1
|
Hall MJ, D'Avanzo PA, Chertock Y, Kelly PJA, Brajuha J, Singley K, Luck CC, Bass SB. Oncologists' perceptions of tumor genomic profiling and barriers to communicating secondary hereditary risks to African American cancer patients. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:412. [PMID: 38566032 PMCID: PMC10988900 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12184-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tumor genomic profiling (TGP) identifies targets for precision cancer treatments, but also secondary hereditary risks. Oncologists are poorly trained to communicate the results of TGP, especially among patients with lower health literacy, poorer genetics knowledge, and higher mistrust. African American (AA) patients are especially vulnerable to poor understanding due to significant cancer disparities and lower uptake of TGP. The goal of this research is to inform the development of an internet-based brief educational support for oncologists to prepare them to provide better decisional support related to TGP for their AA cancer patients. METHODS This mixed-methods study used semi-structured interviews of oncologists to inform development of an online survey with a convenience sample of US-based oncologists (n = 50) to assess perceptions of the challenges of TGP and communicating results to AA patients. RESULTS Most interviewed oncologists felt it was important to consider racial/cultural differences when communicating about hereditary risks. Cost, family dynamics, discrimination concerns, and medical mistrust were identified as particularly salient. Survey respondents' views related to AAs and perceptions of TGP were strongly associated with years since completing training, with recent graduates expressing stronger agreement with statements identifying barriers/disadvantages to TGP for AA patients. CONCLUSIONS Oncologists who had more recently completed training expressed more negative perceptions of TGP and more perceived challenges in communicating about TGP with their AA patients. Focused training for oncologists that addresses barriers specific to AAs may be helpful in supporting improved communication about TGP and improved decisional support for AA patients with cancer considering TGP to evaluate their tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J Hall
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Paul A D'Avanzo
- College of Public Health, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Yana Chertock
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Patrick J A Kelly
- College of Public Health, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jesse Brajuha
- College of Public Health, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Katie Singley
- College of Public Health, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Caseem C Luck
- College of Public Health, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sarah B Bass
- College of Public Health, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bass SB, Kelly PJ, Hoadley A, Arroyo Lloret A, Organtini T. Mapping Perceptual Differences to Understand COVID-19 Beliefs in Those with Vaccine Hesitancy. JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2022; 27:49-61. [PMID: 35199628 DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2022.2042627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Thirty percent of US adults are COVID-19 vaccine hesitant, but little is known about them beyond demographics. We used segmentation and perceptual mapping techniques to assess perceptual differences in unvaccinated, vaccine hesitant adults in Philadelphia, PA (n = 110) who answered a cross-sectional survey in-person or online. The sample was 54% ethnic minority, 65% female, 55% earned less than $25,000 with a mean age of 44. K-means cluster analysis identified three audience segments based on reported trust of healthcare providers and personal COVID-19 impact (High Trust/Low impact [n = 34], Moderate Trust/High impact [n = 39], Low Trust/Low impact [n = 23]). Multidimensional scaling analysis created three-dimensional perceptual maps to understand differences in COVID-19 and vaccine perceptions. The Low Trust/Low Impact group showed higher agreement with items related to COVID-19 being a hoax (p = .034) and that minorities should be suspicious of government information (p = .009). Maps indicate vaccine messaging for all groups would need to acknowledge these items, but added messaging about trust of pharmaceutical companies, belief that COVID messages keep changing or that vaccines are not safe would also need to be addressed to reach different segments. This may be more effective than current messaging that highlights personal responsibility or protection of others.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Bauerle Bass
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Patrick J Kelly
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Risk Communication Laboratory, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Ariel Hoadley
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Anamarys Arroyo Lloret
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Tarah Organtini
