1
|
Boddeti U, Farooque P, McGrath H, Percy J, Chishti O, Duckrow RB, Spencer D, Zaveri HP, Ksendzovsky A. Identifying the epileptic network by linking interictal functional and structural connectivity. Sci Rep 2025; 15:9106. [PMID: 40097693 PMCID: PMC11914057 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-93978-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2025] [Indexed: 03/19/2025] Open
Abstract
Over the last two decades, it has become increasingly clear that epilepsy is a network disorder. However, it is unclear whether these networks are established only during seizures or persist interictally. The goal of this study was to identify whether functional seizure networks exist interictally and evaluate if there is a structural basis to these networks. We identified four patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy who underwent resective epilepsy surgery. We estimated functional and structural connectivity across intracranial electrode contacts involved in seizure onset, early spread, and uninvolved controls. Across all interictal epochs considered, we found higher functional and white matter connectivity across cortical regions involved in seizure spread. Additionally, we observed that the patient in our cohort with the best seizure outcome had the highest functional connectivity across seizure contacts. Functional connectivity findings suggest the presence of an interictal seizure network that parallels underlying structural connectivity. Furthermore, our findings suggest that disruption or ablation of highly connected seizure regions may be necessary to achieve improved post-operative seizure freedom.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ujwal Boddeti
- Surgical Neurology Branch, NINDS, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 670 W Baltimore St, HSF3, Rm 9110, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA
| | - Pue Farooque
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA
| | - Hari McGrath
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA
| | - Jennifer Percy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA
| | - Omar Chishti
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA
| | - Robert B Duckrow
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA
| | - Dennis Spencer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA
| | - Hitten P Zaveri
- Department of Neurology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA
| | - Alexander Ksendzovsky
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 670 W Baltimore St, HSF3, Rm 9110, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sinha N, Lucas A, Adamiak Davis K. From data to decision: Scaling artificial intelligence with informatics for epilepsy management. Clin Transl Med 2024; 14:e70108. [PMID: 39673123 PMCID: PMC11645443 DOI: 10.1002/ctm2.70108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2024] [Accepted: 09/01/2024] [Indexed: 12/16/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Nishant Sinha
- Department of NeurologyUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Alfredo Lucas
- Department of NeurologyUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kundishora AJ, Reeves BC, Lerner DK, Storm PB, Prelack MS, Palmer JN, Adappa ND, Kennedy BC. Endoscopic endonasal resection of olfactory tract hamartoma for pediatric epilepsy. Childs Nerv Syst 2024; 40:3915-3921. [PMID: 39222089 PMCID: PMC11579163 DOI: 10.1007/s00381-024-06595-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2024] [Accepted: 08/25/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-hypothalamic glioneural hamartomas are rare entities known to cause medically refractory epilepsy. Olfactory bulb hamartomas, in particular, are exceptionally rare. METHODS We describe a case of an olfactory bulb hamartoma that was surgically resected at our institution. We also performed a literature review of all glioneural hamartomas and discuss the clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management of these lesions. RESULTS Herein, we present the unusual case of a typically developing 17-year-old boy with a near life-long history of drug-resistant epilepsy, found to have a 0.8 × 1.0 cm right olfactory bulb hamartoma. Endoscopic endonasal trans-cribriform resection of the lesion led to seizure freedom in the 6-month follow-up period (Engel class 1 outcome). Comprehensive literature review revealed only one other sporadic case, which was also successfully treated with total surgical resection. CONCLUSIONS Our case of an olfactory bulb hamartoma adds to the limited literature currently available, illustrating key clinical characteristics of these exceedingly rare lesions and outlining an effective, minimally invasive, and low-morbidity treatment strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam J Kundishora
- Department of Neurosurgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Benjamin C Reeves
- Department of Neurosurgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - David K Lerner
- Department of Neurosurgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Phillip B Storm
- Department of Neurosurgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Marisa S Prelack
- Department of Neurology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - James N Palmer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Nithin D Adappa
- Department of Neurosurgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Benjamin C Kennedy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ben-Menachem E. Drug arrows in the quiver-antiseizure, antiepileptic and neuroprotective medication: Treatment and future aspects. A focused review. Seizure 2024:S1059-1311(24)00334-0. [PMID: 39694757 DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2024.11.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2024] [Revised: 11/17/2024] [Accepted: 11/28/2024] [Indexed: 12/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Drug discovery for the treatment of epilepsy is entering a new era especially with the advancement of genetic therapies as disease modifying, antiepileptogenic therapies. Even new ideas about re-purposed medication with purposed epileptogenic properties have been suggested. The possibilities are enormous, and it is encouraging that so many ideas are flourishing. The focus of this review is to discuss where to concentrate efforts to improve the lives of people with epilepsy (PWE) with medical treatment, especially the elderly who have many challenges besides just seizures. Thus, the arrow needs to be not only focused on DRE patients, but to try to redirect the arrow to prevent the development of seizures before onset as well as preventing refractoriness at the very beginning herald by the first seizures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elinor Ben-Menachem
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience and Physiology, Salgrenska Academy, Goteborg University Goteborg, Blå Stråket 5, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pastore LV, De Vita E, Sudhakar SV, Löbel U, Mankad K, Biswas A, Cirillo L, Pujar S, D’Arco F. Advances in magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of paediatric focal epilepsy: a narrative review. Transl Pediatr 2024; 13:1617-1633. [PMID: 39399717 PMCID: PMC11467228 DOI: 10.21037/tp-24-166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2024] [Accepted: 08/09/2024] [Indexed: 10/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and Objective Epilepsy affects approximately 50 million people worldwide, with 30-40% of patients not responding to medication, necessitating alternative therapies such as surgical intervention. However, the accurate localization of epileptogenic lesions, particularly in pediatric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-negative drug-resistant epilepsy, remains a challenge. This paper reviews advanced neuroimaging techniques aimed at improving the detection of such lesions to enhance surgical outcomes. Methods A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, focusing on advanced MRI sequences, focal epilepsy, and the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in the diagnostic process. Key Content and Findings New MRI sequences, including magnetization prepared 2 rapid gradient echo (MP2RAGE), edge-enhancing gradient echo (EDGE), and fluid and white matter suppression (FLAWS), have demonstrated enhanced capabilities in detecting subtle epileptogenic lesions. Quantitative MRI techniques, notably magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF), alongside innovative post-processing methods, are emphasized for their effectiveness in delineating cortical malformations, whether used alone or in combination with ultra-high field MRI systems. Furthermore, the integration of AI in radiology is progressing, providing significant support in accurately localizing lesions, and potentially optimizing pre-surgical planning. Conclusions While advanced neuroimaging and AI offer significant improvements in the diagnostic process for epilepsy, some challenges remain. These include long acquisition times, the need for extensive data analysis, and a lack of large, standardized datasets for AI validation. However, the future holds promise as research continues to integrate these technologies into clinical practice. These efforts will improve the clinical applicability and effectiveness of these advanced techniques in epilepsy management, paving the way for more accurate diagnoses and better patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Vincenzo Pastore
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Neuroradiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Ospedale Bellaria, Bologna, Italy
| | - Enrico De Vita
- Department of Neuroradiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Sniya Valsa Sudhakar
- Department of Neuroradiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ulrike Löbel
- Department of Neuroradiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Kshitij Mankad
- Department of Neuroradiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Asthik Biswas
- Department of Neuroradiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Luigi Cirillo
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Neuroradiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Ospedale Bellaria, Bologna, Italy
| | - Suresh Pujar
- Neurology/Epilepsy Department, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Developmental Neurosciences Unit, University College London-Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Felice D’Arco
- Department of Neuroradiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gallagher RS, Sinha N, Pattnaik AR, Ojemann WKS, Lucas A, LaRocque JJ, Bernabei JM, Greenblatt AS, Sweeney EM, Cajigas I, Chen HI, Davis KA, Conrad EC, Litt B. The sixth sense: how much does interictal intracranial EEG add to determining the focality of epileptic networks? Brain Commun 2024; 6:fcae320. [PMID: 39440305 PMCID: PMC11495218 DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcae320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Revised: 06/20/2024] [Accepted: 09/25/2024] [Indexed: 10/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Intracranial EEG is used for two main purposes: to determine (i) if epileptic networks are amenable to focal treatment and (ii) where to intervene. Currently, these questions are answered qualitatively and differently across centres. There is a need to quantify the focality of epileptic networks systematically, which may guide surgical decision-making, enable large-scale data analysis and facilitate multi-centre prospective clinical trials. We analysed interictal data from 101 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who underwent pre-surgical evaluation with intracranial EEG at a single centre. We chose interictal data because of its potential to reduce the morbidity and cost associated with ictal recording. Sixty-five patients had unifocal seizure onset on intracranial EEG, and 36 were non-focal or multi-focal. We quantified the spatial dispersion of implanted electrodes and interictal intracranial EEG abnormalities for each patient. We compared these measures against the '5 Sense Score,' a pre-implant prediction of the likelihood of focal seizure onset, assessed the ability to predict unifocal seizure onset by combining these metrics and evaluated how predicted focality relates to subsequent treatment and outcomes. The spatial dispersion of intracranial EEG electrodes predicted network focality with similar performance to the 5-SENSE score [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.68 (95% confidence interval 0.57, 0.78)], indicating that electrode placement accurately reflected pre-implant information. A cross-validated model combining the 5-SENSE score and the spatial dispersion of interictal intracranial EEG abnormalities significantly improved this prediction [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.79 (95% confidence interval 0.70, 0.88); P < 0.05]. Predictions from this combined model differed between surgical- from device-treated patients with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.81 (95% confidence interval 0.68, 0.85) and between patients with good and poor post-surgical outcome at 2 years with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.70 (95% confidence interval 0.56, 0.85). Spatial measures of interictal intracranial EEG abnormality significantly improved upon pre-implant predictions of network focality by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and increased sensitivity in a single-centre study. Quantified focality predictions related to ultimate treatment strategy and surgical outcomes. While the 5-SENSE score weighed for specificity in their multi-centre validation to prevent unnecessary implantation, sensitivity improvement found in our single-centre study by including intracranial EEG may aid the decision on whom to perform the focal intervention. We present this study as an important step in building standardized, quantitative tools to guide epilepsy surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan S Gallagher
