% CI = CI = 0.916-2.419, p = 0.108).

LIMITATIONS

This study focused only on MS patient improvement (positive changes) on the EDSS and MSFC. More studies are needed to include patient deterioration (negative changes) on EDSS and MSFC.

CONCLUSIONS

There is controversy about the sensitivity of the EDSS and MSFC in detecting the progression of MS disease. The EDSS and MSFC are effective tools to assess the clinical severity and progression of MS disease. MSFC is more sensitive than EDSS in detecting the progression of MS disease.

SaGA S, the Short and Graphic A bility Score: an alternative scoring method for the motor components of the Multiple Sclerosis Functional C omposite

The timed performances of the 10-m timed walk (TMTW) and the nine-ho le peg test (NHPT) of 881 consecutive patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) undergoing a rehabilitation stay, were expressed as a logarithmic function of time in two subscores to form a composite score called the Short and G raphic A bility Score (SaGA S). The subscores (sS) were constructed in such a way that any interval of 0.5 unit corresponds to a change of 25% in the tests. The SaGA S was computed as the mean of four subscores: SaGAS=(2×2-TMTWsS+NHPTsS right hand+NHPTsS left hand). With the aid of a nomogram, the timed values of the tests are easily transformed into the corresponding subscores, which are then displayed graphically to facilitate follow-up over time. The correlation coefficients between the SaGA S and the two motor components of the MS Functional C omposite (MSFC) (r =0.987), the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)(r = -0.83), the Nottingham EADL Index (r =0.80) and the Rivermead Mobility Index (RMI) (r =0.90) were all statistically significant (P B-0.001), supporting the validity of the measure. SaGA S had a similar sensitivity to the RMI, but was significantly more sensitive than the EDSS in detecting changes occurring during the rehabilitation stay (14.9% versus 5.0%; P B-0.001) and over a one-year follow-up (35.3% versus 19.7%; P B-0.001). C ompared with the motor components of the MSFC, with which it shares several features, SaGA S has several advantages: it does not depend on the stratification of the study population; it does not skew the results of the NHPT towards improvement at the lower end; and it offers an independent assessment of both hands. SaGA S is a simple, intuitive, nonphysician-based measure, which could provide consistent scoring in future clinical trials.

Telemedicine for Monitoring MS Activity and Progression

OPINION STATEMENT

Telemedicine (TM) is defined as the exchange of medical information between two different physical places. The aims of TM are to provide services that cannot easily be provided face-to-face and improve the efficiency of existing ones. Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic demyelinating disease characterized by a heterogeneous array of symptoms that can lead to severe impairment and may impact on accessibility to medical services, patient's ability to function, and overall health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The use of TM to clinically monitor MS patients has demonstrated benefits by improving HRQoL and reducing associated medical costs. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures have been used in TM interventions, registries, and cost-efficiency studies because they offer valuable information about patient's perspective of MS disease burden. Moreover, TM has shown acceptable reliability in the assessment of the neurological impairment by Kurtzke expanded disability status scale (EDSS) and has the potential to develop more sensitive measures, such as average daily walking activity, to closely monitor MS disease progression in real environment. It is likely that the use of TM will continue to increase in the following years but larger and controlled studies are necessary to confirm the beneficial effects of TM to deliver an optimal care for patients with MS.

Detecting clinically-relevant changes in progressive multiple sclerosis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate which changes in different clinical outcome measures contribute most to increased disease impact, as reported by the patient, in progressive multiple sclerosis (MS).

METHODS

From a cohort of prospectively-followed MS patients, we selected progressive patients with two visits, 4-6 years apart. We assessed long-term changes on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW), 9-Hole Peg Test (9HPT) and Guy's Neurological Disability Scale (GNDS). We defined the presence or absence of clinically meaningful change by using the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) as an anchor measure. We also studied change on recently identified sub-scales of GNDS.

RESULTS

Change on GNDS (especially the spinal-plus subscale) contributed most to increased disease impact. Also change on the T25FW contributed largely. Specific profiles of change in T25FW and MSIS seemed to exist (generally, a lower increase in disease impact in patients with longer disease duration and higher baseline impact/disability). In some patients a dissociation existed between increased impact, according to the MSIS-29, and objective physical worsening of the T25FW.

CONCLUSION

These results support using GNDS (particularly the spinal-plus domain) and T25FW in outcome measurement in progressive MS. We suggest there is a relation between baseline clinical characteristics and an increased impact at follow-up. This may have implications for patient selection in trials for progressive MS.

