Efficacy and safety of ofatumumab in recently diagnosed, treatment-naive patients with multiple sclerosis: Results from ASCLEPIOS I and II

Early use of high-efficacy therapies in multiple sclerosis in the United States: benefits, barriers, and strategies for encouraging adoption

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is characterized by progressive neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration from disease onset that, if left untreated, can result in the accumulation of irreversible neurological disability. Early intervention with high-efficacy therapies (HETs) is increasingly recognized as the best strategy to delay or mitigate disease progression from the earliest stages of the disease and to prevent long-term neurodegeneration. Although there is growing clinical and real-world evidence supporting early HET intervention, foregoing this strategy in favor of a traditional escalation approach prioritizing lower-efficacy disease-modifying therapies remains a common approach in clinical practice. This review explores potential health care professional- and patient-related barriers to the early use of HETs in patients with MS in the United States. Barriers can include regulatory and reimbursement restrictions; knowledge gaps and long-term safety concerns among health care professionals; and various individual, cultural, and societal factors affecting patients. Potential strategies for overcoming these barriers and encouraging early HET use are proposed.

Immunopathogenesis of multiple sclerosis: molecular and cellular mechanisms and new immunotherapeutic approaches

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a central nervous system (CNS) demyelinating autoimmune disease with increasing global prevalence. It predominantly affects females, especially those of European descent. The interplay between environmental factors and genetic predisposition plays a crucial role in MS etiopathogenesis.

METHODS

We searched recent relevant literature on reputable databases, which include, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and ScienceDirect using the following keywords: multiple sclerosis, pathogenesis, autoimmunity, demyelination, therapy, and immunotherapy.

RESULTS

Various animal models have been employed to investigate the MS etiopathogenesis and therapeutics. Autoreactive T cells within the CNS recruit myeloid cells through chemokine expression, leading to the secretion of inflammatory cytokines driving the MS pathogenesis, resulting in demyelination, gliosis, and axonal loss. Key players include T cell lymphocytes (CD4+ and CD8+), B cells, and neutrophils. Signaling dysregulation in inflammatory pathways and the immunogenetic basis of MS are essential considerations for any successful therapy to MS. Data indicates that B cells and neutrophils also have significant roles in MS, despite the common belief that T cells are essential. High neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios correlate with MS severity, indicating their contribution to disease progression. Dysregulated signaling pathways further exacerbate MS progression.

CONCLUSION

MS remains incurable, but disease-modifying therapies, monoclonal antibodies, and immunomodulatory drugs offer hope for patients. Research on the immunogenetics and immunoregulatory functions of gut microbiota is continuing to provide light on possible treatment avenues. Understanding the complex interplay between genetic predisposition, environmental factors, and immune dysregulation is critical for developing effective treatments for MS.

Ocrelizumab and ofatumumab comparison: an Italian real-world propensity score matched study

BACKGROUND

The management of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) has undergone transformative evolution with the introduction of high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (DMTs), specifically anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, such as ocrelizumab (OCR) and ofatumumab (OFA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is an independent retrospective cohort study in Relapsing MS (RMS) patients followed at eight Italian MS centers who initiated treatment with OCR or OFA in the participating centers and with at least 12 months on therapy. A generalized linear regression model inverse probability of treatment weight (IPTW) PS-adjusted was performed to evaluate the relationship between annualized relapse rate (ARR) and treatment groups. No evidence of disease activity-NEDA-3 at 12-month score was also collected. Safety profile of the investigated DMTs was recorded.

RESULTS

A total cohort of 396 RMS patients fulfilled the required criteria and were enrolled in the study. Out of them, 216 had a prescription of OCR and 180 of OFA. The mean follow-up was 13.2 ± 1.9 months. The estimated means for ARR did not show differences between the two groups, 0.059 for patients on OCR and 0.038 for patients on OFA (p = 0.185). The generalized regression model IPTW PS-adjusted did not reveal differences between patients on OCR and OFA (ExpBOFA 0.974, 95%CI 934-1.015, p = 0.207). NEDA-3 at 12 months was experienced by 199(92.1%) patients on OCR and 170(94.4%) patients on OFA (p = 0.368). Generally, both therapies exhibit good tolerability.