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Nishant Sinha
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Akash R Pattnaik
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - William K S Ojemann
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Alfredo Lucas
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Joshua J LaRocque
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - John M Bernabei
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Adam S Greenblatt
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Elizabeth M Sweeney
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Iahn Cajigas
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - H Isaac Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Kathryn A Davis
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Erin C Conrad
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Brian Litt
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Doss DJ, Shless JS, Bick SK, Makhoul GS, Negi AS, Bibro CE, Rashingkar R, Gummadavelli A, Chang C, Gallagher MJ, Naftel RP, Reddy SB, Williams Roberson S, Morgan VL, Johnson GW, Englot DJ. The interictal suppression hypothesis is the dominant differentiator of seizure onset zones in focal epilepsy. Brain 2024; 147:3009-3017. [PMID: 38874456 PMCID: PMC11370787 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awae189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2023] [Revised: 04/19/2024] [Accepted: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Successful surgical treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy traditionally relies on the identification of seizure onset zones (SOZs). Connectome-based analyses of electrographic data from stereo electroencephalography (SEEG) may empower improved detection of SOZs. Specifically, connectome-based analyses based on the interictal suppression hypothesis posit that when the patient is not having a seizure, SOZs are inhibited by non-SOZs through high inward connectivity and low outward connectivity. However, it is not clear whether there are other motifs that can better identify potential SOZs. Thus, we sought to use unsupervised machine learning to identify network motifs that elucidate SOZs and investigate if there is another motif that outperforms the ISH. Resting-state SEEG data from 81 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy undergoing a pre-surgical evaluation at Vanderbilt University Medical Center were collected. Directed connectivity matrices were computed using the alpha band (8-13 Hz). Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed on each patient's connectivity matrix. Each patient's components were analysed qualitatively to identify common patterns across patients. A quantitative definition was then used to identify the component that most closely matched the observed pattern in each patient. A motif characteristic of the interictal suppression hypothesis (high-inward and low-outward connectivity) was present in all individuals and found to be the most robust motif for identification of SOZs in 64/81 (79%) patients. This principal component demonstrated significant differences in SOZs compared to non-SOZs. While other motifs for identifying SOZs were present in other patients, they differed for each patient, suggesting that seizure networks are patient specific, but the ISH is present in nearly all networks. We discovered that a potentially suppressive motif based on the interictal suppression hypothesis was present in all patients, and it was the most robust motif for SOZs in 79% of patients. Each patient had additional motifs that further characterized SOZs, but these motifs were not common across all patients. This work has the potential to augment clinical identification of SOZs to improve epilepsy treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derek J Doss
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University Nashville, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
- Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science (VUIIS), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
- Vanderbilt Institute for Surgery and Engineering (VISE), Vanderbilt University Nashville, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
| | - Jared S Shless
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
| | - Sarah K Bick
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University Nashville, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
| | - Ghassan S Makhoul
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University Nashville, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
- Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science (VUIIS), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
- Vanderbilt Institute for Surgery and Engineering (VISE), Vanderbilt University Nashville, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
| | - Aarushi S Negi
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
| | - Camden E Bibro
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
| | - Rohan Rashingkar
- Department of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University Nashville, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
| | - Abhijeet Gummadavelli
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
| | - Catie Chang
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University Nashville, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
- Department of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University Nashville, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
| | - Martin J Gallagher
- Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
| | - Robert P Naftel
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
| | - Shilpa B Reddy
- Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
| | - Shawniqua Williams Roberson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University Nashville, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
- Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
| | - Victoria L Morgan
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University Nashville, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
- Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science (VUIIS), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
- Vanderbilt Institute for Surgery and Engineering (VISE), Vanderbilt University Nashville, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
- Department of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University Nashville, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
| | - Graham W Johnson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University Nashville, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
- Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science (VUIIS), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
- Vanderbilt Institute for Surgery and Engineering (VISE), Vanderbilt University Nashville, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
| | - Dario J Englot
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University Nashville, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
- Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science (VUIIS), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
- Vanderbilt Institute for Surgery and Engineering (VISE), Vanderbilt University Nashville, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
- Department of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University Nashville, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
- Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Doss DJ, Johnson GW, Makhoul GS, Rashingkar RV, Shless JS, Bibro CE, Paulo DL, Gummadavelli A, Ball TJ, Reddy SB, Naftel RP, Haas KF, Dawant BM, Constantinidis C, Roberson SW, Bick SK, Morgan VL, Englot DJ. Network signatures define consciousness state during focal seizures. Epilepsia 2024; 65:2686-2699. [PMID: 39056406 PMCID: PMC11534508 DOI: 10.1111/epi.18074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2024] [Revised: 07/12/2024] [Accepted: 07/17/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Epilepsy is a common neurological disorder affecting 1% of the global population. Loss of consciousness in focal impaired awareness seizures (FIASs) and focal-to-bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCSs) can be devastating, but the mechanisms are not well understood. Although ictal activity and interictal connectivity changes have been noted, the network states of focal aware seizures (FASs), FIASs, and FBTCSs have not been thoroughly evaluated with network measures ictally. METHODS We obtained electrographic data from 74 patients with stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG). Sliding window band power, functional connectivity, and segregation were computed on preictal, ictal, and postictal data. Five-minute epochs of wake, rapid eye movement sleep, and deep sleep were also extracted. Connectivity of subcortical arousal structures was analyzed in a cohort of patients with both SEEG and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Given that custom neuromodulation of seizures is predicated on detection of seizure type, a convolutional neural network was used to classify seizure types. RESULTS We found that in the frontoparietal association cortex, an area associated with consciousness, both consciousness-impairing seizures (FIASs and FBTCSs) and deep sleep had increases in slow wave delta (1-4 Hz) band power. However, when network measures were employed, we found that only FIASs and deep sleep exhibited an increase in delta segregation and a decrease in gamma segregation. Furthermore, we found that only patients with FIASs had reduced subcortical-to-neocortical functional connectivity with fMRI versus controls. Finally, our deep learning network demonstrated an area under the curve of .75 for detecting consciousness-impairing seizures. SIGNIFICANCE This study provides novel insights into ictal network measures in FASs, FIASs, and FBTCSs. Importantly, although both FIASs and FBTCSs result in loss of consciousness, our results suggest that ictal network changes in FIASs uniquely resemble those that occur during deep sleep. Our results may inform novel neuromodulation strategies for preservation of consciousness in epilepsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derek J. Doss
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Vanderbilt Institute for Surgery and Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Graham W. Johnson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Vanderbilt Institute for Surgery and Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Ghassan S. Makhoul
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Vanderbilt Institute for Surgery and Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Rohan V. Rashingkar
- Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Jared S. Shless
- Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Camden E. Bibro
- Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Danika L. Paulo
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Abhijeet Gummadavelli
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Tyler J. Ball