The multiple sclerosis relapse experience: patient-reported outcomes from the North American Research Committee on Multiple Sclerosis (NARCOMS) Registry

Background

Among patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, relapses are associated with increased disability and decreased quality of life. Relapses are commonly treated with corticosteroids or left untreated. We aimed to better understand patient perceptions of the adequacy of corticosteroids in resolving relapse symptoms.

Methods

We examined self-reported data from 4482 participants in the North American Research Committee on Multiple Sclerosis (NARCOMS) Registry regarding evaluation, treatment, and recovery from relapses. Pearson’s chi-square test was used to analyze categorical variables, while logistic regression was used to assess factors associated with patients’ perceptions.

Results

Forty percent (1775/4482) of respondents were simply observed for disease worsening, whereas 25% (1133/4482) were treated with intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) and 20% (923/4482) with oral corticosteroids; additional treatments included adrenocorticotropic hormone, plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin, and others. Among patients who responded to questions about their most recent relapse, 32% (363/1123) of IVMP-treated and 34% (301/895) of oral corticosteroid-treated patients indicated their symptoms were worse one month after treatment than pre-relapse, as did 39% (612/1574) of observation-only patients; 30% (335/1122) of IVMP-treated patients indicated their treatment made relapse symptoms worse (13% [145/1122]) or had no effect (17% [190/1122]), as did 38% (340/894) of oral corticosteroid-treated patients (worse, 13% [116/894]; no effect, 25% [224/894]) and 76% (1162/1514) of observation-only patients (worse, 17% [264/1514]; no change, 59% [898/1514]).

Conclusions

Overall, patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis who receive treatment report better outcomes than those who are simply observed. However, a sizeable percentage of patients feel that their symptoms following corticosteroid treatment are worse than pre-relapse symptoms and that treatment had no effect or worsened symptoms. Patient perceptions of relapse treatment deserve more attention, and more effective treatment options are needed.

Additional efficacy endpoints from pivotal natalizumab trials in relapsing-remitting MS

Standard clinical endpoints in multiple sclerosis (MS) studies, such as disability progression defined by the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) and annualized relapse rate, may not fully reflect all aspects of therapeutic benefit experienced by patients. Pivotal studies showed that natalizumab is effective both as monotherapy (AFFIRM study) and in combination with interferon beta-1a (IFNβ-1a) (SENTINEL study) in patients with relapsing MS. We present AFFIRM and SENTINEL data demonstrating the efficacy of natalizumab on prespecified tertiary endpoints, including extent of confirmed change in EDSS score from baseline, time to sustained progression to EDSS milestone scores, hospitalizations, corticosteroid use, and time to confirmed progression of cognitive deficits. Natalizumab significantly reduced changes in EDSS scores (P < 0.001) and proportion of patients progressing to an EDSS score ≥4.0 (P < 0.001) and ≥6.0 (P = 0.002) compared with placebo. Natalizumab + IFNβ-1a significantly reduced changes in EDSS scores compared with placebo + IFNβ-1a (P = 0.011). Based on 0.5 standard deviation change in paced auditory serial addition test-3 score, natalizumab treatment reduced the risk of confirmed progression of cognitive deficits by 43% compared with placebo (HR 0.57 [95% CI 0.37, 0.89], P = 0.013); however, no significant difference between groups was seen in SENTINEL. Natalizumab, both as monotherapy and in combination with IFNβ-1a, significantly reduced the annualized rate of MS-related hospitalizations (by 64 and 61%, respectively) and the annualized rate of relapses severe enough to require steroid treatment (by 69 and 61%, respectively) compared with placebo and placebo + IFNβ-1a (P < 0.001). These analyses underline beneficial effects of natalizumab therapy in relapsing MS patients.

Validity of patient-derived disability and clinical data in multiple sclerosis

Patient-derived historical data are widely employed to make fundamental management decisions in multiple sclerosis, although the validity of the information provided is unclear. The objectives of this study were to determine validity of patient-derived historical data and to describe the utility of a locally relevant, patient-administered questionnaire designed to ascertain current disability and other important disease milestones. A well-described cohort of 99 patients was identified for whom comparable, detailed, prospective longitudinal clinician-derived data were available. Patient-derived data were collected by completion of a standardized questionnaire or telephone interview for comparison. Reliability analysis for current Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) demonstrated an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.79 between questionnaire and clinician-derived data in 79 patients, with complete agreement in 75.9%. Intraclass correlation coefficient for year of disease onset, diagnosis and onset of secondary progression was 0.86, 0.91 and 0.78, respectively. Time to EDSS >4.0, 6.0 and 8.0 all had an intraclass correlation coefficient of >0.9. Less robust agreement was observed for current disease course (Kappa coefficient 0.71), initial relapse rate (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.37) and clinical features at disease onset (Kappa 0.25). We conclude that self-reported questionnaires can provide reliable current and retrospective data on time-to-disability milestones with high levels of correlation observed for some additional elements, supporting the use of selected components of patient-derived data in clinical practice and for epidemiological studies.

