A fluctuating intensity of care: A qualitative study on the experiences of informal caregivers of patients with critical limb-threatening ischemia

Informal caregivers play a significant role in providing care for older, often vulnerable, patients, and supporting them as they live with chronic diseases. Due to the rising prevalence of older vascular patients and their use of healthcare, the role of their informal caregivers will become more important. However, little is known about the experiences of informal caregivers of patients with critical limb-threatening ischemia and the impact of informal care on different aspects of these caregivers' lives. In addition, literature does not describe the burden this role brings with it, or lack thereof. Therefore a qualitative study using a phenomenological approach, specifically interpretive phenomenological analysis, was used to gain insight into the experiences of the primary informal caregivers of patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia. Data were collected via semi-structured interviews and focus groups discussions. Fifteen primary informal caregivers of patients with critical limb-threatening ischemia under the care of the vascular surgeon at a tertiary teaching hospital in the Netherlands were included. Data analysis yielded three themes: the perceived identity of this group of caregivers; the varying intensity of informal care; and the collaboration between informal carers, their care recipients and the professional care provider within the vascular surgery department. In contrast to carers of other chronic diseases, the shifting intensity of care that informal caregivers of critical limb-threatening ischemia patients experience seems to prevent long-term overload. Adapting to that fluctuating situation requires flexibility from healthcare providers within the vascular surgery department. In addition, professionals need to involve informal caregivers in the patient's decision-making process and recognize their role in that process.

Application of 3D Printing Insole by Hemodynamics in Older Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia: Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial

Introduction

Critical limb ischemia (CLI) is a severe condition characterized by inadequate blood flow to the lower extremities, often leading to tissue damage and amputation. CLI is characterized by microcirculatory dysfunction, muscle tissue necrosis, and inflammation. Patients may suffer from the traumatic pain and the increase of plantar pressure, and foot care for patients with CLI has become the "last mile" to improve their life quality. Traditional shoe insoles often lack individual customization, failing to address the unique anatomical needs and hemodynamic characteristics of patients. The study aims to investigate the effects of this innovative intervention on improving the clinical outcomes, and quality of life in CLI patients.

Methods and Analysis

This Critical Limb Ischemia Hemodynamic Insole Study is a randomized controlled study performed to explore the effect of a 3D printing insole on foot care of CLI patients. This study recruitment began on November 1, 2021. Patients with CLI confirmed by clinical symptoms and imaging were recruited as the research objects. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the experimental group, which will receive 3D-printed insoles customized based on their hemodynamics, or the control group, which will receive traditionally manufactured insoles. Both groups were followed up for up to 24 months after surgery, including claudication distance, claudication time, pain score, rehospitalization, etc.

Trial Registration Number

ChiCTR2100051857.

Cost-utility analysis of early versus delayed endovascular intervention in critical limb-threatening ischemia patients with rest pain

OBJECTIVE

The prevalence of chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and poor health outcomes are high in Germany. Serious consequences of CLTI such as amputation and mortality can be effectively prevented by the early use of evidence-based therapeutic measures such as endovascular intervention. We have developed a cost-utility analysis to compare endovascular intervention with bare metal stents (BMSs) and endovascular intervention after conservative treatment from the German payer perspective.

METHODS

A Markov model, with a 5-year time horizon and seven states, was developed: (1) intervention, (2) stable 1, (3) major amputation, (4) reintervention, (5) stable 2, (6) care, and (7) all-cause death. Transition probabilities were obtained by pooling the outcomes from multiple clinical studies. The costs were estimated using data from the German diagnosis-related group system, the German rehabilitation fund, and related literature. Health-state utilities were obtained from the reported data. The primary outcomes were the quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and costs.

RESULTS

Early BMS intervention after 5 years resulted in a cost of €23,913 and an increase of 2.5 QALYs per patient, and endovascular intervention with BMS after conservative treatment after 5 years resulted in a cost of €18,323 and an increase of 2 QALYs per patient. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was €12,438. The number of major amputations was reduced by 6%. The results of the structural, deterministic, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were robust.

CONCLUSIONS

Early endovascular intervention with BMS resulted in more QALYs and a reduced risk of major amputation for early-stage CLTI patients. Our results showed that early endovascular intervention is very cost-effective according to World Health Organization recommended cost-effectiveness thresholds. However, the clinical decision regarding the use of early endovascular intervention should be determined by individual patient-level eligibility and the physician's judgment.

Quality of Life in Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the comparative effectiveness and temporal changes in quality of life (QoL) outcomes after revascularisation, major lower extremity amputation (MLEA), and conservative management (CM) in chronic limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI).

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Web of Science.

