Prediction of Radiation Pneumonitis With Machine Learning in Stage III Lung Cancer: A Pilot Study

Performance Comparison of 10 State-of-the-Art Machine Learning Algorithms for Outcome Prediction Modeling of Radiation-Induced Toxicity

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy of prominent machine learning algorithms in predicting normal tissue complication probability using clinical data obtained from 2 distinct disease sites and to create a software tool that facilitates the automatic determination of the optimal algorithm to model any given labeled data set.

Methods and Materials

We obtained 3 sets of radiation toxicity data (478 patients) from our clinic: gastrointestinal toxicity, radiation pneumonitis, and radiation esophagitis. These data comprised clinicopathological and dosimetric information for patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer and anal squamous cell carcinoma. Each data set was modeled using 11 commonly employed machine learning algorithms (elastic net, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator [LASSO], random forest, random forest regression, support vector machine, extreme gradient boosting, light gradient boosting machine, k-nearest neighbors, neural network, Bayesian-LASSO, and Bayesian neural network) by randomly dividing the data set into a training and test set. The training set was used to create and tune the model, and the test set served to assess it by calculating performance metrics. This process was repeated 100 times by each algorithm for each data set. Figures were generated to visually compare the performance of the algorithms. A graphical user interface was developed to automate this whole process.

Results

LASSO achieved the highest area under the precision-recall curve (0.807 ± 0.067) for radiation esophagitis, random forest for gastrointestinal toxicity (0.726 ± 0.096), and the neural network for radiation pneumonitis (0.878 ± 0.060). The area under the curve was 0.754 ± 0.069, 0.889 ± 0.043, and 0.905 ± 0.045, respectively. The graphical user interface was used to compare all algorithms for each data set automatically. When averaging the area under the precision-recall curve across all toxicities, Bayesian-LASSO was the best model.

Conclusions

Our results show that there is no best algorithm for all data sets. Therefore, it is important to compare multiple algorithms when training an outcome prediction model on a new data set. The graphical user interface created for this study automatically compares the performance of these 11 algorithms for any data set.

Predictive Value of Simulated CT Radiomics Combined with Ipsilateral Lung Dosimetry Parameters for Radiation Pneumonitis in Patients with Esophageal Cancer: A Machine Learning-Based Retrospective Study

Objective

To explore how non-surgical esophageal cancer patients can identify high-risk factors for radiation-induced pneumonitis after receiving radiotherapy.

Methods

We retrospectively included 228 esophageal cancer patients who were unable to undergo surgical treatment but received radiotherapy for the first time. By retrospective analysis and identifying potential risk factors for symptomatic radiation-induced pneumonitis (ie ≥grade 2), as well as delineating the affected lung as an area of interest on localized CT and extracting radiomics features, along with extracting dosimetric parameters from the affected lung area. After feature screening, patients were randomly divided into training and testing sets in a 7-to-3 ratio, and a prediction model was established using machine learning algorithms. Finally, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to validate the predictive performance of the model.

Results

A total of 54 cases of symptomatic radiation pneumonitis occurred in this study, with a total incidence rate of 23.68%. The results of multivariate analysis showed that the occurrence of symptomatic radiation pneumonitis was significantly correlated with the mean lung dose (MLD), esophageal PTVD90, esophageal PTVV50, V5, V10, V15, and V20 in patients. The machine learning prediction model constructed based on candidate prediction variables has a prediction performance interval between 0.751 (95% CI: 0.700-0.802) and 0.891 (95% CI: 0.840-0.942) in the training and validation sets, respectively. Among them, the RFM algorithm has the best prediction performance for radiation-induced pneumonitis, with 0.891 (95% CI: 0.840-0.942) and 0.887 (95% CI: 0.836-0.938) in the training and validation sets, respectively.

Conclusion

The combination of localization CT radiomics features and diseased lung dosimetry parameters has good predictive value for radiation-induced pneumonitis in esophageal cancer patients after radiotherapy. Especially, the radiation-induced pneumonitis prediction model constructed using RF algorithm can be more effectively used to guide clinical decision-making in esophageal cancer patients.

