Post-operative Blood Salvage and Retransfusion in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

Impact of postoperative drainage autologous blood re-transfusion on the coagulation parameters and D-dimer levels of patients after total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Postoperative drainage autologous blood re-transfusion (ABT) is an important treatment method that maintains a high haemoglobin (HGB) content and obviates the need for allogeneic blood transfusion in patients after surgery. However, the safety of ABT remains controversial.

OBJECTIVES AND METHODS

This study aimed to investigate the safety of postoperative drainage ABT in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). In this randomized, controlled study, patients undergoing THA were selected and randomly divided into two groups. A device for postoperative ABT was used for the 49 patients in the ABT group, whereas conventional postoperative vacuum drainage was used for the 42 patients in the drainage blood (Drain) group without ABT. The coagulation parameters and D-dimer (DD) levels of the two groups of patients were recorded before surgery (T0) and on postoperative days one (T1), three (T2), seven (T3), and 14 (T4).

RESULTS

A within-group comparison after THA showed that the postoperative fibrinogen (FIB) and DD levels were higher than those before surgery in both groups (P < 0.01). A between-group comparison showed that, at different time points, the postoperative drainage blood amount and the coagulation parameters were not significantly different between the two groups. Compared with the Drain group, the DD levels in the ABT group were significantly higher at T1, T2, and T3 (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative drainage ABT did not significantly impact the coagulation parameters of patients after THA. However, the DD levels after ABT significantly increased, which may affect the risk of thrombosis.

[Decrease in allogenic transfusions due to the spread of use of postoperative retransfusion systems in knee replacement surgery]

OBJECTIVES

Surgical teams have several tools in order to reduce the need for postoperative allogenic transfusion. Postoperative autotransfusion of unwashed shed blood has become common practice for total knee replacement surgery since 2006 in our hospital. This study was designed to evaluate if this practice has reduced allogenic blood transfusions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective study comparing two cohorts, group 2004 with patients operated on for total knee replacement during the year 2004, before the use of the retransfusion system, and group 2008, patients operated on in the year 2008, with regular use of the retransfusion system. Gender, preoperative and postoperative haemoglobin levels, total amount of calculated erythrocytes lost, reinfusion of shed blood and allogenic blood transfusion during hospital stay were recorded.

RESULTS

Both groups were similar as regards gender, preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin levels, and total amount of erythrocytes lost. The proportion of transfused patients was significantly lower in group 2008 versus group 2004 (20.18% versus 42.19%), with a relative risk of being transfused of 0.47 and a NNT of 4.54. P=.0017.

CONCLUSIONS

In our hospital the use of postoperative retransfusion systems has reduced the proportion of transfused patients during hospitalization for total knee replacement surgery, although this result cannot be generalized due to the lack of a fixed transfusion trigger.