1
|
Zhang X, Liu T, Zhang H, Zhang M. Measurements of target volumes and organs at risk using DW‑MRI in patients with central lung cancer accompanied with atelectasis. Mol Clin Oncol 2023; 18:45. [PMID: 37152713 PMCID: PMC10155240 DOI: 10.3892/mco.2023.2641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 05/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Accurate imaging-based tumor delineation is crucial for guiding the radiotherapy treatments of various solid tumors. Currently, several imaging procedures, including diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI), intensified computed tomography and positron emission tomography are routinely used for targeted tumor delineation. However, the performance of these imaging procedures has not yet been comprehensively evaluated. In order to address this matter, the present study was conducted in an aim to assess the use of DW-MRI in guiding radiotherapy treatments, by comparing its performance to that of other imaging procedures. Specifically, the exposure dosages to organs at risk, including the lungs, heart and spinal mencord, were evaluated using various radiotherapy regimes. The findings of the present study demonstrated that DW-MRI is a non-invasive and cost-effective imaging procedure that can be used to reduce lung exposure doses, minimizing the risk of radiation pneumonitis. The data further demonstrate the immense potential of the DW-MRI procedure in the precision radiotherapy of lung cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinli Zhang
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Affiliated Tai'an City Central Hospital of Qingdao University, Tai'an, Shandong 271000, P.R. China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250117, P.R. China
| | - Tong Liu
- Department of Stomatology, The Affiliated Tai'an City Central Hospital of Qingdao University, Tai'an, Shandong 271000, P.R. China
| | - Hong Zhang
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Affiliated Tai'an City Central Hospital of Qingdao University, Tai'an, Shandong 271000, P.R. China
| | - Mingbin Zhang
- Department of Stomatology, The Affiliated Tai'an City Central Hospital of Qingdao University, Tai'an, Shandong 271000, P.R. China
- Correspondence to: Dr Mingbin Zhang, Department of Stomatology, The Affiliated Tai'an City Central Hospital of Qingdao University, 29 Longtan Road, Tai'an, Shandong 271000, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Comparing patient acceptability of MR-guided radiotherapy to conventional CBCT on two Elekta systems: a questionnaire-based survey. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE 2022. [DOI: 10.1017/s1460396922000206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background and Purpose:
The magnetic resonance linear accelerator system (MR Linac) is a novel piece of radiotherapy (RT) equipment allowing the routine application of daily MR-guided treatment adaptation. The hardware design required for such technical capabilities and the increased complexity of the treatment workflow entails a notable departure from cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based RT. Patient tolerability of treatment is paramount to RT practice where high compliance is required. Presented is a comparative analysis of how such modality specific characteristics may ultimately impact the patient experience of treatment.
Materials and Methods:
Forty patients undergoing RT for prostate cancer (PCa) on either the MR Linac (n = 20) or a CBCT-based linac (n = 20) were provided with a validated patient reported outcomes measures (PROM’s) questionnaire at fraction 1 and fraction 20. The 18-item questionnaire provided patient responses recorded using a 4-point Likert scale, 0 denoting a response of ‘Not at all’, 1 ‘Slightly’, 2 ‘Moderately’ and 3 signifying ‘Very’. The analysis provided insight into both comparisons between modalities at singular time points (fractions 1 and 20), as well as a temporal analysis within a single modality, denoting changing patient experience.
Results:
Patients generally found the MR Linac treatment couch more comfortable, however, found the increase in treatment duration harder to tolerate. Responses for all items remained stable between first and last fraction across both cohorts, indicating minimal temporal variation within a single modality. None of the responses were statistically significant at the 0·01 level.
Conclusion:
Whether radiotherapy for PCa is delivered on a CBCT linac or the MR Linac, there is little difference in patient experience with minimal experiential variation within a single modality.