Dosiomics and radiomics-based prediction of pneumonitis after radiotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibition: The relevance of fractionation

OBJECTIVES

Post-therapy pneumonitis (PTP) is a relevant side effect of thoracic radiotherapy and immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). The influence of the combination of both, including dose fractionation schemes on PTP development is still unclear. This study aims to improve the PTP risk estimation after radio(chemo)therapy (R(C)T) for lung cancer with and without ICI by investigation of the impact of dose fractionation on machine learning (ML)-based prediction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from 100 patients who received fractionated R(C)T were collected. 39 patients received additional ICI therapy. Computed Tomography (CT), RT segmentation and dose data were extracted and physical doses were converted to 2-Gy equivalent doses (EQD2) to account for different fractionation schemes. Features were reduced using Pearson intercorrelation and the Boruta algorithm within 1000-fold bootstrapping. Six single (clinics, Dose Volume Histogram (DVH), ICI, chemotherapy, radiomics, dosiomics) and four combined models (radiomics + dosiomics, radiomics + DVH + Clinics, dosiomics + DVH + Clinics, radiomics + dosiomics + DVH + Clinics) were trained to predict PTP. Dose-based models were tested using physical dose and EQD2. Four ML-algorithms (random forest (rf), logistic elastic net regression, support vector machine, logitBoost) were trained and tested using 5-fold nested cross validation and Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) for resampling in R. Prediction was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) on the test sets of the outer folds.

RESULTS

The combined model of all features using EQD2 surpassed all other models (AUC = 0.77, Confidence Interval CI 0.76-0.78). DVH, clinical data and ICI therapy had minor impact on PTP prediction with AUC values between 0.42 and 0.57. All EQD2-based models outperformed models based on physical dose.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiomics + dosiomics based ML models combined with clinical and dosimetric models were found to be suited best for PTP prediction after R(C)T and could improve pre-treatment decision making. Different RT dose fractionation schemes should be considered for dose-based ML approaches.

Deep-Learning Model Prediction of Radiation Pneumonitis Using Pretreatment Chest Computed Tomography and Clinical Factors

Objectives: This study aimed to build a comprehensive deep-learning model for the prediction of radiation pneumonitis using chest computed tomography (CT), clinical, dosimetric, and laboratory data. Introduction: Radiation therapy is an effective tool for treating patients with lung cancer. Despite its effectiveness, the risk of radiation pneumonitis limits its application. Although several studies have demonstrated models to predict radiation pneumonitis, no reliable model has been developed yet. Herein, we developed prediction models using pretreatment chest CT and various clinical data to assess the likelihood of radiation pneumonitis in lung cancer patients. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 3-dimensional (3D) lung volume data from chest CT scans and 27 features including dosimetric, clinical, and laboratory data from 548 patients who were treated at our institution between 2010 and 2021. We developed a neural network, named MergeNet, which processes lung 3D CT, clinical, dosimetric, and laboratory data. The MergeNet integrates a convolutional neural network with subsequent fully connected layers. A support vector machine (SVM) and light gradient boosting machine (LGBM) model were also implemented for comparison. For comparison, the convolution-only neural network was implemented as well. Three-dimensional Resnet-10 network and 4-fold cross-validation were used. Results: Classification performance was quantified by using the area under the receiver operative characteristic curve (AUC) metrics. MergeNet showed the AUC of 0.689. SVM, LGBM, and convolution-only networks showed AUCs of 0.525, 0.541, and 0.550, respectively. Application of DeLong test to pairs of receiver operating characteristic curves respectively yielded P values of .001 for the MergeNet-SVM pair and 0.001 for the MergeNet-LGBM pair. Conclusion: The MergeNet model, which incorporates chest CT, clinical, dosimetric, and laboratory data, demonstrated superior performance compared to other models. However, since its prediction performance has not yet reached an efficient level for clinical application, further research is required. Contribution: This study showed that MergeNet may be an effective means to predict radiation pneumonitis. Various predictive factors can be used together for the radiation pneumonitis prediction task via the MergeNet.

