Will dapivirine redeem the promises of anti-HIV microbicides? Overview of product design and clinical testing

Microbicides are being developed in order to prevent sexual transmission of HIV. Dapivirine, a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, is one of the leading drug candidates in the field, currently being tested in various dosage forms, namely vaginal rings, gels, and films. In particular, a ring allowing sustained drug release for 1month is in an advanced stage of clinical testing. Two parallel phase III clinical trials are underway in sub-Saharan Africa and results are expected to be released in early 2016. This article overviews the development of dapivirine and its multiple products as potential microbicides, with particular emphasis being placed on clinical evaluation. Also, critical aspects regarding regulatory approval, manufacturing, distribution, and access are discussed.

In Vitro Pre- and Post-Exposure Prophylaxis Using HIV Inhibitors as Microbicides Against Cell-Free or Cell-Associated HIV-1 Infection

Several classes of microbicides are being evaluated for the prevention of sexual HIV transmission. In vivo, the infectious dose and viral source involved in transmission remain uncertain and it is likely that women will use microbicides both before and after high-risk HIV exposure. Therefore, we evaluated HIV entry inhibitors (EIs) and reverse transcriptase inhibitors (RTIs) for their ability to block cell-free and cell-associated HIV-1 infection in co-cultures of monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MO-DC) and CD4+T-cells using settings of pre- and post-exposure prophylaxis. In the pre-exposure assay, where compound was present before, during and 24 h after infection, all tested EIs (BMS806, TAK779 and T20) and RTIs (PMPA, TMC120 and UC781) blocked infection with 10−4multiplicity of infection (MOI) of cell-free virus at a dose between 100 and 10,000 nM, dependent on the compound used. At 10−3MOI, however, only T20 and the RTIs completely blocked infection. Furthermore, in experiments with cell-associated virus, EIs were ineffective, whereas RTIs actively blocked infection with similar potency as in the experiments with cell-free virus. In the post-exposure assay, where compound was added 2 h after infection and remained present for 24 h, EIs were inactive whereas RTIs blocked cell-free and cell-associated viral infections equally efficiently. Moreover, post-exposure prophylaxis initiated 24 h after infection with cell-free or cell-associated HIV-1 was still effective with 1,000 nM of TMC120. Both EIs and RTIs were non-cytotoxic at any tested concentration for MO-DC and CD4+T-cells in co-culture. Our study shows that RTIs are potent inhibitors of cell-free and cell-associated virus used either in pre- or post-exposure settings. It highlights that parameters such as viral input, viral source, the time of compound addition and the target cells should be considered in microbicides evaluation.