Long-term results for pit-picking and flap procedures in primary pilonidal sinus disease

BACKGROUND

Pilonidal sinus disease (PSD), a common inflammatory condition of the natal cleft causing morbidity especially in young adults, is a heterogeneous disease group with no consensus regarding its best treatment. Our aim was to report long-term results for primary PSD surgery.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied the medical records of 146 patients who underwent primary PSD surgery between November 2010 and October 2015. Of these, 113 underwent either the mini-invasive pit-picking surgery (PSS) (n = 55) or asymmetrical excision with local flap (AELF) (n = 58); we focused on the outcomes of these two subgroups.

RESULTS

PSD patients who underwent mini-invasive PPS more often succeeded with day surgery (94.5% vs 32.8%, p < 0.001), had fewer postoperative complications (9.4% vs 36.2%, p = 0.002), and had shorter sick leave (median 14 days vs 21 days, p < 0.001) than did AELF patients. Nevertheless, at the first postoperative follow-up visit, both surgery methods healed similarly (75.0% vs 76.8%, p = 0.83). Our long-term follow-up, at a median of 9.3 years (range 5.4-10.6), revealed, however, that recurrence after PPS was markedly higher than after AELF (50.9% vs 10.3%, HR 6.65, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

PPS, which is a mini-invasive surgical technique often performed under local anaesthesia, is suitable for primary PSD, despite the high recurrence rate in our study, bearing in mind that patient selection is an important factor to consider. Primary PSD with simple sinus formations may benefit from PPS. On the other hand, primary PSD with complex sinus formations may benefit from AELF regardless of the initial slow recovery in our study. Because PSD is a very heterogenous disease, and patients have different risk factors, it is mandatory for the surgeon to master several different surgical techniques. A classification system to aid the surgeon in selecting the right surgical technique for each patient is warranted.

Consensus statement of the Italian society of colorectal surgery (SICCR): management and treatment of pilonidal disease

Pilonidal disease (PD) is a relatively common, benign but challenging condition of the natal cleft. This consensus statement was drawn up by a panel of surgeons, identified by the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR) as having a “special interest” in PD, with the aim of recommending the best therapeutic options according to currently available scientific evidence. A three-step modified-Delphi process was adopted, implying: (1) choice of the panelists; (2) development of a discussion outline and of target issues; and (3) a detailed systematic review of the current literature. The agreement/disagreement level was scored on a five-point Likert scale as follows: “A + : strongly agree; A–: agree; N: unsure/no opinion; D–: disagree; D + : strongly disagree. Each panelist contributed to the production of this manuscript, and the final recommendations were reviewed by the Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee.

Inverse 'D' incision technique in treatment of pilonidal sinus disease; excision with minimal tissue loss, closure without tension and lateral location of the suture line

Purpose

Surgical excision is the preferred treatment modality for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus (PS). Notably, the desirable features of an ideal surgical intervention are excision with minimal tissue loss, closure without tension, and a lateral suture line. The present study aimed to investigate early outcomes of surgical excision through the inverse D (ᗡ) incision based on tissue loss, wound tension, and suture line location.

Methods

This prospective study was comprised of 80 patients with PS in whom excision of PS was performed through the ‘ᗡ’ incision to minimize tissue loss with a tensionless primary surgical wound closure. The suture line was located laterally in all patients. Early and late postoperative complications, duration of hospital stay, return to work, and recurrence rates were investigated. The mean duration of the follow-up period was 36 months.

Results

Sixty-three patients (78.8%) were male. PS in all patients was surgically removed by subcutaneous excision through a ‘ᗡ’ incision. Laterally placed surgical wounds were closed primarily with interrupted vertical mattress sutures. No general complications were encountered. Five patients (6.3%) experienced early postoperative surgical site complications. On average, the duration of hospital stay and return to work were 2.4 days and 3.8 days, respectively. Recurrence was seen in 1 case (1.3%) during the follow-up period. Satisfaction score was high in 83.8% of patients.

