Perioperative Pain Control in Upper Extremity Surgery: Prescribing Patterns, Recent Developments, and Opioid-Sparing Treatment Strategies

Analgesic Effect of Sulforaphane: A New Application for Poloxamer-Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogels

Sulforaphane (SFN) has shown potential as an antioxidant and anti-inflammatory agent. To improve its druggability, we developed new analgesic formulations with sulforaphane-loaded hyaluronic acid (HA)-poloxamer (PL) hydrogel. This study evaluated the pre-clinical safety and effectiveness of these formulations. Effectiveness was tested on Wistar rats divided into groups (n = 15) receiving (IM, 10 mg/kg) SFN formulations or control groups (without SFN). This study used a hind paw incision postoperative pain model to evaluate mechanical hypersensitivity with von Frey filaments. TNF-α, IL-1β, substance P, and CGRP levels verified anti-inflammatory activity in the hind paw tissue. Histopathology of tissues surrounding the injection site was assessed after 2 and 7 days post-treatment. To corroborate drug safety, cell viability of 3T3 and RAW 264.7 cultures was assessed. Additionally, RAW 264.7 cultures primed with carrageenan evaluated nitric oxide (NO) levels. All animals exhibited post-incisional hypersensitivity, and F2 (PL 407/338 (18/2%) + HA 1% + SFN 0.1%) showed a longer analgesic effect (p < 0.05). F2 reduced TNF-α, IL-1β, and CGRP levels (p < 0.05). Histopathological evaluation showed mild to moderate inflammatory reactions after the formulations' injections. F2 produced no significant difference in cell viability (p > 0.05) but reduced NO production (p < 0.05). Thus, our results highlight the biocompatibility and effectiveness of F2.

Open Versus Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release: A Comparison of Opioid Prescription Patterns and Occupational Therapy Referrals

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic and open carpal tunnel releases (ECTR and OCTR) are safe and effective operations. We compared the approaches in terms of postoperative opioid refills and occupational therapy (OT) referrals.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) treated with ECTR or OCTR. Patients with isolated idiopathic CTS were included; patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral carpal tunnel release (CTR), revision CTR, and additional procedures at time of CTR were excluded. Outcomes included number of patients requiring an opioid refill and/or an OT referral within 6 months of surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 1125 patients met inclusion criteria. Endoscopic release was performed in 634 (56%) cases and open release in 491 (44%). Unadjusted analysis revealed no difference in number of patients requiring refills (6.0% vs 7.1%, P = .44), mean number of refills among those requiring one (1.29 vs 1.23, P = .69), total oral morphine equivalents (45.1 vs 44.7, P = .84), number of patients calling regarding pain (12.8% vs 14.7%, P = .36), OT referrals (12.1% vs 11.4%, P = .71), or average number of OT visits (4.5 vs 4.2, P = .74) for endoscopic and open techniques, respectively. Adjusted analysis revealed lower age, lower body mass index, and history of muscle relaxant as predictors of opioid refills, and in contrast to the unadjusted analysis, operating surgeon and surgical technique were predictors of referral to OT.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic CTR and OCTR did not differ in terms of unadjusted postoperative patient calls for pain, number of opioid refills, or OT referrals. After correcting for individual surgeon practice, endoscopic was associated with decreased odds of requiring postoperative OT.

Opioid prescribing patterns for distal radius fractures in the ambulatory setting: A 10-year retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are one of the most common orthopedic injuries, with most managed in the nonoperative ambulatory setting. The objectives of this study are to examine National Health Center Statistics (NHCS) data for DRF treated in the nonoperative ambulatory setting to identify opioid and nonopioid analgesic prescribing patterns and to determine demographic risk factors for prescription of these medications. Design, setting, patients, and measures: This study is a retrospective analysis of data collected by the NHCS from 2007 to 2016. Utilizing International Classification of Diseases codes, all visits to emergency departments and doctors' offices for DRFs were identified. Variables of interest included demographic data, expected payment source, and prescription of opioid or nonopioid analgesics.