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Shilpa B. Reddy
- Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt Children's Hospital, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Robert P. Naftel
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Kevin F. Haas
- Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Benoit M. Dawant
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Vanderbilt Institute for Surgery and Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Christos Constantinidis
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Vanderbilt Brain Institute, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Shawniqua Williams Roberson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Sarah K. Bick
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Victoria L. Morgan
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Vanderbilt Institute for Surgery and Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Dario J. Englot
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Vanderbilt Institute for Surgery and Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Vanderbilt Brain Institute, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Langbein J, Boddeti U, Kreinbrink M, Khan Z, Rampalli I, Bachani M, Ksendzovsky A. Therapeutic approaches targeting seizure networks. FRONTIERS IN NETWORK PHYSIOLOGY 2024; 4:1441983. [PMID: 39171119 PMCID: PMC11335476 DOI: 10.3389/fnetp.2024.1441983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2024] [Accepted: 07/16/2024] [Indexed: 08/23/2024]
Abstract
Epilepsy is one of the most common neurological disorders, affecting over 65 million people worldwide. Despite medical management with anti-seizure medications (ASMs), many patients fail to achieve seizure freedom, with over one-third of patients having drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). Even with surgical management through resective surgery and/or neuromodulatory interventions, over 50 % of patients continue to experience refractory seizures within a year of surgery. Over the past 2 decades, studies have increasingly suggested that treatment failure is likely driven by untreated components of a pathological seizure network, a shift in the classical understanding of epilepsy as a focal disorder. However, this shift in thinking has yet to translate to improved treatments and seizure outcomes in patients. Here, we present a narrative review discussing the process of surgical epilepsy management. We explore current surgical interventions and hypothesized mechanisms behind treatment failure, highlighting evidence of pathologic seizure networks. Finally, we conclude by discussing how the network theory may inform surgical management, guiding the identification and targeting of more appropriate surgical regions. Ultimately, we believe that adapting current surgical practices and neuromodulatory interventions towards targeting seizure networks offers new therapeutic strategies that may improve seizure outcomes in patients suffering from DRE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenna Langbein
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Ujwal Boddeti
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
- Surgical Neurology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Matthew Kreinbrink
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Ziam Khan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Ihika Rampalli
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Muzna Bachani
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Alexander Ksendzovsky
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lee DA, Lee HJ, Park KM. Brain connectivity in status epilepticus as a predictor of outcome: A diffusion tensor imaging study. J Neuroimaging 2024; 34:393-401. [PMID: 38499979 DOI: 10.1111/jon.13196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Revised: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE We aimed to explore structural connectivity in status epilepticus. METHODS We enrolled participants who underwent diffusion tensor imaging. We applied graph theory to investigate structural connectivity. We compared the structural connectivity measures between patients and healthy controls and between patients with poor (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] >3) and good (mRS ≤3) admission outcomes. RESULTS We enrolled 28 patients and 31 healthy controls (age 65.5 vs.62.0 years, p = .438). Of these patients, 16 and 12 showed poor and good admission outcome (age 65.5 vs.62.0 years, p = .438). The assortative coefficient (-0.113 vs. -0.121, p = .021), mean clustering coefficient (0.007 vs.0.006, p = .009), global efficiency (0.023 vs.0.020, p = .009), transitivity (0.007 vs.0.006, p = .009), and small-worldness index (0.006 vs.0.005, p = .021) were higher in patients with status epilepticus than in healthy controls. The assortative coefficient (-0.108 vs. -0.119, p = .042), mean clustering coefficient (0.007 vs.0.006, p = .042), and transitivity (0.008 vs.0.007, p = .042) were higher in patients with poor admission outcome than in those with good admission outcome. MRS score was positively correlated with structural connectivity measures, including the assortative coefficient (r = 0.615, p = .003), mean clustering coefficient (r = 0.544, p = .005), global efficiency (r = 0.515, p = .007), transitivity (r = 0.547, p = .007), and small-worldness index (r = 0.435, p = .024). CONCLUSION We revealed alterations in structural connectivity, showing increased integration and segregation in status epilepticus, which might be related with neuronal synchronization. This effect was more pronounced in patients with a poor admission outcome, potentially reshaping our understanding for comprehension of status epilepticus mechanisms and the development of more targeted treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong Ah Lee
- Department of Neurology, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Ho-Joon Lee
- Department of Radiology, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Kang Min Park
- Department of Neurology, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lucas A, Scheid BH, Pattnaik AR, Gallagher R, Mojena M, Tranquille A, Prager B, Gleichgerrcht E, Gong R, Litt B, Davis KA, Das S, Stein JM, Sinha N. iEEG-recon: A fast and scalable pipeline for accurate reconstruction of intracranial electrodes and implantable devices. Epilepsia 2024; 65:817-829. [PMID: 38148517 PMCID: PMC10948311 DOI: 10.1111/epi.17863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Revised: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Clinicians use intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) in conjunction with noninvasive brain imaging to identify epileptic networks and target therapy for drug-resistant epilepsy cases. Our goal was to promote ongoing and future collaboration by automating the process of "electrode reconstruction," which involves the labeling, registration, and assignment of iEEG electrode coordinates on neuroimaging. We developed a standalone, modular pipeline that performs electrode reconstruction. We demonstrate our tool's compatibility with clinical and research workflows and its scalability on cloud platforms. METHODS We created iEEG-recon, a scalable electrode reconstruction pipeline for semiautomatic iEEG annotation, rapid image registration, and electrode assignment on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Its modular architecture includes a clinical module for electrode labeling and localization, and a research module for automated data processing and electrode contact assignment. To ensure accessibility for users with limited programming and imaging expertise, we packaged iEEG-recon in a containerized format that allows integration into clinical workflows. We propose a cloud-based implementation of iEEG-recon and test our pipeline on data from 132 patients at two epilepsy centers using retrospective and prospective cohorts. RESULTS We used iEEG-recon to accurately reconstruct electrodes in both electrocorticography and stereoelectroencephalography cases with a 30-min running time per case (including semiautomatic electrode labeling and reconstruction). iEEG-recon generates quality assurance reports and visualizations to support epilepsy surgery discussions. Reconstruction outputs from the clinical module were radiologically validated through pre- and postimplant T1-MRI visual inspections. We also found that our use of ANTsPyNet deep learning-based brain segmentation for electrode classification was consistent with the widely used FreeSurfer segmentations. SIGNIFICANCE iEEG-recon is a robust pipeline for automating reconstruction of iEEG electrodes and implantable devices on brain MRI, promoting fast data analysis and integration into clinical workflows. iEEG-recon's accuracy, speed, and compatibility with cloud platforms make it a useful resource for epilepsy centers worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alfredo Lucas
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Brittany H. Scheid
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Akash R. Pattnaik
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Ryan Gallagher
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Marissa Mojena
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Ashley Tranquille
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Brian Prager
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
- Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | | | - Brian Litt
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Kathryn A. Davis
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Sandhitsu Das
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Joel M. Stein
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Nishant Sinha
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Doss DJ, Johnson GW, Englot DJ. Imaging and Stereotactic Electroencephalography Functional Networks to Guide Epilepsy Surgery. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2024; 35:61-72. [PMID: 38000842 PMCID: PMC10676462 DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2023.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2023]
Abstract
Epilepsy surgery is a potentially curative treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy that has remained underutilized both due to inadequate referrals and incomplete localization hypotheses. The complexity of patients evaluated for epilepsy surgery has increased, thus new approaches are necessary to treat these patients. The paradigm of epilepsy surgery has evolved to match this challenge, now considering the entire seizure network with the goal of disrupting it through resection, ablation, neuromodulation, or a combination. The network paradigm has the potential to aid in identification of the seizure network as well as treatment selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derek J Doss
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, PMB 351631, 2301 Vanderbilt Place, Nashville, TN 37235, USA; Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science (VUIIS), 1161 21st Avenue South, Medical Center North AA-1105, Nashville, TN 37232, USA; Vanderbilt Institute for Surgery and Engineering (VISE), 1161 21st Avenue South, MCN S2323, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| | - Graham W Johnson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, PMB 351631, 2301 Vanderbilt Place, Nashville, TN 37235, USA; Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science (VUIIS), 1161 21st Avenue South, Medical Center North AA-1105, Nashville, TN 37232, USA; Vanderbilt Institute for Surgery and Engineering (VISE), 1161 21st Avenue South, MCN S2323, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| | - Dario J Englot
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, PMB 351631, 2301 Vanderbilt Place, Nashville, TN 37235, USA; Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science (VUIIS), 1161 21st Avenue South, Medical Center North AA-1105, Nashville, TN 37232, USA; Vanderbilt Institute for Surgery and Engineering (VISE), 1161 21st Avenue South, MCN S2323, Nashville, TN 37232, USA; Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1161 21st Avenue South, T4224 Medical Center North, Nashville, TN 37232, USA; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vanderbilt University, PMB 351824, 2301 Vanderbilt Place, Nashville, TN 37235, USA; Department of Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1161 21st Avenue South, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Mithani K, Suresh H, Ibrahim GM. Graph Theory and Modeling of Network Topology in Clinical Neurosurgery. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2024; 1462:107-122. [PMID: 39523262 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-64892-2_7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2024]