REVIEW METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed on QoL measured by any QoL instrument in adult patients with CLTI after open surgery (OS), endovascular intervention (EVI), MLEA, or CM. Randomised controlled trials and prospective observational studies published in any language between 1 January 1990 and 21 May 2021 were included. There was a pre-specified measurement time point of six months. Random effects meta-analysis was conducted on total scores for each QoL instrument. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations approach (PROSPERO registration: CRD42021253953).

RESULTS

Fifty-five studies with 8 909 patients were included. There was significant heterogeneity in the methods used to measure QoL, and the study characteristics. In particular, 14 different QoL instruments were used with various combinations of disease specific and generic instruments within each study. A narrative summary is therefore presented. Comparative effectiveness data showed there was reasonable certainty that QoL was similar between OS and EVI at six months. Temporal outcomes suggested small to moderate improvements in QOL six months after OS and EVI compared with baseline. Limited data indicated that QoL can be maintained or slightly improved after MLEA or CM. Treatment effects were overestimated owing to small study effects, selective non-reporting, attrition, and survivorship bias.

CONCLUSION

QoL after OS and EVI appears to be similar. Revascularisation may provide modest QoL benefits, while MLEA or CM can maintain QoL. However, certainty of evidence is generally low or very low, and interpretation is hampered by significant heterogeneity. There is a need for a CLTI specific QoL instrument and methodological standardisation in QoL studies.

Peri-procedural complications following endovascular revascularization for critical limb ischemia

OBJECTIVE

Revascularization procedures are considered the cornerstone of therapy in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) and multiple procedures are often required to attain limb salvage. The aim of the present study is to determine the prevalence of peri-procedural complications after endovascular procedure, and to determine the clinical and biological characteristics of patients associated to the risk of peri-procedural complications.

METHODS

From November 2013 to May 2021, 324 consecutive patients were retrospectively included, of whom 99 underwent more than one revascularization procedure for contralateral CLI or clinical recurrence of CLI. A total of 532 revascularizations were performed. Clinical and biological parameters were recorded at baseline before endovascular revascularization. The occurrence of a peri-procedural complication (local complications, fatal and non-fatal major bleeding or cardiovascular events) was recorded up to 30days after revascularization. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to study the parameters associated with per-procedural complications. A P<0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 324 consecutive patients were included, 177 men and 147 women with CLI, with a mean age of 77.6±11.9years. Most of these patients had cardiovascular comorbidities (41% with a history of coronary heart disease, 78% treated hypertensive patients, 49% diabetic patients). Peri-procedural mortality occurred in 13 patients (4%) and 9 patients (2.8%) experienced major amputation at one-month following revascularization. Among the 532 revascularization procedures, 99 major bleeding events (22.8% of the cohort population) and 31 cardiovascular events (8.6% of the cohort population), were recorded in the peri-procedural period. Cardiovascular events were associated with peri-procedural mortality. Complications at the puncture site occurred during 38 of the 532 procedures (10.2% of the cohort population). Compared with patients undergoing a single revascularization procedure, patients with multiple procedures presented a higher risk of major bleeding events (48.5% vs. 11.6%, P<0.0001) and access site complications (20.2% vs. 5.78%, P<0.0001). In multivariate analysis, pulse pressure <60mmHg and hemoglobin level <10g/dl were correlated with the occurrence of major bleeding events; left ventricular ejection fraction<60% and the absence of statin treatment were correlated with the occurrence of cardiovascular complications; a high chronological rank of revascularization was correlated with the occurrence of local complication. Finally, age and gender were not associated with the occurrence of peri-procedural complication.

CONCLUSION

The present results highlight that multiple revascularization procedures for limb salvage are required in almost one third of the population with critical limb ischemia and were associated with the risk of major bleeding events and access site complications. The most frequent complications of peripheral vascular interventions were major bleeding events. Adverse cardiovascular events were related with peri-procedural mortality. Anemia, blood pressure, left ventricular ejection fraction and statin treatment are important parameters to consider for peri-procedural outcomes, independently of age, gender and the chronological rank of revascularization procedure.

Outcome in octogenarian patients with lower extremity artery disease after endovascular revascularisation: a retrospective single-centre cohort study using in-patient data

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the clinical benefit of endovascular revascularisation (EVR) in octogenarian (aged ≥80 years) patients with lower extremity artery disease (LEAD).

DESIGN

Retrospective single-centre study.

SETTING

University hospital with a specialised centre for vascular medicine.

PARTICIPANTS

681 LEAD patients undergoing EVR between 2010 and 2016 were stratified by age.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Technical success, complications and mortality.

