1
|
De Troyer M, Van Remoortel A, Van Schependom J, Faille LD, D'hooghe MB, Peeters G, Nagels G, D'haeseleer M. Clinical effectiveness of coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination in patients with multiple sclerosis stratified by disease-modifying treatment. Eur J Neurol 2024:e16300. [PMID: 38641878 DOI: 10.1111/ene.16300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2023] [Revised: 01/20/2024] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination has been associated with a dampened humoral and/or cellular immune response in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) who were concurrently on disease-modifying treatment (DMT) with B-cell depleting agents or sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators (S1PRMs). Our main goal was to investigate the impact of these DMT classes on the clinical effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination. METHODS Since March 2020, demographics and clinical data of patients with MS who developed COVID-19 have been collected at the Belgian National MS Centre in Melsbroek. Patients were considered to be 'protected by vaccination' if they were (i) fully vaccinated and (ii) tested positive for COVID-19 in the period ranging from 14 days to 6 months after the last administered vaccine. RESULTS On 19 December 2022, 418 COVID-19 cases were retrospectively identified in 389 individual patients. Hospitalization and mortality rates resulting from the infection were 10.8% and 2.4%, respectively. Being 'unprotected by vaccination' was significantly associated with a worse COVID-19 outcome (i.e., hospitalization and/or death) in the total cohort (N = 418, odds ratio [OR] 3.96), in patients on ongoing DMT other than anti-CD20 agents or S1PRMs (N = 123, OR 31.75) and in patients without DMT (N = 182, OR 5.60), but not in those receiving anti-CD20 agents (N = 91, OR 0.39); the S1PRMs subgroup was considered too small (22 infections) for any meaningful analysis. CONCLUSIONS Coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination protects against severe infection in patients with MS but it was not possible to confirm this effect in those on DMT with B-cell depleting agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marijke De Troyer
- Department of Neurology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Neurology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouw Ziekenhuis (OLVZ), Aalst, Belgium
| | | | - Jeroen Van Schependom
- Neuroprotection and Neuromodulation (NEUR) Research Groups, Center for Neurosciences (C4N), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
- Artificial Intelligence supported Modelling in clinical Sciences (AIMS) Research Groups, Center for Neurosciences (C4N), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Electronics and Informatics (ETRO), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Marie B D'hooghe
- Department of Neurology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Brussels, Belgium
- Nationaal Multiple Sclerose Centrum (NMSC), Melsbroek, Belgium
- Neuroprotection and Neuromodulation (NEUR) Research Groups, Center for Neurosciences (C4N), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
- Artificial Intelligence supported Modelling in clinical Sciences (AIMS) Research Groups, Center for Neurosciences (C4N), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Gertjan Peeters
- Department of Neurology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Brussels, Belgium
- Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen (ZNA) Middelheim, Anwerp, Belgium
| | - Guy Nagels
- Department of Neurology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Brussels, Belgium
- Neuroprotection and Neuromodulation (NEUR) Research Groups, Center for Neurosciences (C4N), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
- Artificial Intelligence supported Modelling in clinical Sciences (AIMS) Research Groups, Center for Neurosciences (C4N), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
- icometrix, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Miguel D'haeseleer
- Department of Neurology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Brussels, Belgium
- Nationaal Multiple Sclerose Centrum (NMSC), Melsbroek, Belgium
- Neuroprotection and Neuromodulation (NEUR) Research Groups, Center for Neurosciences (C4N), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
- Artificial Intelligence supported Modelling in clinical Sciences (AIMS) Research Groups, Center for Neurosciences (C4N), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Marantos T, Kyriazopoulou E, Lekakis V, Voumvourakis KI, Tsiodras S. Immunogenicity and safety of vaccines in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Sci 2024; 456:122852. [PMID: 38142541 DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2023.122852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Revised: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Seroconversion rate of vaccines varies and requires further elucidation in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) under treatment with disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). We aimed to investigate this in a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS MEDLINE(PubMed) and Cochrane databases were searched based on a pre-specified protocol (PROSPERO: CRD42020202018). Studies reporting on patients with MS, diagnosed with McDonald criteria getting vaccinated with any type of vaccine were included in the analysis. The primary endpoint was the incidence of patients being seropositive and experience adverse events after vaccination. Outcomes were expressed as proportions with respective 95% confidence interval (CI). Two reviewers independently screened and reviewed existing literature and assessed study quality with the Methodological index for non-randomized studies. RESULTS Of 295 articles, 45 studies were analyzed. Seroconversion after COVID-19 vaccines was 76% (95% CI, 70-80; I2 = 95%; 20 studies including 5601 patients. Protection was lower in patients treated with anti-CD20 antibodies and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor (S1PR) modulators compared to untreated patients or treatment with other DMTs. Relapse occurred in 2% (95% CI, 1-3; I2 = 86%; 16 studies including 7235 patients). Seroconversion after seasonal influenza vaccines was 82% (95% CI, 65-91; I2 = 90%; 6 studies including 490 patients). Relapse rate was similar to this after COVID-19 vaccination. CONCLUSION The majority of MS patients vaccinated for COVID-19 or seasonal influenza mount an adequate immune response without safety concerns. Data on other vaccines are limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theodoros Marantos
- 4(th) Department of Internal Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Athens, Greece
| | - Evdoxia Kyriazopoulou
- 4(th) Department of Internal Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Athens, Greece.
