Fenestrated/Branched Endovascular Repair for Postdissection Thoracoabdominal Aneurysms: A Systematic Review with Pooled Data Analysis

Case Report: The application of amplatzer vascular plug to repair aortic dissection intimal tears and false lumen

In recent years, significant advancements have been made in endovascular therapy for aortic dissection, resulting in the development of various treatment methods. Nevertheless, there is a contentious discussion regarding the suitability of different treatment methods for addressing the unique features of individual lesions. Specifically, the matter of whether the presence of small intimal tears or multiple distal tears requires extensive aortic coverage with graft stents, which may block the blood supply to important organs, intercostal arteries, or lumbar arteries, remains unresolved. Further research is necessary to determine the need for complex fenestrated or branched endovascular aortic repair (F/B-EVAR) in the management of chronic post-dissection aneurysms involving visceral arteries. Our report highlights the successful endovascular repair of three patients with aortic dissection, encompassing one Stanford A type and two Stanford B types. Utilizing the Amplatzer Vascular Plug (AVP) alone or in combination with the coil embolization technique, we achieved favorable clinical outcomes. This article aims to provide valuable insights and new perspectives on the tailored management of aortic dissection by conducting a comprehensive examination of the subtle differences in the treatment processes and techniques applied to these three patients.

A Novel Endovascular Double-Disc Implant for Sealing Intimal Tears in Aortic Dissection

Postdissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm incidence after thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B aortic dissection is high, with residual distal tears being a major reason for persistent blood flow in the false lumen. The EndoPatch is an endovascular double-disc implant for sealing re-entry tears in aortic dissection, isolating blood flow in the false lumen and promoting thrombosis formation. Compared with conventional endovascular treatment techniques, this endovascular double-disc implant's small size and minimal working space requirements may reduce the risk of spinal ischemia and offer flexible vascular access. Although several barriers still impede this endovascular device's broad application, its innovative design, flexible vascular access, and streamlined surgical process make it a promising alternative for managing intimal tears in aortic dissection, either alone or as a supplementary method combined with conventional endovascular techniques. (Guo's Entry Tear Repair: The First in Man Study of Endopatch System; NCT04745039).

Fenestrated and Branched Endografts for Post-Dissection Thoraco-Abdominal Aneurysms: Results of a National Multicentre Study and Literature Review

OBJECTIVE

Fenestrated and branched endografting (F/B-EVAR) has been proposed as an endovascular solution for chronic post-dissection thoraco-abdominal aneurysms (PD-TAAAs). The aim of this study was to analyse the experience of four high volume centres nationwide and the current available literature.

METHODS

Data on patients undergoing F/B-EVAR in four Italian academic centres between 2008 and 2019 were collected, and those from patients with PD-TAAAs were analysed retrospectively. Peri-operative morbidity and mortality were assessed as early outcomes. Survival, freedom from re-intervention (FFR), target visceral vessel (TVV) patency, and aortic remodelling were assessed as follow up outcomes. A MEDLINE search was performed for studies published from 2008 to 2020 reporting on F/B-EVAR in PD-TAAAs.

RESULTS

Among 351 patients who underwent F/B-EVAR for TAAAs, 37 (11%) had PD-TAAAs (Crawford's extent I-III: 35% - 95%). Overall, 135 TVVs (from true lumen 120; false lumen seven; both true and false lumen eight) were accommodated by fenestrations (96% - 71%) and branches (39% - 29%). Technical success (TS) was achieved in 34 (92%) cases with three failures due to endoleaks (Ia: 1; Ic: 1; III: 1). There were no 30 day deaths. No cases of permanent spinal cord ischaemia (SCI) were recorded and six (16%) patients suffered from transient deficits. Renal function worsening (eGFR < 30% than baseline) and pulmonary complications were reported in two (5%) and four (11%) cases, respectively. From the Kaplan-Meier analysis, three year survival, FFR, and TVV patency were 81%, 66%, and 97%, respectively. Radiological imaging was available for 30 (81%) patients at 12 months with complete false lumen thrombosis in 26 (87%). Two hundred and fifty-six patients were reported in seven published papers with TS, 30 day mortality, and SCI ranging from 99% to 100%, 0 to 6%, and 0 to 16%, respectively. The mean follow up ranged from 12 to 26 months, with estimated two year survival between 81% and 90% and a re-intervention rate between 19% and 53%.

CONCLUSION

F/B-EVAR is effective to treat PD-TAAAs. A high re-intervention rate is necessary to complete the aneurysm exclusion and promote aortic remodelling successfully.

Endovascular versus open surgical repair for complicated chronic Type B aortic dissection

BACKGROUND

Type B aortic dissection can lead to serious and life-threatening complications such as aortic rupture, stroke, renal failure, and paraplegia, all of which require intervention. Traditionally, these complications have been treated with open surgery. Recently however, endovascular repair has been proposed as an alternative.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of thoracic aortic endovascular repair versus open surgical repair for treatment of complicated chronic Type B aortic dissection (CBAD).

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and AMED databases, as well as the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov trials registers, to 2 August 2021. We searched references of relevant articles retrieved through the electronic search for additional citations.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We considered all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) assessing the effects of thoracic aortic endovascular repair (TEVAR) versus open surgical repair (OSR) for treatment of complicated chronic Type B aortic dissection (CBAD). Outcomes of interest were mortality (all-cause, dissection-related), neurological sequelae (stroke, spinal cord ischaemia/paresis-paralysis, vertebral insufficiency), morphological outcomes (false lumen thrombosis, progression of dissection, aortic diameters), acute renal failure, ischaemic symptoms (visceral ischaemia, limb ischaemia), re-intervention, and health-related quality of life.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened all titles and abstracts identified by the searches to identify those that met the inclusion criteria. From title and abstract screening, we did not identify any trials (RCTs or CCTs) that required full-text assessment. We planned to undertake data collection and analysis in accordance with recommendations described in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. We planned to assess the certainty of evidence using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

We did not identify any trials (RCTs or CCTs) that met the inclusion criteria for this review.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Due to lack of RCTs or CCTs investigating the effectiveness and safety of TEVAR compared to OSR for patients with complicated CBAD, we are unable to provide any evidence to inform decision-making on the optimal intervention for these patients. High-quality RCTs or CCTs addressing this objective are necessary. However, conducting such studies will be challenging for this life-threatening disease.

Spot Stenting Combined With False Lumen Endovascular Occlusive Repair for Post-dissection Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

PURPOSE

To introduce a new spot stenting, combined with a false lumen endovascular occlusive repair (SS-FLEVOR) technique for treating post-dissection abdominal aortic aneurysms.

TECHNIQUE

This technique is demonstrated in a 74-year-old man who received an initial thoracic endovascular aortic repair 7 years ago and suffered from distal aortic expansion during the follow-up session. All the tears located more than 15 mm away from the orifice of visceral arteries were excluded by spot stenting in the aortic true lumen. Then, a compliant stent-graft was implanted in the false lumen to seal the tears near the visceral arteries orifice from the outside. In addition, coils were deployed to block the potential backflow from the intercostal arteries and to induce false lumen thrombosis. Moreover, visceral arteries originated from false lumen were repaired by covered-stents implanted from the true lumen. The distal iliac arteries were sealed either with iliac extensions or cover-stents. This new technique has been applied in 5 patients, resulting in 100% technical success and encouraging intermediate outcomes.

CONCLUSION

SS-FLEVOR is a feasible and safe technique to promote false lumen thrombosis in selected cases.