Validation of the brazilian version of Guy's neurological disability scale

The Guy's neurological disability scale (GNDS) has recently been introduced as a new measure of disability in multiple sclerosis. It is patient-oriented, multidimensional, and not biased towards any particular disability. The purpose of the present study was to validate the Brazilian version of the GNDS. The adaptation of the scale was based on the translation/back-translation methodology. Sixty-two patients with clinically definite multiple sclerosis (CDMS) according to Poser's criteria were recruited for this study. GNDS was administered individually to each subject. The EDSS and the ambulation index (AI) scores were assigned by a neurologist. The intraclass correlation coefficient and the Cronbach's alpha values of the Brazilian version of GNDS (0.94 and 0.83, respectively) were comparable to the original one (0.98 and 0.79, respectively). Furthermore, the factor analysis of the Brazilian version of GNDS suggested, as the original article, a four-factor solution which accounted for 68.8% of the total variance. The Brazilian version of GNDS was found to be clinically relevant as it correlated significantly with the EDSS and AI. In conclusion, the Brazilian version of GNDS can be considered an important tool to evaluate the disability in MS patients, with clinical usefulness and psychometrics soundness.

Effect of early versus delayed interferon beta-1b treatment on disability after a first clinical event suggestive of multiple sclerosis: a 3-year follow-up analysis of the BENEFIT study

BACKGROUND

Several controlled studies provide evidence that treatment with interferon beta in patients with a first event suggestive of multiple sclerosis (MS) delays conversion to clinically definite MS (CDMS). Our aim was to determine whether early initiation of treatment with interferon beta prevents development of confirmed disability in MS.

METHODS

In the initial placebo-controlled phase of the double-blinded BENEFIT study, patients with a first event suggestive of MS and a minimum of two clinically silent lesions in MRI were randomised to receive either interferon beta-1b 250 microg (n=292) or placebo (n=176) subcutaneously every other day for 2 years, or until diagnosis of CDMS. Patients were then eligible to enter the follow-up phase with open-label interferon beta-1b. In the current prospectively planned analysis 3 years after randomisation, the effects of early interferon beta-1b treatment were compared with those of delayed treatment initiated after diagnosis of CDMS or after 2 years on the study. The primary outcomes of this ITT analysis were time to diagnosis of CDMS, time to confirmed expanded disability status scale (EDSS) progression, and score on a patient-reported functional assessment scale (FAMS-TOI). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00185211.

FINDINGS

Of the 468 patients originally randomised, 418 (89%) entered the follow-up phase; 392 (84%) completed 3 years' post-randomisation follow-up. After 3 years, 99 (37%) patients in the early group developed CDMS compared with 85 (51%) patients in the delayed treatment group. Early treatment reduced the risk of CDMS by 41% (hazard ratio 0.59, 95% CI 0.44-0.80; p=0.0011; absolute risk reduction 14%) compared with delayed treatment. Over 3 years, 42 (16%) patients in the early group and 40 (24%) in the delayed group had confirmed EDSS progression; early treatment reduced the risk for progression of disability by 40% compared with delayed treatment (0.60, 0.39-0.92; p=0.022; absolute risk reduction 8%). The FAMS-TOI score was high and stable in both groups over the 3-year period (p=0.31).

INTERPRETATION

Our data suggest that early initiation of treatment with interferon beta-1b prevents the development of confirmed disability, supporting its use after the first manifestation of relapsing-remitting MS.

Multidisciplinary fatigue management programme in multiple sclerosis: a randomized clinical trial

Objective To establish the efficacy of a multidisciplinary fatigue management programme (MFMP) in MS.

Method Fifty-one subjects with MS were randomly allocated to group A, who only received the four weeks MFMP, or group B receiving a placebo intervention programme first and the MFMP after 6 months. In both groups, assessment was performed at baseline, 3 weeks and 6 months after the programmes and included Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS), Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), MS Self-Efficacy scale (MSSE), Mental Health Inventory (MHI) and Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA).

Results The MFIS showed a significant change over time ( F(4,152) = 3.346, P = 0.012), which was similar in both groups (time*group interaction: F(4,152) = 1.094, P = 0.361). A clinically relevant reduction of MFIS score of 10 points or more was found in 17% of individuals following the MFMP, compared to 44% after the placebo intervention programme ( P = 0.06). Compared to no intervention, a significant effect of the MFMP after 6 months ( P = 0.003) was found in five participants (31%). No significant changes in FSS, MSSE, MHI and IPA, in both groups, were found.

