Early Post-Registry Experience With Drug-Eluting Stents in the Superficial Femoral Artery

Endovascular Intervention for the Treatment of Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) D Femoropopliteal Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

Advancements in the endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal atherosclerotic lesions have led to treatment of more complex lesions, particularly long lesions. The aim of this study was to determine the meta-analytic primary patency and need for re-intervention among patients treated for very long lesions (>200 mm) at the femoropopliteal segment and to identify potential risk factors for loss of patency.

METHODS

This study was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. A random effects model meta-analysis was conducted, and the I-square was used to assess heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Fifty-one studies comprised of 3029 patients were included. The mean lesion length was 269 mm. The primary patency rate at 30 days, 6 m, 1-, 2- and 5-years of follow-up was 98%, 76%, 62%, 55%, and 39% respectively. The incidence of TLR was 16% at one year and 32% at two years. The secondary patency rate at 1, 2, 3 and 5 years was 85%, 71%, 64%, and 64% respectively. Heparin bonded ePTFE covered stents (69%) and paclitaxel eluting stents (73%) demonstrated higher 1-year primary patency rates than self-expanding nitinol stents (55%) or uncoated percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) with provisional stenting (54%). Lesions treated with a heparin bonded ePTFE covered stent had statistically significant higher odds of remaining patent at 1-year of follow-up (OR: 2.74; 95%CI: 1.63-4.61; p < 0.001) than lesions treated with BMS or PTA. Patients with long femoropopliteal lesions causing critical limb ischemia (CLI) developed restenosis or occlusion more often than patients treated for claudication (HR: 1.63; 95%CI: 1.06-2.49; p = 0.026) during an average follow-up of 26 months.

CONCLUSION

Primary stenting of femoropopliteal TASC D lesions using drug eluting stents or covered stents results in sustained patency over time. PTA or uncoated nitinol stents demonstrated lower patency rates. However, additional comparative studies are needed to determine the efficacy of newer technologies for the treatment of complex femoropopliteal lesions and provide evidence for the most optimal treatment approach.

Drug-eluting stents for the treatment of complex femoro-popliteal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Endovascular methods have emerged as an appealing alternative to bypass for the treatment of patients not suitable for surgery. Drug eluting stents (DES) have been developed to address the limitations of angioplasty and stenting. There is a paucity of data in the literature on their performance for the treatment of patients with long femoro- popliteal segment lesions. We aimed to analyse the evidence supporting the use of DES in patients with complex femoro-popliteal disease.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta- Analyses (PRISMA) statement.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

A total of 1255 potentially relevant articles were initially selected. After reviewing at title or abstract level, 22 articles were read in full and 10 were included. These studies reported on the use of DES for 1539 patients. In all studies the DES that was employed was a paclitaxel-eluting stent (Zilver PTX, Cook Medical). Average lesion length ranged from 114mm to 400mm. The pooled technical success rate was 0.964 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.936 - 0.980). The pooled estimate of limb loss at 12 months was 0.019 (95% CI: 0.012 - 0.030), stent fracture at 12 months 0.035 (95% CI: 0.007 - 0.155), primary patency at 12 months 0.705 (95% CI: 0.576 - 0.807) and secondary patency at 12 months 0.898 (95% CI: 0.815 - 0.946).

CONCLUSIONS

The short-term outcomes of DES for TASC C & D femoro-popliteal lesions are encouraging. Caution is advised in extrapolating the results of the included studies due to the large heterogeneity and lack of reporting of subgroup specific outcomes.

Implementation of drug-eluting stents for the treatment of femoropopliteal disease provides significant cost-to-system savings in a single-state outpatient simulation

OBJECTIVES

Initial data on drug-eluting stents (DES) shows that they may increase the durability of endovascular treatment of superficial femoral artery disease compared with traditional bare-metal stents (BMS). Observed decreased target lesion revascularization (TLR) rates have potential for cost savings despite an increased initial cost. The purpose of this study was to run a simulation model of progressive transition from BMS to DES over 5 years evaluating the overall cost impact of that transition.

METHODS

Florida State Ambulatory Databases were searched for all patients undergoing superficial femoral artery stenting in 2013 using Current Procedural Terminology codes 37226 and 37227. A simulation model was developed to estimate the impact of a progressive transition from BMS to DES over a 5-year horizon in this patient population. Cost estimates were determined from available cost charge ratio data. For the 5-year model, 2013 served as the initial year with each subsequent year based on the expected number of interventions per year. Up to one TLR per patient was assumed for the model. The 5-year TLR rates for DES and other parameter estimates were based on pooled data from the literature. Institutional data were used to estimate that up to 48% of superficial femoral artery lesions would fit the instructions for use for the Zilver PTX (Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind), which is currently the only DES approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for peripheral interventions. The net budget impact was expressed as the difference in total costs (primary stenting and reinterventions) for a scenario where BMS is progressively replaced by Zilver PTX compared with a scenario of BMS only. Multiple sensitivity analyses were performed on the base scenario.

RESULTS

We identified 4107 peripheral interventions in the first year that fit our study. The overall cost for these procedures in Florida database was $51,362,142.00. In the base case scenario, DES was introduced slowly into the population at a rate of 8% per year up to 48% at the end of the model. This strategy resulted in an overall cost savings of $1,688,953.72 compared with the model with BMS alone. Sensitivity analyses including slower adoption of DES up to only 24% at 5 years, a 20% increase in TLR rates per year for the DES, and a 10% reduction in TLR rates per year for BMS still resulted in a net savings. As long as the additional cost of a DES compared with BMS is less than $677, the DES model remains less expensive.

CONCLUSIONS

The adoption of DES in lieu of traditional BMS can lead to significant cost savings in a single state model over a short time horizon.