Natural orifice management of anastomotic leaks after minimally invasive esophagogastrectomy

Endoscopic closure of postoperative anastomotic leakage with endoclips and detachable snares

Anastomotic leakage, although uncommon, is a life-threatening complication and requires prompt recognition and treatment. Surgical closure has been recommended for defects that are large and symptomatic. However, recent reports on successful endoscopic closure of anastomotic leakage suggest that endoscopic techniques may be a feasible alternative to surgical approaches in patients with comorbid conditions that are not suitable for undergoing second operation or for those who refuse to be reoperated. Herein, we describe a case of postoperative gastrojejunal anastomotic leakage that was successfully treated with endoscopic closure using endoclips and detachable snares.

[Cervical anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: diagnosis and management]

INTRODUCTION

Cervical anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy are still a frequent and severe complication that needs an early diagnosis and an appropriate treatment. The aim of this study was to describe our experience with the management of this complication.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective study (2003-2011) of a consecutive series of 77 patients with a cervical esophagogastric anastomosis, 18 of them (23.3%) presenting a leak. Fistulae were classified into 4 groups depending on clinical presentation, radiology (esophagogram or CT), surgical findings (in case of re-operation) and, since 2010, endoscopic examination. Type I leaks were an asymptomatic or radiographic leak, type II had local signs limited to the neck, type III was associated with respiratory symptoms due to a pleural or mediastinal collection, and type IV with a systemic disorder secondary to gastric necrosis.

RESULTS

Four patients (22.2%) were classified as type I, 8 (44.4%) as type II, 3 (16.6%) as type III, and 3 (16.6%) as type IV. Eight patients were managed conservatively; in 9 a self-expanding stent was used, 5 required a thoracotomy, and one of them (type IV) died. Leaks were related to a higher associated morbidity (61 versus 30%; P=.019) and a longer hospital stay (median of 28.5 vs 14 days; P=.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Almost one quarter of cervical esophagogastric anastomoses present some kind of anastomotic leak. Although most of them can be treated conservatively or by endoscopy, they are associated with an increase in morbidity and mortality.

Minimally invasive esophagectomy with and without gastric ischemic conditioning

BACKGROUND

Esophagectomy can be associated with significant morbidity such as leaks and strictures. Preoperative gastric ischemic conditioning is a concept aimed at inducing an ischemic insult to the gastric fundus and cardia prior to esophagectomy, thus leading to improvement of gastric perfusion.

METHODS

This retrospective study compared outcome data from 81 patients who underwent esophagectomy after laparoscopic gastric ischemic conditioning with that from 71 patients who underwent esophagectomy without conditioning. Gastric ischemic conditioning consisted of laparoscopic division of the left gastric vessels ± the short gastric vessels. The time interval from gastric ischemic conditioning to esophagectomy ranged from 2 to 75 days. Main outcome measures included demographics, mean time interval between staging and esophagectomy, and the rate of leaks and strictures following esophagectomy.

RESULTS

The two groups were comparable with respect to gender and age. In the gastric ischemic conditioning procedures, there were no conversions; the mean operative time was 57 ± 15 min, the mean length of hospital stay was 1.0 ± 1.1 days, and the rate of postoperative complications was 3.7%. The mean time interval between gastric ischemic conditioning and esophagectomy was 6.0 ± 5.4 days. There were no significant differences in the leak rate (11.1% for conditioning vs. 8.5% without conditioning) or stricture rate (29.6% for conditioning vs. 25.3% without conditioning) between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic gastric ischemic conditioning is feasible and safe. However, the use of gastric ischemic conditioning in this study did not alter the clinical rate of postoperative leaks and strictures.

Esophageal stents for anastomotic leaks and perforations

OBJECTIVE

Intrathoracic esophageal anastomotic leaks and perforations are very morbid and challenging problems. Esophageal stents are increasingly playing an integral role in the management of these patients. Our objective was to report our experience with esophageal stent placement for anastomotic leaks and perforations and to provide a treatment algorithm.

