Use of cell free DNA as a prognostic biomarker in non-small cell lung cancer patients with bone metastasis

Differences in actionable genomic alterations between brain metastases and non‑brain metastases in patients with non‑small cell lung cancer

Brain metastases (BM) have been closely associated with increased morbidity and poor survival outcomes in patients with non‑small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Excluding risk factors in histological subtypes, genomic alterations, including epidermal growth factor receptor mutations and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements have been also regarded as greater risk factors for BM in the aspect of molecular subtypes. In the present study, 69 tumor tissues and 51 peripheral blood samples from patients with NSCLC were analyzed using a hybridization capture‑based next‑generation sequencing (NGS) panel, including 95 known cancer genes. Among the 90 patients with stage IV NSCLC, 26 cases suffered from BM and 64 cases did not. In total, 174 somatic mutations in 35 mutated genes were identified, and 12 of these genes were concurrently present in the BM group and the non‑BM group. Importantly, five mutated genes including ALK, cytidine deaminase (CDA), SMAD family member 4 (SMAD4), superoxide dismutase 2 (SOD2) and Von Hippel‑Lindau tumor suppressor (VHL) genes were uniquely detected in the BM group, and they were enriched in the Hippo signaling pathway, pyrimidine metabolism and pantothenate and co‑enzyme A (CoA) biosynthesis, as demonstrated using Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes enrichment analysis. RNA polymerase II transcription regulator complex and promyelocytic leukemia nuclear body were the top functional categories according to the Gene Ontology enrichment analysis in the BM group and non‑BM group, respectively. Furthermore, 43.33% (13/30) of mutated genes were detected by both tumor tissue deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and plasma‑derived circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in the non‑BM group, while this percentage was only limited to 29.41% (5/17) in the BM group. To summarize, significant differences in somatic mutations, somatic interactions, key signaling pathways, functional biological information, and clinical actionability for the therapy of targeted agents were founded between the BM group and the non‑BM group, and ctDNA analysis may by applied as a more credible alternative for genomic profiling in patients with advanced NSCLC without BM, due to its higher consistency for genomic profiling between ctDNA analysis and tissue DNA analysis.

The Role of Neurotrophin-4/Forkhead Box L1 in the Development of Nonsmall-Cell Lung Cancer

This study aims to uncover the biological function of neurotrophin-4 (NTF4) in affecting the progression of nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). NTF4 levels in NSCLC and paracancerous tissues were detected by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Knockdown of NTF4 in A549 and H1299 cells was achieved by transfection of sh-NTF4. Subsequently, proliferative and migratory changes in NSCLC cells with NTF4 knockdown were determined by cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) and transwell and wound healing assay. The target gene binding NTF4 was predicted by bioinformatic software and verified by a dual-luciferase reporter assay. The role of the NTF4/FOXL1 axis in mediating NSCLC cell behaviors was finally explored through rescue experiments. NTF4 was highly expressed in NSCLC tissues than in normal ones. Knockdown of NTF4 remarkably reduced proliferative and migratory rates in A549 and H1299 cells. Forkhead Box L1 (FOXL1) was confirmed as a target gene of NTF4 by bioinformatic software and verified by a dual-luciferase reporter assay. Knockdown of FOXL1 was able to reverse the reduced proliferative and migratory rates in A549 and H1299 cells transfected with sh-NTF4. NTF4 triggers NSCLC to proliferate and migrate via negatively regulating FOXL1.

Predictive and Prognostic Biomarkers for Lung Cancer Bone Metastasis and Their Therapeutic Value

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Bone metastasis, which usually accompanies severe skeletal-related events, is the most common site for tumor distant dissemination and detected in more than one-third of patients with advanced lung cancer. Biopsy and imaging play critical roles in the diagnosis of bone metastasis; however, these approaches are characterized by evident limitations. Recently, studies regarding potential biomarkers in the serum, urine, and tumor tissue, were performed to predict the bone metastases and prognosis in patients with lung cancer. In this review, we summarize the findings of recent clinical research studies on biomarkers detected in samples obtained from patients with lung cancer bone metastasis. These markers include the following: (1) bone resorption-associated markers, such as N-terminal telopeptide (NTx)/C-terminal telopeptide (CTx), C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTx-I), tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase isoform 5b (TRACP-5b), pyridinoline (PYD), and parathyroid hormone related peptide (PTHrP); (2) bone formation-associated markers, including total serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP)/bone specific alkaline phosphatase(BAP), osteopontin (OP), osteocalcin (OS), amino-terminal extension propeptide of type I procollagen/carboxy-terminal extension propeptide of type I procollagen (PICP/PINP); (3) signaling markers, including epidermal growth factor receptor/Kirsten rat sarcoma/anaplastic lymphoma kinase (EGFR/KRAS/ALK), receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand/receptor activator of nuclear factor κB/osteoprotegerin (RANKL/RANK/OPG), C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 12/C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 (CXCL12/CXCR4), complement component 5a receptor (C5AR); and (4) other potential markers, such as calcium sensing receptor (CASR), bone sialoprotein (BSP), bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP2), cytokeratin 19 fragment/carcinoembryonic antigen (CYFRA/CEA), tissue factor, cell-free DNA, long non-coding RNA, and microRNA. The prognostic value of these markers is also investigated. Furthermore, we listed some clinical trials targeting hotspot biomarkers in advanced lung cancer referring for their therapeutic effects.