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Greener JR, Bass SB, Alhajji M, Gordon TF. Prospective assessment of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy decision-making in women with average risk: an application of perceptual mapping. Transl Behav Med 2021; 11:143-152. [PMID: 31760428 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibz159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Women with early-stage unilateral breast cancer and no familial or genetic risk factors are increasingly electing contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM), despite the lack of evidence demonstrating improved outcomes. To better understand and extend the literature focused on treatment decision-making, a survey was conducted among women with early-stage breast cancer and no associated risk factors, who were in the process of making a surgical decision. This prospective study sought to expand our understanding of the factors that influence patients' decision to have CPM, with the goal of providing healthcare providers with useful guidance in supporting breast cancer patients who are making treatment decisions. Data were collected for this prospective study through an internet survey. Results were analyzed using perceptual mapping, a technique that provides visual insight into the importance of specific variables to groups of women making different surgical decisions, not available through conventional analyses. Results suggest that women more likely to elect CPM demonstrate greater worry about breast cancer through experiences with others and feel the need to take control of their health through selection of the most aggressive treatment option. The information obtained offers guidance for the development of targeted intervention and counsel that will support patients' ability to make high quality, informed decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith R Greener
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sarah B Bass
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Mohammad Alhajji
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Thomas F Gordon
- Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Scalia P, Durand MA, Faber M, Kremer JA, Song J, Elwyn G. User-testing an interactive option grid decision aid for prostate cancer screening: lessons to improve usability. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e026748. [PMID: 31133587 PMCID: PMC6538002 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To user-test a web-based, interactive Option Grid decision aid 'prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test: yes or no?' to determine its usability, acceptability and feasibility with men of high and low health literacy. DESIGN A semi-structured interview study. SETTING Interviews were conducted at a senior centre, academic hospital or college library in New Hampshire and Vermont. PARTICIPANTS Individuals over 45 years of age with no history of prostate cancer who voluntarily contacted study authors after viewing local invitations were eligible for inclusion. Twenty interviews were conducted: 10 participants had not completed a college degree, of which eight had low health literacy, and 10 participants had high health literacy. INTERVENTION An interactive, web-based Option Grid patient decision aid for considering whether or not to have a PSA test. RESULTS Users with lower health literacy levels were able to understand the content in the tool but were not able to navigate the Option Grid independent of assistance. The tool was used independently by men with high health literacy. In terms of acceptability, the flow of questions and answers embedded in the tool did not seem intuitive to some users who preferred seeing more risk information related to age and family history. Users envisioned that the tool could be feasibly implemented in clinical workflows. CONCLUSION Men in our sample with limited health literacy had difficulty navigating the Option Grid, thus suggesting that the tool was not appropriately designed to be usable by all audiences. The information provided in the tool is acceptable, but users preferred to view personalised risk information. Some participants could envision using this tool prior to an encounter in order to facilitate a better dialogue with their clinician. ETHICS APPROVAL The study received ethical approval from the Dartmouth College Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects (STUDY00030116).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Scalia
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Marie-Anne Durand
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Marjan Faber
- Radboud University Medical Centre, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - J A Kremer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Julia Song
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Glyn Elwyn
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bauerle Bass S, Jessop A, Gashat M, Maurer L, Alhajji M, Forry J. Take Charge, Get Cured: The development and user testing of a culturally targeted mHealth decision tool on HCV treatment initiation for methadone patients. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2018; 101:1995-2004. [PMID: 30055893 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2018] [Revised: 06/09/2018] [Accepted: 07/07/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This paper describes the development of a mobile health tool to facilitate Hepatitis C (HCV) treatment decision making in methadone patients. METHODS Using an iterative, formative evaluation framework, we used commercial marketing techniques to create 3D maps of survey data to develop culturally relevant messaging that was concept tested. The resulting tool was then user tested and results were used to modify the tool. RESULTS The "Take Charge, Get Cured" tool was developed with surveys (n = 100), perceptual mapping analysis, concept testing (n = 5), and user testing (n = 10). "Think aloud" sessions were audio recorded and surveys given. Patients thought the goal of the tool was to encourage treatment and it was aimed to the needs of methadone patients. Means of 6.7-7 (on a 7 point scale) were observed for survey items related to ease of use, content, and satisfaction. CONCLUSION The iterative development was essential to ensuring a culturally targeted tool, specific to the needs of HCV + methadone patients. There was a high level of acceptance for the tool. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Our study indicates that using a formative evaluation strategy is essential for development of highly targeted patient communication, especially in hard-to-reach populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Bauerle Bass
- Risk Communication Laboratory, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University College of Public Health, Phiadelphia, PA, 19122, USA.