Collapse
|
3
|
Magnetic Fields and Cancer: Epidemiology, Cellular Biology, and Theranostics. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms23031339. [PMID: 35163262 PMCID: PMC8835851 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23031339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2021] [Revised: 01/22/2022] [Accepted: 01/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Humans are exposed to a complex mix of man-made electric and magnetic fields (MFs) at many different frequencies, at home and at work. Epidemiological studies indicate that there is a positive relationship between residential/domestic and occupational exposure to extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields and some types of cancer, although some other studies indicate no relationship. In this review, after an introduction on the MF definition and a description of natural/anthropogenic sources, the epidemiology of residential/domestic and occupational exposure to MFs and cancer is reviewed, with reference to leukemia, brain, and breast cancer. The in vivo and in vitro effects of MFs on cancer are reviewed considering both human and animal cells, with particular reference to the involvement of reactive oxygen species (ROS). MF application on cancer diagnostic and therapy (theranostic) are also reviewed by describing the use of different magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) applications for the detection of several cancers. Finally, the use of magnetic nanoparticles is described in terms of treatment of cancer by nanomedical applications for the precise delivery of anticancer drugs, nanosurgery by magnetomechanic methods, and selective killing of cancer cells by magnetic hyperthermia. The supplementary tables provide quantitative data and methodologies in epidemiological and cell biology studies. Although scientists do not generally agree that there is a cause-effect relationship between exposure to MF and cancer, MFs might not be the direct cause of cancer but may contribute to produce ROS and generate oxidative stress, which could trigger or enhance the expression of oncogenes.
Collapse
|
4
|
Crockett CB, Samson P, Chuter R, Dubec M, Faivre-Finn C, Green OL, Hackett SL, McDonald F, Robinson C, Shiarli AM, Straza MW, Verhoeff JJC, Werner-Wasik M, Vlacich G, Cobben D. Initial Clinical Experience of MR-Guided Radiotherapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Front Oncol 2021; 11:617681. [PMID: 33777759 PMCID: PMC7988221 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.617681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2020] [Accepted: 01/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Curative-intent radiotherapy plays an integral role in the treatment of lung cancer and therefore improving its therapeutic index is vital. MR guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) systems are the latest technological advance which may help with achieving this aim. The majority of MRgRT treatments delivered to date have been stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) based and include the treatment of (ultra-) central tumors. However, there is a move to also implement MRgRT as curative-intent treatment for patients with inoperable locally advanced NSCLC. This paper presents the initial clinical experience of using the two commercially available systems to date: the ViewRay MRIdian and Elekta Unity. The challenges and potential solutions associated with MRgRT in lung cancer will also be highlighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cathryn B. Crockett
- Radiotherapy Related Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Pamela Samson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Robert Chuter
- Radiotherapy Related Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Dubec
- Radiotherapy Related Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Corinne Faivre-Finn
- Radiotherapy Related Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Olga L. Green
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Sara L. Hackett
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Fiona McDonald
- Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Clifford Robinson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Anna-Maria Shiarli
- Department of Radiotherapy, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Michael W. Straza
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Froedtert and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | - Joost J. C. Verhoeff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Maria Werner-Wasik
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Gregory Vlacich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - David Cobben
- Radiotherapy Related Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bellhouse S, Brown S, Dubec M, Taylor S, Hales R, Whiteside L, Yorke J, Faivre-Finn C. Introducing magnetic resonance imaging into the lung cancer radiotherapy workflow - An assessment of patient experience. Radiography (Lond) 2020; 27:14-23. [PMID: 32451307 DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2020.04.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2019] [Revised: 04/17/2020] [Accepted: 05/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers superior soft tissue contrast to computed tomography (CT), the current standard imaging modality for planning radiotherapy treatment. Improved soft tissue contrast could reduce uncertainties in identifying tumour and surrounding healthy tissues, potentially leading to improved outcomes in patients with lung cancer. This study explored patient experience of MR treatment planning scans in addition to a CT scan. METHODS Participants were recruited to the 'Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Delineation of Organs At Risk and Target Volumes in Lung Cancer Patients (MR-Lung)' study at a UK specialist cancer centre. Participants completed their standard of care radiotherapy planning CT scan and two additional MRI scans. Baseline and post-scan questionnaires were completed assessing anxiety and claustrophobia. Motion artefact during MRI was assessed by a modified visual grading analysis. Sixteen participants completed semi-structured interviews; transcripts were analysed thematically. RESULTS 29 people (66% female; aged 54-89 years) participated. Nineteen participants completed all imaging and 10 participants withdrew before completion. There was minimal adverse impact on state and scan-specific anxiety levels from completing the MRI scans. Completers experienced significantly less scan-specific anxiety during MRI 1 compared to non-completers (U = 33, z = -1.98, p < 0.05). 