Risk Factors for Complications following Introduction of Radical Surgery for Colon Cancer: A Consecutive Patient Series

Complications after open and laparoscopic right-sided colectomy with central lymphadenectomy for colon cancer: randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

A central lymphadenectomy in right-sided colon cancer involves dissection along the superior mesenteric axis, but the extent is debated due to a lack of consensus and the fear of major complications. This randomized controlled trial compared the rate of postoperative morbidity in patients undergoing laparoscopic versus open right-sided colectomy with central lymphadenectomy.

METHODS

This open, prospective, randomized controlled trial compared patients operated on with open and laparoscopic right-sided colectomy (cStages I-III) with a central lymphadenectomy at two Norwegian institutions between October 2016 and December 2021. Dissections were conducted along the superior mesenteric vein in the laparoscopic group, and along the left anterior border of the superior mesenteric artery in the open group, both according to complete mesocolic excision principles. Surgery was standardized and performed by three experienced surgeons for each study group. The primary outcome of interest was to measure postoperative 30-day complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ grade II).

RESULTS

Of 273 eligible patients, 135 were randomized and 128 analysed (63 operated on with open and 65 using laparoscopic procedures). Postoperative complications occurred in 42.8 per cent of the patients treated with open and 38.4 per cent of the patients treated using laparoscopic surgery, P = 0.372. The incidence of Clavien-Dindo grade IIIb complications was 7.9 per cent in the open versus 4.6 per cent in the laparoscopic group, P = 0.341. There were no grade IV or V complications, and no re-operations due to anastomotic leakages. There was no significant difference in the mean(s.e.m.) number of removed lymph nodes (open versus laparoscopic respectively: 31.9(1.8) versus 29.3(1.3); P = 0.235).

CONCLUSION

There was no significant difference in complications between the two groups. Standardized oncologic right-sided colectomy with central lymphadenectomy along the mesenterial root was performed safely, both open and laparoscopic, with incidence of major complications ranging between 4.6 and 7.9 per cent and no re-operations for anastomotic leakage. Radicality in terms of lymphadenectomy was comparable between the two groups.Registration number: NCT03776591 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Definition and reporting of lymphadenectomy and complete mesocolic excision for radical right colectomy: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Several procedures have been proposed to reduce the rates of recurrence in patients with right-sided colon cancer. Different procedures for a radical right colectomy (RRC), including extended D3 lymphadenectomy, complete mesocolic excision and central vascular ligation have been associated with survival benefits by some authors, but results are inconsistent. The aim of this study was to assess the variability in definition and reporting of RRC, which might be responsible for significant differences in outcome evaluation.

METHODS

PRISMA-compliant systematic literature review to identify the definitions of RRC. Primary aims were to identify surgical steps and different nomenclature for RRC. Secondary aims were description of heterogeneity and overlap among different RRC techniques.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine articles satisfied inclusion criteria. Eight surgical steps were identified and recorded as specific to RRC: Central arterial ligation was described in 100% of the included studies; preservation of mesocolic integrity in 73% and dissection along the SMV plane in 67%. Other surgical steps were inconstantly reported. Six differently named techniques for RRC have been identified. There were 35 definitions for the 6 techniques and 40% of these were used to identify more than one technique.

CONCLUSIONS

The only universally adopted surgical step for RRC is central arterial ligation. There is great heterogeneity and consistent overlap among definitions of all RRC techniques. This is likely to jeopardise the interpretation of the outcomes of studies on the topic. Consistent use of definitions and reporting of procedures are needed to obtain reliable conclusions in future trials. PROSPERO CRD42021241650.

Effects of acupuncture treatment on postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction in colorectal cancer: study protocol for randomized controlled trials

Background

Postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction (PGID) is a common complication arising from colorectal cancer surgery. Attributing factors, such as anesthesia, surgical retraction, and early intake of water, can inhibit gastrointestinal motility, causing constipation, reduction or absence of bowel sounds, nausea, vomiting, and other symptoms. Delayed recovery in gastrointestinal function can lead to intestinal obstructions or paralysis, anastomotic leaks, and other complications, affecting the patient’s recovery and quality of life negatively. Due to its complex pathophysiology, treatment for PGID in colorectal patients has remained a challenge. Acupuncture is an alternative therapy commonly used for postoperative recovery. This study aims to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of acupuncture on PGID. Through the complementation of acupuncture and enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols, the advantages of acupuncture treatments could be demonstrated to promote its application in future clinical practice.