| | | | | | - Laurie Maurer
- Risk Communication Laboratory, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University College of Public Health, Phiadelphia, PA, 19122, USA
| | - Mohammed Alhajji
- Risk Communication Laboratory, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University College of Public Health, Phiadelphia, PA, 19122, USA
| | - Jon Forry
- Risk Communication Laboratory, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University College of Public Health, Phiadelphia, PA, 19122, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Huh J, Koola J, Contreras A, Castillo AK, Ruiz M, Tedone KG, Yakuta M, Schiaffino MK. Consumer Health Informatics Adoption among Underserved Populations: Thinking beyond the Digital Divide. Yearb Med Inform 2018; 27:146-155. [PMID: 30157518 PMCID: PMC6115231 DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1641217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives:
Underserved populations can benefit from consumer health informatics (CHI) that promotes self-management at a lower cost. However, prior literature suggested that the digital divide and low motivation constituted barriers to CHI adoption. Despite increased Internet use, underserved populations continue to show slow CHI uptake. The aim of the paper is to revisit barriers and facilitators that may impact CHI adoption among underserved populations.
Methods:
We surveyed the past five years of literature. We searched PubMed for articles published between 2012 and 2017 that describe empirical evaluations involving CHI use by underserved populations. We abstracted and summarized data about facilitators and barriers impacting CHI adoption.
Results:
From 645 search results, after abstract and full-text screening, 13 publications met the inclusion criteria of identifying barriers to and facilitators of underserved populations' CHI adoption. Contrary to earlier literature, the studies suggested that the motivation to improve health literacy and adopt technology was high among studied populations. Beyond the digital divide, barriers included: low health and computer literacy, challenges in accepting the presented information, poor usability, and unclear content. Factors associated with increased use were: user needs for information, user-access mediated by a proxy person, and early user engagement in system design.
Conclusions:
While the digital divide remains a barrier, newer studies show that high motivation for CHI use exists. However, simply gaining access to technology is not sufficient to improve adoption unless CHI technology is tailored to address user needs. Future interventions should consider building larger empirical evidence on identifying CHI barriers and facilitators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jina Huh
- Michigan State University, MI, USA
| | - Jejo Koola
- University of California San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Alejandro Contreras
- Institute for Behavioral and Community Health, San Diego State University, CA, USA
| | - Alanah Kp Castillo
- Institute for Behavioral and Community Health, San Diego State University, CA, USA
| | - Melissa Ruiz
- Institute for Behavioral and Community Health, San Diego State University, CA, USA
| | - Keely G Tedone
- Institute for Behavioral and Community Health, San Diego State University, CA, USA
| | - Melissa Yakuta
- Institute for Behavioral and Community Health, San Diego State University, CA, USA
| | - Melody K Schiaffino
- Institute for Behavioral and Community Health, San Diego State University, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ruggieri DG, Bass SB, Alhajji M, Gordon TF. Understanding Parents' Perceptions of School-Based BMI Screening and BMI Report Cards Using Perceptual Mapping: Implications for School Nurses. J Sch Nurs 2018; 36:144-156. [PMID: 30033842 DOI: 10.1177/1059840518789243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Half of U.S. states measure students' body mass index (BMI), with many communicating that information to parents through a "BMI report card" or notification letter. School nurses are usually responsible for implementing these programs and communicating results to parents. The purpose of this study was to understand parents' perceptions of BMI screening programs to help inform school nurses about messages that are most helpful to use in report cards to motivate parents to follow-up with a health-care provider or to make behavioral changes for their child. Using a cluster analysis and perceptual mapping methods, a commercial marketing technique that creates three-dimensional graphic maps, we identified four unique clusters of parents based on their core attitudes and beliefs related to BMI screenings and report cards. Based on vector modeling techniques, key message strategies were developed that can be used by school nurses to enhance parent response to a BMI report card.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominique G Ruggieri
- Center for Public Health Initiatives, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sarah Bauerle Bass
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Mohammed Alhajji
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Thomas F Gordon
- Psychology Department, College of Fine Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bass SB, Jessop A, Maurer L, Gashat M, Al Hajji M, Gutierrez M. Mapping the Barriers and Facilitators of HCV Treatment Initiation in Methadone Maintenance Therapy Patients: Implications for Intervention Development. JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2017; 23:117-127. [PMID: 29252118 DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2017.1414902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