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment with OCR and OFA resulted in comparable control of disease activity with good safety profile. Our results need further validation in larger multicentre studies with long-term follow-up.

Immune System Dysregulation in the Progression of Multiple Sclerosis: Molecular Insights and Therapeutic Implications

Multiple sclerosis (MS), a prevalent neurological disorder, predominantly affects young adults and is characterized by chronic autoimmune activity. The study explores the immune system dysregulation in MS, highlighting the crucial roles of immune and non-neuronal cells in the disease's progression. This review examines the dual role of cytokines, with some like IL-6, TNF-α, and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) promoting inflammation and CNS tissue injury, and others such as IL-4, IL-10, IL-37, and TGF-β fostering remyelination and protecting against MS. Elevated chemokine levels in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), including CCL2, CCL5, CXCL10, CXCL13, and fractalkine, are analyzed for their role in facilitating immune cell migration across the blood-brain barrier (BBB), worsening inflammation and neurodegeneration. The study also delves into the impact of auto-antibodies targeting myelin components like MOG and AQP4, which activate complement cascades leading to further myelin destruction. The article discusses how compromised BBB integrity allows immune cells and inflammatory mediators to infiltrate the CNS, intensifying MS symptoms. It also examines the involvement of astrocytes, microglia, and oligodendrocytes in the disease's progression. Additionally, the effectiveness of immunomodulatory drugs such as IFN-β and CD20-targeting monoclonal antibodies (e.g., rituximab) in modulating immune responses is reviewed, highlighting their potential to reduce relapse rates and delaying MS progression. These insights emphasize the importance of immune system dysfunction in MS development and progression, guiding the development of new therapeutic strategies. The study underscores recent advancements in understanding MS's molecular pathways, opening avenues for more targeted and effective treatments.

Identification and management of subclinical disease activity in early multiple sclerosis: a review

IMPORTANCE

Early treatment initiation in multiple sclerosis (MS) is crucial in preventing irreversible neurological damage and disability progression. The current assessment of disease activity relies on relapse rates and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesion activity, but inclusion of other early, often "hidden," indicators of disease activity may describe a more comprehensive picture of MS.

OBSERVATIONS

Early indicators of MS disease activity other than relapses and MRI activity, such as cognitive impairment, brain atrophy, and fatigue, are not typically captured by routine disease monitoring. Furthermore, silent progression (neurological decline not clearly captured by standard methods) may occur undetected by relapse and MRI lesion activity monitoring. Consequently, patients considered to have no disease activity actually may have worsening disease, suggesting a need to revise MS management strategies with respect to timely initiation and escalation of disease-modifying therapy (DMT). Traditionally, first-line MS treatment starts with low- or moderate-efficacy therapies, before escalating to high-efficacy therapies (HETs) after evidence of breakthrough disease activity. However, multiple observational studies have shown that early initiation of HETs can prevent or reduce disability progression. Ongoing randomized clinical trials are comparing escalation and early HET approaches.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

There is an urgent need to reassess how MS disease activity and worsening are measured. A greater awareness of "hidden" indicators, potentially combined with biomarkers to reveal silent disease activity and neurodegeneration underlying MS, would provide a more complete picture of MS and allow for timely therapeutic intervention with HET or switching DMTs to address suboptimal treatment responses.

Immunoablative therapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation as the first-line disease-modifying therapy in patients with multiple sclerosis

INTRODUCTION

Immunoablative therapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) is one of the possible disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). In this case series, we would like to present six patients with MS, who underwent AHSCT as the first-line DMT.

CASE REPORTS

Six MS patients with a rapid progression of disability with or without relapses underwent AHSCT as the first-line DMT at the University Hospital Ostrava between 2018 and 2021. The conditioning regimens for AHSCT used were a medium-intensity regime BEAM (Carmustine, Etoposid, Cytarabin, Melphalan) and low-intensity regime based on Cyclophosphamide. Four out of six patients showed some disability progression after AHSCT, so the rapid progression of MS was just slowed down by AHSCT. One patient developed activity on magnetic resonance imaging three months after AHSCT, and two experienced mild relapses during the follow-up period. None of our patients developed grade 4 non-hematological toxicity; all infections were mild. In one patient, an allergic reaction probably to dimethyl sulfoxide was observed.

