Modified Peritoneal Flap Hernioplasty Versus Retromuscular Technique for Incisional Hernia Repair: a Retrospective Cohort Study

Three-year follow-up of the grip concept: an open, prospective, observational registry study on biomechanically calculated abdominal wall repair for complex incisional hernias

PURPOSE

We studied the effectiveness of biomechanically calculated abdominal wall reconstructions for incisional hernias of varying complexity in an open, prospective observational registry trial.

METHODS

From July 1st, 2017 to December 31st, 2020, four hospitals affiliated with the University of Heidelberg recruited 198 patients with complex incisional hernias. Hernias were repaired using biomechanically calculated reconstructions and materials classified on their gripping force towards cyclic load. This approach determines the required strength preoperatively based on the hernia size, using the Critical Resistance to Impacts related to Pressure. The surgeon is supported in reliably determining the Gained Resistance, which is based on the mesh-defect-area-ratio, as well as other mesh and suture factors, and the tissue stability. Tissue stability is defined as a maximum distension of 1.5 cm upon a Valsalva maneuver. In complex cases, a CT scan of the abdomen can be used to assess unstable tissue areas both at rest and during Valsalva's maneuver.

RESULTS

Larger and stronger gripping meshes were required for more complex cases to achieve a durable repair, especially for larger hernia sizes. To achieve durable repairs, the number of fixation points increased while the mesh-defect area ratio decreased. Performing these repairs required more operating room time. The complication rate remained low. Less than 1% of recurrences and low pain levels were observed after 3 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Biomechanical stability, defined as the resistance to cyclic load, is crucial in preventing postoperative complications, including recurrences and chronic pain.

A Scoping Review of Quality-of-Life Assessments Employed in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

Surgeons use several quality-of-life instruments to track outcomes following abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR); however, there is no universally agreed upon instrument. We review the instruments used in AWR and report their utilization trends within the literature.

METHODS

This scoping review was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines using the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane databases. All published articles in the English language that employed a quality-of-life assessment for abdominal wall hernia repair were included. Studies which focused solely on aesthetic abdominoplasty, autologous breast reconstruction, rectus diastasis, pediatric patients, inguinal hernia, or femoral hernias were excluded.

RESULTS

Six hernia-specific tools and six generic health tools were identified. The Hernia-Related Quality-of-Life Survey and Carolinas Comfort Scale are the most common hernia-specific tools, while the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) is the most common generic health tool. Notably, the SF-36 is also the most widely used tool for AWR outcomes overall. Each tool captures a unique set of patient outcomes which ranges from abdominal wall functionality to mental health.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes of AWR have been widely studied with several different assessments proposed and used over the past few decades. These instruments allow for patient assessment of pain, quality of life, functional status, and mental health. Commonly used tools include the Hernia-Related Quality-of-Life Survey, Carolinas Comfort Scale, and SF-36. Due to the large heterogeneity of available instruments, future work may seek to determine or develop a standardized instrument for characterizing AWR outcomes.

Modified peritoneal flap hernioplasty and abdominoplasty in large incisional hernia after cesarean section with midline vertical incision: a case report

An incisional hernia (IH) is a common complication after a cesarean section (CS). Large IH mesh repair is problematic when initial fascial closure cannot be accomplished. We report the case of a large IH for 20 months after a CS with a midline vertical incision that was treated with a combination of modified peritoneal flap hernioplasty and abdominoplasty. There was a large fascia defect (15 × 21 cm) and adhesions of the omentum and the ileum to the anterior abdominal wall. CS with midline vertical incision, history of surgical site infections and obesity are risk factors that increase IH. In conclusion, this combination successfully repairs a large IH, reduces obesity, prevents recurrence and complications after hernia repair, improves the abdominal shape and patient quality of life. Abdominoplasty is also performed to create new umbilical and vascular preservation.

'Flip-flap' hernia sac sandwich mesh hernioplasty for giant incisional hernia

Purpose: The treatment of giant ventral hernia (GVH) with domain loss is a challenge for surgeons. This modified and simplified form of sandwich technique in a form of flip-flap repair was done to assess the outcomes of GVH repair by using the hernia sac taking into account the late complications in terms of recurrence, mesh explantation and early: SSO (surgical site occurrence). Material and method: A total of 21 patients of GVH were treated with flip-flap repair technique in the department of surgery in a teaching hospital in the central India between December 16 to June 21. In flip-flap technique the hernia sac is tailored in the best possible way, by making multiple layered flaps encasing the Polypropylene mesh in between, separating it from intraperitoneal contents and subcutaneous tissue. Results: In this prospective and interventional study, the collected data revealed the mean follow up period of 22.3 months (7months to 48months). Mean age was 44.2years (27-65 years). SSO was seen in 38% of cases mainly in the form of SSI. No explantation of mesh and recurrence was seen in any patient. Conclusion: The flip-flap repair technique is safe and effective surgical technique that can be used for the treatment of GVH regardless of the size, BMI or position of hernia.

Peritoneal flap hernioplasty for reconstruction of transverse incisional hernias

BACKGROUND

Repair of transverse incisional hernias is a surgical challenge with current methods of abdominal wall reconstruction. The peritoneal flap hernioplasty addresses this problem using flaps of hernial sac to bridge the fascial gap and isolate the mesh from both the intraperitoneal contents and the subcutaneous space exploiting the retro-rectus space medially and the avascular plane between the internal and external oblique muscles laterally. The operative technique and long-term results of 80 consecutive cases with transverse incisional hernias undergoing repair with this method are reported.

METHODS

Patients undergoing elective peritoneal flap hernioplasty repair for transverse incisional hernias from Jan. 1, 2010 to Dec. 31, 2014 were identified from the Lothian Surgical Audit system, a prospectively-maintained computer database of all surgical procedures in the Edinburgh region of south-east Scotland. Patient demographics and clinical data were obtained from the hospital case-notes. Follow-up data were obtained in May 2019 from hospital records and telephone interview.

RESULTS

80 patients, (n = 53 male, 66%) were identified. Mean follow-up was 83 months (range 55-114 months) and mean postoperative stay was 6.4 days (range 1-23 days). Eleven repairs (14%) were for recurrent hernia. Mean mesh size applied (Optilene Elastic, 48 g/m², BBraun) was 747 cm² (ranged 150-1500 cm²). Redundant skin excision was performed in 54% of cases. Altogether, seven patients (8.8%) presented with postoperative complications: five superficial wound infections (6.3%), one symptomatic seroma (1.3%) and one recurrence (1.3%) within the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

The peritoneal flap hernioplasty is associated with few complications and a very low recurrence rate. We propose this technique as the method of choice for reconstruction of transverse abdominal incisional hernias when primary fascial apposition is not possible.