An estimated 70-90% of current methadone users have Hepatitis C (HCV). Current treatments have few side effects and can cure infection in 8-12 weeks, but less than 10% of methadone patients initiate treatment. Engaging this group in treatment is an important strategy to lower both morbidity and mortality from liver disease and eliminate a significant reservoir of HCV in communities. To understand how to address this treatment gap we used commercial marketing techniques called perceptual mapping and vector message modeling to analyze survey data from 100 HCV+ methadone patients from four centers in Philadelphia. Results were used to understand barriers and facilitators to treatment initiation and to devise targeted message strategies to adapt to a mobile health communication intervention. Results indicate that focusing on how treatment can make one feel "in charge", positive interactions with healthcare providers, the positive attributes of the new vs. old HCV treatments, and providing strategies to address tangible barriers to getting treatment, would be important to address in a communication intervention. These marketing methods allow for focusing on specific variables to "move" the group toward a treatment decision, making them an innovative technique to use in developing highly targeted health communication messages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Bauerle Bass
- a Risk Communication Laboratory, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences , Temple University College of Public Health , Philadelphia , PA , USA
| | | | - Laurie Maurer
- a Risk Communication Laboratory, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences , Temple University College of Public Health , Philadelphia , PA , USA
| | | | - Mohammed Al Hajji
- a Risk Communication Laboratory, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences , Temple University College of Public Health , Philadelphia , PA , USA
| | - Mercedes Gutierrez
- a Risk Communication Laboratory, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences , Temple University College of Public Health , Philadelphia , PA , USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ruzek SB, Bass SB, Greener J, Wolak C, Gordon TF. Randomized Trial of a Computerized Touch Screen Decision Aid to Increase Acceptance of Colonoscopy Screening in an African American Population with Limited Literacy. HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2016; 31:1291-1300. [PMID: 26940369 PMCID: PMC5310267 DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2015.1069165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
The goal of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a touch screen decision aid to increase acceptance of colonoscopy screening among African American patients with low literacy, developed and tailored using perceptual mapping methods grounded in Illness Self-Regulation and Information-Communication Theories. The pilot randomized controlled trial investigated the effects of a theory-based intervention on patients' acceptance of screening, including their perceptions of educational value, feelings about colonoscopy, likelihood to undergo screening, and decisional conflict about colonoscopy screening. Sixty-one African American patients with low literacy, aged 50-70 years, with no history of colonoscopy, were randomly assigned to receive a computerized touch screen decision aid (CDA; n = 33) or a literacy appropriate print tool (PT; n = 28) immediately before a primary care appointment in an urban, university-affiliated general internal medicine clinic. Patients rated the CDA significantly higher than the PT on all indicators of acceptance, including the helpfulness of the information for making a screening decision, and reported positive feelings about colonoscopy, greater likelihood to be screened, and lower decisional conflict. Results showed that a touch screen decision tool is acceptable to African American patients with low iteracy and, by increasing intent to screen, may increase rates of colonoscopy screening.
Collapse
|
10
|
Bass SB, Gordon TF, Maurer L, Greener J, Mora G, Ruggieri D, Wolak C, Parvanta C. How Do Low-Literacy Populations Perceive "Dirty Bombs"? Implications for Preparedness Messages. Health Secur 2016; 14:331-44. [PMID: 27584855 DOI: 10.1089/hs.2016.0037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Potential terror events such as "dirty bombs" could have significant public health effects, but little is known about how low-literacy populations perceive dirty bombs, their trust in public health or government officials to provide credible information, and their willingness to comply with recommended actions. We surveyed 50 low-literacy adults from a large urban center; they were mostly members of ethnic minority groups. We used unique social marketing methods-perceptual mapping and vector message modeling-to create 3-dimensional models that reflected respondents' knowledge of what a dirty bomb is, their intended behaviors should one occur, and their concerns about complying with "shelter in place" recommendations. To further understand individual variations in this at-risk group, a k-means cluster analysis was used to identify 3 distinct segments, differing on trust of local authorities and their emergency response, willingness to comply with emergency directives, and trust of information sources. Message strategies targeting each segment were developed to focus on concepts important to moving the groups toward a "shelter in place" behavior, revealing key differences in how best to communicate with risk communication. We discuss how these methods helped elucidate specific differences in each segment's understanding of and likely response during the event of a "dirty bomb" and how these techniques can be used to create more effective message strategies targeted to these groups.