Abstract
The last several decades have seen a shift in understanding many neurological disorders as abnormalities in brain networks rather than specific brain regions. This conceptual revolution, coupled with advancements in computing capabilities and resources, has enabled a wealth of research on delineating and treating aberrant brain networks. One approach to network neuroscience, graph theory, involves modeling network topologies as mathematical graphs and computing various metrics that describe its characteristics. Using graph theory, researchers have derived new insights into the pathophysiology of many neuropsychiatric disorders and even developed treatments targeted at restoring network disturbances. In this chapter, we provide an overview of the principles of graph theory and how to implement it, specific applications of graph theory within clinical neurosurgery, and a discussion on the advantages and limitations of these approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karim Mithani
- Division of Neurosurgery, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Hrishikesh Suresh
- Division of Neurosurgery, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - George M Ibrahim
- Division of Neurosurgery, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Stasenko A, Kaestner E, Arienzo D, Schadler AJ, Helm JL, Shih JJ, Ben-Haim S, McDonald CR. Preoperative white matter network organization and memory decline after epilepsy surgery. J Neurosurg 2023; 139:1576-1587. [PMID: 37178024 PMCID: PMC10640663 DOI: 10.3171/2023.4.jns23347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 04/07/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Risk for memory decline is a common concern for individuals with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) undergoing surgery. Global and local network abnormalities are well documented in TLE. However, it is less known whether network abnormalities predict postsurgical memory decline. The authors examined the role of preoperative global and local white matter network organization and risk of postoperative memory decline in TLE. METHODS One hundred one individuals with TLE (n = 51 with left TLE and 50 with right TLE) underwent preoperative T1-weighted MRI, diffusion MRI, and neuropsychological memory testing in a prospective longitudinal study. Fifty-six age- and sex-matched controls completed the same protocol. Forty-four patients (22 with left TLE and 22 with right TLE) subsequently underwent temporal lobe surgery and postoperative memory testing. Preoperative structural connectomes were generated via diffusion tractography and analyzed using measures of global and local (i.e., medial temporal lobe [MTL]) network organization. Global metrics measured network integration and specialization. The local metric was calculated as an asymmetry of the mean local efficiency between the ipsilateral and contralateral MTLs (i.e., MTL network asymmetry). RESULTS Higher preoperative global network integration and specialization were associated with higher preoperative verbal memory function in patients with left TLE. Higher preoperative global network integration and specialization, as well as greater leftward MTL network asymmetry, predicted greater postoperative verbal memory decline for patients with left TLE. No significant effects were observed in right TLE. Accounting for preoperative memory score and hippocampal volume asymmetry, MTL network asymmetry uniquely explained 25%-33% of the variance in verbal memory decline for left TLE and outperformed hippocampal volume asymmetry and global network metrics. MTL network asymmetry alone produced good diagnostic classification of memory decline in left TLE (i.e., an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.80-0.84 and correct classification of 65%-76% of cases with cross-validation). CONCLUSIONS These preliminary data suggest that global white matter network disruption contributes to verbal memory impairment preoperatively and predicts postsurgical verbal memory outcomes in left TLE. However, a leftward asymmetry of MTL white matter network organization may confer the highest risk for verbal memory decline. Although this requires replication in a larger sample, the authors demonstrate the importance of characterizing preoperative local white matter network properties within the to-be-operated hemisphere and the reserve capacity of the contralateral MTL network, which may eventually be useful in presurgical planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alena Stasenko
- Center for Multimodal Imaging and Genetics, University of California, San Diego, California
- Departments of Psychiatry, San Diego State University, San Diego, California
| | - Erik Kaestner
- Center for Multimodal Imaging and Genetics, University of California, San Diego, California
- Departments of Psychiatry, San Diego State University, San Diego, California
| | - Donatello Arienzo
- Center for Multimodal Imaging and Genetics, University of California, San Diego, California
- Departments of Psychiatry, San Diego State University, San Diego, California
| | - Adam J. Schadler
- Center for Multimodal Imaging and Genetics, University of California, San Diego, California
- Departments of Psychiatry, San Diego State University, San Diego, California
| | - Jonathan L. Helm
- Department of Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, California
| | - Jerry J. Shih
- Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, California
| | | | - Carrie R. McDonald
- Center for Multimodal Imaging and Genetics, University of California, San Diego, California
- Departments of Psychiatry, San Diego State University, San Diego, California
- Radiation Medicine & Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, California
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
De Benedictis A, de Palma L, Rossi-Espagnet MC, Marras CE. Connectome-based approaches in pediatric epilepsy surgery: "State-of-the art" and future perspectives. Epilepsy Behav 2023; 149:109523. [PMID: 37944286 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2023.109523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2023] [Revised: 10/29/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
Modern epilepsy science has overcome the traditional interpretation of a strict region-specific origin of epilepsy, highlighting the involvement of wider patterns of altered neuronal circuits. In selected cases, surgery may constitute a valuable option to achieve both seizure freedom and neurocognitive improvement. Although epilepsy is now considered as a brain network disease, the most relevant literature concerning the "connectome-based" epilepsy surgery mainly refers to adults, with a limited number of studies dedicated to the pediatric population. In this review, the Authors summarized the main current available knowledge on the relevance of WM surgical anatomy in epilepsy surgery, the post-surgical modifications of brain structural connectivity and the related clinical impact of such modifications within the pediatric context. In the last part, possible implications and future perspectives of this approach have been discussed, especially concerning the optimization of surgical strategies and the predictive value of the epilepsy network analysis for planning tailored approaches, with the final aim of improving case selection, presurgical planning, intraoperative management, and postoperative results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Luca de Palma
- Epilepsy and Movement Disorders Neurology Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Maher C, Tang Z, D’Souza A, Cabezas M, Cai W, Barnett M, Kavehei O, Wang C, Nikpour A. Deep learning distinguishes connectomes from focal epilepsy patients and controls: feasibility and clinical implications. Brain Commun 2023; 5:fcad294. [PMID: 38025275 PMCID: PMC10644981 DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcad294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Revised: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The application of deep learning models to evaluate connectome data is gaining interest in epilepsy research. Deep learning may be a useful initial tool to partition connectome data into network subsets for further analysis. Few prior works have used deep learning to examine structural connectomes from patients with focal epilepsy. We evaluated whether a deep learning model applied to whole-brain connectomes could classify 28 participants with focal epilepsy from 20 controls and identify nodal importance for each group. Participants with epilepsy were further grouped based on whether they had focal seizures that evolved into bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (17 with, 11 without). The trained neural network classified patients from controls with an accuracy of 72.92%, while the seizure subtype groups achieved a classification accuracy of 67.86%. In the patient subgroups, the nodes and edges deemed important for accurate classification were also clinically relevant, indicating the model's interpretability. The current work expands the evidence for the potential of deep learning to extract relevant markers from clinical datasets. Our findings offer a rationale for further research interrogating structural connectomes to obtain features that can be biomarkers and aid the diagnosis of seizure subtypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Maher
- Faculty of Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Zihao Tang
- Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- Faculty of Engineering, School of Computer Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Arkiev D’Souza
- Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Mariano Cabezas
- Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Weidong Cai
- Faculty of Engineering, School of Computer Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Michael Barnett
- Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- Sydney Neuroimaging Analysis Centre, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Omid Kavehei
- Faculty of Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Chenyu Wang
- Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- Sydney Neuroimaging Analysis Centre, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Armin Nikpour
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- Comprehensive Epilepsy Service and Department of Neurology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Gunasekera CL, Sirven JI, Feyissa AM. The evolution of antiseizure medication therapy selection in adults: Is artificial intelligence -assisted antiseizure medication selection ready for prime time? J Cent Nerv Syst Dis 2023; 15:11795735231209209. [PMID: 37868934 PMCID: PMC10586013 DOI: 10.1177/11795735231209209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Antiseizure medications (ASMs) are the mainstay of symptomatic epilepsy treatment. The primary goal of pharmacotherapy with ASMs in epilepsy is to achieve complete seizure remission while minimizing therapy-related adverse events. Over the years, more ASMs have been introduced, with approximately 30 now in everyday use. With such a wide variety, much guidance is needed in choosing ASMs for initial therapy, subsequent replacement monotherapy, or adjunctive therapy. The specific ASMs are typically tailored by the patient's related factors, including epilepsy syndrome, age, sex, comorbidities, and ASM characteristics, including the spectrum of efficacy, pharmacokinetic properties, safety, and tolerability. Weighing these key clinical variables requires experience and expertise that may be limited. Furthermore, with this approach, patients may endure multiple trials of ineffective treatments before the most appropriate ASM is found. A more reliable way to predict response to different ASMs is needed so that the most effective and tolerated ASM can be selected. Soon, alternative approaches, such as deep machine learning (ML), could aid the individualized selection of the first and subsequent ASMs. The recognition of epilepsy as a network disorder and the integration of personalized epilepsy networks in future ML platforms can also facilitate the prediction of ASM response. Augmenting the conventional approach with artificial intelligence (AI) opens the door to personalized pharmacotherapy in epilepsy. However, more work is needed before these models are ready for primetime clinical practice.