Benchmarking machine learning approaches to predict radiation-induced toxicities in lung cancer patients

Background and purpose

Radiation-induced toxicities are common adverse events in lung cancer (LC) patients undergoing radiotherapy (RT). An accurate prediction of these adverse events might facilitate an informed and shared decision-making process between patient and radiation oncologist with a clearer view of life-balance implications in treatment choices. This work provides a benchmark of machine learning (ML) approaches to predict radiation-induced toxicities in LC patients built upon a real-world health dataset based on a generalizable methodology for their implementation and external validation.

Materials and Methods

Ten feature selection (FS) methods were combined with five ML-based classifiers to predict six RT-induced toxicities (acute esophagitis, acute cough, acute dyspnea, acute pneumonitis, chronic dyspnea, and chronic pneumonitis). A real-world health dataset (RWHD) built from 875 consecutive LC patients was used to train and validate the resulting 300 predictive models. Internal and external accuracy was calculated in terms of AUC per clinical endpoint, FS method, and ML-based classifier under analysis.

Results

Best performing predictive models obtained per clinical endpoint achieved comparable performances to methods from state-of-the-art at internal validation (AUC ≥ 0.81 in all cases) and at external validation (AUC ≥ 0.73 in 5 out of 6 cases).

Conclusion

A benchmark of 300 different ML-based approaches has been tested against a RWHD achieving satisfactory results following a generalizable methodology. The outcomes suggest potential relationships between underrecognized clinical factors and the onset of acute esophagitis or chronic dyspnea, thus demonstrating the potential that ML-based approaches have to generate novel data-driven hypotheses in the field.

Image masking using convolutional networks improves performance classification of radiation pneumonitis for non-small cell lung cancer

Radiation pneumonitis (RP) is a serious side effect of radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Image cropping reduces training noise and may improve classification accuracy. This study proposes a prediction model for RP grade ≥ 2 using a convolutional neural network (CNN) model with image cropping. The 3D computed tomography (CT) images cropped in the whole-body, normal lung (nLung), and nLung regions overlapping the region over 20 Gy (nLung∩20 Gy) used in treatment planning were used as the input data. The output classifies patients as RP grade < 2 or RP grade ≥ 2. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC) were evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC). The accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, and AUC were 53.9%, 80.0%, 25.5%, and 0.58, respectively, for the whole-body method, and 60.0%, 81.7%, 36.4%, and 0.64, respectively, for the nLung method. For the nLung∩20 Gy method, the accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, and AUC improved to 75.7%, 80.0%, 70.9%, and 0.84, respectively. The CNN model, in which the input image is segmented in the normal lung considering the dose distribution, can help predict an RP grade ≥ 2 for NSCLC patients after definitive radiotherapy.

Radiation pneumonitis prediction after stereotactic body radiation therapy based on 3D dose distribution: dosiomics and/or deep learning-based radiomics features

Background

This study was designed to establish radiation pneumonitis (RP) prediction models using dosiomics and/or deep learning-based radiomics (DLR) features based on 3D dose distribution.

Methods

A total of 140 patients with non-small cell lung cancer who received stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) were retrospectively included in this study. These patients were randomly divided into the training (n = 112) and test (n = 28) sets. Besides, 107 dosiomics features were extracted by Pyradiomics, and 1316 DLR features were extracted by ResNet50. Feature visualization was performed based on Spearman’s correlation coefficients, and feature selection was performed based on the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. Three different models were constructed based on random forest, including (1) a dosiomics model (a model constructed based on dosiomics features), (2) a DLR model (a model constructed based on DLR features), and (3) a hybrid model (a model constructed based on dosiomics and DLR features). Subsequently, the performance of these three models was compared with receiver operating characteristic curves. Finally, these dosiomics and DLR features were analyzed with Spearman’s correlation coefficients.

Results

In the training set, the area under the curve (AUC) of the dosiomics, DLR, and hybrid models was 0.9986, 0.9992, and 0.9993, respectively; the accuracy of these three models was 0.9643, 0.9464, and 0.9642, respectively. In the test set, the AUC of these three models was 0.8462, 0.8750, and 0.9000, respectively; the accuracy of these three models was 0.8214, 0.7857, and 0.8571, respectively. The hybrid model based on dosiomics and DLR features outperformed other two models. Correlation analysis between dosiomics features and DLR features showed weak correlations. The dosiomics features that correlated DLR features with the Spearman’s rho |ρ| ≥ 0.8 were all first-order features.