RESULTS

During the study timeframe, 15,572,531 total visits for DRFs were recorded. DRF visits requiring opioid and nonopioid analgesic prescriptions increased over time. Patients aged 45-64 years were significantly more likely to receive an opioid prescription than any other age group (p < 0.05). Opioid prescription was positively correlated with the use of workers' compensation and negatively correlated with patients receiving services under charity care (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Prescriptions of both opioid and nonopioid analgesic medications for DRF have been steadily increasing over time in the nonoperative ambulatory setting, with middle-aged adults most likely to receive an opioid prescription. Opioid prescription rates differ significantly between patients utilizing workers' compensation and patients receiving services under charity care, suggesting that socioeconomic factors play a role in prescribing patterns.

Perioperative Pain Management for Distal Radius Fractures

Distal radius fractures have a high incidence among both young and elderly patients, and in many instances require operative intervention. When operative intervention is employed, adequate pain management is essential to decrease postoperative complications, such as chronic pain and disability, while minimizing the risk of prolonged opioid use and dependence. Strategies to optimize pain management include regional anesthesia, preoperative dosing of medication, multimodal regimens, long-acting selective opioids at the time of surgery, corticosteroids, and non-pharmacologic therapies.

A Novel Molecular Reservoir Based on Reverse Self-Assembled Liquid Crystals - A New Strategy for Prolonging the Duration in Action of Analgesics

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to develop liquid crystal (LC) precursors to obtain novel long-acting analgesics for injection based on depot systems and compare the difference between the cubic and hexagonal precursors in delivering Diclofenac sodium (DS).

METHODS

Diclofenac sodium liquid crystal precursor injections were prepared and characterized, followed by in vitro release, pharmacodynamic, and pharmacokinetic studies.

RESULTS

The optimal formulations were prepared with a ratio of Phytantriol/ethanol/water as 76:19:5 for cubic LC precursors, and a ratio of Phytantriol/ethanol/water/Vitamine-E acetate as 72:18:5:5 for hexagonal, both loading various drug dosages (2.5%, 3.75% and 5%), respectively. Polarized light microscopy and small angle diffraction confirmed that the precursors were isotropic fluids and transformed into gels with Pn3m or HII framework in water. Rheological studies have shown that precursors belong to Newtonian fluids and gels to pseudoplastic fluids. The release showed that the DS in the commercial injection (DS-inj) was completely liberated within 6 h, whereas only 46.55% and 49.73% of the DS in 2.5% cubic precursors and 2.5% hexagonal precursors were freed, respectively. Pharmacodynamic studies have shown that cubic, hexagonal and DS-inj raised the pain threshold in mice by 169.4%, 157.3% and 113.79%, respectively. The mean retention times of DS in cubic and hexagonal were 3.16 and 2.67 times longer than DS-inj, respectively, according to pharmacokinetic results.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, cubic and hexagonal are both promising analgesic sustained release formulations. In addition, based only on the current comparison, cubic seems to have a better long-acting effect.

Improving Perioperative Preparation for Patients Undergoing Surgical Treatment for Distal Radius Fractures

We aimed to review common patient concerns after surgical repair of distal radius fracture (DRF) to identify potential interventions to improve the gap between expectation and education for DRF patients.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 100 consecutive patients who underwent surgical repair of DRF at a level I trauma center. Patient-initiated communication notes were reviewed with thematic analysis to identify the common reasons patients required additional information. We used the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool to score the available educational resources for DRF patients for the understandability and actionability of the educational materials provided to the patients.

Results

Of 165 patient communication episodes, 88.5% occurred postoperatively. The most common concerns were pain (30, 15.4%) and surgical site changes (24, 12.3%). Most communications (171, 83.4%) were resolved with patient education through instruction or reassurance. The reviewed materials did not address pain or surgical site changes. No reviewed materials provided actionable steps patients could take to facilitate recovery.

Conclusions

Pain management and normal wound healing were the most common surgical concerns of DRF patients. We identify opportunities to improve expectation-setting in online materials and during face-to-face education to create a more patient-centered perioperative experience.

Larger Perioperative Opioid Prescriptions Lead to Prolonged Opioid Use After Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery: A Multicenter Analysis

INTRODUCTION

The opioid epidemic remains an ongoing public health crisis. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether surgeons' prescribing patterns of the initial postoperative opioid prescription predispose patients to prolonged opioid use after upper extremity surgery.