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 172 (25.3%) octogenarian and 509 (74.7%) non-octogenarian patients. Despite higher LEAD stages and complexity of EVR in octogenarians, primary technical success rate (79% octogenarians vs 86% non-octogenarians, p=0.006) and 1-year survival (87% vs 96%, p<0.001) were overall on high levels. Especially for the octogenarians, 1-year survival depends on the presence of chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI) (octogenarians: non-CLTI 98%; CLTI 79% p<0.001 vs non-octogenarians: non-CLTI 99%; CLTI 91%, p<0.001). In octogenarians, female sex (HR 0.45; 95% CI (0.24 to 0.86); p=0.015), the intake of statins (HR 0.34; 95% CI 0.19 to 0.65; p=0.001) and platelet aggregation inhibitors (HR 0.10; 95% CI 0.02 to 0.45; p=0.003) were independently associated with improved survival after EVR.

CONCLUSION

EVR can be performed safely and with sustained clinical benefit also in octogenarian patients with LEAD. After-care including medical adherence is of particular importance to improve long-term survival.

Multicomponent Prehabilitation as a Novel Strategy for Preventing Delirium in Older Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia Patients: A Study Protocol

Objective

Chronic limb threatening ischemia is the final stage of peripheral arterial disease. Current treatment is based on revascularization to preserve the leg. In the older, hospitalized chronic limb threatening ischemia patient, delirium is a frequent and severe complication after revascularization. Delirium leads to an increased length of hospital stay, a higher mortality rate and a decrease in quality of life. Currently, no specific guidelines to prevent delirium in chronic limb threatening ischemia patients exist. We aim to evaluate the effect of a multicomponent, multidisciplinary prehabilitation program on the incidence of delirium in chronic limb threatening ischemia patients ≥65 years.

Design

A prospective observational cohort study to investigate the effects of the program on the incidence of delirium will be performed in a large teaching hospital in the Netherlands. This manuscript describes the design of the study and the content of this specific prehabilitation program.

Methods

Chronic limb threatening ischemia patients ≥65 years that require revascularization will participate in the program. This program focuses on optimizing the patient's overall health and includes delirium risk assessment, nutritional optimization, home-based physical therapy, iron infusion in case of anaemia and a comprehensive geriatric assessment in case of frailty. The primary outcome is the incidence of delirium. Secondary outcomes include quality of life, amputation-free survival, length of hospital stay and mortality. Exclusion criteria are the requirement of acute treatment or patients who are mentally incompetent to understand the procedures of the study or to complete questionnaires. A historical cohort from the same hospital is used as a control group.

Discussion

This study will clarify the effect of a prehabilitation program on delirium incidence in chronic limb threatening ischemia patients. New insights will be obtained on optimizing a patient's preoperative mental and physical condition to prevent postoperative complications, including delirium.

Trial

This protocol is registered at the Netherlands National Trial Register (NTR) number: NL9380.

A systematic review of strategies for preventing delirium in patients undergoing vascular surgery

OBJECTIVES

Elderly patients undergoing vascular surgery are at risk of developing postoperative delirium, which is associated with a high mortality. Delirium prevention is difficult and is investigated in surgical patients from various specialisms, but little is known about delirium prevention in vascular surgery. For this reason we performed a systematic review on strategies for delirium prevention in patients undergoing elective surgery for peripheral arterial disease or for an aneurysm of the abdominal aorta.

METHODS

This systematic review included studies describing strategies for preventing delirium in patients undergoing elective surgery for peripheral arterial disease or for an aneurysm of the abdominal aorta. The search was conducted using the keywords 'vascular surgery', 'prevention' and 'delirium', and was last run on October 21st, 2021 in the electronic databases Pubmed, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane library and Emcare. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomized controlled trials and the ROBINS-1 tool for observational studies.

RESULTS

Four studies including 565 patients were included in the systematic review. A significant decrease in the incidence of delirium was reported by a study investigating the effect of comprehensive geriatric assessments within patients undergoing surgery for an aneurysm of the abdominal aorta or lower limb bypass surgery (24% in the control group versus 11% in the intervention group, p = 0.018), and in the total group of a study evaluating the effect of outpatient clinic multimodal prehabilitation for patients with an aneurysm of the abdominal aorta (11.7% in the control group versus 8.2% in the intervention group, p = 0.043, OR = 0.56). A non-significant decrease in delirium incidence was described for patients receiving a multidisciplinary quality improvement at the vascular surgical ward (21.4% in the control group versus 14.6% in the intervention group, p = 0.17). The study concerning the impact of the type of anaesthesia on delirium in eleven older vascular surgical patients, of which three developed delirium, did not differentiate between the different types of anaesthesia the patients received.

CONCLUSION

Despite the high and continuous increasing incidence of delirium in the growing elderly vascular population, little is known about effective preventive strategies. An approach to address multiple risk factors simultaneously seems to be promising in delirium prevention, whether through multimodal prehabilitation or comprehensive geriatric assessments. Several strategies including prehabilitation programs have been proven to be successful in other types of surgery and more research is required to evaluate effective preventive strategies and prehabilitation programs in vascular surgical patients.

