Analysis of NTRK mutation and clinicopathologic factors in lung cancer patients in northeast China

An odd dancing couple. Non-small cell lung carcinoma with coexisting EGFR mutation and NTRK-1 translocation: A case report

In the 21st century, there has been a dramatic shift in the diagnosis and management of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), with an increasing use of minimally invasive tissue acquisition methods. Current treatments require morphologic subtyping and biomarker information in all cases. Determining such biomarkers is a continuously evolving field; current guidelines state that the determination of mutations on the Epidermal Growth Factor (EFGR), Kirsten Rat Sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS), Proto-oncogene B-Raf (BRAF), Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK), genes as well as fusions on genes such as ROS Proto-Oncogene 1, Receptor Tyrosine Kinase (ROS1), MET proto-oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinase (MET), RET proto-oncogene (RET), and the Neurotrophic Tyrosine Receptor Kinase (NTRK) family is mandatory. While analyzing such alterations, some of them were first reported to be mutually exclusive, although in recent years, it has been shown otherwise in some of these cases. Moreover, so was the case with the concomitant expression of NTRK fusions and EGFR mutations. We present a case report of a patient with concomitant EGFR mutation and NTRK1 fusion.

Analysis of CD74 Occurrence in Oncogenic Fusion Proteins

CD74 is a type II cell surface receptor found to be highly expressed in several hematological and solid cancers, due to its ability to activate pathways associated with tumor cell survival and proliferation. Over the past 16 years, CD74 has emerged as a commonly detected fusion partner in multiple oncogenic fusion proteins. Studies have found CD74 fusion proteins in a range of cancers, including lung adenocarcinoma, inflammatory breast cancer, and pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. To date, there are five known CD74 fusion proteins, CD74-ROS1, CD74-NTRK1, CD74-NRG1, CD74-NRG2α, and CD74-PDGFRB, with a total of 16 different variants, each with unique genetic signatures. Importantly, the occurrence of CD74 in the formation of fusion proteins has not been well explored despite the fact that ROS1 and NRG1 families utilize CD74 as the primary partner for the formation of oncogenic fusions. Fusion proteins known to be oncogenic drivers, including those of CD74, are typically detected and targeted after standard chemotherapeutic plans fail and the disease relapses. The analysis reported herein provides insights into the early intervention of CD74 fusions and highlights the need for improved routine assessment methods so that targeted therapies can be applied while they are most effective.

Distinct gene mutation profiles among multiple and single primary lung adenocarcinoma

With the development of technologies, multiple primary lung cancer (MPLC) has been detected more frequently. Although large-scale genomics studies have made significant progress, the aberrant gene mutation in MPLC is largely unclear. In this study, 141 and 44 lesions from single and multiple primary lung adenocarcinoma (SP- and MP-LUAD) were analyzed. DNA and RNA were extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor tissue and sequenced by using the next-generation sequencing-based YuanSu450TM gene panel. We systematically analyzed the clinical features and gene mutations of these lesions, and found that there were six genes differently mutated in MP-LUAD and SP-LUAD lesions, including RBM10, CDK4, ATRX, NTRK1, PREX2, SS18. Data from the cBioPortal database indicated that mutation of these genes was related to some clinical characteristics, such as TMB, tumor type, et al. Besides, heterogeneity analysis suggested that different lesions could be tracked back to monophyletic relationships. We compared the mutation landscape of MP-LUAD and SP-LUAD and identified six differentially mutated genes (RBM10, CDK4, ATRX, NTRK1, PREX2, SS18), and certain SNV loci in TP53 and EGFR which might play key roles in lineage decomposition in multifocal samples. These findings may provide insight into personalized prognosis prediction and new therapies for MP-LUAD patients.

What Is New in Biomarker Testing at Diagnosis of Advanced Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma? Implications for Cytology and Liquid Biopsy

The discovery and clinical validation of biomarkers predictive of the response of non-squamous non-small-cell lung carcinomas (NS-NSCLC) to therapeutic strategies continue to provide new data. The evaluation of novel treatments is based on molecular analyses aimed at determining their efficacy. These tests are increasing in number, but the tissue specimens are smaller and smaller and/or can have few tumor cells. Indeed, in addition to tissue samples, complementary cytological and/or blood samples can also give access to these biomarkers. To date, it is recommended and necessary to look for the status of five genomic molecular biomarkers (EGFR, ALK, ROS1, BRAFV600, NTRK) and of a protein biomarker (PD-L1). However, the short- and more or less long-term emergence of new targeted treatments of genomic alterations on RET and MET, but also on others’ genomic alteration, notably on KRAS, HER2, NRG1, SMARCA4, and NUT, have made cellular and blood samples essential for molecular testing. The aim of this review is to present the interest in using cytological and/or liquid biopsies as complementary biological material, or as an alternative to tissue specimens, for detection at diagnosis of new predictive biomarkers of NS-NSCLC.