78% of those who withdrew during or post MRI 1 were positioned 'arms up'. Motion artefact negatively impacted image quality in 34% of scans. Participants commonly reported concerns during MRI; noise, claustrophobia and pain in upper limbs. CONCLUSION Two thirds of participants tolerated two additional MR scans with minimal adverse impact on anxiety levels. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Patient arm positioning and comfort ought to be considered when introducing MR-Linac systems. A screening tool to identify those at high risk of non-completion should be developed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Bellhouse
- Christie Patient Centred Research (CPCR), The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
| | - S Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - M Dubec
- Division of Cancer Science, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, UK; Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - S Taylor
- Christie Patient Centred Research (CPCR), The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - R Hales
- Radiotherapy Related Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - L Whiteside
- Radiotherapy Related Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - J Yorke
- Christie Patient Centred Research (CPCR), The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, UK; Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, UK
| | - C Faivre-Finn
- Division of Cancer Science, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, UK; Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lillington J, Brusaferri L, Kläser K, Shmueli K, Neji R, Hutton BF, Fraioli F, Arridge S, Cardoso MJ, Ourselin S, Thielemans K, Atkinson D. PET/MRI attenuation estimation in the lung: A review of past, present, and potential techniques. Med Phys 2020; 47:790-811. [PMID: 31794071 PMCID: PMC7027532 DOI: 10.1002/mp.13943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2019] [Revised: 07/23/2019] [Accepted: 11/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) potentially offers several advantages over positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), for example, no CT radiation dose and soft tissue images from MR acquired at the same time as the PET. However, obtaining accurate linear attenuation correction (LAC) factors for the lung remains difficult in PET/MRI. LACs depend on electron density and in the lung, these vary significantly both within an individual and from person to person. Current commercial practice is to use a single‐valued population‐based lung LAC, and better estimation is needed to improve quantification. Given the under‐appreciation of lung attenuation estimation as an issue, the inaccuracy of PET quantification due to the use of single‐valued lung LACs, the unique challenges of lung estimation, and the emerging status of PET/MRI scanners in lung disease, a review is timely. This paper highlights past and present methods, categorizing them into segmentation, atlas/mapping, and emission‐based schemes. Potential strategies for future developments are also presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Lillington
- Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, W1W 7TS, UK
| | - Ludovica Brusaferri
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London, London, NW1 2BU, UK
| | - Kerstin Kläser
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, WC1E 7JE, UK
| | - Karin Shmueli
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging Group, Department of Medical Physics & Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Radhouene Neji
- MR Research Collaborations, Siemens Healthcare Limited, Frimley, GU16 8QD, UK
| | - Brian F Hutton
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London, London, NW1 2BU, UK
| | - Francesco Fraioli
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London, London, NW1 2BU, UK
| | - Simon Arridge
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, WC1E 7JE, UK
| | - Manuel Jorge Cardoso
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Sebastien Ourselin
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Kris Thielemans
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London, London, NW1 2BU, UK
| | - David Atkinson
- Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, W1W 7TS, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Menten MJ, Wetscherek A, Fast MF. MRI-guided lung SBRT: Present and future developments. Phys Med 2017; 44:139-149. [PMID: 28242140 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2016] [Revised: 01/25/2017] [Accepted: 02/07/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is rapidly becoming an alternative to surgery for the treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients. Lung SBRT is administered in a hypo-fractionated, conformal manner, delivering high doses to the target. To avoid normal-tissue toxicity, it is crucial to limit the exposure of nearby healthy organs-at-risk (OAR). Current image-guided radiotherapy strategies for lung SBRT are mostly based on X-ray imaging modalities. Although still in its infancy, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guidance for lung SBRT is not exposure-limited and MRI promises to improve crucial soft-tissue contrast. Looking beyond anatomical imaging, functional MRI is expected to inform treatment decisions and adaptations in the future. This review summarises and discusses how MRI could be advantageous to the different links of the radiotherapy treatment chain for lung SBRT: diagnosis and staging, tumour and OAR delineation, treatment planning, and inter- or intrafractional motion management. Special emphasis is placed on a new generation of hybrid MRI treatment devices and their potential for real-time adaptive radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin J Menten