METHODS

This multicenter retrospective study was done at three academic institutions. Patients who underwent carpal tunnel release, basal joint arthroplasty, and distal radius fracture open reduction and internal fixation over a 1.5-year period were included. Opioid prescription data were obtained from the Pennsylvania Prescription Drug Monitoring Program website.

RESULTS

Postoperatively, 30.1% of the patients (191/634) filled ≥1 additional opioid prescription, and 14.0% (89/634) experienced prolonged opioid use 3 to 6 months postoperatively. Patients who filled an additional prescription postoperatively were initially prescribed significantly more pills (P = 0.001), a significantly longer duration prescription (P = 0.009), and a significantly larger prescription in total milligram morphine equivalents (P = 0.002) than patients who did not fill additional prescriptions. Patients who had prolonged opioid use were prescribed a significantly longer duration prescription (P = 0.026) than those without prolonged use.

CONCLUSION

Larger and longer duration of initial opioid prescriptions predisposed patients to continued postoperative opioid use. These findings emphasize the importance of safe and evidence-based prescribing practices to prevent the detrimental effects of opioid use after orthopaedic surgery.

Complete Abolition of Opioid Prescribing in an Upper Extremity Surgical Practice

BACKGROUND

Prescription opioids threaten potential addiction, diversion, and death. Nonopioid regimens have demonstrated similar efficacy for select upper extremity postoperative patients.

METHODS

After adopting a practice policy completely abolishing opioid prescriptions, data were collected on all consecutive surgical cases for the next 6 months, without exclusion. There were 800 cases, 61% male and 39% female, with a mean age of 45. Seventy patients (9%) reported already using prescription medications employed in multimodality regimens; no instruction was given to alter consumption. Patients were divided into 5 groups based on the type of surgery: elective soft tissue (24%), trauma wound management (19%), soft tissue structural repairs (9%), hand fracture/bone procedures (34%), and wrist to elbow fracture/bone procedures (14%). Each group was compared directly to each other group with a 2-tailed t-test, P < .05.

RESULTS

Patients reported achieving pain control without the need for further medication assistance by a mean of postoperative day 2.7. Times to pain control by group were as follows: 1.5, 3.1, 2.7, 2.9, and 3.6 days respectively. Mean postoperative daily pain scores (using a 10-point visual analog scale) for days 1 to 5 were as follows: 2.8, 2.1, 1.5, 1.0, and 0.6, respectively, with a sum of 8.0. During the 6-month tracking period, the practice only received 4 calls from patients with questions about pain control (0.5% of cases).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients achieved good immediate pain control without opioids and reported rapidly declining pain levels over the next several days to the point of no longer requiring medication.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prospective cohort case series, therapeutic; Level IV.

Opioid Prescribing Patterns Among Orthopedic Hand Surgeons After Implementation of a Divisional Protocol

INTRODUCTION

Overprescribing contributes to the misuse and overuse of narcotics. We hypothesized that implementation of postoperative prescribing guidelines would consistently reduce the amount of opioids prescribed after ambulatory hand surgery.

METHODS

A divisional protocol was instituted in November 2018. A retrospective cohort study was designed to examine the policy's effects on postoperative prescribing. Postoperative opioid prescriptions for patients undergoing ambulatory hand surgery were evaluated 1 year before and 1 year after policy initiation. All prescriptions were converted into the total oral morphine equivalent (OME) prescribed.

RESULTS

A total of 1,672 surgeries were included. Six hundred sixty-one cases were in preimplementation group, and 1,011 cases were in the postimplementation group. The median of total OME decreased significantly after distribution of prescribing guidelines from 75 in the preimplementation group to 45 in the postimplementation group (p < .001) with significant reductions seen for carpal tunnel release (p < .001), trigger finger release (p < .001), distal radius open reduction internal fixation (p < .001), and finger closed reduction and pinning (p < .001). When categorized by procedure type, the median of total OME decreased from 75 to 30 for soft tissue procedures (p < .001) and from 120 to 100 for bony procedures (p < .001).