Conclusion

The method of sinus excision using the ‘ᗡ’ incision with a primary suture facilitates excision with minimal tissue loss and closure without tension with an off-midline suture. It is both a simple and effective surgical technique for the treatment of sacrococcygeal PS.

Impact of geography and surgical approach on recurrence in global pilonidal sinus disease

Pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) is increasing globally. A recent meta-analysis and merged-data analysis showed that recurrence rates in PSD depend essentially on follow-up time and specific surgical procedures. However, the global distribution of surgical approaches and respective recurrence rates have never been studied in PSD. We aimed at studying the impact of geographic distribution of surgical approaches to treat PSD and subsequent geography-specific recurrence rates. We searched relevant databases as described previously. Recurrence rates were then associated with reported follow-up times and geographic origin. We simulated individual patients to enable analogy across data. Globally, recurrence rates range from 0.3% for Limberg/Dufourmentel approaches (95% CI 0.2–0.4) and flaps (95% CI 0.1–0.5) and up to 6.3% for incision (95% CI 3.2–9.3) at 12 months. Recurrence rates range from 0.3% for Karydakis/Bascom approaches (95% CI 0.0–0.8) up to 67.2% for incision (95% CI 7.5–100) in the USA, and 0.0% for primary asymmetric closure in Germany (95% CI 0.0–0.0). Our analysis shows that recurrence rates in PSD not only depend on therapeutic approaches and follow-up time but also on geography. Primary asymmetric closure and various flap techniques remain superior regardless of the geographical region. Some approaches have extraordinarily good outcomes in specific countries.

D-shape asymmetric excision in recurrent pilonidalis disease: an analytic longitudinal long-term evaluation

Sacrococcigeal pilonidalis disease (SPD) recurrence is a major factor influencing surgical outcomes. Several different surgical treatments have been reported, however, there is a lack of long-term data on reoperation. Aim of this study was to analyze outcomes of a single center adopting a standardized off-midline asymmetric procedure (D-shape). Analytic longitudinal assessment of 83 patients (median age 35 years, range 23-59 years) with recurrent SPD that completed the 5-year study design following D-shape reoperation. Among a cohort of 607 patients, we enrolled 83 recurrent SPD. After D-shape reoperation, second recurrence rate was 9.6% (8/83). Second recurrence rate was not statistically significantly different among patients undergone D-shape as first surgery compared to patients of symmetric excision group (11.8% vs. 7.4%, p = 0.57). Similarly, there was no statistical difference among patients who underwent D-shape as first surgery compared to patients who underwent symmetric excision elsewhere (11.8% vs. 9.1%, p = .75). D-shape is a safe and effective when adopted as revisional surgery at a long-term follow-up. Comparative evaluation is warranted to establish the potential superiority over different surgical surgery in case of recurrence.

Common surgical procedures in pilonidal sinus disease: A meta-analysis, merged data analysis, and comprehensive study on recurrence

We systematically searched available databases. We reviewed 6,143 studies published from 1833 to 2017. Reports in English, French, German, Italian, and Spanish were considered, as were publications in other languages if definitive treatment and recurrence at specific follow-up times were described in an English abstract. We assessed data in the manner of a meta-analysis of RCTs; further we assessed non-RCTs in the manner of a merged data analysis. In the RCT analysis including 11,730 patients, Limberg & Dufourmentel operations were associated with low recurrence of 0.6% (95%CI 0.3-0.9%) 12 months and 1.8% (95%CI 1.1-2.4%) respectively 24 months postoperatively. Analysing 89,583 patients from RCTs and non-RCTs, the Karydakis & Bascom approaches were associated with recurrence of only 0.2% (95%CI 0.1-0.3%) 12 months and 0.6% (95%CI 0.5-0.8%) 24 months postoperatively. Primary midline closure exhibited long-term recurrence up to 67.9% (95%CI 53.3-82.4%) 240 months post-surgery. For most procedures, only a few RCTs without long term follow up data exist, but substitute data from numerous non-RCTs are available. Recurrence in PSD is highly dependent on surgical procedure and by follow-up time; both must be considered when drawing conclusions regarding the efficacy of a procedure.