| | - Vasileios Lekakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Sotirios Tsiodras
- 4(th) Department of Internal Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Athens, Greece.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Groß-Albenhausen E, Weier A, Velten M, Heider T, Chunder R, Kuerten S. Immune monitoring of SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell and B cell responses in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with ocrelizumab. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1254128. [PMID: 37841269 PMCID: PMC10569464 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1254128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Since the development of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2), there has been significant interest in determining the effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients under immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive therapies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of ocrelizumab, a monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody, on SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell and B cell responses in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Methods To this end, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from n = 23 patients with RRMS. Of these patients, n = 17 were tested before (time point t0) and one month after (time point t1) their first dose of ocrelizumab. In addition, we studied n = 9 RRMS patients that got infected with SARS-CoV-2 over the course of ocrelizumab therapy (time point t2). PBMCs were also isolated from n = 19 age- and gender-matched healthy controls (HCs) after vaccination or infection with SARS-CoV-2, respectively. Interferon-γ (IFN-γ)/interleukin-2 (IL-2) and granzyme B (GzB)/perforin (PFN) double-color enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assays or single-color ELISPOT assays were performed to measure SARS-CoV-2 antigen-specific T cell and B cell responses. Anti-viral antibody titers were quantified in the serum by chemiluminescence immunoassay. Results Our data indicate a significant difference in the SARS-CoV-2 specific IFN-γ (P = 0.0119) and PFN (P = 0.0005) secreting T cell compartment in the MS cohort at t0 compared to HCs. Following the first dose of ocrelizumab treatment, a significant decrease in the number of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein-specific B cells was observed (P = 0.0012). Infection with SARS-CoV-2 in MS patients under ocrelizumab therapy did not significantly alter their existing immune response against the virus. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis suggested that the spike S1 protein-specific immunoglobulin (Ig)G response might be a key parameter for predicting the probability of (re)infection with SARS-CoV-2. Discussion Our results call for a critical discussion regarding appropriate vaccination intervals and potential biomarkers for the prediction of (re)infection with SARS-CoV-2 in patients with MS receiving ocrelizumab. Unique identifier DRKS00029110; URL: http://apps.who.int/trialsearch/.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elina Groß-Albenhausen
- Institute of Neuroanatomy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bonn and University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Alicia Weier
- Institute of Neuroanatomy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bonn and University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Markus Velten
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Thorsten Heider
- Clinic for Neurology, Klinikum St. Marien Amberg, Amberg, Germany
| | - Rittika Chunder
- Institute of Neuroanatomy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bonn and University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Stefanie Kuerten
- Institute of Neuroanatomy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bonn and University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rodero-Romero A, Sainz de la Maza S, Fernández-Velasco JI, Monreal E, Walo-Delgado PE, Chico-García JL, Villarrubia N, Rodríguez-Jorge F, Rodríguez-Ramos R, Masjuan J, Costa-Frossard L, Villar LM. Blood CD8+ Naïve T-Cells Identify MS Patients with High Probability of Optimal Cellular Response to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:1399. [PMID: 37766078 PMCID: PMC10535818 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11091399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Revised: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