CONCLUSION

Divisional prescribing guidelines lead to consistent short-term to mid-term reductions in the amount of opioid medication prescribed postoperatively.

Hand Surgery Patient Perspectives on Medical Cannabis: A Survey of Over 600 Patients

Purpose

Medical cannabis (MC) has been proposed as a potential addition to multimodal pain management regimens in orthopedics. This study evaluates hand and upper-extremity patient perspectives of MC as a treatment for common orthopedic and musculoskeletal pain conditions. This study also aims to identify the proportion of patients already using MC, perceived barriers to MC use, and opinions on insurance coverage and legality of cannabis.

Methods

An anonymous cross-sectional survey study was conducted of all patients at least 18 years old presenting from October 2020 to January 2021 to a hand and upper-extremity outpatient clinic. The survey collected information regarding opinion on MC, including use, legality, and willingness to use MC in the future. Medical cannabis was legal in the states where the study was conducted.

Results

A total of 679 patients completed the survey (response rate 72.5%). Sixty-eight patients (10.0%) reported currently using MC. Of the 623 patients (90.0%) who reported not currently using MC, 504 (80.9%) would consider using MC for chronic pain, while the remaining 119 (19.1%) would not consider the use of MC for chronic pain. Age was not associated with whether a patient would consider using MC (P = .16) or was already using MC (P = .10). The most identified barrier to MC use was cost, reported as either expensive or not affordable by 477 patients (70.5%).

Conclusions

This study found that most patients presenting for hand and upper-extremity complaints would consider using MC (80.9%), and most perceive it as a safe treatment option for common orthopedic conditions. Moreover, 10% of patients reported already using MC. One of the major barriers to MC use is the cost. Most (90.9%) patients support policies for legalization and insurance coverage of MC.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic Level III.

Multimodal Analgesia with Extended-Release Dinalbuphine Sebacate for Perioperative Pain Management in Upper Extremity Trauma Surgery: A Retrospective Comparative Study

Introduction

Patients undergoing upper extremity fracture surgery (UEFS) commonly suffer from unbearable acute pain. Opioids remain the mainstay of moderate to severe pain alleviation, although there is a growing concern regarding the increasing trend in misuse and abuse. This study aimed to observe the safety and efficacy of dinalbuphine sebacate (DS), a novel extended-release analgesic, along with multimodal analgesia (MMA) for post-UEFS pain control.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients undergoing UEFS between August 2020 and January 2021. Eligible patients were included and divided into two groups, depending on the analgesic regimen. In the DS group, 150 mg DS was administered intramuscularly at least 12 h pre-operatively, while in the conventional analgesia (CA) group, 40 mg parecoxib was given within 3 h before surgery. Intraoperative fentanyl administration was guided by the Analgesia Nociception Index System in both groups. For breakthrough pain, fentanyl was used as rescue medicine in the postanaesthesia care unit while tramadol and parecoxib were administered in the ward.

Results

Forty-nine patients were allocated to the DS group and 60 patients were allocated to the CA group. In comparison with the CA group, the proportion of patients requiring opioids for breakthrough pain post-operatively was significantly lower in the DS group (fentanyl: 31% vs. 68%, p < 0.001; tramadol: 27% vs. 70%, p < 0.001). The DS group also consumed lower amounts of post-operative rescue opioids. Furthermore, both mean worst and least pain scores were significantly lower in the DS group from post-operative day (POD) 1 to POD 5. There was no significant difference in intraoperative consumption of fentanyl or incidence of adverse events.

Conclusion

This result suggests that extended-release DS is a suitable analgesic incorporated in MMA and a promising solution to the misuse and abuse of opioids.

