Is diabetes a marker of higher risk after carotid revascularization? Experience from a single centre

30-Day Outcomes of Real-World Elective Carotid Stenosis Treatment Using a Dual-Layer Micromesh Stent (ROADSAVER Study)

PURPOSE

Carotid artery stenting with single-layer stents carries a risk of periprocedural cerebral embolization compared to carotid endarterectomy. Dual-layer micromesh stents were designed for improved plaque coverage and sustained embolic protection. This analysis aimed to confirm the Roadsaver dual-layer micromesh stent safety in a real-world carotid artery stenting cohort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

ROADSAVER was a prospective, single-arm, multicenter, observational study. Patients with carotid artery stenosis, eligible for elective stenting, were enrolled at 52 sites across 13 European countries. All procedures followed standard practice. The primary outcome was the 30-day major adverse event rate, defined as the cumulative incidence of any death or stroke. All deaths, strokes, and carotid artery revascularizations were independently adjudicated.

RESULTS

In total, 1965 patients were analysed (mean age 70.6 ± 8.8 years). Cerebral ischaemia symptoms were present in 49.4% of participants. Radial/ulnar access was used in 26.3% of cases and embolic protection in 63.8%. The 30-day major adverse event incidence was 2.2% (1.6% in asymptomatic and 2.8% in symptomatic patients), with any stroke at 1.9%, any death at 0.8%, and stroke-related death at 0.5%. Predictors of higher 30-day major adverse event risk, identified through multivariable modelling, included residual stenosis ≥ 30%, thromboembolic venous disease, previous myocardial infarction, age ≥ 75 years, family history of atherosclerosis, non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, symptomatic carotid stenosis, and stent length.

CONCLUSION

Dual-layer micromesh carotid artery stenting is safe, with a low 30-day major adverse event incidence in real-world asymptomatic and symptomatic patients, supporting the sustained embolic protection design concept.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 2, observational study (with dramatic effect).

Diabetes mellitus and adverse outcomes after carotid endarterectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is still uncertainty regarding whether diabetes mellitus (DM) can adversely affect patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for carotid stenosis. The aim of the study was to assess the adverse impact of DM on patients with carotid stenosis treated by CEA.

METHODS

Eligible studies published between 1 January 2000 and 30 March 2023 were selected from the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials databases. The short-term and long-term outcomes of major adverse events (MAEs), death, stroke, the composite outcomes of death/stroke, and myocardial infarction (MI) were collected to calculate the pooled effect sizes (ESs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and prevalence of adverse outcomes. Subgroup analysis by asymptomatic/symptomatic carotid stenosis and insulin/noninsulin-dependent DM was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 19 studies (n = 122,003) were included. Regarding the short-term outcomes, DM was associated with increased risks of MAEs (ES = 1.52, 95% CI: [1.15-2.01], prevalence = 5.1%), death/stroke (ES = 1.61, 95% CI: [1.13-2.28], prevalence = 2.3%), stroke (ES = 1.55, 95% CI: [1.16-1.55], prevalence = 3.5%), death (ES = 1.70, 95% CI: [1.25-2.31], prevalence =1.2%), and MI (ES = 1.52, 95% CI: [1.15-2.01], prevalence = 1.4%). DM was associated with increased risks of long-term MAEs (ES = 1.24, 95% CI: [1.04-1.49], prevalence = 12.2%). In the subgroup analysis, DM was associated with an increased risk of short-term MAEs, death/stroke, stroke, and MI in asymptomatic patients undergoing CEA and with only short-term MAEs in the symptomatic patients. Both insulin- and noninsulin-dependent DM patients had an increased risk of short-term and long-term MAEs, and insulin-dependent DM was also associated with the short-term risk of death/stroke, death, and MI.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with carotid stenosis treated by CEA, DM is associated with short-term and long-term MAEs. DM may have a greater impact on adverse outcomes in asymptomatic patients after CEA. Insulin-dependent DM may have a more significant impact on post-CEA adverse outcomes than noninsulin-dependent DM. Whether DM management could reduce the risk of adverse outcomes after CEA requires further investigation.

