Early rehabilitation in cardiology - heart failure: The ERIC-HF protocol, a novel intervention to decompensated heart failure patients rehabilitation

Effect of Exercise Rehabilitation in Patients With Acute Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Exercise rehabilitation is conducive to increasing functional ability and improving health outcomes, but its effectiveness in patients with acute heart failure (AHF) is still controversial.

PURPOSE

In this study, our aim was to systematically examine the efficacy of exercise rehabilitation in people with AHF.

METHODS

A search was conducted for randomized controlled trial studies on exercise rehabilitation in patients with AHF up to November 2021. Two investigators conducted literature selection, quality assessments, and data extractions independently. The primary outcome was 6-minute walk distance, and the secondary outcomes were left ventricular ejection fraction, quality of life, Short Physical Performance Battery, readmission, and mortality. RevMan (version 5.3) software was used for the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Twelve studies with 1215 participants were included. Exercise rehabilitation significantly improved the 6-minute walk distance (mean difference [MD], 33.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 31.37-34.70; P < .001; I2 = 0%), quality of life (MD, -11.57; 95% CI, -19.25 to -3.89; P = .003; I2 = 98%), Short Physical Performance Battery (MD, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.36-1.44; P < .001; I2 = 0%), and rate of readmission for any cause (risk ratio, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.26-0.88; P = .02; I2 = 7%), compared with routine care. However, no statistically significant effects on left ventricular ejection fraction (MD, 0.94; 95% CI, -1.62 to 3.51; P = .47; I2 = 0%) and mortality (risk ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.64-1.80; P = .79; I2 = 0%) were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with routine care, exercise rehabilitation improved functional ability and quality of life, reducing readmission in patients with AHF.

Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for adults with heart failure

BACKGROUND

People with heart failure experience substantial disease burden that includes low exercise tolerance, poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL), increased risk of mortality and hospital admission, and high healthcare costs. The previous 2018 Cochrane review reported that exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (ExCR) compared to no exercise control shows improvement in HRQoL and hospital admission amongst people with heart failure, as well as possible reduction in mortality over the longer term, and that these reductions appear to be consistent across patient and programme characteristics. Limitations noted by the authors of this previous Cochrane review include the following: (1) most trials were undertaken in patients with heart failure with reduced (< 45%) ejection fraction (HFrEF), and women, older people, and those with heart failure with preserved (≥ 45%) ejection fraction (HFpEF) were under-represented; and (2) most trials were undertaken in a hospital or centre-based setting.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of ExCR on mortality, hospital admission, and health-related quality of life of adults with heart failure.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Web of Science without language restriction on 13 December 2021. We also checked the bibliographies of included studies, identified relevant systematic reviews, and two clinical trials registers.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared ExCR interventions (either exercise only or exercise as part of a comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation) with a follow-up of six months or longer versus a no-exercise control (e.g. usual medical care). The study population comprised adults (≥ 18 years) with heart failure - either HFrEF or HFpEF.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, mortality due to heart failure, all-cause hospital admissions, heart failure-related hospital admissions, and HRQoL. Secondary outcomes were costs and cost-effectiveness. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 60 trials (8728 participants) with a median of six months' follow-up. For this latest update, we identified 16 new trials (2945 new participants), in addition to the previously identified 44 trials (5783 existing participants). Although the existing evidence base predominantly includes patients with HFrEF, with New York Heart Association (NYHA) classes II and III receiving centre-based ExCR programmes, a growing body of trials includes patients with HFpEF with ExCR undertaken in a home-based setting. All included trials employed a usual care comparator with a formal no-exercise intervention as well as a wide range of active comparators, such as education, psychological intervention, or medical management. The overall risk of bias in the included trials was low or unclear, and we mostly downgraded the certainty of evidence of outcomes upon GRADE assessment. There was no evidence of a difference in the short term (up to 12 months' follow-up) in the pooled risk of all-cause mortality when comparing ExCR versus usual care (risk ratio (RR) 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71 to 1.21; absolute effects 5.0% versus 5.8%; 34 trials, 36 comparisons, 3941 participants; low-certainty evidence). Only a few trials reported information on whether participants died due to heart failure. Participation in ExCR versus usual care likely reduced the risk of all-cause hospital admissions (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.86; absolute effects 15.9% versus 23.8%; 23 trials, 24 comparisons, 2283 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and heart failure-related hospital admissions (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.35; absolute effects 5.6% versus 6.4%; 10 trials; 10 comparisons, 911 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) in the short term. Participation in ExCR likely improved short-term HRQoL as measured by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLWHF) questionnaire (lower scores indicate better HRQoL and a difference of 5 points or more indicates clinical importance; mean difference (MD) -7.39 points, 95% CI -10.30 to -4.77; 21 trials, 22 comparisons, 2699 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). When pooling HRQoL data measured by any questionnaire/scale, we found that ExCR may improve HRQoL in the short term, but the evidence is very uncertain (33 trials, 37 comparisons, 4769 participants; standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.52, 95% CI -0.70 to -0.34; very-low certainty evidence). ExCR effects appeared to be consistent across different models of ExCR delivery: centre- versus home-based, exercise dose, exercise only versus comprehensive programmes, and aerobic training alone versus aerobic plus resistance programmes.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This updated Cochrane review provides additional randomised evidence (16 trials) to support the conclusions of the previous 2018 version of the review. Compared to no exercise control, whilst there was no evidence of a difference in all-cause mortality in people with heart failure, ExCR participation likely reduces the risk of all-cause hospital admissions and heart failure-related hospital admissions, and may result in important improvements in HRQoL. Importantly, this updated review provides additional evidence supporting the use of alternative modes of ExCR delivery, including home-based and digitally-supported programmes. Future ExCR trials need to focus on the recruitment of traditionally less represented heart failure patient groups including older patients, women, and those with HFpEF.

