Bifurcated bypass in severe chronic limb threatening ischaemia

Peripheral Arterial Disease in Diabetic Foot: One Disease with Multiple Patterns

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a major complication in individuals with diabetes and is increasingly prevalent in those with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). Despite this, the characterisation of PAD in diabetic patients remains insufficiently refined, leading to suboptimal management and outcomes. This review underscores the necessity for a more nuanced understanding of PAD's anatomical and biological aspects in diabetic patients. The distribution of atherosclerotic plaques varies significantly among individuals, influencing prognosis and treatment efficacy. We describe three key patterns of PAD in diabetes: pattern 1 PAD-below-the-knee (BTK) disease (with infrageniculate disease where present); pattern 2-below-the-ankle (BTA) disease; and pattern 3-small artery disease (SAD), each presenting unique challenges and require tailored therapeutic approaches. BTK PAD, characterised by occlusions in the anterior tibial, posterior tibial, and peroneal arteries, necessitates targeted revascularisation to improve foot perfusion. BTA PAD, involving the pedal and plantar arteries, is associated with higher risks of amputation and requires advanced revascularisation techniques. SAD, affecting the small arteries of the foot, remains an enigma and is challenging to treat with the current mechanical methods, highlighting the potential of autologous cell therapy as a promising alternative. A refined characterisation of PAD in diabetes is crucial for developing effective, individualised treatment strategies, ultimately improving patient outcomes, and reducing the burden of diabetic foot complications. In light of these complexities, it is incredulous that we often use a single term, "peripheral arterial disease", to describe such a diverse array of disease patterns. This oversimplification can be perilous, as it may lead to inadequate therapeutic approaches and suboptimal patient care.

A new declaration for feet's sake: Halving the global diabetic foot disease burden from 2% to 1% with next generation care

The 1989 Saint Vincent Declaration established a goal of halving global diabetes-related amputation rates. A generation later, this goal has been achieved for major but not minor amputations. However, diabetic foot disease (DFD) is not only a leading cause of global amputation but also of hospitalisation, poor quality of life (QoL) and disability burdens. In this paper, we review latest estimates on the global disease burden of DFD and the next generation care of DFD that could reduce this burden. We found DFD causes 2% of the global disease burden. This makes DFD the 13th largest of 350+ leading conditions causing the global disease burden, and much larger than dementia, breast cancer and type 1 diabetes. Neuropathy without ulcers and amputations makes up the largest portion of the global DFD burden yet receives the least DFD focus. Future care focussed on improving safe physical activity in people with DFD could considerably reduce the DFD burden, as this incorporates increasing physical fitness and QoL, while simultaneously decreasing ulceration and other risks. Charcot neuro-osteoarthropathy is more prevalent than previously thought. Most cases respond well to non-removable offloading devices, but surgical intervention may further reduce the considerable burden of these neuropathic fracture dislocations. Ischaemia is becoming more common and complex. Most cases respond well to revascularisation interventions, but novel revascularisation techniques, medical management and autologous cell therapies may hold the key to more cases responding in the future. We conclude that DFD causes a global disease burden larger than most conditions and existing guideline-based care and next generation treatments can reduce this burden. We suggest the World Health Organization and International Diabetes Federation declare a new goal: halving the global DFD burden from 2% to 1% within the next generation.

Non-reversed bifurcated vein graft improves time to healing in ischemic patients undergoing lower limb distal bypass

BACKGROUND

Bifurcated vein grafts have been described in reconstructive microsurgery. No comparative studies have been published in lower limb arterial revascularization. The aim of this study was to compare non-reversed bifurcated vs. single vein graft in patients with critical limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) undergoing lower limb distal bypass.

METHODS

Between January 2015 and December 2021 193 CLTI patients have been treated at our center with vein bypass, and distal anastomosis on infrapopliteal vessels; 137 patients (71%) received a single graft (Group SIN), and 56 patients (29%) had a bifurcated bypass (Group BIF). Primary outcomes measures were time to healing, primary patency, primary assisted patency, secondary patency, and limb salvage. Two-year outcomes according to Kaplan-Meier curves were evaluated and compared.

RESULTS

Both groups were homogeneous in terms of demographic data, preoperative risk factors, and clinical presentation except for an elderly age in Group BIF (77.5 vs. 71.5 years; P<0.001). Intraoperative technical success was achieved in all patients. Overall median duration of follow-up was 19 months (interquartile range 9-36). Wound healing did not differ between the two groups (77.4% Group SIN vs. 73.2% Group BIF; P=0.33). Mean time to healing was faster in Group BIF (2.4 vs. 6.8 months; P<0.001). At 2-year follow-up there were no differences between the two groups in terms of primary patency (71.4% Group SIN vs. 54% Group BIF; P=0.10), primary assisted patency (81.7% Group SIN vs. 76.4% Group BIF; P=0.53), secondary patency (85.1% Group SIN vs. 80.9% Group BIF; P=0.79), and limb salvage (92.3% Group SIN vs. 87.2% Group BIF; P=0.64).

CONCLUSIONS

Bifurcated graft improved time to healing in CLTI patients undergoing infrapopliteal non-reversed vein bypass. Two-year overall patencies and limb salvage did not differ accordingly to vein graft configuration (single vs. bifurcated).

Factors affecting patency of in situ saphenous vein bypass: 2-year results from LIMBSAVE (Treatment of critical Limb IscheMia with infragenicular Bypass adopting in situ SAphenous VEin technique) registry

OBJECTIVES

Aim is to demonstrate contemporary outcomes of in situ saphenous vein bypass with the use of a valvulotome.

DESIGN

Analysis of two-year outcomes of a multicenter registry based on the treatment of critical Limb IscheMia with infragenicular Bypass adopting in situ SAphenous VEin technique (LIMBSAVE).

MATERIALS

Between January 2018 and December 2019 541 patients in 43 centers have been enrolled. In all patients an innovative valvulotome was used.

METHODS

Early outcomes were assessed. Two-year outcomes according to Kaplan-Meier curves in terms of patencies, and limb salvage were evaluated. Associations of patient and procedure variables were analysed with univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

In all cases valvulotome was able to lyse the valves. Vein injuries due to the in situ technique was 3.5%. Thirty-day mortality and major amputation rates were 3% and 0.9%, respectively. Mean follow-up was 12.1 months. Two-year estimated primary patency, primary assisted patency, secondary patency, and limb salvage were 69.1%, 81.4%, 86.5%, and 94.5%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed association of preoperative vein diameter < 3 mm with lower primary patency (HR 14.3, p < .001), primary assisted patency (HR 9.4, p = .002), secondary patency (HR 7.2, p = .007), and limb salvage (HR 7.8, p = .005) rates. Distal anastomosis on a tibial/foot vessel also had association with lower primary patency (HR 4.8, p = .033), and primary assisted patency (HR 6, p = .011) rates. Use of a suprafascial tributary collateral as a graft confirmed association with lower primary patency (HR 6.7, p = .013), and primary assisted patency (HR 4.2, p = .042) rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Vein diameter < 3 mm, distal anastomosis on a tibial/foot vessel, and use of a suprafascial tributary collateral as a graft were significantly associated with loss of patency and limb loss during follow-up.