Body mass index and early outcomes after carotid endarterectomy

As the existing data on the correlation of adiposity with adverse outcomes of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) are inconsistent, the aim of the present study is to examine the correlation of an increased body mass index with 30-day complications after carotid endarterectomy. The cohort study comprises 1586 CEAs, performed at the Clinic for Vascular Surgery in Belgrade, from 2012-2017. Out of them, 550 CEAs were performed in patients with normal body mass index (18.5-24.9), 750 in overweight (25.0-29.9), and 286 in obese (≥30) patients. The association of overweight and obesity with early outcomes of carotid endarterectomy was assessed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Overweight patients, in whom CEAs were performed, were significantly more frequently males, compared to normal weight patients-Odds Ratio (OR) 1.51 (95% confidence interval- 1.19-1.89). Moreover, overweight patients significantly more frequently had non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus-OR 1.44 (1.09-1.90), and more frequently used ACEI in hospital discharge therapy-OR 1.41 (1.07-1.84) than normal weight patients. Additionally, the CEAs in them were less frequently followed by bleedings-OR 0.37 (0.16-0.83). Compared to normal weight patients, obese patients were significantly younger-OR 0.98 (0.96-0.99), and with insulin-dependent and non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus-OR 1.83 (1.09-3.06) and OR 2.13 (1.50-3.01) respectively. They also more frequently had increased triglyceride levels-OR 1.36 (1.01-1.83), and more frequently used oral anticoagulants in therapy before the surgery-OR 2.16 (1.11-4.19). According to the results obtained, overweight and obesity were not associated with an increased death rate, transient ischemic attack (TIA), stroke, myocardial infarction, or with minor complications, and the need for reoperation after carotid endarterectomy. The only exception was bleeding, which was significantly less frequent after CEA in overweight compared to normal weight patients.

Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Early Clinical Outcome and Stent Restenosis after Carotid Artery Stenting

Background

Diabetes mellitus is closely related to both the severity of carotid disease and its outcome after revascularization. Carotid artery stenting (CAS) has emerged as a viable alternative to surgical endarterectomy but little is known about the impact of diabetes after CAS.

Methods

A consecutive cohort of 1940 patients undergoing CAS in two institutions was divided into two groups, diabetics and nondiabetics, and major cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) were analyzed at 30 days post-CAS and at 1 year follow-up.

Results

There were 730 patients with diabetes, with significantly higher BMI, hypertension, chronic dialysis, and dyslipidemia frequency (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of early and late MACCEs (composite of transient ischemic attack, major stroke, myocardial infarction, and death), with an early rate of 3.5% nondiabetics vs. 5.3%, p = 0.08 and 2.4 nondiabetics vs. 2.3% diabetics, p = 0.1 at 12 months. Overall stroke/death rate in the asymptomatic patients was 2.4%, and the restenosis rate was higher in the diabetes population (2.3% vs. 1%, p = 0.04).

Conclusion

The presence of diabetes was associated with an acceptable increased periprocedural risk for CAS, but no further additional risk emerged during longer term follow-up. Diabetes may precipitate the rate of early in-stent restenosis.

The impact of diabetes mellitus on carotid artery stenting: a meta-analysis

Diabetes is considered to be one of the important factors affecting the prognosis of patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA), but its effect on carotid stenting (CAS) has not been determined. We performed this analysis to evaluate the impact of diabetes mellitus (DM) on carotid stenting. Studies were searched in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases for all available studies comparing the outcomes of diabetic and nondiabetic patients who underwent CAS. A meta-analysis was performed using the Mantel-Haenszel model to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with RevMan 5.3 software. Five studies with high quality were ultimately included. A total of 3364 patients underwent CAS, including 1042 diabetic patients and 2322 nondiabetic patients. Meta-analysis showed that there was no statistically significant difference in the risk of perioperative stroke(OR,1.20;95%CI,0.74-1.97;P = 0.46;I² = 24%), transient ischemic attack(TIA)(OR,1.46;95%CI,0.80-2.66;P=0.22;I²=37%), myocardial infarction(MI)(OR,1.12;95%CI,0.47-2.67;P=0.80;I²=0%), mortality (OR,1.77;95%CI,0.91-3.42;P = 0.09;I²=0%), and composite of stroke or death (OR,1.26;95%CI,0.87-1.81;P = 0.22;I²=35%) between diabetic and nondiabetic patients receiving CAS. Sensitivity analysis showed that the meta-analysis results of all outcome events were stable. Compared with nondiabetic patients, diabetes did not increase the risk of the following: perioperative stroke, TIA, MI, mortality, and composite of stroke or death in patients receiving CAS. This study may be used to guide carotid artery stenosis patients with diabetes to choose the optimal treatment option. However, due to the limited number of studies and the different technical levels of institutions, the results should be interpreted caution.