Practical guidelines for exercise prescription in patients with chronic heart failure

Chronic heart failure (HF) is a major cause of morbidity, mortality, disability, and health care costs. A hallmark feature of HF is severe exercise intolerance, which is multifactorial and stems from central and peripheral pathophysiological mechanisms. Exercise training is internationally recognized as a Class 1 recommendation for patients with HF, regardless of whether ejection fraction is reduced or preserved. Optimal exercise prescription has been shown to enhance exercise capacity, improve quality of life, and reduce hospitalizations and mortality in patients with HF. This article will review the rationale and current recommendations for aerobic training, resistance training, and inspiratory muscle training in patients with HF. Furthermore, the review provides practical guidelines for optimizing exercise prescription according to the principles of frequency, intensity, time (duration), type, volume, and progression. Finally, the review addresses common clinical considerations and strategies when prescribing exercise in patients with HF, including considerations for medications, implantable devices, exercise-induced ischemia, and/or frailty.

Effects of early mobilisation program on functional capacity, daily living activities, and N-terminal prohormone brain natriuretic peptide in patients hospitalised for acute heart failure. A randomised controlled trial

Background

Patients hospitalised for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) show reduced functional capacity, limited activities of daily living (ADL), and elevated N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). The management of these patients focuses mainly on medical therapy with little consideration for in-patient cardiac rehabilitation. There has been a growing interest in evaluating the efficacy of early mobilisation, as the core for in-hospital rehabilitation, in ADHF patients in the last decade; however, the randomised trials on this topic are few.

Objective

This randomised-controlled study, therefore, aimed to further test the hypothesis that early supervised mobilisation would have beneficial effects on functional capacity, ADL, and NT-proBNP in stabilised patients following ADHF.

Methods

This is a single-centered, randomised-controlled, parallel-group trial in which 30 patients hospitalised for ADHF were randomly assigned to two groups; the study group (age = 55 . 4 ± 5 . 46 years, n 1 = 15 ) and the control group (age = 55 . 73 ± 5 . 61 years, n 2 =15). Inclusion criteria were ADHF on top of chronic heart failure independent of etiology or ejection fraction, clinical/hemodynamic stability, age from 40 to 60 years old, and both genders. Exclusion criteria were cardiogenic shock, acute coronary ischemia, or significant arrhythmia. Both groups received the usual medical care, but only the study group received an early structured mobilisation protocol within 3 days of hospital admission till discharge. The outcome measures were the 6-min walk distance (6-MWD) and the rating of perceived exertion (RPE) determined from the 6-min walk test at discharge, the Barthel index (BI), NT-proBNP, and the length of hospital stays (LOS).

Results

The study group showed significantly greater improvements compared to the controls in the 6-MWD (252 . 28 ± 92 . 32 versus 106 . 35 ± 56 . 36 m, P < 0 . 001 ), the RPE (12 . 53 ± 0 . 91 versus 15 . 4 ± 1 . 63 , P < 0 . 001 ), and the LOS (10 . 42 ± 4 . 23 versus 16 . 85 ± 6 . 87 days, p = 0 . 009 ) at discharge. Also, the study group showed significant improvements in the BI compared to baseline [100 (100-100) versus 41.87 (35-55), p = 0 . 009 ] and the controls [100 (100-100) versus 92.5(85-95), p = 0 . 006 ]. The mean value of NT-proBNP showed a significant reduction only compared to baseline (786 . 28 ± 269 . 5 versus 1069 . 03 ± 528 . 87 pg/mL, p = 0 . 04 ) following the intervention. The absolute mean change (Δ ) of NT-proBNP showed an observed difference between groups in favor of the study group (i.e., Δ = ↓ 282 . 75 ± 494 . 13 pg/mL in the study group versus ↓ 26 . 42 ± 222 . 21 pg/mL in the control group, p = 0 . 077 ).

Conclusion

Early structured mobilisation under the supervision of a physiotherapist could be strongly suggested in combination with the usual medical care to help improve the functional capacity and daily living activities, reduce NT-proBNP levels, and shorten the hospital stay in stabilised patients following ADHF. Trial registration number: PACTR202202476383975.