Health-related quality of life after a one-year follow-up of patients undergoing endovascular leg revascularization

BACKGROUND

Lower limb revascularization not only improves walking distance, but also disease-specific and general health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Therefore, we analyzed changes in HRQoL after endovascular leg revascularization in patients with chronic lower limb ischemia during a one-year follow-up.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire was completed by 50 patients with intermittent claudication (IC) and 50 patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) who underwent endovascular revascularization with a stent implantation, as well as 40 patients with IC not requiring endovascular intervention who received medical management only. The survey was completed before and then 3 and 12 months after an intervention.

RESULTS

Patients with CLTI before endovascular intervention had the lowest HRQoL in the somatic, psychological, social, and environmental domains. After endovascular revascularization, these patients achieved the greatest improvement in HRQoL. Scores in the HRQoL domains correlated with Rutherford class, ankle-brachial index, and walking distance. The initial score in the somatic domain predicted the risk of target lesion revascularization (TLR) during the one-year follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular leg revascularization improved patients' functioning, not only in the physical, but also in the psychological, environmental and social domains of HRQoL. A higher score in the somatic domain of HRQoL before and at 3 months after an intervention predicted the risk of TLR during the one-year follow-up. It is recommended that scores for general HRQoL domains are added to the standard measures of the direct outcome of leg revascularization due to their one-year prognostic value.

PROMISE I early feasibility study of the LimFlow System for percutaneous deep vein arterialization in no-option chronic limb-threatening ischemia 12-month results

OBJECTIVE

We report the 6 and 12-month outcomes of the PROMISE I early feasibility study (EFS) after treatment of no-option chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) with percutaneous deep vein arterialization (pDVA) using the LimFlow System.

METHODS

Thirty-two no-option CLTI patients, previously offered major amputation, were enrolled in this single-arm EFS of the LimFlow pDVA System. No-option CLTI was defined as being ineligible for surgical or endovascular arterial revascularization. Patients were assessed for clinical status, pain, wound healing, and duplex ultrasound at 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months post-treatment. Primary endpoint analysis was amputation-free survival (AFS) at 30 days and 6 and 12 months. AFS was defined as freedom from above-ankle amputation of the index limb and freedom from all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints evaluated included technical success of the procedure, and wound healing at 6 and 12 months.

RESULTS

Of 32 enrolled patients, 31 (97%) were successfully treated with the LimFlow System at the time of the procedure, and 2 (6.3%) were lost to follow-up. The 30-day, 6-month, and 12-month AFS rates were 91%, 74%, and 70% respectively. Wound healing status of fully healed or healing was 67% at 6-months, and 75% at 12-months. Reintervention was performed in 16 patients (52%) with 14 (88%) of the maintenance reinterventions occurring within the first three months. The majority of reinterventions, 12 (75%), involved the arterial inflow tract proximal to the stented LimFlow circuit, and no in-stent stenoses were determined to have been the cause of reintervention.

CONCLUSIONS

The LimFlow pDVA System was utilized in treating no-option patients with CLTI. High technical success rate was observed, with a significant percentage of patients surviving free of major amputation at 12 months. These results suggest early safety and provide an initial assessment of the efficacy of the LimFlow pDVA System which supports the expansion of carefully executed studies to determine whether this is a viable option that can be used in this critically disadvantaged and growing patient population.

Two-year Outcome of Quality of Life and Health Status for the Elderly with Chronic Limb-threatening Ischemia

Purpose

In elderly patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), there is little scientific understanding of the long-term changes of quality of life (QoL) and health status (HS) after treatment. The primary goal of this study was to provide long-term QoL and HS results for elderly CLTI patients after therapy. Treatments consisted of endovascular revascularization, surgical revascularization, or conservative treatment. Furthermore, the aim of this study was to identify the distinctive trajectories of QoL and HS.

Patients and Methods

CLTI patients aged ≥70 years were included in a prospective observational cohort study with a two-year follow-up. The WHOQOL-BREF was used to asses QoL. The 12-Item Short Form Health Survey was used to measure HS. The QoL and HS scores were compared to the scores in the general elderly Dutch population. Latent class trajectory analysis was used.

Results

A total of 195 patients were included in this study. After two years, in all treatment groups patients showed significantly higher physical QoL score compared to baseline and there was no significant difference with the corresponding values in the elderly Dutch population. In the latent class trajectory analysis, there were no overlapping risk factors for poorer QoL or HS.

Conclusion

This study shows that QoL levels in surviving elderly CLTI patients in the long-term do not differ from the corresponding values for elderly in the general population. There were no disparities in sociodemographic, clinical and treatment characteristics associated with poorer QoL and HS. This study was carried out to encourage further analysis of the influence of biopsychosocial characteristics on QoL and HS in elderly CLTI patients.