Methods

The study design is a prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT). One hundred sixty postoperative colorectal cancer patients will be recruited from Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CICAMS). Subjects who fulfill inclusion criteria will be randomly assigned into the acupuncture group (AG) (n = 80) or control group (CG) (n = 80). AG will receive acupuncture treatment and perioperative care guided by ERAS protocols, and CG will only receive perioperative care guided by ERAS protocols. The intervention will begin on the first day post-surgery, continuing for 4 days, with a follow-up assessment in a month. Time of first postoperative flatus would be the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures include the time of first postoperative defecation, time of first fluid intake, time of first ambulation, postoperative hospital stay, gastrointestinal reaction score, acupuncture sensation evaluation scale, laboratory tests, postoperative quality of life, readmission rate, and postoperative complications. All results are evaluated from baseline, post-treatment, and upon follow-up.

Discussion

The results of the study would help elucidate evidence of the therapeutic effects of acupuncture on the recovery of postoperative gastrointestinal function. The objective of the study aims for the eventual inclusion of acupuncture in the ERAS protocol, allowing for wider application in clinical practice.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov ChiCTR2000036351. Registered on August 22, 2020

Intra-operative nociceptive responses and postoperative major complications after gastrointestinal surgery under general anaesthesia: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Surgical procedures stimulate nociception and induce physiological responses according to the balance between nociception and antinociception. The severity of surgical stimuli is associated with major postoperative complications. Although an intra-operative quantitative index representing surgical invasiveness would be useful for anaesthetic management to predict and prevent major complications, no such index is available.

OBJECTIVES

To identify associations between major complications after gastrointestinal surgery and intra-operative quantitative values from intra-operative nociception monitoring.

DESIGN

A multi-institutional observational study.

SETTING

Two university hospitals.

PATIENTS

Consecutive adult patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery under general anaesthesia.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Averaged values of nociceptive response index from start to end of surgery (mean NR index) and risk scores of the Surgical Mortality Probability Model (S-MPM) were calculated. Pre and postoperative serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were obtained. After receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, all patients were divided into groups with high and low mean nociceptive response index. Associations between mean nociceptive response index and postoperative major complications, defined as Clavien-Dindo grade at least IIIa, were examined using logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

ROC curve analysis showed a nociceptive response index cut-off value for major complications of 0.83, and we divided patients into two groups with mean nociceptive response index less than 0.83 and at least 0.83. The incidence of major complications was significantly higher in patients with mean nociceptive response index at least 0.83 (23.1%; n = 346) than in patients with mean nociceptive response index less than 0.83 (7.7%; n = 443; P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed emergency surgery, S-MPM risk score, mean nociceptive response index and postoperative CRP levels as independent risk factors for major complications.

CONCLUSION

Mean nociceptive response index during surgery likely correlates with major complications after gastrointestinal surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The current observational study had no intervention, and was therefore, not registered.

Sarcopenia is associated with increased severe postoperative complications after colon cancer surgery

INTRODUCTION

Studies have shown that sarcopenia is associated with poor outcomes in patients with gastrointestinal cancer undergoing surgery. We aimed to investigate the relationship between postoperative complications of sarcopenic patients who had been operated on for colon cancer and the effects on short-term mortality.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this study, patients who had undergone colon cancer surgery between January 2013 and December 2018 were collected retrospectively. Sarcopenia was diagnosed by the skeletal muscle index (SMI) derived from a preoperative computed tomography scan. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to determine whether sarcopenia is associated with postoperative major complications (POMC).

RESULTS

The study included 160 patients with a mean age of 62.4 ±12.6 years. Clavien-Dindo grade 1-2 (minor) complications were not significantly different between the groups (p = 0.896). However, grade ≥ 3 (major) complications were detected in 13 (17.8%) patients in the sarcopenic group (SG) and in 5 patients in the non-sarcopenic group (NSG) (5.7%) (p = 0.016). Length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay was longer in SG (p = 0.002) and there was no difference between 1-month and 6-month mortality rates (p = 0.273 and p = 0.402, respectively). According to univariate analyses, sarcopenia and age over 65 years were related to POMC. In multivariate analyses, sarcopenia (odds ratio = 3.039; 95% confidence interval 1.008-9.174; p = 0.048) and advanced age (odds ratio = 3.246; 95% confidence interval 1.078-9.803; p = 0.036) were found to be independent risk factors for POMC.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that while sarcopenia is a risk factor for POMC, sarcopenia also prolongs the duration of ICU stay. Also sarcopenia has no effect on short-term mortality.

Risk Factors for Severe Complications After Laparoscopic Surgery for T3 or T4 Rectal Cancer for Chinese Patients: Experience from a Single Center

Background

Patients with rectal cancer are usually at advanced stage with or beyond serosa invasion in China. Severe complications after laparoscopic rectal surgery leads to prolonged hospitalization and high medical cost. This study aimed to explore risk factors for severe complications after laparoscopic surgery of T3 or T4 rectal cancer.

