Renin-angiotensin system-related highlights from the High Blood Pressure Research Conference annual meeting

Diagnostic tools for hypertension and salt sensitivity testing

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

One-third of the world's population has hypertension and it is responsible for almost 50% of deaths from stroke or coronary heart disease. These statistics do not distinguish salt-sensitive from salt-resistant hypertension or include normotensives who are salt-sensitive even though salt sensitivity, independent of blood pressure, is a risk factor for cardiovascular and other diseases, including cancer. This review describes new personalized diagnostic tools for salt sensitivity.

RECENT FINDINGS

The relationship between salt intake and cardiovascular risk is not linear, but rather fits a J-shaped curve relationship. Thus, a low-salt diet may not be beneficial to everyone and may paradoxically increase blood pressure in some individuals. Current surrogate markers of salt sensitivity are not adequately sensitive or specific. Tests in the urine that could be surrogate markers of salt sensitivity with a quick turn-around time include renal proximal tubule cells, exosomes, and microRNA shed in the urine.

SUMMARY

Accurate testing of salt sensitivity is not only laborious but also expensive, and with low patient compliance. Patients who have normal blood pressure but are salt-sensitive cannot be diagnosed in an office setting and there are no laboratory tests for salt sensitivity. Urinary surrogate markers for salt sensitivity are being developed.

CCR5 deficiency does not reduce hypertensive end-organ damage in mice

BACKGROUND

CCR5 is expressed on infiltrating T cells in hypertensive mice and CCR5 antagonists reduce hypertension making CCR5 an interesting target in treatment of hypertension.

METHODS

To evaluate the role of CCR5 in hypertensive renal and cardiac end-organ damage, we induced hypertension with desoxycorticosterone acetate (DOCA) and angiotensin II (Ang II) in wild-type (WT) and CCR5-deficient mice.

RESULTS

CCR5 expression was increased in renal cortex and cardiac tissue as measured by quantitative PCR. Systolic blood pressure and renal function did not differ between hypertensive CCR5(-/-) and WT mice. DOCA + Ang II induced massive albuminuria and glomerular injury but no difference was found between CCR5(-/-) and WT mice. In addition, no difference was found for renal inflammation as measured by infiltrating T cells, macrophages, and CCL2 expression. The renal expression of the CCR5 ligands, CCL3, and CCL5 was increased in the kidney of hypertensive mice. For CCL3 the increase was significantly higher in CCR5(-/-) than in WT mice. DOCA + Ang II induced cardiac damage as assessed by heart weight, cardiac fibrosis as well as expression of fetal and matrix components but no significant difference was found between CCR5(-/-) and WT mice.

CONCLUSIONS

CCR5 deficiency does not influence hypertensive renal and cardiac end-organ damage. Cells that infiltrate by expression of CCR5 are either not pathogenic or CCR5-positive leukocytes can migrate via alternative chemokine receptors. Beneficial effects of CCR5 antagonists in hypertension are most likely due to unspecific effects of the antagonists. Possibly, other chemokine receptors in concert with CCR5 are important for hypertensive injury.

The epistasis between vascular homeostasis genes is apparent in essential hypertension

OBJECTIVE

The epistasis influence of vascular homeostasis genes is vital to multigenetic diseases. This study was designed to perceive the possible role of epistasis in the etiology of essential hypertension.

METHODS

We investigated seven polymorphisms of ACE, CYP11B2 and NOS3 epistatically, and SBP, DBP, MAP, ACE activity, plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) and NOx level in 860 age- and ethnicity-matched unrelated north-Indian subjects.

RESULTS

The hypertension risk in individuals with interacted-genotypes (IwIw+IwIc)+(4aa), (IcIc)+(4bb+4ba) and IcIc+4aa of the CYP11B2 and NOS3 was significantly higher with odds ratio 5.5 (95% CI=2.9-10.6, P<0.0001), 2.4 (95% CI=1.4-4.1, P<0.0008) and 7.5 (95% CI=1.6-34.8, P=0.010), respectively. The odds ratio for hypertension with interacted-haplotypes (-344T/Ic)+(-922A/-786T/4a/894G) and (-344T/Ic)+(-922G/-786C/4a/894G) of CYP11B2 and NOS3 was 5.3 (95% CI=2.0-14.2, P=0.005) and 3.9 (95% CI=1.4-10.4, P=0.04), respectively; whereas for the protective interacted-haplotypes (-344T/Iw)+(-922A/-786T/4b/894G), the odds ratio was 0.7 (95% CI=0.5-0.9, P=0.03). While the interacted-genotypes, IcIc+4aa correlated with higher SBP and MAP (P=0.006; P=0.04), the interacted-haplotypes, (-344T/Ic)+(-922A/-786T/4a/894G) and (-344T/Ic)+(-922G/-786C/4a/894G) correlated with higher MAP and lower NOx level (P=0.02 and P=0.03, respectively), and the protective interacted-haplotypes (-344T/Iw)+(-922A/-786T/4b/894G) correlated with lower PAC and MAP (P=0.024 and P=0.018, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The epistasis between CYP11B2 and NOS3 and its correlation with varied clinical and biochemical parameters signify its possible contribution in the complex etiology of hypertension.