This single-center study included 68 multiple sclerosis (MS) patients who received the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination from one of several approved vaccine preparations in Spain. Blood samples were collected one to three months after the second dose of the vaccine had been administered. Cellular immune responses to the vaccine were assessed using QuantiFERON analysis, and peripheral blood mononuclear cell subsets were assayed using flow cytometry. Response associated with higher percentages of total lymphocytes, naïve CD4+ T-cells (p = 0.028), CD8+ T-cells (p = 0.013), and, mostly, naïve CD8+ T-cells (p = 0.0003). These results were confirmed by analyzing absolute numbers (p = 0.019; p = 0.002, and p = 0.0003, respectively). Naïve CD8 T-cell numbers higher than 17 cells/μL were closely associated with an optimal cellular response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination (odds ratio: 24.0, confidence interval: 4.8-460.3; p = 0.0001). This finding clearly shows that independent of the treatment received, higher numbers of naïve CD8+ T-cells yield a strong cellular response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in MS patients. If this finding is validated with other viruses/vaccines, it could provide a good tool for identifying MS patients undergoing treatment who will develop strong cellular responses to anti-virus vaccines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Rodero-Romero
- Department of Immunology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Red Española de Esclerosis Múltiple (REEM), Red de Enfermedades Inflamatorias (REI), Universidad de Alcalá, 28034 Madrid, Spain; (A.R.-R.); (J.I.F.-V.); (P.E.W.-D.); (N.V.); (R.R.-R.)
| | - Susana Sainz de la Maza
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Red Española de Esclerosis Múltiple (REEM), Universidad de Alcalá, 28034 Madrid, Spain (E.M.); (J.L.C.-G.); (F.R.-J.); (J.M.); (L.C.-F.)
| | - José Ignacio Fernández-Velasco
- Department of Immunology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Red Española de Esclerosis Múltiple (REEM), Red de Enfermedades Inflamatorias (REI), Universidad de Alcalá, 28034 Madrid, Spain; (A.R.-R.); (J.I.F.-V.); (P.E.W.-D.); (N.V.); (R.R.-R.)
| | - Enric Monreal
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Red Española de Esclerosis Múltiple (REEM), Universidad de Alcalá, 28034 Madrid, Spain (E.M.); (J.L.C.-G.); (F.R.-J.); (J.M.); (L.C.-F.)
| | - Paulette Esperanza Walo-Delgado
- Department of Immunology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Red Española de Esclerosis Múltiple (REEM), Red de Enfermedades Inflamatorias (REI), Universidad de Alcalá, 28034 Madrid, Spain; (A.R.-R.); (J.I.F.-V.); (P.E.W.-D.); (N.V.); (R.R.-R.)
| | - Juan Luis Chico-García
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Red Española de Esclerosis Múltiple (REEM), Universidad de Alcalá, 28034 Madrid, Spain (E.M.); (J.L.C.-G.); (F.R.-J.); (J.M.); (L.C.-F.)
| | - Noelia Villarrubia
- Department of Immunology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Red Española de Esclerosis Múltiple (REEM), Red de Enfermedades Inflamatorias (REI), Universidad de Alcalá, 28034 Madrid, Spain; (A.R.-R.); (J.I.F.-V.); (P.E.W.-D.); (N.V.); (R.R.-R.)
| | - Fernando Rodríguez-Jorge
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Red Española de Esclerosis Múltiple (REEM), Universidad de Alcalá, 28034 Madrid, Spain (E.M.); (J.L.C.-G.); (F.R.-J.); (J.M.); (L.C.-F.)
| | - Rafael Rodríguez-Ramos
- Department of Immunology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Red Española de Esclerosis Múltiple (REEM), Red de Enfermedades Inflamatorias (REI), Universidad de Alcalá, 28034 Madrid, Spain; (A.R.-R.); (J.I.F.-V.); (P.E.W.-D.); (N.V.); (R.R.-R.)
| | - Jaime Masjuan
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Red Española de Esclerosis Múltiple (REEM), Universidad de Alcalá, 28034 Madrid, Spain (E.M.); (J.L.C.-G.); (F.R.-J.); (J.M.); (L.C.-F.)