Material/Methods

A total of 287 patients diagnosed with T3 or T4 rectal cancer were enrolled from the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery of Anhui Provincial Hospital from February 2012 to February 2017. Univariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression model were used to analyze the risk factors for severe complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III) after laparoscopic surgery.

Results

Eighteen patients (6.25%) had severe complications; 15 patients were categorized as Clavien-Dindo grade III, and 3 patients were categorized as Clavien-Dindo grade IV. Univariate analysis showed that male gender, high preoperative white blood cells (WBC), diabetes mellitus, pulmonary dysfunction, and tumor distance from anus were associated with increased risk of severe complications after laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Multivariate analysis showed that preoperative WBC ≥6.9×10⁹/L (OR=5.54 (1.58–19.45), P=0.008), diabetes mellitus (OR=13.07 (3.31–51.67), P=0.000) and pulmonary dysfunction (OR=7.75 (1.69–35.63), P=0.008) were independent risk factors for postoperative severe complications.

Conclusions

Preoperative high white blood cells, diabetes mellitus and pulmonary dysfunction were independent risk factors for severe complications after laparoscopic surgery for T3 or T4 rectal cancer.

Risk factors of short-term survival in the aged in elective colon cancer surgery: a population-based study

PURPOSE

Patients aged > 80 years represent an increasing proportion of colon cancer diagnoses. Selecting patients for elective surgery is challenging because of possibly compromised health status and functional decline. The aim of this retrospective, population-based study was to identify risk factors and health measures that predict short-term mortality after elective colon cancer surgery in the aged.

METHODS

All patients > 80 years operated electively for stages I-III colon cancer from 2005 to 2016 in four Finnish hospitals were included. The prospectively collected data included comorbidities, functional status, postoperative surgical and medical outcomes as well as mortality data.

RESULTS

A total of 386 patients (mean 84.0 years, range 80-96, 56% female) were included. Male gender (46% vs 35%, p = 0.03), higher BMI (51% vs 37%, p = 0.02), diabetes mellitus (51% vs 37%, p = 0.02), coronary artery disease (52% vs 36%, p = 0.003) and rheumatic diseases (67% vs 39%, p = 0.03) were related to higher risk of complications. The severe complications were more common in patients with increased preoperative hospitalizations (31% vs 15%, p = 0.05) and who lived in nursing homes (30% vs 17%, p = 0.05). The 30-day and 1-year mortality rates were 6.0% and 15% for all the patients compared with 30% and 45% in patients with severe postoperative complications (p < 0.001). Severe postoperative complications were the only significant patient-related variable affecting 1-year mortality (OR 9.60, 95% CI 2.33-39.55, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

The ability to identify preoperatively patients at high risk of decreased survival and thus prevent severe postoperative complications could improve overall outcome of aged colon cancer patients.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Single-Incision Versus Multiport Laparoscopic Complete Mesocolic Excision Colectomy for Colon Cancer

Background. Our aim was to compare the emerging technique of single-incision laparoscopic surgery complete mesocolic excision (SILS CME) colectomy with the standard multiport laparoscopic CME (MPL CME) colectomy. Methods. MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, EMBASE, Ovid, and the Cochrane library were searched. Studies comparing the SILS CME with MPL CME in adults with colon adenocarcinoma were included. The Jadad and Newcastle Ottawa Scales were used to critically appraise the studies. The presence of statistical heterogeneity or publication bias was examined. Results. Seven studies (3 randomized) with a total number of 1344 patients were included (546 SILS CME and 798 MPL CME). No difference was found in anastomotic leakage (odds ratio [OR] = 0.79 [0.31 to 2.03]; P = .63), number of lymph nodes (weighted mean difference [WMD] = 0.85 [-0.97 to 2.66]; P = .36), hospital stay (WMD = 0.01 [-0.19 to 0.20]; P = .96), overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.19 [0.29 to 4.80]; P = .81), and disease-free survival (HR = 1.30 [0.30 to 5.61]; P = .72). Skin incision was shorter in SILS CME group (WMD = -3.02 [-3.25 to -2.80]; P < .00001) but with no difference in pain reported in postoperative day 1 (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -0.21 [-0.50 to 0.09]; P = .17) or day 2 (SMD = 0.16 [-0.52 to 0.84]; P = .64). Conclusions. SILS CME, although technically more demanding, has equivalent short- and long-term outcomes when compared with MPL CME. Potential benefits in cosmesis or postoperative pain need to be further explored by high-quality randomized controlled trials.