Pharmaceutical citizenship in an era of universal access to hepatitis C treatment: Situated potentials and limits

The sociology of prescribing: A narrative review and agenda

Prescribing is a key symbol of the authority of medical practice, and is restricted to qualified clinicians who permit access to many medicines. Variously framed as over- or under-prescribed, or otherwise inadequately provisioned, sociologists have attended to the clinical logics and practices underpinning prescribing. Despite being a key feature in medical practice, there is only scattered attention to a 'sociology of prescribing' or a general social theory of prescribing. In contrast, there has been a flourishing sociology of diagnosis in recent decades that organises the field. Revisiting a nascent sociology of prescribing that emerged in the 1970s, this article reviews sociological (and other social scientific) contributions to prescribing and provides an agenda for a contemporary approach to sociological perspectives on drug prescribing. A sociology of prescribing conceptualises the act of prescribing as an embodied and relational social practice shaped through the complex choreographies of health encounters and systems. Early prescribing literature documented variations in prescribing practices across clinical sites, attended to the divergent expectations of the prescription between doctor and patient, and characterised prescribing as symbolically potent, enabling the doctor to alleviate, validate, and placate patient concerns. While health industries understand prescribing as a technical process of following the mandates of ethics and evidence-based medicine (or 'rational prescribing'), social research has identified pharmaceutical detailing, workplace cultures, and practice-relevant knowledge as key determinants of prescribing practice. Recent sociological inquiry has also focused on professional tensions with the expansion of non-medical prescribing, critiques of the (bio)medicalisation and pharmaceuticalisation of society, and the impacts of new technologies like electronic prescribing. I propose care, expertise, power, and work as domains for future sociological inquiry on prescribing. Attending to these domains will be vital as prescribing is continually reimagined through transformations in the technological and political arrangements of pharmaceuticals and healthcare.

The 'missing' in the 'endgame' of hepatitis C elimination: A qualitative study in New South Wales, Australia

INTRODUCTION

After a promising start in Australia, elimination efforts for hepatitis C are not on track. Following the global campaign to 'find the missing' in hepatitis C response, this qualitative study explores stakeholder perspectives on the 'missing' in the 'endgame' of hepatitis elimination in the state of New South Wales, Australia.

METHOD

Twenty-eight key informants working in New South Wales, elsewhere in Australia and internationally in high income countries participated in a semi-structured qualitative interview. Analysis examined key informant accounts of the 'missing' in efforts to eliminate hepatitis C.

RESULTS

Participants' accounts framed the missing in relation to epidemiological knowledge, making-up four population categories 'missing' or 'missed' in hepatitis C response. In turn, accounts situated the missing in relation to where and how individuals were presumed to connect, or not, with existing health-care infrastructures. This gave rise to concerns about the capacity of health services to be made available for those at risk or in need, with systems said to create opportunities for people to 'miss out' on hepatitis C services.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

The 'missing' in the 'endgame' of hepatitis C elimination effort is not simply a function of who-populations missed-but of where and how, that is, situation and context. Our findings encourage a focus on how services, systems and contexts may create situations in which people become missed or are 'made missing' from care. We therefore advocate for a systemic, and not only population-based, approach in the final push towards hepatitis C's elimination.

'We've got a present for you': Hepatitis C elimination, compromised healthcare subjects and treatment as a gift

With the advent of highly effective and tolerable direct-acting antiviral treatments for hepatitis C, widespread optimism for and investment in the project of disease elimination now informs the public health response. In Australia, the Commonwealth government has invested heavily in elimination by universally subsidising treatment, promising access for all. Reflecting concerns that commonly accompany ambitious public health projects, cost for governments supporting access to the treatment and cost for individuals consuming it have emerged as central issues. Drawing on 30 interviews with people who have been cured of hepatitis C with direct-acting antivirals, this article examines how cost shapes experiences of hepatitis C treatment and cure in Australia. Drawing on Lauren Berlant's (2011) influential work on 'cruel optimism', we analyse three interconnected ways that notions of cost shape participants' views of treatment as a beneficent gift from the state: (1) understandings of treatment access as a form of 'luck'; (2) conceptions of the cost of treatment; and (3) criticisms of others who are seen to waste state resources by not taking up treatment or by re-acquiring hepatitis C. We argue that, together, these dynamics constitute people affected by hepatitis C not as citizens worthy of public investment and fundamentally entitled to care, but as second-class citizens less deserving of treatment and of the health care to which they might otherwise be considered entitled. It is within this dynamic that the compromised quality of elimination optimism takes shape, binding people affected by hepatitis C to an inequitable relationship to health care, reproduced through the very things that promise to free them of such inequality - investments in access to treatment and cure.