Cilostazol Addition to Aspirin could not Reduce the Neurological Deterioration in TOAST Subtypes: ADS Post-Hoc Analysis

BACKGROUND

Our previous trial acute dual study (ADS) reported that dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) using cilostazol and aspirin did not reduce the rate of short-term neurological worsening in non-cardioembolic stroke patients. Present post-hoc analysis investigated whether the impact of combined cilostazol and aspirin differed among stroke subtypes and factors associated with neurological deterioration and/or stroke recurrence.

METHODS

Using the ADS registry, the rate of neurological deterioration, defined as clinical worsening and/or recurrent stroke, including transient ischemic attack was calculated. Stroke subtypes included large-artery atherosclerosis (LAA), small vessel occlusion (SVO), other determined etiology (Others), and undetermined etiology of stroke (Undetermined).

RESULTS

Data of 1022 patients were analyzed. Deterioration was seen in 104 (10%) patients, and the rates were not markedly different between patients treated with DAPT vs. aspirin in any stroke subtypes: LAA, 19% vs. 11%, (p=0.192); SVO, 10% vs. 10% (p=1.000); Others, 6% vs. 6% (p=1.000); Undetermined, 11% vs. 8% (p=0.590). Diabetes mellitus was the independent factor associated with deterioration (odds ratio 4.360, 95% confidence interval 1.139-16.691, p=0.032) in the LAA group. Age (1.030 [1.004-1.057], p=0.026), systolic blood pressure (1.012 [1.003-1.022], p=0.010), and infarct size (2.550 [1.488-4.371], p=0.001) were associated with deterioration in SVO group, and intracranial stenosis/occlusion was associated with it in the Undetermined group (3.744 [1.138-12.318], p=0.030).

CONCLUSIONS

Combined cilostazol and aspirin did not reduce the rate of short-term neurological deterioration in any clinical stroke subtype. The characteristics of patients whose condition deteriorates in the acute period may differ based on the stroke subtypes.

Influence of contralateral carotid artery occlusions on short- and long-term outcomes of carotid artery stenting: a retrospective single-center analysis and review of literature

BACKGROUND

In the current literature, correlations between a contralateral carotid artery occlusion (CCO) with mortality and major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (MACCE) rates after carotid artery stenting (CAS) are often described with controversial conclusions. Moreover, long-term results of mortality, MACCE and restenosis rate are scarcely reported. This study examined the association between a CCO and the short- and long-term outcomes after CAS.

METHODS

One hundred and forty-six patients with CCO and without (No-CCO) who underwent between 2010 and 2017 to a CAS procedure in a single institution were retrospectively evaluated. The primary aim of the study was to evaluate mortality and MACCE rates in the short-term (defined as the occurrence during hospitalization and within 30-day) and after 3-year follow-up. The secondary aim of the study was to examine the restenosis rates in the short- and long-term period.