CONCLUSION

Our case series of 6 patients shows that AHSCT is a promising therapeutic approach to slow down the rapid progression of clinical disability in MS patients with a good safety profile.

It is time to rethink clinical trials on Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors in multiple sclerosis

The EVOLUTION trials comparing evobrutinib and teriflunomide in multiple sclerosis revealed unexpected negative results, challenging the choice of the annualized relapse rate (ARR) as the primary outcome. While monoclonal antibodies effectively control inflammation, the focus on ARR may not capture the long-term disability progression addressed by Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi). This letter questions the suitability of teriflunomide as a comparator due to low relapse rates in the control group, possibly stemming from patient selection bias. The author advocates for a reevaluation of study design, outcomes, and comparators in multiple sclerosis research, emphasizing the need for new approaches to address disease activity and disability progression. It is time to rethink clinical trials on Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors in multiple sclerosis.

No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA) as a Clinical Assessment Tool for Multiple Sclerosis: Clinician and Patient Perspectives [Narrative Review]

The emergence of high-efficacy therapies for multiple sclerosis (MS), which target inflammation more effectively than traditional disease-modifying therapies, has led to a shift in MS management towards achieving the outcome assessment known as no evidence of disease activity (NEDA). The most common NEDA definition, termed NEDA-3, is a composite of three related measures of disease activity: no clinical relapses, no disability progression, and no radiological activity. NEDA has been frequently used as a composite endpoint in clinical trials, but there is growing interest in its use as an assessment tool to help patients and healthcare professionals navigate treatment decisions in the clinic. Raising awareness about NEDA may therefore help patients and clinicians make more informed decisions around MS management and improve overall MS care. This review aims to explore the potential utility of NEDA as a clinical decision-making tool and treatment target by summarizing the literature on its current use in the context of the expanding treatment landscape. We identify current challenges to the use of NEDA in clinical practice and detail the proposed amendments, such as the inclusion of alternative outcomes and biomarkers, to broaden the clinical information captured by NEDA. These themes are further illustrated with the real-life perspectives and experiences of our two patient authors with MS. This review is intended to be an educational resource to support discussions between clinicians and patients on this evolving approach to MS-specialized care.

Potential Crosstalk between the PACAP/VIP Neuropeptide System and Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress-Relevance to Multiple Sclerosis Pathophysiology

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an immune-mediated disorder characterized by focal demyelination and chronic inflammation of the central nervous system (CNS). Although the exact etiology is unclear, mounting evidence indicates that endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress represents a key event in disease pathogenesis. Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide (PACAP) and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) are two structurally related neuropeptides that are abundant in the CNS and are known to exert neuroprotective and immune modulatory roles. Activation of this endogenous neuropeptide system may interfere with ER stress processes to promote glial cell survival and myelin self-repair. However, the potential crosstalk between the PACAP/VIP system and ER stress remains elusive. In this review, we aim to discuss how these peptides ameliorate ER stress in the CNS, with a focus on MS pathology. Our goal is to emphasize the importance of this potential interaction to aid in the identification of novel therapeutic targets for the treatment of MS and other demyelinating disorders.

Harmonizing Definitions for Progression Independent of Relapse Activity in Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review

Importance

Emerging evidence suggests that progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) is a substantial contributor to long-term disability accumulation in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). To date, there is no uniform agreed-upon definition of PIRA, limiting the comparability of published studies.

Objective

To summarize the current evidence about PIRA based on a systematic review, to discuss the various terminologies used in the context of PIRA, and to propose a harmonized definition for PIRA for use in clinical practice and future trials.

Evidence Review

A literature search was conducted using the search terms multiple sclerosis, PIRA, progression independent of relapse activity, silent progression, and progression unrelated to relapses in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science, published between January 1990 and December 2022.

Findings

Of 119 identified single records, 48 eligible studies were analyzed. PIRA was reported to occur in roughly 5% of all patients with RRMS per annum, causing at least 50% of all disability accrual events in typical RRMS. The proportion of PIRA vs relapse-associated worsening increased with age, longer disease duration, and, despite lower absolute event numbers, potent suppression of relapses by highly effective disease-modifying therapy. However, different studies used various definitions of PIRA, rendering the comparability of studies difficult.