Conclusion

The hybrid features based on dosiomics and DLR features from 3D dose distribution could improve the performance of RP prediction after SBRT.

CT radiomics-based long-term survival prediction for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy using features from tumor and tumor organismal environment

Background

Definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the standard treatment for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LANSCLC) patients, but the treatment response and survival outcomes varied among these patients. We aimed to identify pretreatment computed tomography-based radiomics features extracted from tumor and tumor organismal environment (TOE) for long-term survival prediction in these patients treated with CCRT.

Methods

A total of 298 eligible patients were randomly assigned into the training cohort and validation cohort with a ratio 2:1. An integrated feature selection and model training approach using support vector machine combined with genetic algorithm was performed to predict 3-year overall survival (OS). Patients were stratified into the high-risk and low-risk group based on the predicted survival status. Pulmonary function test and blood gas analysis indicators were associated with radiomic features. Dynamic changes of peripheral blood lymphocytes counts before and after CCRT had been documented.

Results

Nine features including 5 tumor-related features and 4 pulmonary features were selected in the predictive model. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the training and validation cohort were 0.965 and 0.869, and were reduced by 0.179 and 0.223 when all pulmonary features were excluded. Based on radiomics-derived stratification, the low-risk group yielded better 3-year OS (68.4% vs. 3.3%, p < 0.001) than the high-risk group. Patients in the low-risk group had better baseline FEV1/FVC% (96.3% vs. 85.9%, p = 0.046), less Grade ≥ 3 lymphopenia during CCRT (63.2% vs. 83.3%, p = 0.031), better recovery of lymphopenia from CCRT (71.4% vs. 27.8%, p < 0.001), lower incidence of Grade ≥ 2 radiation-induced pneumonitis (31.6% vs. 53.3%, p = 0.040), superior tumor remission (84.2% vs. 66.7%, p = 0.003).

Conclusion

Pretreatment radiomics features from tumor and TOE could boost the long-term survival forecast accuracy in LANSCLC patients, and the predictive results could be utilized as an effective indicator for survival risk stratification. Low-risk patients might benefit more from radical CCRT and further adjuvant immunotherapy.

Trial registration:

retrospectively registered.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-022-02136-w.

Current status and future developments in predicting outcomes in radiation oncology

Advancements in data-driven technologies and the inclusion of information-rich multiomics features have significantly improved the performance of outcomes modeling in radiation oncology. For this current trend to be sustainable, challenges related to robust data modeling such as small sample size, low size to feature ratio, noisy data, as well as issues related to algorithmic modeling such as complexity, uncertainty, and interpretability, need to be mitigated if not resolved. Emerging computational technologies and new paradigms such as federated learning, human-in-the-loop, quantum computing, and novel interpretability methods show great potential in overcoming these challenges and bridging the gap towards precision outcome modeling in radiotherapy. Examples of these promising technologies will be presented and their potential role in improving outcome modeling will be discussed.

Using Artificial Intelligence for Optimization of the Processes and Resource Utilization in Radiotherapy

The radiotherapy (RT) process from planning to treatment delivery is a multistep, complex operation involving numerous levels of human-machine interaction and requiring high precision. These steps are labor-intensive and time-consuming and require meticulous coordination between professionals with diverse expertise. We reviewed and summarized the current status and prospects of artificial intelligence and machine learning relevant to the various steps in RT treatment planning and delivery workflow specifically in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We also searched the PubMed database using the search terms (Artificial Intelligence OR Machine Learning OR Deep Learning OR Automation OR knowledge-based planning AND Radiotherapy) AND (list of Low- and Middle-Income Countries as defined by the World Bank at the time of writing this review). The search yielded a total of 90 results, of which results with first authors from the LMICs were chosen. The reference lists of retrieved articles were also reviewed to search for more studies. No language restrictions were imposed. A total of 20 research items with unique study objectives conducted with the aim of enhancing RT processes were examined in detail. Artificial intelligence and machine learning can improve the overall efficiency of RT processes by reducing human intervention, aiding decision making, and efficiently executing lengthy, repetitive tasks. This improvement could permit the radiation oncologist to redistribute resources and focus on responsibilities such as patient counseling, education, and research, especially in resource-constrained LMICs.