METHODS

We performed a review of patients with stent placement for esophagogastric anastomotic leaks or esophageal perforation from March 2005 to August 2009. A prospective database was used to collect data. Success was defined as endoscopic defect closure, negative esophagram, and resumption of oral intake. Failure was defined as no change in leak size or clinical signs of ongoing infection. We collected and analyzed patient demographics, diagnosis, clinical history, and poststent outcomes using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients underwent esophageal stent placement for anastomotic leaks (n = 22) and perforations (n = 15). The median time from original procedure to diagnosis of leak or perforation was 6 days (0-420 days). Nineteen patients (51%) had 21 associated procedures for source control. We placed 94 stents (mean = 2.7 stents/patient); 16 patients (43%) required more than 1 stenting procedure (mean = 1.8 procedures/patient). The median time to restoration of esophageal integrity was 33 days (7-120 days). There were 22 successes (59%); 2 failures were secondary to undrained abscess. Only 2 failures occurred in the last 15 patients (88% success). Strictures did not develop in any patients. Serious complications occurred in 3 patients (stent erosion, leak enlargement, fatal gastroaortic fistula).

CONCLUSIONS

Esophageal stents can potentially play an integral role in the management of anastomotic leaks and perforations. Success depends on appropriate procedures for source control and surgeon experience.

Impact of anastomotic leak on outcomes after transhiatal esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

The development of anastomotic leaks and/or strictures can be associated with considerable morbidity and impairment of quality of life. In the current study, we evaluated the outcomes of patients who developed anastomotic complications after esophagectomy to elucidate the impact of these events on morbidity, mortality, and subsequent need for dilation.

METHODS

We analyzed retrospectively the clinical course of 235 patients who underwent transhiatal esophagectomy for cancer from 2001 to 2009. Patients with confirmed anastomotic leaks were identified and classified with the following scale: class 1: Radiographic leak only, no intervention; class 2: leak requiring opening of the wound, cervical and/or percutaneous drainage; class 3: disruption of anastomosis (10-50% circumference) with perianastomotic abscess requiring video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery or thoracotomy; and class 4: gastric tip necrosis with anastomotic separation (>50% circumference).

RESULTS

Anastomotic leaks were encountered in 30 patients (13%). Anastomotic leaks were associated with greater morbidity (70% vs 47%; P = .02) and stricture formation (57% vs 19%; P = .0001). Mortality was not different. Increasing leak class was associated with an increased need for postoperative anastomotic dilations (P = .016).

CONCLUSION

Anastomotic integrity after esophagectomy has a substantial impact on perioperative course and long-term swallowing. A more formal radiographic and endoscopic leak classification system seems justified.

Utility of removable esophageal covered self-expanding metal stents for leak and fistula management

BACKGROUND

Esophageal or gastric leakage from anastomotic wound dehiscence, perforation, staple line dehiscence, or trauma can be a devastating event. Traditional therapy has often consisted of either surgical repair for rapidly diagnosed leaks or diversion for more complicated cases, commonly associated with a delayed diagnosis. This study summarizes our experience treating leaks or fistulas with novel, covered self-expanding metal stents (cSEMS). The primary objective of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of covered self-expanding metal stents when used to treat complicated leaks and fistulas.

METHODS

Over 15 months, 25 patients with esophageal or gastric leaks were evaluated for stenting as primary treatment. A prospective database was used to collect data. Stents were placed endoscopically, with contrast evaluation used for leak evaluation. Patients who did not improve clinically after stenting or whose leak could not be sealed underwent operative management.

RESULTS

During a mean follow-up of 15 months, 23 of the 25 patients with esophageal or gastric leaks during a 15-month period were managed with endoscopic stenting as primary treatment. Healing occurred in patients who were stented for anastomotic leakage after gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy (n = 10). One patient with three esophageal iatrogenic perforations healed with stenting. Eight patients successfully avoided esophageal diversion and healed with stenting and adjunctive therapy. Two of the 4 patients with tracheoesophageal fistulas sealed with the assistance of a new pexy technique to prevent stent migration; 1 additional patient had this same technique used to successfully heal an upper esophageal perforation.

CONCLUSIONS

Esophageal leaks and fistulas can be effectively managed with cSEMS as a primary modality. The potential benefits of esophageal stenting are healing without diversion or reconstruction and early return to an oral diet.