Conclusion and Relevance

PIRA is the most frequent manifestation of disability accumulation across the full spectrum of traditional MS phenotypes, including clinically isolated syndrome and early RRMS. The harmonized definition suggested here may improve the comparability of results in current and future cohorts and data sets.

Prevalence of 2-year "No evidence of disease activity" (NEDA-3 and NEDA-4) in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. A real-world study

BACKGROUND

No evidence of disease activity (NEDA) is becoming a gold standard in the evaluation of disease modifying therapies (DMT) in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). NEDA-3 status is the absence of relapses, new activity on brain MRI, and disability progression. NEDA-4 meets all NEDA-3 criteria plus lack of brain atrophy.

OBJECTIVE

Aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of two-year NEDA-3, NEDA-4, six-month delayed NEDA-3 (6mdNEDA-3), and six-month delayed NEDA-4 (6mdNEDA-4) in a cohort of patients with RRMS. Six-month delayed measures were introduced to consider latency of action of drugs.

METHODS

Observational retrospective monocentric study. All the patients with RRMS starting DMT between 2015 and 2018, and with 2-year of follow-up, were included. Annualized brain volume loss (a-BVL) was calculated by SIENA software.

RESULTS

We included 108 patients, the majority treated with first line DMT. At 2-year follow-up, 35 % of patients were NEDA-3 (50 % 6mdNEDA-3), and 17 % NEDA-4 (28 % 6mdNEDA-4). Loss of NEDA-3 status was mainly driven by MRI activity (70 %), followed by relapses (56 %), and only minimally by disability progression (7 %).

CONCLUSION

In our cohort 2-year NEDA status, especially including lack of brain atrophy, was hard to achieve. Further studies are needed to establish the prognostic value of NEDA-3 and NEDA4 in the long-term follow-up.

The Development of Ofatumumab, a Fully Human Anti-CD20 Monoclonal Antibody for Practical Use in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Treatment

The importance of B cells in multiple sclerosis (MS) has been demonstrated through the advent of B-cell-depleting anti-CD20 antibody therapies. Ofatumumab is the first fully human anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb) developed and tested for subcutaneous (SC) self-administration at monthly doses of 20 mg, and has been approved in the US, UK, EU, and other regions and countries worldwide for the treatment of relapsing MS. The development goal of ofatumumab was to obtain a highly efficacious anti-CD20 therapy, with a safety and tolerability profile that allows for self-administration by MS patients at home and a positive benefit-risk balance for use in the broad relapsing MS population. This development goal was enabled by the unique binding site, higher affinity to B cells, and higher potency of ofatumumab compared to previous anti-CD20 mAbs; these properties of ofatumumab facilitate rapid B-cell depletion and maintenance with a low dose at a low injection volume (20 mg/0.4 ml). The high potency in turn enables the selective targeting of B cells that reside in the lymphatic system via subcutaneous (SC) administration. Through a comprehensive dose-finding program in two phase 2 studies (one intravenous and one SC) and model simulations, it was found that safety and tolerability can be further improved, and the risk of systemic injection-related reactions (IRRs) minimized, by avoiding doses ≥ 30 mg, and by reaching initial and rapid B-cell depletion via stepwise weekly administration of ofatumumab at Weeks 0, 1, and 2 (instead of a single high dose). Once near-complete B-cell depletion is reached, it can be maintained by monthly doses of 20 mg/0.4 ml. Indeed, in phase 3 trials (ASCLEPIOS I/II), rapid and sustained near-complete B-cell depletion (largely independent of body weight, race and other factors) was observed with this dosing regimen, which resulted in superior efficacy of ofatumumab versus teriflunomide on relapse rates, disability worsening, neuronal injury (serum neurofilament light chain), and imaging outcomes. Likely due to its fully human nature, ofatumumab has a low immunogenic risk profile-only 2 of 914 patients receiving ofatumumab in ASCLEPIOS I/II developed anti-drug antibodies-and this may also underlie the infrequent IRRs (20% with ofatumumab vs. 15% with the placebo injection in the teriflunomide arm) that were mostly (99.8%) mild to moderate in severity. The overall rates of infections and serious infections in patients treated with ofatumumab were similar to those in patients treated with teriflunomide (51.6% vs. 52.7% and 2.5% vs. 1.8%, respectively). The benefit-risk profile of ofatumumab was favorable compared to teriflunomide in the broad RMS population, and also in the predefined subgroups of both recently diagnosed and/or treatment-naïve patients, as well as previously disease-modifying therapy-treated patients. Interim data from the ongoing extension study (ALITHIOS) have shown that long-term treatment with ofatumumab up to 4 years is well-tolerated in RMS patients, with no new safety risks identified. In parallel to the phase 3 trials in which SC administration was carried out with a pre-filled syringe, an autoinjector pen for more convenient self-administration of the ofatumumab 20 mg dose was developed and is available for use in clinical practice.