Collapse
|
11
|
Sanders M, Fiscella K, Veazie P, Dolan JG, Jerant A. Does patient time spent viewing computer-tailored colorectal cancer screening materials predict patient-reported discussion of screening with providers? HEALTH EDUCATION RESEARCH 2016; 31:555-562. [PMID: 27343254 PMCID: PMC4945861 DOI: 10.1093/her/cyw032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2015] [Accepted: 05/18/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
The main aim is to examine whether patients' viewing time on information about colorectal cancer (CRC) screening before a primary care physician (PCP) visit is associated with discussion of screening options during the visit. We analyzed data from a multi-center randomized controlled trial of a tailored interactive multimedia computer program (IMCP) to activate patients to undergo CRC screening, deployed in primary care offices immediately before a visit. We employed usage time information stored in the IMCP to examine the association of patient time spent using the program with patient-reported discussion of screening during the visit, adjusting for previous CRC screening recommendation and reading speed.On average, patients spent 33 minutes on the program. In adjusted analyses, 30 minutes spent using the program was associated with a 41% increase in the odds of the patient having a discussion with their PCP (1.04, 1.59, 95% CI). In a separate analysis of the tailoring modules; the modules encouraging adherence to the tailored screening recommendation and discussion with the patient's PCP yielded significant results. Other predictors of screening discussion included better self-reported physical health and increased patient activation. Time spent on the program predicted greater patient-physician discussion of screening during a linked visit.Usage time information gathered automatically by IMCPs offers promise for objectively assessing patient engagement around a topic and predicting likelihood of discussion between patients and their clinician.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mechelle Sanders
- Departments of Family Medicine and Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Kevin Fiscella
- Departments of Family Medicine and Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Peter Veazie
- Department of Public Health Science, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - James G Dolan
- Department of Public Health Science, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Anthony Jerant
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bass SB, Gordon TF, Gordon R, Parvanta C. Using eye tracking and gaze pattern analysis to test a "dirty bomb" decision aid in a pilot RCT in urban adults with limited literacy. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2016; 16:67. [PMID: 27267603 PMCID: PMC4897859 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-016-0304-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2016] [Accepted: 06/01/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Eye tracking is commonly used in marketing to understand complex responses to materials, but has not been used to understand how low-literacy adults access health information or its relationship to decision making. Methods This study assessed how participants use a literacy appropriate “dirty bomb” decision aid. Participants were randomized to receive a CDC “factsheet” (n = 21) or literacy-appropriate aid (n = 29) shown on a computer screen. Using 7 content similar slides, gaze patterns, mean pupil fixation time and mean overall time reading and looking at slides were compared. Groups were also compared by literacy level and effect on 'confidence of knowledge' and intended behavior. Results Results revealed differing abilities to read densely written material. Intervention participants more precisely followed text on 4 of 7 content-similar slides compared to control participants whose gaze patterns indicated unread text, or repeated attempts at reading the same text, suggesting difficulty in understanding key preparedness messages. Controls had significantly longer pupil fixations on 5 of 7 slides and spent more overall time on every slide. In those with very low literacy, intervention participants were more likely than controls to say they understood what a “dirty bomb” is and how to respond if one should occur. Conclusions Results indicate limited- literacy adults, especially those with very low literacy, may not be able to understand how to respond during a “dirty bomb” using available materials, making them vulnerable to negative health events. This study provides insights into how individuals perceive and process risk communication messages, illustrating a rich and nuanced understanding of the qualitative experience of a limited literacy population with written materials. It also demonstrates the feasibility of using these methods on a wider scale to develop more effective health and risk communication messages designed to increase knowledge of and compliance with general health guidelines, and enhance decision making. This has application for those with learning disabilities, those with limited media-literacy skills, and those needing to access the diverse array of assistive technologies now available. Eye tracking is thus a practical approach to understanding these diverse needs to ensure the development of cogent and salient communication. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12911-016-0304-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Bauerle Bass
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Risk Communication Laboratory, Temple University, College of Public Health, 1301 Cecil B. Moore Ave., Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA.
