Expectation prior to human papilloma virus vaccination: 11 to 12-Year-old girls' written narratives

Factors that influence caregivers' and adolescents' views and practices regarding human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination for adolescents: a qualitative evidence synthesis

BACKGROUND

Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination in adolescents provides a powerful tool for preventing cervical cancer in women and other HPV-associated diseases in people of all genders. HPV vaccines have been progressively introduced in many countries. However, worldwide, many adolescents do not receive HPV vaccination, for various reasons. The HPV vaccine might be costly or unavailable, healthcare systems might lack capacity for its delivery, or adolescent health might not be prioritised. Some caregivers and adolescents may not accept available HPV vaccines and vaccination services. We currently lack a comprehensive understanding of the factors that influence HPV vaccination views and practices, and why some caregivers and adolescents may be less accepting of the vaccine. Qualitative research can contribute to this understanding and help inform policy and practice, including the development of more relevant, acceptable and effective interventions to promote public acceptance and uptake of HPV vaccination in adolescents. This qualitative evidence synthesis supplements a Cochrane review of the effectiveness of interventions to improve uptake of adolescent vaccination, including HPV vaccination.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of the review are to identify, appraise, and synthesise qualitative studies that explore caregivers' or adolescents' views, experiences, practices, intentions, decision-making, acceptance, hesitancy, or nonacceptance of HPV vaccination; to gain an understanding of the factors that influence caregiver and adolescent views and practices regarding HPV vaccination for adolescents; and to explore how the findings of this review can enhance our understanding of the related Cochrane intervention review.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and Scopus for eligible studies (February 2023). We updated this search in October 2024, but these results have not yet been fully incorporated.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included studies that utilised qualitative methods for data collection and analysis; focused on caregivers' or adolescents' views, practices, acceptance, hesitancy, or refusal of HPV vaccination for adolescents aged 9 to 19 years of age; and were from any setting globally where HPV vaccination is provided.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used a prespecified sampling frame to capture a sample of eligible studies that were from a range of geographical and income-level settings, were conceptually rich in relation to the review's phenomenon of interest, and included HPV vaccination for diverse genders. We extracted contextual and methodological data from each sampled study. We used a thematic synthesis approach to analyse the evidence. We assessed methodological limitations using a list of criteria used in previous Cochrane reviews and originally based on the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme quality assessment tool for qualitative studies. We used the GRADE-CERQual (Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research) approach to assess our confidence in each review finding. We integrated the findings of this review with those from the related Cochrane review of intervention effectiveness (by Abdullahi and colleagues), by mapping whether the trial interventions reflected or targeted the factors identified by this review as influencing caregivers' or adolescents' views and practices regarding HPV vaccination.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 206 studies in the review and sampled 71 of these for our synthesis. Of these, 35 studies were conducted in high-income countries, 26 studies in middle-income countries, 8 studies in low-income countries, and 2 studies in multiple-income settings. Studies came from all six World Health Organization (WHO) regions and included urban and rural settings. We downgraded our confidence in several findings, mainly due to concerns about how the studies were conducted (methodological limitations), concerns about perspectives lacking from some types of participants or in some settings (relevance), or because of variability in the data or insufficient evidence to support all aspects of a review finding (coherence). Many complex factors were found to influence caregivers' and adolescents' HPV vaccination views and practices, which we categorised into eight overarching themes: 1) A lack of biomedical knowledge; 2) Perceptions of a range of interrelated risks and benefits (or lack thereof) associated with HPV vaccination; 3) Routine responses to vaccination generally or more specific views or experiences of other vaccines and vaccination programmes; 4) Complex nuclear familial decision-making dynamics; 5) Extended familial and social relations and networks, particularly extended family members, peers, traditional or religious leaders, and the media; 6) Interrelated socio-cultural beliefs and practices regarding adolescence, sexuality, gender, parenting and health; 7) Trust or distrust in the institutions, systems or experts associated with vaccination, most particularly teachers and the school, the pharmaceutical industry, government, science and biomedicine, and healthcare professionals; and 8) Access to, and experiences of, HPV vaccination programmes and delivery services, such as the convenience (or lack thereof) of HPV vaccination services, the cost of the vaccine, language barriers, the feminisation of HPV vaccination programmes and procedural aspects of school-based vaccination delivery. We did not identify any major differences in the occurrence of these overarching themes between subgroups. However, for various subthemes certain differences emerged in relation to place, gender and socio-economic status, and between caregivers and adolescents. The interventions tested in the related Cochrane review of intervention effectiveness most commonly targeted caregivers' and adolescents' lack of biomedical knowledge and their perceptions of the risks and benefits of HPV vaccination, with the other influencing factors identified by our review being underrepresented.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Our review reveals that caregivers' and adolescents' HPV vaccination views and practices are not only influenced by issues related to individual knowledge and perceptions of the vaccine, but also an array of more complex, contextual factors and meanings: social, political, economic, structural, and moral. Successful development of interventions to promote the acceptance and uptake of HPV vaccination for adolescents requires an understanding of the context-specific factors that influence HPV vaccination views and practices in the target setting. Through this, more tailored and in turn more relevant, acceptable, and effective responses could be developed. The eight overarching themes that emerged from our review could serve as a basis for gaining this understanding.