Real-world use of ofatumumab to treat multiple sclerosis 9 months post-FDA approval during COVID-19 pandemic

BACKGROUND

Relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory, demyelinating, neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system that causes episodes of neurological dysfunction (relapse) alternating with variable intervals of stability. Disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) aim to reduce the rate of relapse and slow disease progression in people with MS, particularly in those with relapsing MS. Ofatumumab is a fully human anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody approved to treat patients with relapsing forms of MS. This study describes the demographics, clinical characteristics, and prior DMT use of patients with at least one ofatumumab prescription claim following approval by the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Understanding ofatumumab utilization patterns and patient characteristics can help define the journey of patients with MS and aid future clinical decision-making.

METHODS

This retrospective study is based on data from IQVIA's Longitudinal Prescription Data (LRx) and Medical Claims (Dx) databases in the US, collected between August 01, 2019 and May 31, 2021. The index date was defined as the date of the first ofatumumab prescription. The pre-index period was defined as the 12 months prior to the index date. Adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with a diagnosis of MS and at least one prescription for ofatumumab between August 2020 and May 2021 in the LRx database were included. Only patients with at least one medical claim in the Dx database and a diagnosis of MS 24 months prior to the index date were included. Descriptive analyses were conducted 3, 6, and 9 months after FDA approval.

RESULTS

Overall, 3,600 patients with a prescription for ofatumumab were identified in the LRx claims database, and 2,101 patients remained in the study after inclusion and exclusion criteria had been applied. At the 9-month post-approval time point, patients with ofatumumab claims were characterized as primarily female (74%) and middle-aged (median age: 48 years); two-thirds (64.7%) had a mild MS disability level. Patients were otherwise generally healthy with limited comorbid conditions. Most patients (81.7%) in the study did not experience relapse during the pre-index period. DMT-naïve patients who were prescribed ofatumumab at 3, 6, and 9 months post-approval accounted for 46.9%, 54.8%, and 58.4% of the study population, respectively. Over time, this increase in DMT-naïve ofatumumab initiators was statistically significant (p = 0.0003). Among patients who had been treated with DMTs during the previous year, most had taken them orally (50.6%), some had received them via intravenous infusion (32.2%), and some via subcutaneous/intramuscular injection (21.1%). Intravenous ocrelizumab was the most common DMT switch observed (n = 205, 23.4%) among these patients.

CONCLUSION

This real-world study is the first to describe patients treated with ofatumumab since FDA approval during the COVID-19 pandemic. The majority of patients in this study were middle-aged women with mild MS symptoms. Ofatumumab was increasingly used as a first-line DMT. Additionally, a number of patients aged ≥55 years (beyond the trial population) used ofatumumab, which may suggest expanding clinician confidence in the safety and clinical utility of ofatumumab therapy. However, future long-term observational studies are needed to confirm these results.

Efficacy and safety of four-year ofatumumab treatment in relapsing multiple sclerosis: The ALITHIOS open-label extension

BACKGROUND

Ofatumumab has demonstrated superior efficacy and favorable safety for up to 2.5 years versus teriflunomide in relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS).

OBJECTIVE

Further characterize efficacy and safety of ofatumumab in RMS.

METHODS

Efficacy set: patients randomized to ofatumumab/teriflunomide in ASCLEPIOS I/II (core). Safety set: patients who received ⩾ 1 dose of ofatumumab in ASCLEPIOS I/II, APLIOS, APOLITOS (all core), or ALITHIOS (umbrella open-label extension). Patients received continuous ofatumumab or were newly switched from teriflunomide. Data cut-off: 25 September 2021.