| | - Thomas F Gordon
- Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts-Lowell, Health and Social Sciences Bldg., Suite 300, 113 Wilder St., Lowell, MA, 01854, USA
| | - Ryan Gordon
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Risk Communication Laboratory, Temple University, College of Public Health, 1301 Cecil B. Moore Ave., Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA
| | - Claudia Parvanta
- Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, University of the Sciences, 600 S. 43rd St., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bass SB, Muñiz J, Gordon TF, Maurer L, Patterson F. Understanding help-seeking intentions in male military cadets: An application of perceptual mapping. BMC Public Health 2016; 16:413. [PMID: 27184052 PMCID: PMC4869204 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-016-3092-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2015] [Accepted: 05/10/2016] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Research suggests that men are less likely to seek help for depression, substance abuse, and stressful life events due to negative perceptions of asking for and receiving help. This may be exacerbated in male military cadets who exhibit higher levels of gender role conflict because of military culture. Methods This exploratory study examined the perceptions of 78 male military cadets toward help-seeking behaviors. Cadets completed the 31-item Barriers to Help Seeking Scale (BHSS) and a component factor analysis was used to generate five composite variables and compare to validated factors. Perceptual mapping and vector modeling, which produce 3-dimensional models of a group’s perceptions, were then used to model how they conceptualize help-seeking. Results Factor analysis showed slightly different groupings than the BHSS, perhaps attributed to different characteristics of respondents, who are situated in a military school compared to general university males. Perceptual maps show that cadets perceive trust of doctors closest to them and help-seeking farthest, supporting the concept that these males have rigid beliefs about having control and its relationship to health seeking. Differences were seen when comparing maps of White and non-White cadets. White cadets positioned themselves far away from all variables, while non-White cadets were closest to “emotional control”. Conclusion To move these cadets toward help-seeking, vector modeling suggests that interventions should focus on their general trust of doctors, accepting lack of control, and decreasing feelings of weakness when asking for help. For non-White cadets a focus on self-reliance may also need to be emphasized. Use of these unique methods resulted in articulation of specific barriers that if addressed early, may have lasting effects on help-seeking behavior as these young men become adults. Future studies are needed to develop and test specific interventions to promote help-seeking among military cadets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Bauerle Bass
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University, College of Public Health, 1301 Cecil B. Moore Ave., Room 951, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA.
| | - Javier Muñiz
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University, College of Public Health, 1301 Cecil B. Moore Ave., Room 951, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA
| | - Thomas F Gordon
- Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts-Lowell, 113 Wilder St., Lowell, MA, 01854-3059, USA
| | - Laurie Maurer
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University, College of Public Health, 1301 Cecil B. Moore Ave., Room 951, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA
| | - Freda Patterson
- Department of Behavioral Health and Nutrition, University of Delaware, 026 North College Ave., Carpenter Sports Building, Newark, DE, 19711, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Owens OL, Friedman DB, Brandt HM, Bernhardt JM, Hébert JR. Digital Solutions for Informed Decision Making: An Academic-Community Partnership for the Development of a Prostate Cancer Decision Aid for African American Men. Am J Mens Health 2016; 10:207-19. [PMID: 25563381 PMCID: PMC4492917 DOI: 10.1177/1557988314564178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
African American (AA) men are significantly more likely to die of prostate cancer (PrCA) than other racial groups, and there is a critical need to identify strategies for providing information about PrCA screening and the importance of informed decision making (IDM). To assess whether a computer-based IDM intervention for PrCA screening would be appropriate for AA men, this formative evaluation study examined their (1) PrCA risk and screening knowledge; (2) decision-making processes for PrCA screening; (3) usage of, attitudes toward, and access to interactive communication technologies (ICTs); and (4) perceptions regarding a future, novel, computer-based PrCA education intervention. A purposive convenience sample of 39 AA men aged 37 to 66 years in the Southeastern United States was recruited through faith-based organizations to participate in one of six 90-minute focus groups and complete a 45-item descriptive survey. Participants were generally knowledgeable about PrCA. However, few engaged in IDM with their doctor and few were informed about the associated risks and uncertainties of PrCA screening. Most participants used ICTs on a daily basis for various purposes including health information seeking. Most participants were open to a novel, computer-based intervention if the system was easy to use and its animated avatars were culturally appropriate. Because study participants had low exposure to IDM for PrCA, but frequently used ICTs, IDM interventions using ICTs (e.g., computers) hold promise for AA men and should be explored for feasibility and effectiveness. These interventions should aim to increase PrCA screening knowledge and stress the importance of participating in IDM with doctors.