Collapse
|
18
|
Sinha N, Duncan JS, Diehl B, Chowdhury FA, de Tisi J, Miserocchi A, McEvoy AW, Davis KA, Vos SB, Winston GP, Wang Y, Taylor PN. Intracranial EEG Structure-Function Coupling and Seizure Outcomes After Epilepsy Surgery. Neurology 2023; 101:e1293-e1306. [PMID: 37652703 PMCID: PMC10558161 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000207661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Surgery is an effective treatment for drug-resistant epilepsy, which modifies the brain's structure and networks to regulate seizure activity. Our objective was to examine the relationship between brain structure and function to determine the extent to which this relationship affects the success of the surgery in controlling seizures. We hypothesized that a stronger association between brain structure and function would lead to improved seizure control after surgery. METHODS We constructed functional and structural brain networks in patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy by using presurgery functional data from intracranial EEG (iEEG) recordings, presurgery and postsurgery structural data from T1-weighted MRI, and presurgery diffusion-weighted MRI. We quantified the relationship (coupling) between structural and functional connectivity by using the Spearman rank correlation and analyzed this structure-function coupling at 2 spatial scales: (1) global iEEG network level and (2) individual iEEG electrode contacts using virtual surgeries. We retrospectively predicted postoperative seizure freedom by incorporating the structure-function connectivity coupling metrics and routine clinical variables into a cross-validated predictive model. RESULTS We conducted a retrospective analysis on data from 39 patients who met our inclusion criteria. Brain areas implanted with iEEG electrodes had stronger structure-function coupling in seizure-free patients compared with those with seizure recurrence (p = 0.002, d = 0.76, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.78 [95% CI 0.62-0.93]). Virtual surgeries on brain areas that resulted in stronger structure-function coupling of the remaining network were associated with seizure-free outcomes (p = 0.007, d = 0.96, AUC = 0.73 [95% CI 0.58-0.89]). The combination of global and local structure-function coupling measures accurately predicted seizure outcomes with a cross-validated AUC of 0.81 (95% CI 0.67-0.94). These measures were complementary to other clinical variables and, when included for prediction, resulted in a cross-validated AUC of 0.91 (95% CI 0.82-1.0), accuracy of 92%, sensitivity of 93%, and specificity of 91%. DISCUSSION Our study showed that the strength of structure-function connectivity coupling may play a crucial role in determining the success of epilepsy surgery. By quantitatively incorporating structure-function coupling measures and standard-of-care clinical variables into presurgical evaluations, we may be able to better localize epileptogenic tissue and select patients for epilepsy surgery. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE This is a Class IV retrospective case series showing that structure-function mapping may help determine the outcome from surgical resection for treatment-resistant focal epilepsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nishant Sinha
- From the Department of Neurology (N.S., K.A.D.), Penn Epilepsy Center, Perelman School of Medicine, and Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics (N.S., K.A.D.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Translational and Clinical Research Institute (Y.W., P.N.T.), Faculty of Medical Sciences, and Computational Neuroscience, Neurology, and Psychiatry Lab (Y.W., P.N.T.), ICOS Group, School of Computing, Newcastle University; Department of Epilepsy (J.S.D., B.D., F.A.C., J.d.T., A.M., A.W.M., G.P.W., Y.W., P.N.T.), UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology; UCL Centre for Medical Image Computing (S.B.V.); Neuroradiological Academic Unit (S.B.V.), UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London; MRI Unit (J.S.D., G.P.W.), Chalfont Centre for Epilepsy, Bucks, United Kingdom; Centre for Microscopy, Characterisation, and Analysis (S.B.V.), The University of Western Australia, Nedlands; and Division of Neurology (G.P.W.), Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
| | - John S Duncan
- From the Department of Neurology (N.S., K.A.D.), Penn Epilepsy Center, Perelman School of Medicine, and Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics (N.S., K.A.D.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Translational and Clinical Research Institute (Y.W., P.N.T.), Faculty of Medical Sciences, and Computational Neuroscience, Neurology, and Psychiatry Lab (Y.W., P.N.T.), ICOS Group, School of Computing, Newcastle University; Department of Epilepsy (J.S.D., B.D., F.A.C., J.d.T., A.M., A.W.M., G.P.W., Y.W., P.N.T.), UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology; UCL Centre for Medical Image Computing (S.B.V.); Neuroradiological Academic Unit (S.B.V.), UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London; MRI Unit (J.S.D., G.P.W.), Chalfont Centre for Epilepsy, Bucks, United Kingdom; Centre for Microscopy, Characterisation, and Analysis (S.B.V.), The University of Western Australia, Nedlands; and Division of Neurology (G.P.W.), Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Beate Diehl
- From the Department of Neurology (N.S., K.A.D.), Penn Epilepsy Center, Perelman School of Medicine, and Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics (N.S., K.A.D.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Translational and Clinical Research Institute (Y.W., P.N.T.), Faculty of Medical Sciences, and Computational Neuroscience, Neurology, and Psychiatry Lab (Y.W., P.N.T.), ICOS Group, School of Computing, Newcastle University; Department of Epilepsy (J.S.D., B.D., F.A.C., J.d.T., A.M., A.W.M., G.P.W., Y.W., P.N.T.), UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology; UCL Centre for Medical Image Computing (S.B.V.); Neuroradiological Academic Unit (S.B.V.), UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London; MRI Unit (J.S.D., G.P.W.), Chalfont Centre for Epilepsy, Bucks, United Kingdom; Centre for Microscopy, Characterisation, and Analysis (S.B.V.), The University of Western Australia, Nedlands; and Division of Neurology (G.P.W.), Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Fahmida A Chowdhury
- From the Department of Neurology (N.S., K.A.D.), Penn Epilepsy Center, Perelman School of Medicine, and Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics (N.S., K.A.D.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Translational and Clinical Research Institute (Y.W., P.N.T.), Faculty of Medical Sciences, and Computational Neuroscience, Neurology, and Psychiatry Lab (Y.W., P.N.T.), ICOS Group, School of Computing, Newcastle University; Department of Epilepsy (J.S.D., B.D., F.A.C., J.d.T., A.M., A.W.M., G.P.W., Y.W., P.N.T.), UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology; UCL Centre for Medical Image Computing (S.B.V.); Neuroradiological Academic Unit (S.B.V.), UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London; MRI Unit (J.S.D., G.P.W.), Chalfont Centre for Epilepsy, Bucks, United Kingdom; Centre for Microscopy, Characterisation, and Analysis (S.B.V.), The University of Western Australia, Nedlands; and Division of Neurology (G.P.W.), Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Jane de Tisi
- From the Department of Neurology (N.S., K.A.D.), Penn Epilepsy Center, Perelman School of Medicine, and Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics (N.S., K.A.D.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Translational and Clinical Research Institute (Y.W., P.N.T.), Faculty of Medical Sciences, and Computational Neuroscience, Neurology, and Psychiatry Lab (Y.W., P.N.T.), ICOS Group, School of Computing, Newcastle University; Department of Epilepsy (J.S.D., B.D., F.A.C., J.d.T., A.M., A.W.M., G.P.W., Y.W., P.N.T.), UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology; UCL Centre for Medical Image Computing (S.B.V.); Neuroradiological Academic Unit (S.B.V.), UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London; MRI Unit (J.S.D., G.P.W.), Chalfont Centre for Epilepsy, Bucks, United Kingdom; Centre for Microscopy, Characterisation, and Analysis (S.B.V.), The University of Western Australia, Nedlands; and Division of Neurology (G.P.W.), Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Anna Miserocchi
- From the Department of Neurology (N.S., K.A.D.), Penn Epilepsy Center, Perelman School of Medicine, and Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics (N.S., K.A.D.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Translational and Clinical Research Institute (Y.W., P.N.T.), Faculty of Medical Sciences, and Computational Neuroscience, Neurology, and Psychiatry Lab (Y.W., P.N.T.), ICOS Group, School of Computing, Newcastle University; Department of Epilepsy (J.S.D., B.D., F.A.C., J.d.T., A.M., A.W.M., G.P.W., Y.W., P.N.T.), UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology; UCL Centre for Medical Image Computing (S.B.V.); Neuroradiological Academic Unit (S.B.V.), UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London; MRI Unit (J.S.D., G.P.W.), Chalfont Centre for Epilepsy, Bucks, United Kingdom; Centre for Microscopy, Characterisation, and Analysis (S.B.V.), The University of Western Australia, Nedlands; and Division of Neurology (G.P.W.), Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Andrew William McEvoy
- From the Department of Neurology (N.S., K.A.D.), Penn Epilepsy Center, Perelman School of Medicine, and Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics (N.S., K.A.D.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Translational and Clinical Research Institute (Y.W., P.N.T.), Faculty of Medical Sciences, and Computational Neuroscience, Neurology, and Psychiatry Lab (Y.W., P.N.T.), ICOS Group, School of Computing, Newcastle University; Department of Epilepsy (J.S.D., B.D., F.A.C., J.d.T., A.M., A.W.M., G.P.W., Y.W., P.N.T.), UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology; UCL Centre for Medical Image Computing (S.B.V.); Neuroradiological Academic Unit (S.B.V.), UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London; MRI Unit (J.S.D., G.P.W.), Chalfont Centre for Epilepsy, Bucks, United Kingdom; Centre for Microscopy, Characterisation, and Analysis (S.B.V.), The University of Western Australia, Nedlands; and Division of Neurology (G.P.W.), Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Kathryn A Davis
- From the Department of Neurology (N.S., K.A.D.), Penn Epilepsy Center, Perelman School of Medicine, and Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics (N.S., K.A.D.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Translational and Clinical Research Institute (Y.W., P.N.T.), Faculty of Medical Sciences, and Computational Neuroscience, Neurology, and Psychiatry Lab (Y.W., P.N.T.), ICOS Group, School of Computing, Newcastle University; Department of Epilepsy (J.S.D., B.D., F.A.C., J.d.T., A.M., A.W.M., G.P.W., Y.W., P.N.T.), UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology; UCL Centre for Medical Image Computing (S.B.V.); Neuroradiological Academic Unit (S.B.V.), UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London; MRI Unit (J.S.D., G.P.W.), Chalfont Centre for Epilepsy, Bucks, United Kingdom; Centre for Microscopy, Characterisation, and Analysis (S.B.V.), The University of Western Australia, Nedlands; and Division of Neurology (G.P.W.), Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Sjoerd B Vos