RESULTS

In the efficacy set (n = 1882), the continuous ofatumumab group had a low annualized relapse rate (ARR 0.05 (95% confidence interval: 0.04-0.07)), low numbers of gadolinium-enhancing (Gd+) T1 lesions (0.01 lesions/scan) and fewer new/enlarging T2 lesions (annualized rate 0.08). Overall, 78.8% met three-parameter "no evidence of disease activity" criteria through 4 years. Switching from teriflunomide led to reduced ARR, risk of confirmed disability worsening (CDW), new/enlarging T2 lesions, Gd+ T1 lesions, and serum neurofilament light chain. In the continuous and newly switched ofatumumab groups, cumulative 3- and 6-month CDW rates remained low. In the safety set (n = 1969), the most frequently reported adverse events were infections and infestations (58.35%). No new safety signals were identified.

CONCLUSION

Ofatumumab has a favorable longer-term benefit-risk profile in RMS.

TRIAL REGISTRY

ALITHIOS (NCT03650114): https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03650114.

Exploring the Potential of Aptamers in Targeting Neuroinflammation and Neurodegenerative Disorders: Opportunities and Challenges

Neuroinflammation is the precursor for several neurodegenerative diseases (NDDs), such as Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD), and multiple sclerosis (MS). Targeting neuroinflammation has emerged as a promising strategy to address a wide range of CNS pathologies. These NDDs still present significant challenges in terms of limited and ineffective diagnosis and treatment options, driving the need to explore innovative and novel therapeutic alternatives. Aptamers are single-stranded nucleic acids that offer the potential for addressing these challenges through diagnostic and therapeutic applications. In this review, we summarize diagnostic and therapeutic aptamers for inflammatory biomolecules, as well as the inflammatory cells in NDDs. We also discussed the potential of short nucleotides for Aptamer-Based Targeted Brain Delivery through their unique features and modifications, as well as their ability to penetrate the blood-brain barrier. Moreover, the unprecedented opportunities and substantial challenges of using aptamers as therapeutic agents, such as drug efficacy, safety considerations, and pharmacokinetics, are also discussed. Taken together, this review assesses the potential of aptamers as a pioneering approach for target delivery to the CNS and the treatment of neuroinflammation and NDDs.

Implications of immunometabolism for smouldering MS pathology and therapy

Clinical symptom worsening in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) is driven by inflammation compartmentalized within the CNS, which results in chronic neuronal damage owing to insufficient repair mechanisms. The term 'smouldering inflammation' summarizes the biological aspects underlying this chronic, non-relapsing and immune-mediated mechanism of disease progression. Smouldering inflammation is likely to be shaped and sustained by local factors in the CNS that account for the persistence of this inflammatory response and explain why current treatments for MS do not sufficiently target this process. Local factors that affect the metabolic properties of glial cells and neurons include cytokines, pH value, lactate levels and nutrient availability. This Review summarizes current knowledge of the local inflammatory microenvironment in smouldering inflammation and how it interacts with the metabolism of tissue-resident immune cells, thereby promoting inflammatory niches within the CNS. The discussion highlights environmental and lifestyle factors that are increasingly recognized as capable of altering immune cell metabolism and potentially responsible for smouldering pathology in the CNS. Currently approved MS therapies that target metabolic pathways are also discussed, along with their potential for preventing the processes that contribute to smouldering inflammation and thereby to progressive neurodegenerative damage in MS.

Interferon beta-1a sc at 25 years: a mainstay in the treatment of multiple sclerosis over the period of one generation

INTRODUCTION

Interferon beta (IFN beta) preparations are an established group of drugs used for immunomodulation in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Subcutaneously (sc) applied interferon beta-1a (IFN beta-1a sc) has been in continuous clinical use for 25 years as a disease-modifying treatment.

AREAS COVERED

Based on data published since 2018, we discuss recent insights from analyses of the pivotal trial PRISMS and its long-term extension as well as from newer randomized studies with IFN beta-1a sc as the reference treatment, the use of IFN beta-1a sc across the patient life span and as a bridging therapy, recent data regarding the mechanisms of action, and potential benefits of IFN beta-1a sc regarding vaccine responses.

EXPERT OPINION

IFN beta-1a sc paved the way to effective immunomodulatory treatment of MS, enabled meaningful insights into the disease process, and remains a valid therapeutic option in selected vulnerable MS patient groups.

