Hybrid Minimally Invasive Approach for Combined Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease and Severe Aortic Stenosis

Complete transcatheter versus surgical approach to aortic stenosis with coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

METHODS

The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched through November 2021 to identify studies comparing TAVR + PCI and SAVR + CABG for severe aortic stenosis with concurrent coronary artery disease. Outcomes of interest were all-cause mortality, repeat coronary intervention, rehospitalization, myocardial infarction, and stroke during follow-up, and 30-day periprocedural outcomes.

RESULTS

Two randomized controlled trials and 6 observational studies including a total of 104,220 patients (TAVR + PCI, n = 5004; SAVR + CABG, n = 99,216) were included. The weighted mean follow-up period was 30.2 months. TAVR + PCI was associated with greater all-cause mortality and coronary reintervention during follow-up period (hazard ratio, 1.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-1.65; P = .003, hazard ratio, 4.14; 95% CI, 1.74-9.86; P = .001, respectively), 30-day permanent pacemaker implantation rate (odds ratio [OR], 3.79; 95% CI, 1.61-8.95; P = .002), and periprocedural vascular complications (OR, 6.97; 95% CI, 1.85-26.30; P = .004). In contrast, TAVR + PCI was associated with a lower rate of 30-day acute kidney injury (OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.20-0.50; P = .0001). Rehospitalization, myocardial infarction, stroke during follow-up, and other periprocedural outcomes including 30-day mortality were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with severe aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease, TAVR + PCI was associated with greater all-cause mortality at follow-up compared with SAVR + CABG. Heart Team approach to assess TAVR candidacy remains imperative.

New approach for combined aortic valve and coronary procedures through the left anterior minithoracotomy

OBJECTIVES

We have developed a novel technique for accessing the aortic valve (AoV) through the left anterior minithoracotomy (LAmT). This approach has been used in patients requiring both AoV surgery and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

METHODS

From April 2023 to July 2023, we performed 6 concomitant AoV procedures and CABG through the LAmT. The mean age was 71.5 [standard deviation (SD): 5.8; 64; 82] years, and the mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 53% (SD: 12.1; 30; 60). Surgical technique includes LAmT in the fourth intercostal space, peripheral cardiopulmonary bypass, aortic cross-clamping using transthoracic clamp, cold blood cardioplegia, conventional oblique aortotomy and special surgical exposure manoeuvres, aimed to position the ascending aorta and AoV close to the surgical incision.

RESULTS

AoV was effectively visualized and the procedure was performed as planned in all 6 patients. No conversion to sternotomy was required. AoV replacement with biological prosthesis was performed in 6 (100%) patients. Conventional surgical instruments were used in all cases. The long-shafted instruments were not required. Knot-pusher was used in 4 (67%)cases. Concomitant complete revascularization was achieved in all cases. The mean number of distal anastomosis was 2.0 (SD: 0.6; 1; 3). Total operation time was 371 (SD: 43; 300; 420) min, cardiopulmonary bypass time was 253 (SD: 36; 193; 284) min and cross-clamp time was - 162 (SD: 29; 128; 214) min. intensive care unit stay was-1.5 (SD: 0.55; 1; 2) days, total hospital stay was-7.3 (SD: 1; 6; 9) days. There were no revisions for bleeding, no strokes or other major complications, and no hospital or 30-days mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The simultaneous performance of AoV replacement and multivessel CABG through a single left anterior thoracotomy is technically feasible and can be carried out by experienced surgeons. However, a larger number of cases are required to fully comprehend the potential limitations of this procedure.

Simultaneous hybrid off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting and transcatheter aortic valve implantation in elderly patients

Purpose

Optimal strategy for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) is unresolved. We evaluated the surgical outcomes of hybrid coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and TAVI in elderly patients.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated patients who underwent simultaneous TAVI and CABG at Wakayama Medical University, Japan. All patients underwent off-pump CABG (OPCAB) including minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS-CABG). In an earlier period, OPCAB + transfemoral TAVI (TF-TAVI) was the only method used, while in a later period, we introduced MICS-CABG and alternative approaches for TAVI.

Results

Twenty-seven patients were enrolled, the average age was 83.6 ± 5.1 years. In the MICS-CABG and TAVI group, average patient age was higher (87.0 ± 3.1 years) than in the earlier group. Thirty-day and in-hospital mortalities were zero. Incomplete revascularization rate was 33.3% and one patient required percutaneous coronary intervention after the operation. Graft patency rate was 100%. In MICS-CABG group, the number of distal anastomoses was smaller (1.29, range 1-2), but the number of days required to re-starting walking and postoperative hospital stay were shorter, and the rate of discharge to home was higher (100%) than in the other groups.

Conclusions

Although 33.3% of patients did not achieve complete revascularization, there was no 30-day or in-hospital mortality. TAVI and hybrid OPCAB, including MICS-CABG, were suggested to be feasible treatment in elderly patients.

Sternal-Sparing Surgical Options in Combined Aortic Valve and Coronary Artery Disease: Proof of Concept

OBJECTIVE

The standard management of concomitant aortic valve (AV) and coronary artery disease has been coronary artery bypass and AV replacement (AVR). With the advent of minimally invasive options, many isolated lesions have been successfully managed using a sternal-sparing approach. In our institution, patients with isolated AV disease are offered minimally invasive surgical or transcatheter AVR, and those with isolated coronary artery disease are routinely managed with robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass or percutaneous coronary intervention. Various combinations of these techniques can be used when a sternal-sparing posture is desired because of patient risk or preference. The aim of this study was to review the outcomes in patients with combined AV and coronary disease who were managed using sternal-sparing approaches.

METHODS

We reviewed the records of 10 patients in our minimally invasive surgical database who presented with concomitant AV and coronary artery disease and underwent combined sternal-sparing management of these 2 lesions using various combinations of minimally invasive approaches.

RESULTS

Four patients had totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass and minimally invasive AVR at the same time, 2 patients underwent transcatheter AVR followed by totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass, and 4 patients underwent minimally invasive AVR with percutaneous coronary intervention. There was no 30-day mortality. The duration of postoperative surgical hospital stay was 3.1 ± 0.9 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Sternal-sparing approaches in combined AV and coronary artery disease are feasible with patient-specific treatment selection of minimally invasive techniques.