Ganhos com o programa de reabilitação e ensino à pessoa com insuficiência cardíaca (Programa REPIC)

Introdução: Apesar dos avanços no tratamento, a insuficiência cardíaca é uma doença crónica, cuja incidência aumenta com a idade. Os internamentos por descompensação mantêm-se elevados, pelo que é crucial priorizar estratégias para a autogestão, tais como o ensino, o acompanhamento e os programas de reabilitação cardíaca. Face ao exposto, este estudo teve como objetivo verificar o impacto do programa REPIC na qualidade de vida, nível de conhecimentos e adesão ao exercício físico. Metodologia: Estudo quantitativo com desenho antes-após de grupo único realizado numa amostra de 110 pessoas com insuficiência cardíaca, sujeitos a um programa de reabilitação e educação para a saúde durante o internamento e com follow-up telefónico, ao final de um mês, seis meses e um ano após a alta clínica. Resultados e Discussão: A maioria dos participantes são do sexo masculino (66%) e a amplitude da idade varia entre 30 e 89, com uma média de 64,3 anos e um desvio padrão de 14,4. A análise dos dados evidenciou uma melhoria estatisticamente significativa no conhecimento sobre a doença, bem como na perceção da qualidade de vida nas dimensões mobilidade, cuidados pessoais, atividades habituais e nível geral de saúde (p=0,01). O incremento no tempo de exercício físico após o programa REPIC foi confirmado com resultado estatisticamente significativo [t (109)=6,03; p=0,019]. Os resultados obtidos demonstram os benefícios da educação para a saúde e do acompanhamento telefónico de enfermagem, nomeadamente a melhoria no nível de conhecimentos sobre a doença, na qualidade de vida e na adesão ao exercício físico.  Conclusão: O programa REPIC permitiu reforçar o processo educativo, potenciar os comportamentos de autogestão, melhorar a qualidade de vida e aumentar a duração do exercício físico.

The effects of early rehabilitation on functional exercise tolerance in decompensated heart failure patients: Results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial (ERIC-HF study)

Objective

To analyze (1) the effect of an aerobic training program on functional exercise tolerance in decompensated heart failure (DHF) patients; (2) to assess the effects of an aerobic training program on functional independence; and (3) dyspnea during activities of daily living.

Design

A randomized controlled clinical trial with follow-up at discharge.

Settings

Eight hospitals. Recruitment took place between 9/ 2017 and 3/2019.

Group Assignments

Patients with DHF who were admitted to the hospital, were randomly assigned to usual rehabilitation care guideline recommended (control group) or aerobic training program (exercise group).

Main outcome

Functional exercise tolerance was measured with a 6-min walking test at discharge.

Results

In total 257 patients with DHF were included, with a mean age of 67 ± 11 years, 84% (n = 205) had a reduced ejection fraction and the hospital stay was 16 ± 10 days. At discharge, patients in the intervention group walked further compared to the control group (278 ± 117m vs 219 ± 115m, p < 0.01) and this difference stayed significant after correcting for confounders (p < 0.01). A significant difference was found favoring the exercise group in functional independence (96 ± 7 vs 93 ± 12, p = 0.02) and dyspnea associated to ADL (13 ± 5 vs 17 ± 7, p < 0.01) and these differences persisted after correcting for baseline values and confounders (functional independence p < 0.01; dyspnea associated with ADL p = 0.02).

Conclusion

The ERIC-HF program is safe, feasible, and effective in increasing functional exercise tolerance and functional independence in hospitalized patients admitted due to DHF.

Review of Trials on Exercise-Based Rehabilitation Interventions Following Acute Decompensated Heart Failure: OBSERVATIONS FROM THE WHO INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY PLATFORM

PURPOSE

Cardiac rehabilitation is an important intervention for patients with heart failure. However, its clinical application in acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) remains underutilized with limited research available. An assessment of current research in this area will help guide future investigations. The aim of this review is to summarize the current research focusing on rehabilitation interventions following recovery from ADHF.

REVIEW METHODS

A systematic search was carried out on all trials registered in the clinical trial registry database of the World Health Organization-International Clinical Trial Registry Platform (WHO-ICTRP). Studies focusing on ADHF and utilizing any exercise and rehabilitation-based intervention were included.

RESULTS

A majority of 11 trial protocols, including 3827 participants with low ejection fraction (<40%), were identified from the WHO-ICTRP database. Majority of the protocols (64%) focused on exercise-based interventions with approximately one-quarter (29%) focusing on neuromuscular electrical stimulation and one on noninvasive ventilation during exercise. Irrespective of the mode of exercise, all protocols employed low-moderate intensity training with outcomes focusing on physical function and quality of life.

CONCLUSION

Studies on rehabilitative interventions for ADHF are still in their early stages. More research is needed using innovative methodologies and testing for feasibility and fidelity.