Getting It "Right"

Systematic review of ethical issues in perinatal mental health research

BACKGROUND

Maternal mental health during the peripartum period is critically important to the wellbeing of mothers and their infants. Numerous studies and clinical trials have focused on various aspects of interventions and treatments for perinatal mental health from the perspective of researchers and medical health professionals. However, less is known about women's experiences of participating in perinatal mental health research, and the ethical issues that arise.

AIM

To systematically review the literature on the ethical issues that emerge from pregnant and/or postpartum women's experiences of taking part in perinatal mental health-related research.

METHODS

Systematic review of nine bibliographic databases, from inception to July 2021. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed method studies were included if they reported on ethical issues experienced by perinatal women. Research ethical issues encompassed any issue relating to women's experiences of being offered study information, recruitment, consent, retention and respect for autonomy.Titles, abstracts and full text screening, appraisal of the methodological quality of included studies, and data extraction, were conducted independently by two reviewers.

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS

Ethical approval was not required for this systematic review.

FINDINGS

A total of 9830 unique citations was retrieved. Six studies met the inclusion criteria. Studies were clinically and methodologically heterogenous, and only one was purposively designed to explore women's experiences. The key finding was the establishment of trust between the researcher and participant in all stages of the research process. Findings are presented according to recruitment and consent processes, participation and retention, and study follow-up and completion.

CONCLUSION

The establishment of trust between the researcher and perinatal women leads to a dynamic with research ethical implications relevant to all stages of perinatal mental health-related research. Further research on the research ethical issues experienced by perinatal women is required because of the limited literature.

Electronic informed consent: effects on enrolment, practical and economic benefits, challenges, and drawbacks-a systematic review of studies within randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Enrolment is one of the most challenging aspects of conducting clinical trials, preceded by the process of informed consent (IC). Different strategies to improve recruitment in clinical trials have been used, including electronic IC. During COVID-19 pandemic, barriers to enrolment have been evident. Although digital technologies were acknowledged as the future of clinical research and potential advantages were shown for recruitment, electronic informed consent (e-IC) has not yet been globally adopted. The purpose of this review is to investigate the effect of using e-IC on enrolment, practical and economic benefits, challenges, and drawbacks when compared to traditional informed consent, through a systematic review.

METHODS

Embase, Global Health Library, Medline, and The Cochrane Library databases were searched. No limit was set for publication date, age, sex, or study design. We included all studies within a randomized controlled trial (RCT), published in English, Chinese or Spanish, evaluating the electronic consent process used in the parent RCT. Studies were included if any of the three components ((i) information provision, (ii) participant's comprehension, (iii) signature) of the IC process was designed as electronic, whether administered remotely or face-to-face. The primary outcome was the rate of enrolment to the parent trial. Secondary outcomes were summarized according to the various findings reported on the use of electronic consent.

RESULTS

From a total of 9069 titles, 12 studies were included in the final analysis with a total of 8864 participants. Five studies of high heterogeneity and risk of bias showed mixed results on the efficacy of e-IC on enrolment. Data of included studies suggested e-IC could improve comprehension and recall of study-related information. Meta-analysis could not be conducted due to different study designs and outcome measures and the predominantly qualitative findings.

CONCLUSION

Few published studies have investigated the impact of e-IC on enrolment and findings were mixed. e-IC may improve participant's comprehension and recall of information. High-quality studies are needed to evaluate the potential benefit of e-IC to increase clinical trial enrolment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42021231035 . Registration date: 19-Feb-2021.

Informed Consent in Onlinestudien

Zusammenfassung. Theoretischer Hintergrund: Für eine Studienteilnahme ist das Einverständnis der Teilnehmer_innen notwendig. Dazu ist es wichtig, dass Teilnahme- und Einverständniserklärungen gelesen und verstanden werden. Fragestellung: In einer Onlinestudie mit Studierenden wurde untersucht, inwieweit die zum Einholen eines Informed Consent (IC) verwendeten Dokumente gelesen und verstanden werden und welchen Einfluss die Gestaltung der Formatvorlage hat. Methode: Die Teilnehmenden ( N = 214) wurden randomisiert einer von drei Bedingungen (zwei unterschiedliche Teilnehmer- und Einverständniserklärungen und eine Kontrollbedingung) zugeteilt. Das Lesen dieser Dokumente wurde mittels Selbstbericht sowie über die Lesezeit erfasst. Das Verständnis der gelesenen Texte wurde mit Multiple-Choice-Fragen erhoben. Ergebnisse: Der Großteil der Proband_innen las die IC-Dokumente nicht vollständig und zeigte ein unzureichendes Verständnis relevanter Inhaltsbereiche. Hinsichtlich der Gestaltung der IC-Dokumente zeigte sich, dass beide Testversionen im Vergleich zum Kontrolldokument zu einer höheren Leserate führen. Schlussfolgerungen: Die Ergebnisse liefern Anhaltspunkte für eine optimierte Gestaltung von Einverständniserklärungen.

Men living through multiple miscarriages: protocol for a qualitative exploration of experiences and support requirements

INTRODUCTION

Up to 1 in 4 pregnancies and 1 in 20 subsequent pregnancies end in miscarriage. Despite such prevalence the psychosocial effects are often unrecognised and unsupported. In the absence of any biomedical sequelae among men such marginalisation may be intensified. Men living through multiple miscarriages may also find any grief or anxiety intensified by loss of hope for future parenthood, but robust qualitative studies of these experiences are limited. We aim to rectify the deficiency.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Our qualitative study will adopt the sounds of silence framework designed by Serrant-Green to hear the voices of populations possibly marginalised. We will listen and learn from 30 to 50 men with a history of two or more miscarriages. The research participants will be recruited from a recurrent miscarriage clinic at a large tertiary hospital in England, and from advertisements to be disseminated by the project sponsor and miscarriage charities.Individual telephone interviews supported by a semistructured discussion guide will be audio-recorded, transcribed and anonymised. The transcriptions and any field notes will be interpreted by the framework method of Ritchie and Lewis embedded within the sounds of silence framework. Tentative findings will be presented to research participants in face-to-face focus group discussion, to enable member synthesis to enhance authenticity. The focus group discussion will be audio-recorded, transcribed, anonymised and similarly interpreted to contribute to our final synthesis.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The protocol of this project received a favourable opinion from the West Midlands South Birmingham Research Ethics Committee (16/WM/0423). Results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and at conferences, and disseminated via newsletters and social media of our clinical collaborators and miscarriage charities. Outputs are anticipated to inform future policy and practice in the management of multiple miscarriages.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN 21828561.