- Joint Department of Physics at The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | - Andreas Wetscherek
- Joint Department of Physics at The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Martin F Fast
- Joint Department of Physics at The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Choudhury A, Budgell G, MacKay R, Falk S, Faivre-Finn C, Dubec M, van Herk M, McWilliam A. The Future of Image-guided Radiotherapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2017; 29:662-666. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2017.04.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2017] [Revised: 04/11/2017] [Accepted: 04/28/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
9
|
Kumar S, Rai R, Stemmer A, Josan S, Holloway L, Vinod S, Moses D, Liney G. Feasibility of free breathing Lung MRI for Radiotherapy using non-Cartesian k-space acquisition schemes. Br J Radiol 2017; 90:20170037. [PMID: 28937270 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20170037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To test a free-breathing MRI protocol for anatomical and functional assessment during lung cancer radiotherapy by assessing two non-Cartesian acquisition schemes based on T1 weighted 3D gradient recall echo sequence: (i) stack-of stars (StarVIBE) and (ii) spiral (SpiralVIBE) trajectories. METHODS MR images on five healthy volunteers were acquired on a wide bore 3T scanner (MAGNETOM Skyra, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). Anatomical image quality was assessed on: (1) free breathing (StarVIBE), (2) the standard clinical sequence (volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination, VIBE) acquired in a 20 second (s) compliant breath-hold and (3) 20 s non-compliant breath-hold. For functional assessment, StarVIBE and the current standard breath-hold time-resolved angiography with stochastic trajectories (TWIST) sequence were run as multiphase acquisitions to replicate dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) in one healthy volunteer. The potential application of the SpiralVIBE sequence for lung parenchymal imaging was assessed on one healthy volunteer. Ten patients with lung cancer were subsequently imaged with the StarVIBE and SpiralVIBE sequences for anatomical and structural assessment. For functional assessment, free-breathing StarVIBE DCE protocol was compared with breath-hold TWIST sequences on four prior lung cancer patients with similar tumour locations. Image quality was evaluated independently and blinded to sequence information by an experienced thoracic radiologist. RESULTS For anatomical assessment, the compliant breath-hold VIBE sequence was better than free-breathing StarVIBE. However, in the presence of a non-compliant breath-hold, StarVIBE was superior. For functional assessment, StarVIBE outperformed the standard sequence and was shown to provide robust DCE data in the presence of motion. The ultrashort echo of the SpiralVIBE sequence enabled visualisation of lung parenchyma. CONCLUSION The two non-Cartesian acquisition sequences, StarVIBE and SpiralVIBE, provide a free-breathing imaging protocol of the lung with sufficient image quality to permit anatomical, structural and functional assessment during radiotherapy. Advances in knowledge: Novel application of non-Cartesian MRI sequences for lung cancer imaging for radiotherapy. Illustration of SpiralVIBE UTE sequence as a promising sequence for lung structural imaging during lung radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shivani Kumar
- 1 South Western Clinical School, School of Medicine, University of New South Wales , NSW , Australia.,2 Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Liverpool Hospital , Liverpool, NSW , Australia.,3 Ingham Institute of Applied Medical Research , NSW , Australia
| | - Robba Rai
- 1 South Western Clinical School, School of Medicine, University of New South Wales , NSW , Australia.,2 Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Liverpool Hospital , Liverpool, NSW , Australia
| | | | - Sonal Josan
- 5 Siemens Healthcare , Melbourne, VIC , Australia
| | - Lois Holloway
- 1 South Western Clinical School, School of Medicine, University of New South Wales , NSW , Australia.,2 Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Liverpool Hospital , Liverpool, NSW , Australia.,3 Ingham Institute of Applied Medical Research , NSW , Australia.,6 Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong , Wollongong, NSW , Australia.,7 Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University of Sydney , Sydney, NSW , Australia
| | - Shalini Vinod
- 1 South Western Clinical School, School of Medicine, University of New South Wales , NSW , Australia.,2 Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Liverpool Hospital , Liverpool, NSW , Australia.,8 University of Western Sydney , Sydney, NSW , Australia
| | - Daniel Moses
- 1 South Western Clinical School, School of Medicine, University of New South Wales , NSW , Australia.,9 Department of Medical Imaging, Prince of Wales Hospital , Kensington, NSW , Australia
| | - Gary Liney
- 1 South Western Clinical School, School of Medicine, University of New South Wales , NSW , Australia.,2 Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Liverpool Hospital , Liverpool, NSW , Australia.,3 Ingham Institute of Applied Medical Research , NSW , Australia.,6 Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong , Wollongong, NSW , Australia
| |
Collapse
|