Monitoring cfDNA in Plasma and in Other Liquid Biopsies of Advanced EGFR Mutated NSCLC Patients: A Pilot Study and a Review of the Literature

Simple Summary

In advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, tumor tissue biopsy represents the gold standard for molecular analysis procedures. However, to achieve the necessary information, both at the time of diagnosis and progressive disease, is sometimes challenging, considering the small cancer material available. Liquid biopsy consists of a non-invasive alternative approach that owns the potential to provide useful information for molecular diagnostic. We aimed to prove the worth of liquid biopsy as plasma but also as urine and exhaled breath condensate (EBC) as the best surrogate to tumor tissue as well as to explore the molecular mechanisms that underlying the resistance to second-line osimertinib in advanced EGFR mutated NSCLC. We believe that our findings, with the PLUREX study and the review of literature, may add another brick in the wall on the use of liquid biopsy in the clinical practice in the setting of EGFR-mutated NSCLC disease.

Abstract

In order to study alternatives at the tissue biopsy to study EGFR status in NSCLC patients, we evaluated three different liquid biopsy platforms (plasma, urine and exhaled breath condensate, EBC). We also reviewed the literature of the cfDNA biological sources other than plasma and compared our results with it about the sensitivity to EGFR mutation determination. Twenty-two EGFR T790M-mutated NSCLC patients in progression to first-line treatment were enrolled and candidate to osimertinib. Plasma, urine and EBC samples were collected at baseline and every two months until progression. Molecular analysis of cfDNA was performed by ddPCR and compared to tissue results. At progression NGS analysis was performed. The EGFR activating mutation detection reached a sensitivity of 58 and 11% and for the T790M mutation of 45 and 10%, in plasma and urine samples, respectively. Any DNA content was recovered from EBC samples. Considering the plasma monitoring study, the worst survival was associated with positive shedding status; both plasma and urine molecular progression anticipated the radiological worsening. Our results confirmed the role of plasma liquid biopsy in testing EGFR mutational status, but unfortunately, did not evidence any improvement from the combination with alternative sources, as urine and EBC.

Current progress and mechanisms of bone metastasis in lung cancer: a narrative review

Lung cancer is a kind of malignant tumor with rapid progression and poor prognosis. Distant metastasis has been the main cause of mortality among lung cancer patients. Bone is one of the most common sites. Among all lung cancer patients with bone metastasis, most of them are osteolytic metastasis. Some serious clinical consequences like bone pain, pathological fractures, spinal instability, spinal cord compression and hypercalcemia occur as well. Since the severity of bone metastasis in lung cancer, it is undoubtedly necessary to know how lung cancer spread to bone, how can we diagnose it and how can we treat it. Here, we reviewed the process, possible mechanisms, diagnosis methods and current treatment of bone metastasis in lung cancer. We divided the process of bone metastasis in lung cancer into three steps: tumor invasion, tumor cell migration and invasion in bone tissue. It may be influenced by genetic factors, microenvironment and other adhesion-related factors. Imaging examination, laboratory examination, and pathological examination are used to diagnose lung cancer metastasis to bone. Surgery, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, bisphosphonate, radiation therapy and chemotherapy are the common clinical treatment methods currently. We also found some problems remained to be solved. For example, drugs for skeletal related events mainly target on osteoclasts at present, which increase the ratio of patients in osteoporosis and fractures in the long term. In all, this review provides the direction for future research on bone metastasis in lung cancer.

The Validity and Predictive Value of Blood-Based Biomarkers in Prediction of Response in the Treatment of Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review

With the introduction of targeted therapies and immunotherapy, molecular diagnostics gained a more profound role in the management of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to systematically search for studies reporting on the use of liquid biopsies (LB), the correlation between LBs and tissue biopsies, and finally the predictive value in the management of NSCLC. A systematic literature search was performed, including results published after 1 January 2014. Articles studying the predictive value or validity of a LB were included. The search (up to 1 September 2019) retrieved 1704 articles, 1323 articles were excluded after title and abstract screening. Remaining articles were assessed for eligibility by full-text review. After full-text review, 64 articles investigating the predictive value and 78 articles describing the validity were included. The majority of studies investigated the predictive value of LBs in relation to therapies targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) receptor (n = 38). Of studies describing the validity of a biomarker, 55 articles report on one or more EGFR mutations. Although a variety of blood-based biomarkers are currently under investigation, most studies evaluated the validity of LBs to determine EGFR mutation status and the subsequent targeting of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors based on the mutation status found in LBs of NSCLC patients.