It hurts to get forced: Children's narratives about restraint during medical procedures

According to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC), children have the right to be involved in decisions about medical procedures affecting them. However, research has shown that healthcare professionals sometimes find this difficult to achieve and those procedures then are performed against the will of the child. The aim was to illuminate restraint from the perspective of children's and young people's experiences of feeling forced during medical procedures. Following the phenomenological hermeneutic method, a secondary qualitative analysis of narrative data from four datasets collected between 2001 and 2020 was performed. Twelve children and young people aged 6-19 years (three male, nine female) from central and northern Sweden narrated their experiences of restraint related to medical procedures in nine narrative interviews and three short written narratives. The analysis revealed that it hurts to get forced, this being illustrated in six themes: bodily misery, emotional rebellion, feeling disregarded, physically limited, desiring escape, and leaving deep traces. From the perspective of children and young people, restraint was interpreted with inspiration from the philosopher Michel Foucault, as being overpowered - not voluntary submission but offering resistance - and according to the theory of caring and uncaring, a relationship in which the healthcare professional is perceived as indifferent to the patient as a person. In conclusion restraint hurts and means powerlessness to the child, leaving deep traces that remain for a long time. The findings call the healthcare profession to take action to support children's self-determination, participation, and integrity in healthcare. How children experience restraint in healthcare merits further investigation from the children's own perspective.

Children's and adolescent's narratives about pain and negative experiences in diabetes treatment

Pain and fear associated with needle procedures have been found to be more common among children and adolescents treated for type 1 diabetes (T1D) than among others in their age group. Furthermore, high glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) values are associated with needle-related fear.

AIM

To describe negative experiences of needle procedures in childhood diabetes treatment from children's and adolescents' own perspectives.

METHODS

Short written narratives (n = 83) and drawings (n = 2) from children and adolescents treated for T1D, aged 7-18 years, were subjected to inductive qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS

Negative experiences with needle procedures had many facets, such as pain and fear, changing over time and affecting everyday life. All kinds of needle procedures caused difficulties, but venipunctures were described as the worst.

CONCLUSION

All needle procedures involved in diabetes treatment are potentially experienced as creating pain and fear, but the negative experiences are multifaceted and vary between individuals. These experiences create suffering for children and adolescents, and influence their daily lives. Besides finding techniques to decrease the number of needle procedures in the treatment, research should focus on implementing methods to decrease pain, fear, and other negative experiences as well as to promote self-coping. This is urgent, since needle-related fear has an impact on glycaemic control and therefore increases the risk of long-term complications.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

When caring for children and adolescents with diabetes, their previous experiences with needle procedures need to be considered.

Understanding the determinants of vaccine hesitancy and vaccine confidence among adolescents: a systematic review

Vaccine hesitancy (VH) in the age of adolescence is a major public health issue, though it has not been widely examined in the scientific literature. This systematic review aims to address the determinants of VH among adolescents aged 10-19. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from the inception until 11 December 2020. Articles in English, assessing adolescents' attitudes toward vaccination in terms of hesitancy and/or confidence were considered eligible. Out of 14,704 articles, 20 studies were included in the qualitative analysis. Quality assessment was performed through the Appraisal tool for Cross-Sectional Studies (AXIS). A better knowledge of vaccine-preventable diseases, a higher confidence in vaccines, as well as an active involvement in the decision-making process showed a positive relationship with adolescents' vaccine uptake. These aspects should be considered to plan tailored interventions for the promotion of vaccination among adolescents and to reduce VH. Major limitations of this review are represented by the high heterogeneity of the tools used in the primary studies and the lack of standardization in outcomes definitions. Future research is needed to disentangle the interrelationship among the different determinants of VH in this age group.

Moral Challenges When Suspecting Abuse and Neglect in School Children: A Mixed Method Study

The World Health Organization (WHO), concludes that child maltreatment is a global concern calling for a multi sectoral interdisciplinary approach. School professionals, such as social workers, teachers, and health care professionals are in positions to discover and report maltreatment enabling social workers to intervene. However, a variety of reports reveal an evident gap between incidences and frequency of number of cases reported. A review of relevant research indicates that the problem of "not reporting" suggests that moral conflicts are activated in the process of decision-making. The aim was to gain a deeper understanding of school professionals' experiences of reporting suspected neglect and abuse to the Social Welfare Board. In a mixed method approach 32 school professionals, such as teachers, social workers, nurses and psychologists participated in interviews and responded to questionnaires. Findings from the qualitative content analysis were compared to the quantitative analysis in a meta-analysis. Moral conflicts occur when faced with making decisions about how to best deal with a child's situation. Thoughts about the child's best interest and relationship with his/her parents as well as the informants´ own safety, were central. The comparative meta- analysis of both data sets revealed these conflicts commence with a moral sensitivity of possible negative consequences for the child. Moral sensitivity can be viewed as a "good" personal attribute, it paradoxically might lead to moral stress despite an open ethical climate. Based on the results of this study, further research on the interpersonal aspects of dealing with moral conflicts involved in reporting suspected child abuse is indicated.

The Faces Emotional Coping Scale as a self-reporting instrument for coping with needle-related procedures: An initial validation study with children treated for type 1 diabetes

The aim of this study was to determine the concurrent and content validity, sensitivity and inter-rater reliability of the Faces Emotional Coping Scale (FECS) to evaluate the children's anticipation of the level of emotional coping in conjunction with a venepuncture. A total of 153 children with type 1 diabetes and 86 of their parents participated in the study. The age of the children, 76 of whom were boys, ranged from 7 to 18 years. The child and his or her parent reported the child's coping ability, and the child reported the pain intensity and unpleasantness of a venepuncture. The child also wrote a short narrative about his or her experience of the needle procedure. The FECS correlated negatively with the Coloured Analogue Scale and the Facial Affective Scale and positively with the FECS by proxy. The narratives of 90 children correlated negatively with the FECS. Younger children reported significantly lower scores than older children did regarding their ability to cope with a venepuncture. The children's scores on the FECS showed good agreement with the parents' scores. In this study, the FECS was deemed valid for measuring children's ability to cope with their emotions when undergoing needle-related procedures like venepuncture.