Ublituximab: A new FDA-approved anti-CD20 mAb for relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis

Ublituximab, an intravenous glycoengineered chimeric anti-CD20 IgG1 monoclonal antibody (mAb), is a new FDA-approved treatment for relapsing forms of Multiple Sclerosis (MS). Reassembling the other three anti-CD20 mAbs already in use for MS (rituximab, ocrelizumab and ofatumumab), ublituximab leads to depletion of B cells but spars long-lived plasma cells. Here, we discuss the main findings obtained during the phase 3 clinical trials (ULTIMATE I and II) for ublituximab versus teriflunomide. The current emergence and approval of new anti-CD20 mAbs with different dose regimens, routes of application, glycoengineering and mechanisms of action may contribute to different clinical outcomes.

Recent Progress in Multiple Sclerosis Treatment Using Immune Cells as Targets

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune-mediated demyelinating disease of the central nervous system. The main pathological features are inflammatory reaction, demyelination, axonal disintegration, reactive gliosis, etc. The etiology and pathogenesis of the disease have not been clarified. The initial studies believed that T cell-mediated cellular immunity is the key to the pathogenesis of MS. In recent years, more and more evidence has shown that B cells and their mediated humoral immune and innate immune cells (such as microglia, dendritic cells, macrophages, etc.) also play an important role in the pathogenesis of MS. This article mainly reviews the research progress of MS by targeting different immune cells and analyzes the action pathways of drugs. The types and mechanisms of immune cells related to the pathogenesis are introduced in detail, and the mechanisms of drugs targeting different immune cells are discussed in depth. This article aims to clarify the pathogenesis and immunotherapy pathway of MS, hoping to find new targets and strategies for the development of therapeutic drugs for MS.

Cost, efficacy, and safety comparison between early intensive and escalating strategies for multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment strategy of multiple sclerosis (MS) is a matter of debate. The classical approach is the escalating (ESC) strategy, which consists of starting with low- to moderate-efficacy disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) and upscale to high-efficacy DMDs when noting some evidence of active disease. Another approach, the early intensive (EIT) strategy, is starting with high-efficiency DMDs as first-line therapy. Our goal was to compare effectiveness, safety, and cost of ESC and EIT strategies.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and SCOPUS until September 2022, for studies comparing EIT and ESC strategies in adult participants with relapsing-remitting MS and a minimum follow-up of 5 years. We examined the Expanded Disability Severity Scale (EDSS), the proportion of severe adverse events, and cost in a 5-year period. Random-effects meta-analysis summarized the efficacy and safety and an EDSS-based Markov model estimated the cost.

RESULTS

Seven studies with 3,467 participants showed a 30% reduction in EDSS worsening in 5 years (RR 0.7; [0.59-0.83]; p < 0.001) in the EIT group vs in the ESC group. Two studies with 1,118 participants suggested a similar safety profile for these strategies (RR 1.92; [0.38-9.72]; p = 0.4324). EIT with natalizumab in extended interval dosing, rituximab, alemtuzumab, and cladribine demonstrated cost-effectiveness in our model.

DISCUSSION

EIT presents higher efficacy in preventing disability progression, a similar safety profile, and can be cost-effective within a 5-year timeline.

An Overview of the History, Pathophysiology, and Pharmacological Interventions of Multiple Sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an immune-inflammatory disease that attacks and damages myelinated axons in the central nervous system (CNS) and causes nontraumatic neurological impairment in young people. Historically, Lidwina of Schiedam documented the first MS case. After that, Augustus d'Este wrote for years about how his MS symptoms worsened. Age, sex, genetics, environment, smoking, injuries, and infections, including herpes simplex and rabies, are risk factors for MS. According to epidemiology, the average age of onset is between 20 and 40 years. MS is more prevalent in women and is common in Europe and America. As diagnostic methods and criteria change, people with MS may be discovered at earlier and earlier stages of the disease. MS therapy has advanced dramatically due to breakthroughs in our knowledge of the disease's etiology and progression. Therefore, the efficacy and risk of treatment medications increased exponentially. Management goals include reducing lesion activity and avoiding secondary progression. Current treatment approaches focus on managing acute episodes, relieving symptoms, and reducing biological activity. Disease-modifying drugs such as fingolimod, interferon-beta, natalizumab, and dimethyl fumarate are the most widely used treatments for MS. For proof of the efficacy and safety of these medications, investigations in the real world are necessary.