- From the Department of Neurology (N.S., K.A.D.), Penn Epilepsy Center, Perelman School of Medicine, and Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics (N.S., K.A.D.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Translational and Clinical Research Institute (Y.W., P.N.T.), Faculty of Medical Sciences, and Computational Neuroscience, Neurology, and Psychiatry Lab (Y.W., P.N.T.), ICOS Group, School of Computing, Newcastle University; Department of Epilepsy (J.S.D., B.D., F.A.C., J.d.T., A.M., A.W.M., G.P.W., Y.W., P.N.T.), UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology; UCL Centre for Medical Image Computing (S.B.V.); Neuroradiological Academic Unit (S.B.V.), UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London; MRI Unit (J.S.D., G.P.W.), Chalfont Centre for Epilepsy, Bucks, United Kingdom; Centre for Microscopy, Characterisation, and Analysis (S.B.V.), The University of Western Australia, Nedlands; and Division of Neurology (G.P.W.), Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Gavin P Winston
- From the Department of Neurology (N.S., K.A.D.), Penn Epilepsy Center, Perelman School of Medicine, and Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics (N.S., K.A.D.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Translational and Clinical Research Institute (Y.W., P.N.T.), Faculty of Medical Sciences, and Computational Neuroscience, Neurology, and Psychiatry Lab (Y.W., P.N.T.), ICOS Group, School of Computing, Newcastle University; Department of Epilepsy (J.S.D., B.D., F.A.C., J.d.T., A.M., A.W.M., G.P.W., Y.W., P.N.T.), UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology; UCL Centre for Medical Image Computing (S.B.V.); Neuroradiological Academic Unit (S.B.V.), UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London; MRI Unit (J.S.D., G.P.W.), Chalfont Centre for Epilepsy, Bucks, United Kingdom; Centre for Microscopy, Characterisation, and Analysis (S.B.V.), The University of Western Australia, Nedlands; and Division of Neurology (G.P.W.), Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Yujiang Wang
- From the Department of Neurology (N.S., K.A.D.), Penn Epilepsy Center, Perelman School of Medicine, and Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics (N.S., K.A.D.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Translational and Clinical Research Institute (Y.W., P.N.T.), Faculty of Medical Sciences, and Computational Neuroscience, Neurology, and Psychiatry Lab (Y.W., P.N.T.), ICOS Group, School of Computing, Newcastle University; Department of Epilepsy (J.S.D., B.D., F.A.C., J.d.T., A.M., A.W.M., G.P.W., Y.W., P.N.T.), UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology; UCL Centre for Medical Image Computing (S.B.V.); Neuroradiological Academic Unit (S.B.V.), UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London; MRI Unit (J.S.D., G.P.W.), Chalfont Centre for Epilepsy, Bucks, United Kingdom; Centre for Microscopy, Characterisation, and Analysis (S.B.V.), The University of Western Australia, Nedlands; and Division of Neurology (G.P.W.), Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Peter Neal Taylor
- From the Department of Neurology (N.S., K.A.D.), Penn Epilepsy Center, Perelman School of Medicine, and Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics (N.S., K.A.D.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Translational and Clinical Research Institute (Y.W., P.N.T.), Faculty of Medical Sciences, and Computational Neuroscience, Neurology, and Psychiatry Lab (Y.W., P.N.T.), ICOS Group, School of Computing, Newcastle University; Department of Epilepsy (J.S.D., B.D., F.A.C., J.d.T., A.M., A.W.M., G.P.W., Y.W., P.N.T.), UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology; UCL Centre for Medical Image Computing (S.B.V.); Neuroradiological Academic Unit (S.B.V.), UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London; MRI Unit (J.S.D., G.P.W.), Chalfont Centre for Epilepsy, Bucks, United Kingdom; Centre for Microscopy, Characterisation, and Analysis (S.B.V.), The University of Western Australia, Nedlands; and Division of Neurology (G.P.W.), Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ghosh S, Sinha JK, Ghosh S, Sharma H, Bhaskar R, Narayanan KB. A Comprehensive Review of Emerging Trends and Innovative Therapies in Epilepsy Management. Brain Sci 2023; 13:1305. [PMID: 37759906 PMCID: PMC10527076 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13091305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Revised: 09/09/2023] [Accepted: 09/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Epilepsy is a complex neurological disorder affecting millions worldwide, with a substantial number of patients facing drug-resistant epilepsy. This comprehensive review explores innovative therapies for epilepsy management, focusing on their principles, clinical evidence, and potential applications. Traditional antiseizure medications (ASMs) form the cornerstone of epilepsy treatment, but their limitations necessitate alternative approaches. The review delves into cutting-edge therapies such as responsive neurostimulation (RNS), vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), and deep brain stimulation (DBS), highlighting their mechanisms of action and promising clinical outcomes. Additionally, the potential of gene therapies and optogenetics in epilepsy research is discussed, revealing groundbreaking findings that shed light on seizure mechanisms. Insights into cannabidiol (CBD) and the ketogenic diet as adjunctive therapies further broaden the spectrum of epilepsy management. Challenges in achieving seizure control with traditional therapies, including treatment resistance and individual variability, are addressed. The importance of staying updated with emerging trends in epilepsy management is emphasized, along with the hope for improved therapeutic options. Future research directions, such as combining therapies, AI applications, and non-invasive optogenetics, hold promise for personalized and effective epilepsy treatment. As the field advances, collaboration among researchers of natural and synthetic biochemistry, clinicians from different streams and various forms of medicine, and patients will drive progress toward better seizure control and a higher quality of life for individuals living with epilepsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shampa Ghosh
- GloNeuro, Sector 107, Vishwakarma Road, Noida 201301, India
- ICMR—National Institute of Nutrition, Tarnaka, Hyderabad 500007, India
| | | | - Soumya Ghosh
- GloNeuro, Sector 107, Vishwakarma Road, Noida 201301, India
| | | | - Rakesh Bhaskar
- School of Chemical Engineering, Yeungnam University, 280 Daehak-Ro, Gyeongsan, Gyeongbuk 38541, Republic of Korea
| | - Kannan Badri Narayanan
- School of Chemical Engineering, Yeungnam University, 280 Daehak-Ro, Gyeongsan, Gyeongbuk 38541, Republic of Korea
- Research Institute of Cell Culture, Yeungnam University, 280 Daehak-Ro, Gyeongsan, Gyeongbuk 38541, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Gallagher RS, Sinha N, Pattnaik AR, Ojemann WK, Lucas A, LaRocque JJ, Bernabei JM, Greenblatt AS, Sweeney EM, Chen HI, Davis KA, Conrad EC, Litt B. Quantifying interictal intracranial EEG to predict focal epilepsy. ARXIV 2023:arXiv:2307.15170v1. [PMID: 37547655 PMCID: PMC10402195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Intracranial EEG (IEEG) is used for 2 main purposes, to determine: (1) if epileptic networks are amenable to focal treatment and (2) where to intervene. Currently these questions are answered qualitatively and sometimes differently across centers. There is a need for objective, standardized methods to guide surgical decision making and to enable large scale data analysis across centers and prospective clinical trials. Methods We analyzed interictal data from 101 patients with drug resistant epilepsy who underwent presurgical evaluation with IEEG. We chose interictal data because of its potential to reduce the morbidity and cost associated with ictal recording. 65 patients had unifocal seizure onset on IEEG, and 36 were non-focal or multi-focal. We quantified the spatial dispersion of implanted electrodes and interictal IEEG abnormalities for each patient. We compared these measures against the "5 Sense Score (5SS)," a pre-implant estimate of the likelihood of focal seizure onset, and assessed their ability to predict the clinicians' choice of therapeutic intervention and the patient outcome. Results The spatial dispersion of IEEG electrodes predicted network focality with precision similar to the 5SS (AUC = 0.67), indicating that electrode placement accurately reflected pre-implant information. A cross-validated model combining the 5SS and the spatial dispersion of interictal IEEG abnormalities significantly improved this prediction (AUC = 0.79; p<0.05). The combined model predicted ultimate treatment strategy (surgery vs. device) with an AUC of 0.81 and post-surgical outcome at 2 years with an AUC of 0.70. The 5SS, interictal IEEG, and electrode placement were not correlated and provided complementary information. Conclusions Quantitative, interictal IEEG significantly improved upon pre-implant estimates of network focality and predicted treatment with precision approaching that of clinical experts. We present this study as an important step in building standardized, quantitative tools to guide epilepsy surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan S Gallagher
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Nishant Sinha
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Akash R. Pattnaik
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania
| | - William K.S. Ojemann
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Alfredo Lucas
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Joshua J. LaRocque
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania
| | - John M Bernabei
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania
| | | | - Elizabeth M Sweeney
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania
| | - H Isaac Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania
- Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center
| | - Kathryn A Davis
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Erin C Conrad
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Brian Litt