Archaea Microbiome Dysregulated Genes and Pathways as Molecular Targets for Lung Adenocarcinoma and Squamous Cell Carcinoma

The human microbiome is a vast collection of microbial species that exist throughout the human body and regulate various bodily functions and phenomena. Of the microbial species that exist in the human microbiome, those within the archaea domain have not been characterized to the extent of those in more common domains, despite their potential for unique metabolic interaction with host cells. Research has correlated tumoral presence of bacterial microbial species to the development and progression of lung cancer; however, the impacts and influences of archaea in the microbiome remain heavily unexplored. Within the United States lung cancer remains highly fatal, responsible for over 100,000 deaths every year with a 5-year survival rate of roughly 22.9%. This project attempts to investigate specific archaeal species' correlation to lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) incidence, patient staging, death rates across individuals of varying ages, races, genders, and smoking-statuses, and potential molecular targets associated with archaea microbiome. Archaeal species abundance was assessed across lung tissue samples of 527 LUAD patients, 479 LUSC patients, and 99 healthy individuals. Nine archaeal species were found to be of significantly altered abundance in cancerous samples as compared to normal counterparts, 6 of which are common to both LUAD and LUSC subgroups. Several of these species are of the taxonomic class Thermoprotei or the phylum Euryarchaeota, both known to contain metabolic processes distinct from most bacterial species. Host-microbe metabolic interactions may be responsible for the observed correlation of these species' abundance with cancer incidence. Significant microbes were correlated to patient gene expression to reveal genes of altered abundance with respect to high and low archaeal presence. With these genes, cellular oncogenic signaling pathways were analyzed for enrichment across cancer and normal samples. In comparing gene expression between LUAD and adjacent normal samples, 2 gene sets were found to be significantly enriched in cancers. In LUSC comparison, 6 sets were significantly enriched in cancer, and 34 were enriched in normals. Microbial counts across healthy and cancerous patients were then used to develop a machine-learning based predictive algorithm, capable of distinguishing lung cancer patients from healthy normal with 99% accuracy.

Lung Cancer Prediction from Text Datasets Using Machine Learning

Lung cancer is the major cause of cancer-related death in this generation, and it is expected to remain so for the foreseeable future. It is feasible to treat lung cancer if the symptoms of the disease are detected early. It is possible to construct a sustainable prototype model for the treatment of lung cancer using the current developments in computational intelligence without negatively impacting the environment. Because it will reduce the number of resources squandered as well as the amount of work necessary to complete manual tasks, it will save both time and money. To optimise the process of detection from the lung cancer dataset, a machine learning model based on support vector machines (SVMs) was used. Using an SVM classifier, lung cancer patients are classified based on their symptoms at the same time as the Python programming language is utilised to further the model implementation. The effectiveness of our SVM model was evaluated in terms of several different criteria. Several cancer datasets from the University of California, Irvine, library were utilised to evaluate the evaluated model. As a result of the favourable findings of this research, smart cities will be able to deliver better healthcare to their citizens. Patients with lung cancer can obtain real-time treatment in a cost-effective manner with the least amount of effort and latency from any location and at any time. The proposed model was compared with the existing SVM and SMOTE methods. The proposed method gets a 98.8% of accuracy rate when comparing the existing methods.

Predictive Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT Using Machine Learning for Pathological Response to Neoadjuvant Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Patients with Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

We investigated predictions from 18F-FDG PET/CT using machine learning (ML) to assess the neoadjuvant CCRT response of patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and compared them with predictions from conventional PET parameters and from physicians. A retrospective study was conducted of 430 patients. They underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT before initial treatment and after neoadjuvant CCRT followed by curative surgery. We analyzed texture features from segmented tumors and reviewed the pathologic response. The ML model employed a random forest and was used to classify the binary outcome of the pathological complete response (pCR). The predictive accuracy of the ML model for the pCR was 93.4%. The accuracy of predicting pCR using the conventional PET parameters was up to 70.9%, and the accuracy of the physicians’ assessment was 80.5%. The accuracy of the prediction from the ML model was significantly higher than those derived from conventional PET parameters and provided by physicians (p < 0.05). The ML model is useful for predicting pCR after neoadjuvant CCRT, which showed a higher predictive accuracy than those achieved from conventional PET parameters and from physicians.