Neutropenia complicating anti-CD20 treatment in patients with multiple sclerosis: A retrospective case series and a systematic review of reported cases

BACKGROUND

Neutropenia is an infrequent complication of treatment with CD20 depleting agents and may require the administration of granulocyte-colony stimulating factors (G-CSF), which have been associated with an increased relapse risk in patients with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). The management of this side effect is still matter of debate.

METHODS

Aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical features and the management of neutropenia occurring in anti-CD20 treated PwMS through a single-center case series and a systematic review of the literature, performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 19 patients were included (3 from our clinical experience, 16 from the systematic review). Median age was 38 years-old (25-69) and nearly 70% were female, most of these patients had already received a median of 3 (0-4) previous treatments. Neutropenia occurred in 11 patients treated with ocrelizumab and 8 with rituximab, after a median of 2 (1-7) infusions and 9.5 (1-42) months from the first infusion. Most of these patients had late-onset neutropenia, that occurred after a median time of 90 days (2-156). About 70% of patients were symptomatic and most were treated with G-CSF or antibiotics. No relapses after G-CSF were reported. In those who did not suspend anti-CD20 (68.8%), neutropenia reoccurred in 18.2% of cases. Finally, switching between rituximab and ocrelizumab seem not to affect the occurrence of neutropenia.

CONCLUSION

Our data provides practical evidence regarding the occurrence and the management of neutropenia during treatment with anti-CD20 in PwMS.

Impact of histone modifier-induced protection against autoimmune encephalomyelitis on multiple sclerosis treatment

Multiple sclerosis is a progressive demyelinating central nervous system disorder with unknown etiology. The condition has heterogeneous presentations, including relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and secondary and primary progressive multiple sclerosis. The genetic and epigenetic mechanisms underlying these various forms of multiple sclerosis remain elusive. Many disease-modifying therapies approved for multiple sclerosis are broad-spectrum immunomodulatory drugs that reduce relapses but do not halt the disease progression or neuroaxonal damage. Some are also associated with many severe side effects, including fatalities. Improvements in disease-modifying treatments especially for primary progressive multiple sclerosis remain an unmet need. Several experimental animal models are available to decipher the mechanisms involved in multiple sclerosis. These models help us decipher the advantages and limitations of novel disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis.

TLR9/FCRL3 regulates B cell viability, apoptosis, and antibody and IL-10 production through ERK1/2, p38, and STAT3 signaling pathways

B cells play a role in the progression of multiple sclerosis (MS) and are closely related to Fc-receptor like-3 (FCRL3), but little is known about FCRL3 in B cells and MS. Activation of TLR9 in B cells with CpG found that CpG promoted FCRL3 expression in a dose- and time-dependent manner. CpG significantly activated ERK1/2, p38, and STAT3 pathways, and FCRL3 overexpression further promoted the activation of these pathways, while FCRL3 siRNA significantly inhibited the activation of these pathways by CpG. CpG stimulation significantly promoted the viability of B cells, inhibited cell apoptosis, and enhanced the production of antibodies and secretion of IL-10 by B cells. FCRL3 siRNA blocked most of the above regulatory effects of CpG, but promoted the further production of antibodies by B cells. FCRL3 overexpression enhanced the pro-survival, anti-apoptotic, and IL-10-inducing effects of CpG, but inhibited the effect of CpG on promoting antibody production. After adding inhibitors of ERK1/2, p38, and STAT3 pathways, respectively, the effects of CpG on promoting cell viability, antibody production, and IL-10 secretion were significantly reduced, but the anti-apoptotic effect of CpG was only affected by the blockade of STAT3 pathway. In addition, FCRL3 regulated B cell antibody and IL-10 secretion mainly through its ITIMs. These results indicate that TLR9 activation affects B cell proliferation, apoptosis, antibody production, and IL-10 secretion by upregulating FCRL3 expression, and is associated with ERK1/2, p38, and STAT3 pathways. Therefore, FCRL3 may be an important target for the diagnosis and treatment of B cell-related diseases.