Prospective, Double-blind Evaluation of Perioperative Intravenous Acetaminophen and Ketorolac for Postoperative Pain and Opioid Consumption After Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release

Background: The current opioid epidemic highlights the need for pain management strategies to decrease or eliminate postoperative use of opioid medications. The purpose of this study was to determine if perioperative administration of intravenous (IV) acetaminophen and/or IV ketorolac decreases postoperative pain and opioid consumption after endoscopic carpal tunnel release. Methods: In all, 44 subjects were enrolled in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study from October 2015 to April 2017 and divided into 4 treatment arms: placebo, IV acetaminophen, IV ketorolac, or both IV acetaminophen and IV ketorolac. Patients recorded pain at 8-hour intervals on an 11-point scale and daily opioid use for 7 days after surgery. Analysis of variance and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare mean pain scores and opioid consumption. Results: Mean pain scores over the 7-day study period were lower in the placebo and IV acetaminophen groups. Patients in the placebo and acetaminophen groups reported less pain than those in the ketorolac and combination groups on postoperative days 6 and 7. Patients administered IV acetaminophen had lower daily mean opioid usage. In all, 50% of the patients did not take any opioids after surgery. Conclusions: There are small, statistically significant differences in postoperative pain and opioid consumption supporting the use of IV acetaminophen for pain control after endoscopic carpal tunnel release, though these results are likely not clinically relevant. We recommend continued investigation into multimodal pain management in upper extremity surgery as well as limiting the number and quantity of opioid prescriptions provided to patients postoperatively.

Bridge Plate Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures: Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes

Distal radius fractures are among the most commonly encountered injuries treated by orthopedic surgeons. The incidence of distal radius fractures appears to be on the rise. Although this injury is usually treated nonoperatively, surgical management is often indicated and involves several options, including percutaneous pinning, fragment-specific fixation, volar/dorsal/radial locked plating, intramedullary fixation, and external fixation. More recently, dorsal spanning bridge plating has been introduced for certain fracture patterns and patient circumstances. This article reviews the indications, surgical techniques, outcomes, and potential complications associated with bridge plating of distal radius fractures. The authors believe that this article will familiarize surgeons with an additional surgical technique that can be used to treat complex presentations of a common orthopedic injury. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(4):e620-e625.].

Opioid use following a total shoulder arthroplasty: who requires refills and for how long?

Introduction

Pain control following a total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is multifactorial. The current standard of care includes the utilization of a multimodal analgesic approach including breakthrough prescription opioid medication in an effort to provide postoperative analgesia. While this original opioid prescription is sufficient for the majority of patients, some go on to require prolonged opioid use. Our study investigated patient risk factors associated with opioid refill postsurgery.

Methods

The Truven Marketscan® database was queried for all patients who underwent either a primary anatomic TSA or primary reverse TSA from 2010 to 2017. Opioid data were collected using National Drug Codes (NDC) from outpatient pharmacy claims. Only opioid-naïve patients were included. Patients were then grouped into 1 of 3 cohorts based on postoperative opioid use: 1) Patients with no additional refills, 2) patients with a minimum of one additional refill up through 6 months postoperatively, and 3) patients with additional refills and continued opioid use past 6 months.

Results

Of the total of 17,706 opioid-naïve patients that underwent a TSA, 10,882 (61.5%) did not have any additional refills, 4473 (25.3%) required an additional prescription within 6 months after surgery, and 2351 (13.3%) had prolonged opioid use beyond 6 months postoperatively. A dose-dependent relationship was identified between initial opioid prescription quantity and risk for refill and prolonged use. The prolonged use group was prescribed an equivalent of 20.0 more 5 mg oxycodone pills than the no refill group and 12.7 more than the refill group (P < .001). On multivariate analysis, younger age, female gender, and tobacco use, along with the comorbidities of coronary artery disease, clinical depression, diabetes, and rheumatic disease were all found to be predictive factors of prolonged opioid use.

Discussion

The dose-dependent relationship observed between original opioid prescription data and number of additional refills needed, suggests that initially overprescribing opioids may lead to prolonged dependency. This study also identified several independent risk factors for prolonged opioid use, including younger age, depression, and tobacco use. This study will hopefully help recognize high-risk patient populations and serve as the foundation for future studies into opioid prescription standardization and preoperative opioid education.

Augmented intramedullary screw tension band construct for olecranon fracture reduction and fixation: a review of literature and surgical technique

Olecranon fractures, which make up 10% of upper extremity fractures in adults, often require anatomic reduction and stable internal fixation. Successful olecranon fracture osteosynthesis has classically been achieved via tension band wiring or plate fixation. This article reviews the indications, outcomes, and a surgical technique as an alternative construct for tension band wiring of olecranon fractures. The technique involves placement of an ulnar intramedullary partially threaded screw that is used as a proximal point of attachment for tension band wiring of the olecranon. Although infrequently used by orthopedic surgeons, this construct has been shown to be biomechanically and clinically superior to classic Kirschner wire tension banding techniques. This review is intended to familiarize surgeons with a surgical technique that can be applied to a variety of proximal ulna fractures.

