Comparison of open surgery and endovascular procedures as a therapeutic choice for visceral artery aneurysms

Superior mesenteric artery aneurysm endovascular repair

Superior mesenteric artery aneurysms are rare and associated with high mortality rates in cases of rupture. Current Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines recommend treatment of all superior mesenteric artery aneurysms regardless of size. A 53-year-old woman who was admitted for abdominal pain was found with a 14-cm, ruptured superior mesenteric artery branch aneurysm. Endovascular approach was performed with microvascular plug embolization of a feeding branch and aneurysm sac exclusion with a stent graft. Four months later, the patient demonstrated a 21% regression of the aneurysm and stent patency. Thus, timely diagnosis and treatment of superior mesenteric artery aneurysms with endovascular techniques can reduce potential complications.

Technical considerations of endovascular management of true visceral artery aneurysms

BACKGROUND

True visceral artery aneurysms are potentially complex to treat but with advances in technology and increasing interventional radiology expertise over the past decade are now increasingly the domain of the interventional radiologist. BODY: The interventional approach is based on localization of the aneurysm and identification of the anatomical determinants to treat these lesions to prevent aneurysm rupture. Several different endovascular techniques are available and should be selected carefully, dependent on the aneurysm morphology. Standard endovascular treatment options include stent-graft placement and trans-arterial embolisation. Different strategies are divided into parent artery preservation and parent artery sacrifice techniques. Endovascular device innovations now include multilayer flow-diverting stents, double-layer micromesh stents, double-lumen balloons and microvascular plugs and are also associated with high rates of technical success.

CONCLUSION

Complex techniques such as stent-assisted coiling and balloon-remodeling techniques are useful techniques and require advanced embolisation skills and are further described.

Emergent vessel embolization for major traumatic and non-traumatic hemorrhage: Indications, tools and outcomes

Endovascular embolization of bleeding vessels in trauma and non-trauma patients is frequently used and is an important tool for bleeding control. It is included in the EVTM (endovascular resuscitation and trauma management) concept and its use in patients with hemodynamic instability is increasing. When the correct embolization tool is chosen, a dedicated multidisciplinary team can rapidly and effectively achieve bleeding control. In this article, we will describe the current use and possibilities for embolization of major hemorrhage (traumatic and non-traumatic) and the published data supporting these techniques as part of the EVTM concept.

Results of current endovascular treatments for visceral artery aneurysms

OBJECTIVE

This single-centre retrospective cohort study was aimed to analyse the early and long-term results of endovascular treatment for true visceral artery aneurysms. Moreover, a comparison with the results of our previously published historical series of open surgical procedures was performed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2008 to December 2021, 78 consecutive patients were treated at our institution for true visceral artery aneurysms. All demographic data, procedural details, perioperative outcomes, and follow-up data were prospectively collected from a dedicated database. A retrospective analysis identified 72 patients who underwent endovascular surgery. Early results were analysed in terms of technical success, conversion to open surgery, mortality, and local and systemic morbidities. Follow-up results were analysed in terms of survival, need for open or endovascular reintervention, and freedom from complications at the level of the treated visceral artery. These results were then compared with those of our historical open surgical group (1982-2007), which included 54 interventions.

RESULTS

In four cases, the planned endovascular procedure could not be completed, and the overall technical success rate was 94.5%. No deaths occurred during the hospital stay or 30 days after surgery. Overall, the 30-day perioperative complication rate was 5.8%, with an early reintervention rate of 2.9%. The median follow-up time was 29 months (1-132 months). The estimated 7-year survival rate was 88% (standard error, SE 0.05). The estimated 7-year aneurysm-related complication-free rate was 85.5% (SE 0.06), with reintervention-free and aneurysm-related complication-free survival rates of 93.3% (SE 0.04) and 75.6% (SE 0.07), respectively. At the 7-year follow-up, the survival rate was similar between the endovascular and open groups. There was a trend towards a higher aneurysm-related complication rate in the endovascular group than in the open group (14.5% vs. 6.4%, p=0.07). However, no significant differences in reintervention-free and overall estimated aneurysm-related complication-free survival rates were found between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular repair is safe and effective in patients with visceral artery aneurysms, with low perioperative complication rates. The long-term outcomes were satisfactory and comparable with those of the historical series of open surgical repairs. Even if there is a trend towards a higher risk of late aneurysm-related complications among endovascular patients, it does not imply an increased need for late reinterventions.

[Superior mesenteric artery aneurysm]

We report surgical treatment of 4 patients with superior mesenteric artery aneurysm. A comprehensive examination including Doppler ultrasound and CT angiography of visceral arteries made it possible to assess the features of vascular anatomy. In accordance with the peculiarities of upper mesenteric artery angioarchitectonics, open and endovascular methods were used. A differentiated approach made it possible to treat patients without any complications.

Outpatient Management of Gastroduodenal Artery Aneurysm

Gastroduodenal artery (GDA) aneurysms are exceptionally rare. Although rare, providers should have a sufficient understanding of the causes, symptoms, and treatment options due to there being a high risk of mortality if these aneurysms rupture. It is important to understand the need for close management and follow-up in patients with this diagnosis, especially in the outpatient setting. Various treatment options are available and should be immediately discussed with every patient diagnosed with this aneurysm. We report a patient with a previously diagnosed gastroduodenal aneurysm who presented to the clinic with new-onset symptoms.

Aneurysms of pancreaticoduodenal arcade: Clinical profile and endovascular strategies

Background and Aim

Pancreaticoduodenal arcade aneurysms (PDAAs) are uncommon lesions associated with a significant risk of rupture and mortality. This study describes the etiology, clinical presentation, and endovascular management strategies of PDAAs across a spectrum of indications.

Methods

The clinical records of patients with PDAAs referred for endovascular management from January 2018 till November 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Data on presenting symptoms, associated etiologies, and outcomes after endovascular treatment were collected and studied.

Results

We found 15 patients with false and 1 patient with true aneurysm of pancreatoduodenal arcade (PDA). The associated conditions were coeliac artery stenosis, severe necrotizing pancreatitis, and chronic pancreatitis or iatrogenic (postendoscopic papillotomy and percutaneous metallic biliary stenting). The main presenting feature was gastrointestinal bleed, while 2 patients had abdominal pain and 1 had gastric outlet obstruction. A multiphase computed tomography scan demonstrated the ruptured aneurysm in all patients. Site of origin of PDAA influenced the choice of transarterial endovascular strategy (coiling for aneurysms of main trunk of arteries and glue injection for those arising from small arterial branches). This was carried out in an emergency setting for 12 patients and as an elective procedure in 4 patients. Technical success was demonstrated in all patients and clinical success in 14. The two patients who had rebleed were salvaged by repeat endovascular procedure. Postembolization syndrome was seen in three patients.

Conclusions

With advancing technology, endovascular strategies continue to evolve. Careful attention to ensure hemodynamic resuscitation and stability, correction of pre‐existing coagulopathy and attention to technique can lead to the possibility of endovascular approaches as a dependable option in the management of ruptured PDAAs.