Flow diverter for endovascular treatment of intracranial mirror segment internal carotid artery aneurysms

Comparative efficacy and safety of therapeutic strategies for mirror aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Mirror aneurysms are rare and pose therapeutic challenges, with both endovascular and microsurgical options available. Single-stage and two-stage procedures are employed, but the optimal strategy remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the efficacy and safety of different therapeutic strategies for managing mirror aneurysms. The study adhered to PRISMA guidelines and comprehensively analyzed data from multiple databases, including Pubmed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, up to 30th September 2024. Statistical analysis utilized the Comprehensive Meta-analysis (CMA) software version 3.0. This systematic review encompasses 42 studies, with 11 studies undergoing meta-analysis. The meta-analysis included 629 participants. Both microsurgical clipping and endovascular interventions achieved high rates of complete occlusion (RROC 1) (ES = 0.896; 95% CI: 0.840 to 0.931; P < 0.001) with low to moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 46.46%). Favorable neurological outcomes (mRS ≤ 2) were significantly achieved among all patients (ES = 0.924; 95% CI: 0.891 to 0.948; P < 0.001) with low heterogeneity (I2 = 15.52%). Subgroup analysis revealed that microsurgical clipping demonstrated superior occlusion rates and more consistent neurological outcomes compared to endovascular treatment. Also, complications were reported in seven studies (n = 492) and included cerebral infarction, hydrocephalus, and vasospasm. As well, mortality and recurrence were rare. Both microsurgical clipping and endovascular interventions are effective and safe for treating mirror aneurysms, with clipping showing superior occlusion rates and consistent outcomes. Single-stage procedures and unilateral craniotomy are associated with better neurological outcomes when feasible.

Flow diversion for compressive unruptured internal carotid artery aneurysms with neuro-ophthalmological symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Data on the safety and efficacy of flow diverters (FD) for the treatment of unruptured internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysms with compressive neuro-ophthalmological symptoms (NOS) are scarce and comprise mainly small case series.

METHODS

We performed a search of three databases and included series with ≥10 patients, with unruptured aneurysms of the ICA and NOS, treated with FD. Random-effects analysis of treatment results and safety was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 22 studies reporting on 594 patients were included. Pooled proportions of NOS recovery, improvement, transient and permanent worsening were: 47.4% (95% CI 35.0% to 60.1%); 74.5% (95% CI 67.9% to 80.2%); 7.1% (95% CI 3.3% to 14.7%); and 4.9% (95% CI 3.2% to 7.4%), respectively. Rates of complete recovery and improvement in patients with isolated visual symptoms were 30.6% (95% CI 12.5% to 57.7%) and 56.6% (95% CI 42.3% to 69.9%). Isolated oculomotor symptoms recovered completely in 47.8% (95% CI 29.9% to 66.3%) and improved in 78% (95% CI 69.2% to 84.9%). Morbidity occurred in 5% (95% CI 2.8% to 9%) and mortality in 3.9% (95% CI 2% to 7.5%) of patients. An increased likelihood of symptom improvement was observed when treatment was performed early (<1 month) after symptom onset (OR=11.22, 95% CI 3.9% to 32.5%).

CONCLUSION

Flow diversion promotes recovery or improvement of compressive symptoms in a large proportion of patients but is associated with significant rates of morbidity and mortality. Transient and permanent NOS worsening is not uncommon. Early treatment is of utmost importance, as it increases the likelihood of symptom improvement more than 10-fold.

Complex cerebral aneurysms: intra-luminal reconstruction using Pipeline flow-diverting stent and the obliteration mechanism

OBJECTIVES

Patients with complex cerebral aneurysms can now be treated intravascularly with the help of flow-diverting stents. The primary purpose of this article is to document the clinical and angiographic outcomes in 80 patients who were treated with the Pipeline flow-diverting stent (PFS; Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland) and the obliteration mechanism was discussed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between October 2015 and October 2019, 80 patients with 90 complex (undefined neck, large/giant, blood blister-like, and recurrent side-wall) cerebral aneurysms treated with the PFS were retrospectively reviewed. Forty-five patients were women and 35 were men, with a mean age of 52 years. Large or giant aneurysms were defined as 10 mm or larger and small aneurysms were defined as less than 10 mm at the largest diameter measured on angiogram.

RESULTS

Forty-one aneurysms (45.6%) were large or giant, 41 (45.6%) were small, four (4.4%) were recurrent side-wall aneurysms and four (4.4%) were blood blister-like aneurysms. In total, 87 PFSs were placed in 80 patients with 90 aneurysms. In six patients, coexisting proximal stenosis of parent artery was also covered with PFS without balloon angioplasty. Adjunct coils were placed in 31 aneurysms (34%). One patient died of intracerebral hematoma after thrombolysis. There was one intrastent occlusion at six-month follow-up without any symptoms. The morbidity and the mortality rate is 0% and 1.3% (95% confidence interval (CI), 0%-3.7%). Control angiography was available in 74 (92.5%) patients with 83 aneurysms, and the aneurysm occlusion rate was 98.8% (95% CI, 96.5%-100%) in 6 to 12 months.

CONCLUSION

For wide-necked saccular, large/giant, blood blister-like aneurysms and recurrent side-wall aneurysms, PFS is a valid and safe treatment option.

Safety and Efficacy of Bilateral Flow Diversion for Treatment of Anterior Circulation Cerebral Aneurysms

BACKGROUND

Nearly 20% of individuals with an aneurysm will have multiple aneurysms-these individuals are at increased risk of subarachnoid hemorrhage. Treatment of bilateral aneurysms with flow diverters (FDs), or Pipeline embolization device, has not yet been established as an effective therapy. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of a 2-stage treatment of bilateral aneurysms with Pipeline embolization devices placed 6 months apart.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review to analyze the clinical and angiographic outcomes of 16 individuals with bilateral aneurysms treated with 2-stage flow diversion at a tertiary referral center from January 2010 to July 2018.

RESULTS

Of the 16 patients with 33 aneurysms treated with bilateral flow diversion, 1 had 2 aneurysms treated with a single FD on the contralateral side. The aneurysms treated were ophthalmic, superior hypophyseal, posterior communicating, or cavernous segment aneurysms, with an average size of 6.5 mm. No major complications, such as in-stent stenosis, thromboembolic events, distal intraparenchymal hemorrhage, rerupture, stent migration, or neurological death, were recorded. All the patients had good functional outcomes. At the 24-month follow-up examination, 81% of aneurysms showed complete occlusion. No aneurysm required repeat treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The results from the present study have demonstrated that 2-stage treatment of bilateral aneurysms with FDs is both safe and efficacious. The timing of contralateral FD stent placement is critical. We found that 6 months allows for adequate neurological recovery and stent endothelialization.