Identifying reliable change in tactile temporal thresholds in multiple sclerosis: test-retest reliability

Psychometric properties of light touch-pressure somatosensory measures in adults with neurological disorders: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To critically appraise the psychometric properties of light touch-pressure somatosensory assessments to provide guidance for tool selection for research or clinical purposes.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, CINAHL, and PsycInfo were searched for research indexed from January 1990-November 2022. English language and human subject filters were applied. "Somatosensation", "psychometric property", and "nervous system-based health condition" search terms were combined. Grey literature and manual searches were conducted to ensure thoroughness.

REVIEW METHODS

The reliability, construct validity, and/or measurement error of light touch-pressure assessments was reviewed in adult populations with neurological disorders. Reviewers individually extracted and managed data including patient demographics, assessment characteristics, statistical methods, and psychometric properties. Methodological quality of results was evaluated using an adapted version of the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments checklist.

RESULTS

Thirty-three of 1938 articles were included for review. Fifteen light touch-pressure assessments demonstrated good or excellent reliability. Further, five of those 15 assessments achieved adequate validity and one of the 15 assessments achieved adequate measurement error. Over 80% of the summarized study ratings were determined to be of low or very low quality.

CONCLUSION

We recommend using electrical perceptual tests, the Semmes-Weinstein Monofilaments, the Graded and Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility, and Prehension, and the Moving Touch Pressure Test given that they demonstrated good to excellent results in three psychometric properties. No other assessment achieved adequate ratings in more than two psychometric properties. This review highlights a fundamental need to develop sensory assessments that are reliable, valid, and sensitive to change.

Corpus Callosum Volume and Interhemispheric Transfer in Multiple Sclerosis

Background:

The corpus callosum (CC) is frequently compromised in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Structural and functional measurements of the CC may be useful to monitor the progression of the disease. The aim of this pilot study was to determine if bimanual tactile temporal thresholds correlates with CC volume. A tactile temporal threshold is the longest temporal interval that separates the onsets of two tactile stimuli when they are judged by the observer as simultaneous. Judgments to bimanual stimulations require interhemispheric transfer via the CC.

Methods:

Thresholds were examined in MS patients and matched controls. Magnetic resonance (MR) images were acquired on a 3T MR system within 48 hours of clinical assessment and measurement of thresholds.

Results:

Corpus callosum volume was assessed by using a semiautomatic livewire algorithm. The CC volume was smaller (by 21% on average, p < 0.01) and thresholds were higher (by 49% on average, p < 0.03) in MS patients when compared to controls. A significant correlation (r = -0.66, p = 0.01) between CC volume and thresholds emerged for the MS patients.

Conclusion:

Measuring treatment benefits of neuroprotective and repair therapies is a well recognized challenge in MS research. The overall findings of this study suggest that these measurements, which involve the transfer of information interhemispherically via the CC, may be promising outcome measures that warrant further scientific exploration to develop a model to measure recovery.

Measures of sensation in neurological conditions: a systematic review

Objective: To systematically review the psychometric properties and clinical utility of measures of sensation in neurological conditions to inform future research studies and clinical practice.

Data sources: Electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE and AMED) were searched from their inception to December 2010.

Review methods: Search terms were used to identify articles that investigated any sensory measures in neurological conditions. Data about their psychometric properties and clinical utility were extracted and analyzed independently. The strength of the psychometric properties and clinical utility were assessed following recommendations. 1

Results: Sixteen sensory measures were identified. Inter-rater reliability and redundancy of testing protocols are particular issues for this area of assessment. Eleven were rejected because they were not available for a researcher or clinician to use. Of the remaining five measures, the Erasmus MC modifications of the Nottingham Sensory Assessment and the Sensory section of the Fugl–Meyer Assessment showed the best balance of clinical utility and psychometric properties.

Conclusion: Many measures of sensory impairment have been used in research but few have been fully developed to produce robust data and be easy to use. At present, the sensory section of the Fugl–Meyer Assessment and the Erasmus MC modifications of the Nottingham Sensory Assessment show the most effective balance of usability and robustness, when delivered according to the operating instructions.

Reliability of Visual Temporal Thresholds

Background:

Visual processing deficits involving temporal characteristics are typically not captured by the widely used outcome measures (i.e., Expanded Disability Status Scale, Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite) in multiple sclerosis (MS). Visual temporal thresholds (i.e., measurements of the temporal aspects in visual processing) are typically significantly higher (i.e., prolonged) in MS patients when compared to controls. The test-retest reliability of these thresholds was examined in patients with MS.

Methods:

Visual temporal thresholds were measured in 21 stable MS patients during two separate test sessions. Test-retest reliability and the standard error of measurement were calculated. The threshold of change in visual temporal thresholds in MS patients that would correspond to real change beyond measurement error with 95% certainty was also calculated. For comparisons, a control group (n = 10) was included.

Results:

The test-retest reliability of this measure of visual temporal thresholds was 0.97. The threshold indicating change beyond chance or measurement error with 95% certainty was 11 ms. Higher thresholds were significantly correlated with longer durations of disease.

Conclusions:

This measure of visual temporal thresholds has excellent test-retest reliability and a change of greater than 11 ms is highly likely to represent real change in MS patients. The findings indicate that these measurements may provide useful clinical information about functional changes regarding the temporal aspects of the visual system, which is currently not captured by the Extended Disability Status Scale.