Patient Satisfaction and Opioid Use With a Postoperative Opioid Protocol After Common Hand Procedures

Purpose

Given the state of the opioid crisis and national pressure to minimize prescriptions, pain management after common hand procedures can pose a challenge for patients and providers. Despite the volume of recent literature on prescribing protocols and over-the-counter (OTC) medications, patient satisfaction has not been adequately assessed. The purposes of this study were (1) to investigate patient satisfaction with pain management using an opioid prescribing protocol after common hand procedures, and (2) to evaluate medication use in the postoperative period using this opioid prescribing protocol.

Methods

A prospective survey was administered to 100 consecutive patients undergoing common soft tissue hand procedures at a Level I academic institution over a 5-month period. The medical record was reviewed for demographics and the number or dosage of opioid pills prescribed. The survey was conducted at 2 time points within 2 weeks after the procedure and assessed the number of opioid pills taken, use of OTC medications, visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, and satisfaction with pain management and surgery.

Results

Mean number of opioid pills consumed at 2 weeks after the procedure was 1.5; 19 patients consumed all of their prescribed opioid pills. Acetaminophen was the most commonly used OTC medication and 84 patients reported using OTC medication in the postoperative period. The average VAS score at the end of the study period was 1.7. Nearly all patients were satisfied with the pain management and surgery; no patients received a second opioid prescription.

Conclusions

We found that patients consumed far fewer opioid pills than were prescribed to them. We also found that patients who took more opioid pills had higher VAS pain scores, with lower satisfaction in both categories. The cohort demonstrated effective control of pain with high satisfaction, indicating that an opioid protocol is a successful and patient-accepted tool for managing postoperative pain.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic IV.

Effects of Baseline Opioid Medication Use on Patient-Reported Functional and Psychological Impairment Among Hand Clinic Patients

PURPOSE

To test the null hypothesis that baseline opioid use is not associated with functional or psychological impairment among new hand surgery clinic patients, as measured by Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) instruments.

METHODS

New adult (≥ 18 years) patient visits to a tertiary academic orthopedic nonshoulder hand and upper extremity clinic between February 2014 and April 2018 were eligible. Collected outcomes include the question, "Are you currently taking narcotic pain medications?", the PROMIS Upper Extremity (UE) computerized adaptive testing (CAT), abbreviated version of the Disorders of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH), PROMIS Physical Function (PF) CAT, PROMIS Pain Interference (PI) CAT, PROMIS Depression CAT, and PROMIS Anxiety CAT. Patients responding to the opioid question, plus the UE CAT or QuickDASH, were included. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression modelling were used to assess factors associated with baseline scores.

RESULTS

Of 5997 included patients, 1,046 (17.4%) reported baseline opioid use. Patients in the opioid group demonstrated significantly worse scores on all patient-reported outcomes, and a significantly greater proportion of patients with PROMIS Depression CAT scores exceeding 60 (associated with a clinical diagnosis of depression; 29.5% vs 15.5%). Lower functional scores were observed in the opioid group after controlling for age, sex, other activity-limiting comorbidities, and either depression (UE CAT -7.0; QuickDASH +18.1; and PF CAT -6.6 points), anxiety (UE CAT -6.3; QuickDASH +16.4; PF CAT -6.3), or PI (UE CAT -3.7; QuickDASH +9.5; and PF CAT -4.2 points). Pain interference was greater among opiate users when controlling for age, sex, other activity-limiting comorbidities, and baseline function or psychological status: PI was 2.5, 5.0, or 4.3 points greater when controlling for the PROMIS UE CAT, Depression CAT, or Anxiety CAT.

CONCLUSIONS

New patients presenting to a hand surgery clinic who endorse use of opioid medications at baseline report significantly decreased physical function, increased psychological burden, and greater levels of pain interference than nonusers.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic III.