Collapse
|
15
|
Bass SB, Wolak C, Greener J, Tedaldi E, Nanavati A, Ruppert K, Gordon TF. Using perceptual mapping methods to understand gender differences in perceived barriers and benefits of clinical research participation in urban minority HIV+ patients. AIDS Care 2015; 28:528-36. [PMID: 26572215 DOI: 10.1080/09540121.2015.1112352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Minority participation in HIV clinical trials research is critical to understanding the impact of medications or behavioral interventions, but little is known about gender differences in perceptions of participation. We surveyed 50 minority HIV+ patients from an urban clinic to assess perceived risks/benefits of clinical trial research participation and used innovative marketing methods to analyze results. Perceptual mapping and vector message-modeling, a method that creates 3-D models representing how groups conceptualize elements, were used to assess how male and female participants could be motivated to participate. Results showed men farther away from participation and more concerned with HIV disclosure and experimentation than women. Men expressed distrust of the medical system, doubted HIV's origin, and knew less about research implementation. Women were closer to participation in both behavior and medical trials and perceived medication issues as more significant, including fear of losing medication stability, medications not working, being in the placebo group, and experiencing side effects. Vector modeling shows that messages would need to focus on different aspects of clinical research for men and women and that interventions aimed at minority HIV+ patients to encourage clinical trial participation would need to be targeted to their unique perceptions. Understanding gender perceptions of HIV clinical research has significant implications for targeting messages to increase minority participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Bauerle Bass
- a Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University College of Public Health , Temple University , Philadelphia , PA , USA
| | - Caitlin Wolak
- a Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University College of Public Health , Temple University , Philadelphia , PA , USA
| | - Judith Greener
- a Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University College of Public Health , Temple University , Philadelphia , PA , USA
| | - Ellen Tedaldi
- b Department of Medicine , Temple University Hospital , Philadelphia , PA , USA
| | - Aasit Nanavati
- a Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University College of Public Health , Temple University , Philadelphia , PA , USA
| | - Katey Ruppert
- c Department of Psychology , University of Massachusetts Lowell , Lowell , MA , USA
| | - Thomas F Gordon
- c Department of Psychology , University of Massachusetts Lowell , Lowell , MA , USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kaltoft MK, Turner R, Cunich M, Salkeld G, Nielsen JB, Dowie J. Addressing preference heterogeneity in public health policy by combining Cluster Analysis and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: Proof of Method. HEALTH ECONOMICS REVIEW 2015; 5:10. [PMID: 25992305 PMCID: PMC4429422 DOI: 10.1186/s13561-015-0048-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2014] [Accepted: 04/08/2015] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
The use of subgroups based on biological-clinical and socio-demographic variables to deal with population heterogeneity is well-established in public policy. The use of subgroups based on preferences is rare, except when religion based, and controversial. If it were decided to treat subgroup preferences as valid determinants of public policy, a transparent analytical procedure is needed. In this proof of method study we show how public preferences could be incorporated into policy decisions in a way that respects both the multi-criterial nature of those decisions, and the heterogeneity of the population in relation to the importance assigned to relevant criteria. It involves combining Cluster Analysis (CA), to generate the subgroup sets of preferences, with Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA), to provide the policy framework into which the clustered preferences are entered. We employ three techniques of CA to demonstrate that not only do different techniques produce different clusters, but that choosing among techniques (as well as developing the MCDA structure) is an important task to be undertaken in implementing the approach outlined in any specific policy context. Data for the illustrative, not substantive, application are from a Randomized Controlled Trial of online decision aids for Australian men aged 40-69 years considering Prostate-specific Antigen testing for prostate cancer. We show that such analyses can provide policy-makers with insights into the criterion-specific needs of different subgroups. Implementing CA and MCDA in combination to assist in the development of policies on important health and community issues such as drug coverage, reimbursement, and screening programs, poses major challenges -conceptual, methodological, ethical-political, and practical - but most are exposed by the techniques, not created by them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mette Kjer Kaltoft
- Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 9 B, 5000 Odense C, Denmark
| | - Robin Turner
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052 Australia
| | - Michelle Cunich
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Sydney Medical School, Charles Perkins Centre, Johns Hopkins Drive, Camperdown, NSW 2050 Australia
| | - Glenn Salkeld
- Faculty of Medicine, School of Public Health University of Sydney, Edward Ford Building (A27), Sydney, NSW 2006 Australia
| | - Jesper Bo Nielsen
- Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 9 B, 5000 Odense C, Denmark
| | - Jack Dowie
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH UK
| |
Collapse
|