Conclusion Although an additional effect was found, the multidisciplinary fatigue management programme showed no efficacy in reducing the impact of fatigue compared to a placebo intervention programme. Multiple Sclerosis 2007; 13: 996—1003. http://msj.sagepub.com

Changes in LORETA and conventional patterns of P600 after steroid treatment in multiple sclerosis patients

OBJECTIVE

The P600 component of event-related potentials (ERPs) reflecting the 'rule-governed sequence of information processing', has been associated with multiple sclerosis (MS)-related cognition. The present study aimed at examining the effects of methylprednisolone treatment in MS patients on cognition as reflected by the low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA) of the P600 as well as its conventional constituents (amplitudes and latencies) recorded during a working memory (WM) test.

METHOD

A paired LORETA comparison was performed in the P600 component of ERPs elicited during a (WM) test in 18 MS patients suffering from the relapsing-remitting form, before and after 1 week treatment with methylprednisolone. The P600 component was also evaluated in 16 healthy controls matched to the patients on age and educational level.

RESULTS

When pre- and post-treatment recordings of LORETA were compared all patients as a group showed significantly different patterns of current density activation located at right frontal lobe. The treatment was accompanied by an increase of the amplitude of P600 at the right frontoparietal area. In the post-treatment phase the patients exhibited significant improvement of the memory performance as compared to themselves before treatment. As a result both the P600 amplitudes and memory performance at post-treatment were closer to those exhibited by normal controls.

CONCLUSION

These findings support the notion that steroid treatment in relapsing-remitting MS patients, may exert a beneficial effect in 'rule-governed sequence of information processing'.

A randomised controlled trial comparing rehabilitation against standard therapy in multiple sclerosis patients receiving intravenous steroid treatment

BACKGROUND

There is evidence to support both the use of intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) in multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse and physiotherapy in the management of MS, but no studies have investigated the combination of steroids and rehabilitation together.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits of IVMP with planned, comprehensive multidisciplinary team (MDT) care compared to IVMP with standard care.

METHODS

In this randomised controlled trial, patients confirmed to have had a definite MS relapse severe enough to warrant IVMP (1 g daily for three days) were randomised to two groups. The control group was managed according to the standard ward routine; the treatment group received planned coordinated multidisciplinary team assessment and treatment. Baseline assessments, including demographics and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) were carried out on both groups. The primary outcome measures were Guy's Neurological Disability Scale (GNDS), and Amended Motor Club Assessment (AMCA). The secondary measures were the Barthel Index (BI), Human Activity Profile (HAP), and Short Form Item 36 Health Survey (SF-36). All measures have published data on reliability and validity. Measures were administered at one and three months.

RESULTS

Forty subjects, including 27 females, completed data collection. There were no significant differences between the two groups at baseline. Results showed statistically significant differences in GNDS (p = 0.03), AMCA (p = 0.03), HAPM (p < 0.01), HAPA (p = 0.02), and BI (p = 0.02) at three months in favour of planned MDT care.

CONCLUSION

This study indicates that combining steroids with planned MDT care is superior to administering them in a standard neurology or day ward setting. Further research is necessary in order to confirm this finding.

One year changes in disability in multiple sclerosis: neurological examination compared with patient self report

OBJECTIVE

To characterise prospectively the relation between one year changes in neurologist rating of neurological exam abnormalities as measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and changes in patient perceived disability as measured by the Guy's Neurological Disability Scale (GNDS) in patients with multiple sclerosis.

METHODS

Two hundred and fifty patients with MS were recruited at an outpatient clinic. Disability at baseline and one year follow-up was assessed using the EDSS and GNDS. Correlations between change in EDSS, GNDS-sum score, Functional Systems and GNDS subcategories were studied as well as the significance of changes in EDSS associated with changes in perceived disability.

RESULTS

The correlation between one year changes in EDSS versus GNDS was substantially lower (0.19) than cross-sectional correlations between EDSS and GNDS either at baseline (0.62) or at follow-up (0.77). Notably, changes in functional system scores that are based on neurological examination are poorly or not at all correlated with changes in disability as perceived by the patient. Analysing the impact of a significant worsening in EDSS-score, a commonly applied outcome criterion in clinical trials, we found that this was associated with significant worsening, insignificant change, and significant improvement in the patients' perceived disability in 45%, 39% and 15% of patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Patients' perception of change in disability differs not only quantitatively but also qualitatively from that of an examining physician. This seems to be due both to the fact that there are true differences in change as perceived by the patient and that measured by the physician and to the fact that changes in many dimensions of disability that are relevant to the patient have no measurable impact on the EDSS.