RESULTS

The overall success of CAS was 99.3% and the 30-day all-cause mortality rate was 0.7% (one death). About MACCE, there were no major strokes in the CCO groups and 1 (1.4%) in the No-CCO group (P=1.00). The rate of 30-day minor strokes was 1.4% (1 patient) in the CCO group and 2.7% (2 patients) in the No-CCO group (P=1.00). In the 3-year follow-up, death occurred in 11 CCO vs. 6 No-CCO patients, respectively (15.1% vs. 8.2%, P=0.30). Regarding MACCE, major stroke occurred in 6 CCO vs. 2 No-CCO patients (8.2% vs. 2.7%, P=0.27), minor stroke in 6 CCO vs. 6 No-CCO (8.2% vs. 8.2%, P=1.0) and myocardial infarction in 6 CCO (8.2%) vs. 3 No-CCO patients (8.2 vs. 4.1%, P=0.49), respectively. Regarding the 30-day restenosis rate, it was observed in one patient (1.4%) in the CCO group while no cases were recorded in the No-CCO group, respectively (P=1.00). In the 3-year follow-up, greater than >50% restenosis was observed in 7 patients (9.6%) in the CCO group and in one patient (1.4%) in the No-CCO group (P=0.06), respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that CCO patients had a lower 3-year freedom from restenosis rate with respect to the No-CCO group (87.6% vs. 98.6%, P=0.024). A Cox regression model on 3-year restenosis highlighted female gender and hypertension to be statistically significant predictors of restenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a preexisting CCO did not show a significative increased risk of procedural adverse events after CAS both in the immediate and long-term follow-up, but on the long term they are more likely to experience restenosis. CCO condition should be considered always as a clinical manifestation of a more aggressive carotid atherosclerosis.

Aortic arch types and postoperative outcomes after carotid artery stenting in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of the aortic arch type on technical and clinical success of carotid artery stenting (CAS) procedure.

METHODS

Clinical and anatomical data of consecutive patients who underwent CAS from 2010 to 2018 were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. Primary outcome was technical success, define as successful stent delivery and deployment and <30% residual carotid stenosis. Secondary outcomes were death, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI) and transient ischemic attack (TIA) rates at 30 days after CAS. Subgroups analysis with asymptomatic and symptomatic patients were also performed.

RESULTS

During the study period, 523 patients were enrolled and analyzed. Among these, 176 (33.6%) had Type I, 227 (43.4%) had Type II and 120 (23.0%) had Type III or bovine aortic arch (BAA) type. Technical success rate was achieved in 96.0% of cases. At 30 days, if compared with Type I or II, patient with Type III or BAA experienced a higher death rate (0 vs. 0 vs. 1.8%, respectively; P=0.056) and combined postoperative stroke/TIA rate (3% vs. 2.8% vs. 9.9%, respectively; P=0.012). No differences for same outcomes between asymptomatic and symptomatic patients were described, although the latter group experienced more postoperative MI. A multivariate analysis revealed Type III or BAA as an independent risk factor for postoperative stroke/TIA (HR 3.23, IC95% 1.40-7.45; P=0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort of patients, death and postoperative neurological complications rates were associated with Type III or BAA, irrespective of symptomatic patients' status. Extremely attention is required during perioperative period in patients who were candidate to CAS and with challenging aortic arch anatomy.

Thirty-day outcomes of carotid endarterectomy in the elderly: A 17-year single-center study

INTRODUCTION

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has been supported as a durable procedure for treating patients with carotid artery stenosis by many randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The aim of this study was to evaluate the 30-day outcomes and risk factors for CEA in elderly patients with a retrospective single-center study.

METHODS

Our study sample consisted of patients from 2001 to 2017 CEA-targeted Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University data set. The primary outcome was 30-day postoperative incidence of major adverse clinical events (MACEs; death, myocardial infarction (MI) and ipsilateral stroke). Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify high-risk patients and procedural characteristics associated with MACEs.

RESULTS

A total of 348 elderly patients undergoing CEA for carotid artery stenosis were identified and analyzed. The incidence of postoperative MACEs was 4.6% (16 cases, included 1 death, 14 S, and 1 MI respectively) for elderly patients. Univariate analysis indicated symptomatic lesion (81.3% vs 55.7%, p = 0.044), diabetes mellitus (56.3% vs 26.8%, p = 0.011) and DBP (85.56 ± 11.26 mmHg vs 76.53 ± 9.51 mmHg, p < 0.001) were statistically significant with MACEs. On multivariable analysis, independent predictors of MACEs included diabetes mellitus (DM) (OR = 2.882; 95% CI = 1.005-8.266; P = 0.049) and higher diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (OR = 1.079; 95% CI = 1.025-1.136; P = 0.004). Symptomatic lesion was not an independent risk factor (OR = 2.805; 95% CI = 0.759-10.361; P = 0.122).

CONCLUSIONS

According to our single-center experience, CEA could be safely performed in elderly patients. Risk factors identified for MACEs in this special group patients were DM and higher DBP.