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Johnson GW, Doss DJ, Morgan VL, Paulo DL, Cai LY, Shless JS, Negi AS, Gummadavelli A, Kang H, Reddy SB, Naftel RP, Bick SK, Williams Roberson S, Dawant BM, Wallace MT, Englot DJ. The Interictal Suppression Hypothesis in focal epilepsy: network-level supporting evidence. Brain 2023; 146:2828-2845. [PMID: 36722219 PMCID: PMC10316780 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awad016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Revised: 12/24/2022] [Accepted: 01/08/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Why are people with focal epilepsy not continuously having seizures? Previous neuronal signalling work has implicated gamma-aminobutyric acid balance as integral to seizure generation and termination, but is a high-level distributed brain network involved in suppressing seizures? Recent intracranial electrographic evidence has suggested that seizure-onset zones have increased inward connectivity that could be associated with interictal suppression of seizure activity. Accordingly, we hypothesize that seizure-onset zones are actively suppressed by the rest of the brain network during interictal states. Full testing of this hypothesis would require collaboration across multiple domains of neuroscience. We focused on partially testing this hypothesis at the electrographic network level within 81 individuals with drug-resistant focal epilepsy undergoing presurgical evaluation. We used intracranial electrographic resting-state and neurostimulation recordings to evaluate the network connectivity of seizure onset, early propagation and non-involved zones. We then used diffusion imaging to acquire estimates of white-matter connectivity to evaluate structure-function coupling effects on connectivity findings. Finally, we generated a resting-state classification model to assist clinicians in detecting seizure-onset and propagation zones without the need for multiple ictal recordings. Our findings indicate that seizure onset and early propagation zones demonstrate markedly increased inwards connectivity and decreased outwards connectivity using both resting-state (one-way ANOVA, P-value = 3.13 × 10-13) and neurostimulation analyses to evaluate evoked responses (one-way ANOVA, P-value = 2.5 × 10-3). When controlling for the distance between regions, the difference between inwards and outwards connectivity remained stable up to 80 mm between brain connections (two-way repeated measures ANOVA, group effect P-value of 2.6 × 10-12). Structure-function coupling analyses revealed that seizure-onset zones exhibit abnormally enhanced coupling (hypercoupling) of surrounding regions compared to presumably healthy tissue (two-way repeated measures ANOVA, interaction effect P-value of 9.76 × 10-21). Using these observations, our support vector classification models achieved a maximum held-out testing set accuracy of 92.0 ± 2.2% to classify early propagation and seizure-onset zones. These results suggest that seizure-onset zones are actively segregated and suppressed by a widespread brain network. Furthermore, this electrographically observed functional suppression is disproportionate to any observed structural connectivity alterations of the seizure-onset zones. These findings have implications for the identification of seizure-onset zones using only brief electrographic recordings to reduce patient morbidity and augment the presurgical evaluation of drug-resistant epilepsy. Further testing of the interictal suppression hypothesis can provide insight into potential new resective, ablative and neuromodulation approaches to improve surgical success rates in those suffering from drug-resistant focal epilepsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Graham W Johnson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
- Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science (VUIIS), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
- Vanderbilt Institute for Surgery and Engineering (VISE), Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
| | - Derek J Doss
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
- Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science (VUIIS), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
- Vanderbilt Institute for Surgery and Engineering (VISE), Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
| | - Victoria L Morgan
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
- Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science (VUIIS), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
- Vanderbilt Institute for Surgery and Engineering (VISE), Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
- Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| | - Danika L Paulo
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| | - Leon Y Cai
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
- Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science (VUIIS), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
- Vanderbilt Institute for Surgery and Engineering (VISE), Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
| | - Jared S Shless
- Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science (VUIIS), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
- Vanderbilt Institute for Surgery and Engineering (VISE), Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| | - Aarushi S Negi
- Department of Neuroscience, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| | - Abhijeet Gummadavelli
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| | - Hakmook Kang
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| | - Shilpa B Reddy
- Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt Children’s Hospital, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| | - Robert P Naftel
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| | - Sarah K Bick
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| | | | - Benoit M Dawant
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
- Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science (VUIIS), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
- Vanderbilt Institute for Surgery and Engineering (VISE), Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
| | - Mark T Wallace
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
- Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
- Department of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| | - Dario J Englot
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
- Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science (VUIIS), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
- Vanderbilt Institute for Surgery and Engineering (VISE), Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lucas A, Scheid BH, Pattnaik AR, Gallagher R, Mojena M, Tranquille A, Prager B, Gleichgerrcht E, Gong R, Litt B, Davis KA, Das S, Stein JM, Sinha N. iEEG-recon: A Fast and Scalable Pipeline for Accurate Reconstruction of Intracranial Electrodes and Implantable Devices. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.06.12.23291286. [PMID: 37398160 PMCID: PMC10312891 DOI: 10.1101/2023.06.12.23291286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/04/2023]
Abstract
Background Collaboration between epilepsy centers is essential to integrate multimodal data for epilepsy research. Scalable tools for rapid and reproducible data analysis facilitate multicenter data integration and harmonization. Clinicians use intracranial EEG (iEEG) in conjunction with non-invasive brain imaging to identify epileptic networks and target therapy for drug-resistant epilepsy cases. Our goal was to promote ongoing and future collaboration by automating the process of "electrode reconstruction," which involves the labeling, registration, and assignment of iEEG electrode coordinates on neuroimaging. These tasks are still performed manually in many epilepsy centers. We developed a standalone, modular pipeline that performs electrode reconstruction. We demonstrate our tool's compatibility with clinical and research workflows and its scalability on cloud platforms. Methods We created iEEG-recon, a scalable electrode reconstruction pipeline for semi-automatic iEEG annotation, rapid image registration, and electrode assignment on brain MRIs. Its modular architecture includes three modules: a clinical module for electrode labeling and localization, and a research module for automated data processing and electrode contact assignment. To ensure accessibility for users with limited programming and imaging expertise, we packaged iEEG-recon in a containerized format that allows integration into clinical workflows. We propose a cloud-based implementation of iEEG-recon, and test our pipeline on data from 132 patients at two epilepsy centers using retrospective and prospective cohorts. Results We used iEEG-recon to accurately reconstruct electrodes in both electrocorticography (ECoG) and stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) cases with a 10 minute running time per case, and ~20 min for semi-automatic electrode labeling. iEEG-recon generates quality assurance reports and visualizations to support epilepsy surgery discussions. Reconstruction outputs from the clinical module were radiologically validated through pre- and post-implant T1-MRI visual inspections. Our use of ANTsPyNet deep learning approach for brain segmentation and electrode classification was consistent with the widely used Freesurfer segmentation. Discussion iEEG-recon is a valuable tool for automating reconstruction of iEEG electrodes and implantable devices on brain MRI, promoting efficient data analysis, and integration into clinical workflows. The tool's accuracy, speed, and compatibility with cloud platforms make it a useful resource for epilepsy centers worldwide. Comprehensive documentation is available at https://ieeg-recon.readthedocs.io/en/latest/.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alfredo Lucas
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Brittany H. Scheid
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Akash R. Pattnaik
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Ryan Gallagher
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Marissa Mojena
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Ashley Tranquille
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Brian Prager
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
- Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | | | - Brian Litt
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Kathryn A. Davis
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Sandhitsu Das
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Joel M. Stein
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Nishant Sinha
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Bernabei JM, Li A, Revell AY, Smith RJ, Gunnarsdottir KM, Ong IZ, Davis KA, Sinha N, Sarma S, Litt B. Quantitative approaches to guide epilepsy surgery from intracranial EEG. Brain 2023; 146:2248-2258. [PMID: 36623936 PMCID: PMC10232272 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awad007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2022] [Revised: 12/11/2022] [Accepted: 12/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Over the past 10 years, the drive to improve outcomes from epilepsy surgery has stimulated widespread interest in methods to quantitatively guide epilepsy surgery from intracranial EEG (iEEG). Many patients fail to achieve seizure freedom, in part due to the challenges in subjective iEEG interpretation. To address this clinical need, quantitative iEEG analytics have been developed using a variety of approaches, spanning studies of seizures, interictal periods, and their transitions, and encompass a range of techniques including electrographic signal analysis, dynamical systems modeling, machine learning and graph theory. Unfortunately, many methods fail to generalize to new data and are sensitive to differences in pathology and electrode placement. Here, we critically review selected literature on computational methods of identifying the epileptogenic zone from iEEG. We highlight shared methodological challenges common to many studies in this field and propose ways that they can be addressed. One fundamental common pitfall is a lack of open-source, high-quality data, which we specifically address by sharing a centralized high-quality, well-annotated, multicentre dataset consisting of >100 patients to support larger and more rigorous studies. Ultimately, we provide a road map to help these tools reach clinical trials and hope to improve the lives of future patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John M Bernabei
- Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering & Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Center for Neuroengineering & Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Adam Li
