Pretreatment 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake in the Lung Parenchyma Predicts Poor Survival After Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Evaluation of response to stereotactic body radiation therapy for nonsmall cell lung cancer: PET response criteria in solid tumors versus response evaluation criteria in solid tumors

OBJECTIVE

Recommendations for surveillance after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for early-stage nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are not well defined. Recently, PET response criteria in solid tumors (PERCIST) have been proposed as a new standardized method to assess radiotherapeutic response both quantitatively and metabolically. The aim of this study was to evaluate therapeutic response following SBRT in early-stage NSCLC patients by comparing PERCIST with the currently widely used RECIST.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-nine patients with early-stage NSCLC who had been prescribed SBRT were studied. Responses of lesion were evaluated using CT and 18F-FDG PET according to the RECIST and PERCIST methods. PET-CT scans were obtained before SBRT and 3-6 months after SBRT. Associations between overall survival (OS) and clinicopathologic results (histology, tumor location, tumor size, lymphatic invasion, clinical stage, and radiotherapeutic responses in RECIST and PERCIST) were statistically analyzed. The median patient follow-up was 30 months.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients had stage IA, 9 stage IB, 10 stage IIA, and 17 stage IIB biopsy-proven NSCLC. Three-year OS was 79.6%. CT scans indicated three regional recurrences. PET-CT/chest indicated three regional recurrences and distant metastasis. Significant differences were observed in response classification between RECIST and PERCIST (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, P = 0.0041). Univariate analysis showed that clinical stage, RECIST, and PERCIST were significant factors associated with OS, whereas by multivariate analysis PERCIST was the only predictor of OS. SMD, PMD/PMR, and CMR in PERCIST criteria were indicative of a 9.900-fold increase in the risk of OS in early NSCLC patients [risk ratio, 9.900 (95% CI, 1.040-21.591); P = 0.001].

CONCLUSION

RECIST based on the anatomic size reduction rate did not demonstrate the correlation between radiotherapeutic response and prognosis in patients with early-stage NSCLC receiving SBRT. However, PERCIST was shown as the strongest independent predictor of outcomes. PERCIST might be considered more suitable for the evaluation of NSCLC tumor response to SBRT than RECIST.

Comparison of stereotactic body radiotherapy and radiofrequency ablation for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are recommended for patients with inoperable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with both offering promising results. However, it is largely unknown which of these two treatment modalities provides superior benefits for patients. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis compared clinical outcomes and safety between SBRT and RFA in patients with inoperable early-stage NSCLC.

Methods

Eligible studies published between 2001 and 2020 were obtained through a comprehensive search of the PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Original English-language studies on the treatment of early-stage NSCLC with SBRT or RFA were included. Local control (LC) rates, overall survival (OS) rates, and adverse events were obtained by pooled analyses.

Results

Eighty-seven SBRT studies (12,811 patients) and 18 RFA studies (1,535 patients) met the eligibility criteria. For SBRT, the LC rates (with 95% confidence intervals) at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years were 98% (97-98%), 95% (95-96%), 92% (91-93%), and 92% (91-93%), respectively, which were significantly higher than those for RFA [75% (69-82%), 31% (22-39%), 67% (58-76%), and 41% (30-52%), respectively] (P<0.01). There were no significant differences in short-term OS between SBRT and RFA [1-year OS rate: 87% (86-88%) versus 89% (88-91%), P=0.07; 2-year OS rate: 71% (69-72%) versus 69% (64-74%), P=0.42]. Regarding long-term OS, the 3- and 5-year OS rates for SBRT were 58% (56-59%) and 39% (37-40%), respectively, which were significantly (P<0.01) superior to those for RFA [48% (45-51%) and 21% (19-23%), respectively]. The most common complication of SBRT was radiation pneumonitis (grade ≥2), making up 9.1% of patients treated with SBRT, while pneumothorax was the most common complication of RFA, making up 27.2% of patients treated with RFA.

Discussion

Compared with RFA, SBRT has superior LC and long-term OS rates but similar short-term OS rates. Prospective randomized trials with large sample sizes comparing the efficacy of SBRT and RFA are warranted.