Development of indirect cavernous dural arteriovenous fistula after trapping for direct carotid cavernous fistula. A case report

Combined endovascular and microsurgical management of complex traumatic carotid-cavernous fistula: Three case reports

Background:

With the evolution of the endovascular devices, the management of endovascular interventions has become the current standard therapy for traumatic carotid-cavernous fistula (TCCF). However, only endovascular treatment may not be feasible in some patients with atypical TCCF.

Case Description:

We described three complex TCCFs that could not be managed by conventional endovascular methods. The first patient had recurrent TCCF previously treated by muscle embolization and ligation of affected carotid arteries 23 years ago. Another two patients had TCCFs association with large pseudoaneurysm within the sphenoid sinus. In each patient, the fistula was successfully closed by trapping procedure using a combination of endovascular and surgical treatment.

Conclusion:

To reduce costs of treatment, trapping operation by combining surgical and endovascular treatment may be considered as an alternative option for complex TCCF which has some features including chronic stage, preexisting carotid artery ligation, or association with large venous pouch of the cavernous sinus or sphenoid sinus pseudoaneurysm.

Combined direct and indirect traumatic carotid-cavernous fistula (CCF): Case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Within the current Barrow classification system, there are no categorical descriptions or reports in the literature of cavernous carotid fistulas (CCFs) with both a direct component (type A) and separate indirect contribution (type B, C, or D). We report the first definitive case of a combined simultaneous traumatic direct and indirect CCF, and review the literature on the similar existing entity of traumatic indirect CCFs presenting delayed and subsequent to the treatment of traumatic, direct CCFs.

METHODS

We report a case of simultaneous direct type A CCF with a traumatic indirect CCF component and a review of the relevant literature.

RESULTS

An 18year-old female presented after a motor vehicle collision. A diagnostic cerebral angiogram confirmed the diagnosis of CCF, with contribution both directly from the ICA and indirectly via branches of the ECA. The direct component of the CCF was first treated in 3 stages via both transarterial and transvenous coil embolization, followed by a final 4th stage of parent vessel sacrifice in order to treat the residual direct component, with transarterial embolization to treat residual indirect CCF activity.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first report of a traumatic CCF with simultaneous direct (type A) and indirect via the ECA (type C) contributions.