Radiomic and Dosiomic Features for the Prediction of Radiation Pneumonitis Across Esophageal Cancer and Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

The aim was to investigate the advantages of dosiomic and radiomic features over traditional dose-volume histogram (DVH) features for predicting the development of radiation pneumonitis (RP), to validate the generalizability of dosiomic and radiomic features by using features selected from an esophageal cancer dataset and to use these features with a lung cancer dataset.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A dataset containing 101 patients with esophageal cancer and 93 patients with lung cancer was included in this study. DVH and dosiomic features were extracted from 3D dose distributions. Radiomic features were extracted from pretreatment CT images. Feature selection was performed using only the esophageal cancer dataset. Four predictive models for RP (DVH, dosiomic, radiomic and dosiomic + radiomic models) were compared on the esophageal cancer dataset. We further used a lung cancer dataset for the external validation of the selected dosiomic and radiomic features from the esophageal cancer dataset. The performance of the predictive models was evaluated by the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROCAUC) and the AUC of the precision recall curve (PRAUC) metrics.

RESULT

The ROCAUCs and PRAUCs of the DVH, dosiomic, radiomic and dosiomic + radiomic models on esophageal cancer dataset were 0.67 ± 0.11 and 0.75 ± 0.10, 0.71 ± 0.10 and 0.77 ± 0.09, 0.71 ± 0.11 and 0.79 ± 0.09, and 0.75 ± 0.10 and 0.81 ± 0.09, respectively. The predictive performance of the dosiomic- and radiomic-based models was significantly higher than that of the DVH-based model with respect to esophageal cancer. The ROCAUCs and PRAUCs of the DVH, dosiomic, radiomic and dosiomic + radiomic models on the lung cancer dataset were 0.64 ± 0.18 and 0.37 ± 0.20, 0.67 ± 0.17 and 0.37 ± 0.20, 0.67 ± 0.16 and 0.45 ± 0.23, and 0.68 ± 0.16 and 0.44 ± 0.22, respectively. On the lung cancer dataset, the predictive performance of the radiomic and dosiomic + radiomic models was significantly higher than that of the DVH-based model. However, the PRAUC of the dosiomic-based model showed no significant difference relative to the corresponding RP prediction performance on the lung cancer dataset.

CONCLUSION

The results suggested that dosiomic and CT radiomic features could improve RP prediction in thoracic radiotherapy. Dosiomic and radiomic feature knowledge might be transferrable from esophageal cancer to lung cancer.

Biological dosiomic features for the prediction of radiation pneumonitis in esophageal cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to develop a model using dose volume histogram (DVH) and dosiomic features to predict the risk of radiation pneumonitis (RP) in the treatment of esophageal cancer with radiation therapy and to compare the performance of DVH and dosiomic features after adjustment for the effect of fractionation by correcting the dose to the equivalent dose in 2 Gy (EQD2).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

DVH features and dosiomic features were extracted from the 3D dose distribution of 101 esophageal cancer patients. The features were extracted with and without correction to EQD2. A predictive model was trained to predict RP grade ≥ 1 by logistic regression with L1 norm regularization. The models were then evaluated by the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs).

RESULT

The AUCs of both DVH-based models with and without correction of the dose to EQD2 were 0.66 and 0.66, respectively. Both dosiomic-based models with correction of the dose to EQD2 (AUC = 0.70) and without correction of the dose to EQD2 (AUC = 0.71) showed significant improvement in performance when compared to both DVH-based models. There were no significant differences in the performance of the model by correcting the dose to EQD2.

CONCLUSION

Dosiomic features can improve the performance of the predictive model for RP compared with that obtained with the DVH-based model.