| | - Lucienne Costa-Frossard
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Red Española de Esclerosis Múltiple (REEM), Universidad de Alcalá, 28034 Madrid, Spain (E.M.); (J.L.C.-G.); (F.R.-J.); (J.M.); (L.C.-F.)
| | - Luisa María Villar
- Department of Immunology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Red Española de Esclerosis Múltiple (REEM), Red de Enfermedades Inflamatorias (REI), Universidad de Alcalá, 28034 Madrid, Spain; (A.R.-R.); (J.I.F.-V.); (P.E.W.-D.); (N.V.); (R.R.-R.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Although neurological complications of SARS-CoV-2 infection are relatively rare, their potential long term morbidity and mortality have a significant impact, given the large numbers of infected patients. Covid-19 is now in the differential diagnosis of a number of common neurological syndromes including encephalopathy, encephalitis, acute demyelinating encephalomyelitis, stroke, and Guillain-Barré syndrome. Physicians should be aware of the pathophysiology underlying these presentations to diagnose and treat patients rapidly and appropriately. Although good evidence has been found for neurovirulence, the neuroinvasive and neurotropic potential of SARS-CoV-2 is limited. The pathophysiology of most complications is immune mediated and vascular, or both. A significant proportion of patients have developed long covid, which can include neuropsychiatric presentations. The mechanisms of long covid remain unclear. The longer term consequences of infection with covid-19 on the brain, particularly in terms of neurodegeneration, will only become apparent with time and long term follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel L Brown
- University College London, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
- National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK
- UCL Institute of Immunity and Transplantation, London, UK
| | - Laura Benjamin
- National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK
- UCL Laboratory of Molecular and Cell Biology, London, UK
| | - Michael P Lunn
- University College London, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
- National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK
| | - Tehmina Bharucha
- National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, UK
| | - Michael S Zandi
- University College London, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
- National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK
| | - Chandrashekar Hoskote
- Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Patricia McNamara
- National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK
| | - Hadi Manji
- University College London, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
- National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
McGuire J, Muto C, Marcello C. Multiple sclerosis: Implications for the primary care NP. Nurse Pract 2023; 48:38-47. [PMID: 37487047 DOI: 10.1097/01.npr.0000000000000083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/26/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Multiple sclerosis is a demyelinating disease of the central nervous system. It contributes to a variety of symptoms affecting different areas of the body. The primary care NP must be familiar with the disease, therapies, and social impact to provide proper care to affected patients.
Collapse
|
7
|
Pernicová E, Macounová P, Krsek M, Maďar R. Summary of Safety and Efficacy of COVID Vaccination in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis. Eur Neurol 2023; 86:263-276. [PMID: 36871554 PMCID: PMC10614228 DOI: 10.1159/000529982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 03/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic represents one of the most challenging issues that have recently influenced everyday life in countries all over the world. Understanding the risk of this disease is of high importance in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) as they represent a vulnerable population through their treatment with disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). Infective episodes may trigger relapses and lead to deterioration of the health condition. SUMMARY Vaccination is an important preventive measure against infectious diseases. In MS patients, concerns have been raised about the effectiveness of vaccines in patients on various immunomodulatory drugs and about their possible adverse effects including impairment of neurological functions. The objectives of this article were to summarize the current knowledge on immune responses to the COVID-19 vaccines and their safety in MS patients and to provide practical guidance based on the data available to date. KEY MESSAGES Although MS is not associated with a higher risk of COVID-19, this infection can trigger relapses or pseudo-relapses. Vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 are recommended for all MS patients who are not in the active phase of the disease, despite the fact that there is still a lack of long-term reliable data on the effectiveness and safety of vaccines against COVID-19. Some DMTs can reduce vaccine humoral responses, but might still provide some protection and adequate T-cell response. To optimize the effectiveness of vaccination, the ideal timing of vaccine application and DMTs dosing regimen is crucial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Pernicová
- Avenier, Centres of Vaccination and Travel Medicine, Brno and Ostrava, Czechia
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
| | - Petra Macounová
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czechia,
| | - Martin Krsek
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
| | - Rastislav Maďar
- Avenier, Centres of Vaccination and Travel Medicine, Brno and Ostrava, Czechia
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czechia
| |
Collapse
|