Optimism and eternal vigilance: Gathering disease, responsible subjects and the hope of elimination in the new hepatitis C treatment era

The advent of direct-acting antiviral hepatitis C medications has reshaped experiences of hepatitis C treatment and cure. Positioned as a treatment revolution, the new medications mean a world without hepatitis C has become imaginable, and this optimism is reflected in Australia's commitment to the WHO's target of 'eliminating' the virus as a public health threat by 2030. Alongside optimism about new treatments, Australia's current National Hepatitis C Strategy also emphasises the importance of partnerships with, and the 'meaningful involvement' of, priority populations for elimination to be achieved. We draw on Fraser and Seear's (2011) work on hepatitis C as a 'gathering' to examine these developments, and to approach hepatitis C as a disease in-the-making. Analysing 50 interviews conducted with people affected by the virus, we identify three key articulations that combine to trouble the distinction between old and new treatments: (1) the new treatment constitutes the disease as readily curable; (2) nevertheless, those who have been cured are responsibilised against acquiring it again by managing and monitoring their conduct; and (3) in the process, hepatitis C becomes re-constituted as an ongoing threat requiring continual post-cure medical and other monitoring. We argue that while treatment experiences have dramatically improved, responsibilising people affected by hepatitis C to attain cure in the context of an elimination agenda constitutes cure as valuable as much for the greater good as for self-care. This raises pressing ethical and political questions. Overall, we shed light on how, even in a context shaped by the availability of highly effective treatment, the hepatitis C-free body is never hepatitis C-free, but must be continually reproduced through regulatory practices.

Future destinations and social inclusion scoping review: how people cured of hepatitis C (HCV) using direct- acting antiviral drugs progress in a new HCV-free world

BACKGROUND

There has been a paradigm shift in the treatment of Hepatitis C (HCV) from the interferon-era to direct-acting antiviral (DAA) drugs. Cure of HCV for the key risk group, those with a history of injecting drug use, may provide a range of benefits to an individual's quality of life that can be additional to that of a clinical cure. The interferon-era provided evidence that cure of HCV can be a turning point for those who use drugs, supporting a recovery journey. There remains a question if DAAs can provide the same opportunity.

METHODS

We employed a scoping review methodology to consider the additional non-clinical benefits that HCV cure may provide. We used the theoretical construct of recovery capital to consider how these benefits may support a recovery journey in the DAA-era.

RESULTS

Our search provided 2095 articles, from which 35 were included in the analysis. We developed a thematic synthesis of the non-clinical outcomes identified based on the four over-arching themes of recovery capital: physical, cultural, social and human capital. Our review suggests that identity change is a constituent part of each of the recovery capital domains in relation to HCV treatment.

CONCLUSION

We identified Social Identity Model Of Recovery (SIMOR) as a mechanism through which DAAs may provide non-clinical outcomes to increase recovery capital domains. Further research is required to develop an understanding of the impact a cure of HCV with DAAs may have on identity, overall health and wellbeing and social inclusion to support recovery journeys.

'Not just one box that you tick off' - Deconstructing the hepatitis C care cascade in the interferon-free direct acting antiviral era from the client perspective

BACKGROUND

To achieve hepatitis C viral (HCV) elimination targets set by the World Health Organisation, pillars of the HCV care cascade are often referenced to track progress. The aim of this qualitative study was to explore the limitations of the care cascade framework through the real-world accounts of 'HCV journeys' among people who inject drugs (PWID), with particular attention to the intersection of PWID agency and structural determinants in the healthcare system.

METHODS

An in-depth analysis was conducted on five case studies to better understand participant experiences 'behind the cascade pillars'. The five case studies were drawn from the ETHOS Engage cohort as exemplars of the real-world complexities of people's HCV cascade journeys. Inclusion criteria for the qualitative study were participant has voluntarily signed the informed consent form, aged ≥18 years, HCV antibody positive by self-report, clients of selected sites participating in the ETHOS Engage cohort, and sufficiently proficient in English to participate in an interview. Thirty-four semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants who had received or had not received HCV treatment to identify barriers and facilitators to HCV care.

RESULTS

Participants 'housed' at the 'HCV RNA diagnosed pillar' (n = 2; Will; Julie) reported withholding their HCV serostatus in certain healthcare settings for fear that disclosure would lead to discriminatory decision-making from their treating physician. among participants who had completed treatment (n = 3; Corey; John; Nora) two reported still being unsure of their HCV status >6 months post-treatment. Ongoing feelings of frustration and shame were expressed in this 'post-cure care pillar' due to a perceived lack of quality care from clinic services and continued uneasiness when discussing drug use and reinfection while receiving opioid agonist treatment (OAT). Both case 'categories' described often tenuous therapeutic relationships with their physicians and recommended task-shifting to nurses and trusted case workers for ongoing care.

CONCLUSION

The care cascade provides a linear, two dimensional snapshot of clinical targets. Our findings illuminate structural barriers not visible behind its 'static' pillars, presenting insights into experiences among PWID otherwise dismissed as 'disengaged' or 'lost to follow-up'.

Becoming posthuman: hepatitis C, the race to elimination and the politics of remaking the subject

Hepatitis C has long been a public health problem in Australia. 'Revolutionary' new drugs with the potential to cure hepatitis C have now emerged. The Australian government has invested heavily in them, and has an ambitious goal to eliminate hepatitis C by 2030. Numerous shifts in policy and practice are required if the elimination agenda is to be realised. This paper explores the significance of these shifts. We ask: what is the race to elimination doing with the subject? We argue that the race to elimination can be understood, simultaneously, as a product of posthuman forces, capable of being analysed using the theoretical tools made available via the posthuman turn; producing an intervention in what it means to be human; and generating a dilemma for people who use (or used) drugs, people with hepatitis C, and posthuman scholarship. In drawing out these issues, we aim to: trace the significant developments underway in hepatitis C medicine and raise awareness of them; encourage reflection on the consequences of these developments; and invite reflections on what might be lost when the human is remade by hepatitis C medicine.