- Department of Computer Science, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA
| | - Andrew Y Revell
- Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering & Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Rachel J Smith
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
- Neuroengineering Program, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | - Kristin M Gunnarsdottir
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
- Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
| | - Ian Z Ong
- Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering & Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Kathryn A Davis
- Center for Neuroengineering & Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Nishant Sinha
- Center for Neuroengineering & Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Sridevi Sarma
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
- Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
| | - Brian Litt
- Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering & Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Center for Neuroengineering & Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lucas A, Cornblath EJ, Sinha N, Hadar P, Caciagli L, Keller SS, Bonilha L, Shinohara RT, Stein JM, Das S, Gleichgerrcht E, Davis KA. Resting state functional connectivity demonstrates increased segregation in bilateral temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia 2023; 64:1305-1317. [PMID: 36855286 PMCID: PMC11934684 DOI: 10.1111/epi.17565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2022] [Revised: 02/26/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) is the most common type of focal epilepsy. An increasingly identified subset of patients with TLE consists of those who show bilaterally independent temporal lobe seizures. The purpose of this study was to leverage network neuroscience to better understand the interictal whole brain network of bilateral TLE (BiTLE). METHODS In this study, using a multicenter resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) data set, we constructed whole-brain functional networks of 19 patients with BiTLE, and compared them to those of 75 patients with unilateral TLE (UTLE). We quantified resting-state, whole-brain topological properties using metrics derived from network theory, including clustering coefficient, global efficiency, participation coefficient, and modularity. For each metric, we computed an average across all brain regions, and iterated this process across network densities. Curves of network density vs each network metric were compared between groups. Finally, we derived a combined metric, which we term the "integration-segregation axis," by combining whole-brain average clustering coefficient and global efficiency curves, and applying principal component analysis (PCA)-based dimensionality reduction. RESULTS Compared to UTLE, BiTLE had decreased global efficiency (p = .031), and decreased whole brain average participation coefficient across a range of network densities (p = .019). Modularity maximization yielded a larger number of smaller communities in BiTLE than in UTLE (p = .020). Differences in network properties separate BiTLE and UTLE along the integration-segregation axis, with regions within the axis having a specificity of up to 0.87 for BiTLE. Along the integration-segregation axis, UTLE patients with poor surgical outcomes were distributed in the same regions as BiTLE, and network metrics confirmed similar patterns of increased segregation in both BiTLE and poor outcome UTLE. SIGNIFICANCE Increased interictal whole-brain network segregation, as measured by rs-fMRI, is specific to BiTLE, as well as poor surgical outcome UTLE, and may assist in non-invasively identifying this patient population prior to intracranial electroencephalography or device implantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alfredo Lucas
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Eli J. Cornblath
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nishant Sinha
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Peter Hadar
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Lorenzo Caciagli
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Simon S. Keller
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Leonardo Bonilha
- Department of Neurology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Russell T. Shinohara
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Joel M. Stein
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sandhitsu Das
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Kathryn A. Davis
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Stasenko A, Kaestner E, Arienzo D, Schadler AJ, Helm JL, Shih J, Ben-Haim S, McDonald CR. White matter network organization predicts memory decline after epilepsy surgery. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.01.14.524071. [PMID: 36711617 PMCID: PMC9882113 DOI: 10.1101/2023.01.14.524071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
The authors have withdrawn their manuscript owing to a substantial change in data analysis and findings/conclusions. Therefore, the authors do not wish this work to be cited as reference for the project. If you have any questions, please contact the corresponding author.
Collapse
|
26
|
Englot DJ. Early MRI in Epilepsy: A Picture Is Worth a Thousand Preventable Seizures. Epilepsy Curr 2023; 23:84-86. [PMID: 37122406 PMCID: PMC10131562 DOI: 10.1177/15357597221138509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Structural Neuroimaging in Adults and Adolescents With Newly Diagnosed Focal Epilepsy: The Human Epilepsy Project Bank AM, Kuzniecky R, Knowlton RC, Cascino GD, Jackson G, Pardoe HR; for the Human Epilepsy Project Investigators. Neurology . 2022. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000201125 . Online ahead of print. Background and objectives: Identification of an epileptogenic lesion on structural neuroimaging in individuals with focal epilepsy is important for management and treatment planning. The objective of this study was to determine the frequency of MRI-identified potentially epileptogenic structural abnormalities in a large multicenter study of adolescent and adult patients with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy. Methods: Patients with a new diagnosis of focal epilepsy enrolled in the Human Epilepsy Project observational cohort study underwent 3-Tesla (3 T) brain MRI using a standardized protocol. Imaging findings were classified as normal, abnormal, or incidental. Abnormal findings were classified as focal or diffuse, and as likely epilepsy-related or of unknown relationship to epilepsy. Fisher exact tests were performed to determine whether abnormal imaging or abnormality type was associated with clinical characteristics. Results: 418 participants were enrolled. 218 participants (59.3%) had no abnormalities detected, 149 (35.6%) had abnormal imaging, and 21 (5.0%) had incidental findings. 78 participants (18.7%) had abnormalities that were considered epilepsy-related and 71 (17.0%) had abnormalities of unknown relationship to epilepsy. Older participants were more likely to have imaging abnormalities, while participants with focal and epilepsy-related imaging abnormalities were younger than those without these abnormalities. 131 participants (31.3%) had a family history of epilepsy. Epilepsy-related abnormalities were not associated with participant sex, family history of epilepsy, or seizure type. Discussion: We found that one in five patients with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy has an MRI finding that is likely causative and may alter treatment options. An additional one in five patients has abnormalities of unknown significance. This information is important for patient counseling, prognostication, and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dario J Englot
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Sinha N. Localizing epileptogenic tissues in epilepsy: are we losing (the) focus? Brain 2022; 145:3735-3737. [PMID: 36412515 PMCID: PMC10200283 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awac373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 10/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2023] Open
Abstract
This scientific commentary refers to ‘Source-sink connectivity: a novel interictal EEG marker for seizure localization’ by Gunnarsdottir et al. (https://doi.org/10.1093/awac300).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nishant Sinha
- Department of Neurology, Perlman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Maher C, D'Souza A, Zeng R, Barnett M, Kavehei O, Nikpour A, Wang C. White matter alterations in focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures. Front Neurol 2022; 13:972590. [PMID: 36188403 PMCID: PMC9515421 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.972590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
We examined the white matter of patients with and without focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS), and control participants. A neural network based tract segmentation model (Tractseg) was used to isolate tract-specific, track-weighted tensor-based measurements from the tracts of interest. We compared the group differences in the track-weighted tensor-based measurements derived from whole and hemispheric tracts. We identified several regions that displayed significantly altered white matter in patients with focal epilepsy compared to controls. Furthermore, patients without FBTCS showed significantly increased white matter disruption in the inferior fronto-occipital fascicle and the striato-occipital tract. In contrast, the track-weighted tensor-based measurements from the FBTCS cohort exhibited a stronger resemblance to the healthy controls (compared to the non-FBTCS group). Our findings revealed marked alterations in a range of subcortical tracts considered critical in the genesis of seizures in focal epilepsy. Our novel application of tract-specific, track-weighted tensor-based measurements to a new clinical dataset aided the elucidation of specific tracts that may act as a predictive biomarker to distinguish patients likely to develop FBTCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Maher
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Australian Research Council Training Centre for Innovative BioEngineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Arkiev D'Souza
- Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Translational Research Collective, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Rui Zeng
- Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Translational Research Collective, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Michael Barnett
- Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Neurology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Sydney Neuroimaging Analysis Centre, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Omid Kavehei
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Australian Research Council Training Centre for Innovative BioEngineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Armin Nikpour
- Department of Neurology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Chenyu Wang
- Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Translational Research Collective, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Sydney Neuroimaging Analysis Centre, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|