1
|
Cabreira V, Alty J, Antic S, Araújo R, Aybek S, Ball HA, Baslet G, Bhome R, Coebergh J, Dubois B, Edwards M, Filipović SR, Frederiksen KS, Harbo T, Hayhow B, Howard R, Huntley J, Isaacs J, LaFrance WC, Larner AJ, Di Lorenzo F, Main J, Mallam E, Marra C, Massano J, McGrath ER, McWhirter L, Moreira IP, Nobili F, Pennington C, Tábuas-Pereira M, Perez DL, Popkirov S, Rayment D, Rossor M, Russo M, Santana I, Schott J, Scott EP, Taipa R, Tinazzi M, Tomic S, Toniolo S, Tørring CW, Wilkinson T, Frostholm L, Stone J, Carson A. Perspectives on the diagnosis and management of functional cognitive disorder: An international Delphi study. Eur J Neurol 2024:e16318. [PMID: 38700361 DOI: 10.1111/ene.16318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Revised: 03/18/2024] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current proposed criteria for functional cognitive disorder (FCD) have not been externally validated. We sought to analyse the current perspectives of cognitive specialists in the diagnosis and management of FCD in comparison with neurodegenerative conditions. METHODS International experts in cognitive disorders were invited to assess seven illustrative clinical vignettes containing history and bedside characteristics alone. Participants assigned a probable diagnosis and selected the appropriate investigation and treatment. Qualitative, quantitative and inter-rater agreement analyses were undertaken. RESULTS Eighteen diagnostic terminologies were assigned by 45 cognitive experts from 12 countries with a median of 13 years of experience, across the seven scenarios. Accurate discrimination between FCD and neurodegeneration was observed, independently of background and years of experience: 100% of the neurodegenerative vignettes were correctly classified and 75%-88% of the FCD diagnoses were attributed to non-neurodegenerative causes. There was <50% agreement in the terminology used for FCD, in comparison with 87%-92% agreement for neurodegenerative syndromes. Blood tests and neuropsychological evaluation were the leading diagnostic modalities for FCD. Diagnostic communication, psychotherapy and psychiatry referral were the main suggested management strategies in FCD. CONCLUSIONS Our study demonstrates the feasibility of distinguishing between FCD and neurodegeneration based on relevant patient characteristics and history details. These characteristics need further validation and operationalisation. Heterogeneous labelling and framing pose clinical and research challenges reflecting a lack of agreement in the field. Careful consideration of FCD diagnosis is advised, particularly in the presence of comorbidities. This study informs future research on diagnostic tools and evidence-based interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Verónica Cabreira
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Jane Alty
- Wicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Sonja Antic
- Department of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Rui Araújo
- Department of Neurology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Porto, Portugal
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Faculty of Medicine University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Selma Aybek
- Neurology, Faculty of Sciences and Medicine, Fribourg University, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Harriet A Ball
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
| | - Gaston Baslet
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Rohan Bhome
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, UK
| | - Jan Coebergh
- Department of Neurology, St George's University of London, London, UK
| | - Bruno Dubois
- Department of Neurology, Institut de la mémoire et de la maladie d'Alzheimer (IM2A), AP-HP, Brain Institute, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Mark Edwards
- Department of Basic and Clinical Neurosciences, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neurosciences, Kings College London, London, UK
| | - Saša R Filipović
- University of Belgrade Institute for Medical Research, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Kristian Steen Frederiksen
- Clinical Trial Unit, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Thomas Harbo
- Department of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Bradleigh Hayhow
- Department of Neurology, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Robert Howard
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Jonathan Huntley
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jeremy Isaacs
- Department of Neurology, St George's University of London, London, UK
| | - William Curt LaFrance
- Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
- Neuropsychiatry and Behavioral Neurology, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Andrew J Larner
- Cognitive Function Clinic, Walton Centre for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Liverpool, UK
| | - Francesco Di Lorenzo
- Department of Clinical and Behavioural Neurology, Santa Lucia Foundation IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - James Main
- Bristol Dementia Wellbeing Service, Devon Partnership NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Camillo Marra
- Department of Neuroscience, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Memory Clinic - Fondazione Policlinico Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - João Massano
- Department of Neurology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Porto, Portugal
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Faculty of Medicine University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Emer R McGrath
- School of Medicine, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Laura McWhirter
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Isabel Portela Moreira
- Neurology Department, Private Hospital of Gaia of the Trofa Saúde Group, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal
| | - Flavio Nobili
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Catherine Pennington
- Clinical Lecturer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Neurology Department, NHS Forth Valley, Larbert, UK
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Miguel Tábuas-Pereira
- Neurology Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Praceta Prof. Mota Pinto, Coimbra, Portugal
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
- Center for Innovative Biomedicine and Biotechnology, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - David L Perez
- Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Stoyan Popkirov
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Dane Rayment
- Rosa Burden Centre for Neuropsychiatry, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - Martin Rossor
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Mirella Russo
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences G. d'Annunzio University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
| | - Isabel Santana
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
- Center for Innovative Biomedicine and Biotechnology, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Jonathan Schott
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Emmi P Scott
- Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Ricardo Taipa
- Neuropathology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal
| | - Michele Tinazzi
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Svetlana Tomic
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Center Osijek, Medical School on University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia
| | - Sofia Toniolo
- Cognitive Disorder Clinic, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Tim Wilkinson
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Lisbeth Frostholm
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Functional Disorders and Psychosomatics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Jon Stone
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Alan Carson
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Walker G, Pevy N, O'Malley R, Mirheidari B, Reuber M, Christensen H, Blackburn DJ. Speech patterns in responses to questions asked by an intelligent virtual agent can help to distinguish between people with early stage neurodegenerative disorders and healthy controls. CLINICAL LINGUISTICS & PHONETICS 2023:1-22. [PMID: 37722818 DOI: 10.1080/02699206.2023.2254458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2022] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/20/2023]
Abstract
Previous research has provided strong evidence that speech patterns can help to distinguish between people with early stage neurodegenerative disorders (ND) and healthy controls. This study examined speech patterns in responses to questions asked by an intelligent virtual agent (IVA): a talking head on a computer which asks pre-recorded questions. The study investigated whether measures of response length, speech rate and pausing in responses to questions asked by an IVA help to distinguish between healthy control participants and people diagnosed with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) or Alzheimer's disease (AD). The study also considered whether those measures can further help to distinguish between people with MCI, people with AD, and healthy control participants (HC). There were 38 people with ND (31 people with MCI, 7 people with AD) and 26 HC. All interactions took place in English. People with MCI spoke fewer words compared to HC, and people with AD and people with MCI spoke for less time than HC. People with AD spoke at a slower rate than people with MCI and HC. There were significant differences across all three groups for the proportion of time spent pausing and the average pause duration: silent pauses make up the greatest proportion of responses from people with AD, who also have the longest average silent pause duration, followed by people with MCI then HC. Therefore, the study demonstrates the potential of an IVA as a method for collecting data showing patterns which can help to distinguish between diagnostic groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gareth Walker
- School of English, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Nathan Pevy
- Department of Computer Science, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Ronan O'Malley
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Bahman Mirheidari
- Department of Computer Science, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Markus Reuber
- Academic Neurology Unit, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Heidi Christensen
- Department of Computer Science, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|