Evaluation of the serum markers CEA, NSE, TPS and CYFRA 21.1 in lung cancer

Identification of a Glycosyltransferase Signature for Predicting Prognosis and Immune Microenvironment in Neuroblastoma

Neuroblastoma (NB) is one of the most common solid tumors in children. Glycosyltransferases (GTs) play a crucial role in tumor development and immune escape and have been used as prognostic biomarkers in various tumors. However, the biological functions and prognostic significance of GTs in NB remain poorly understood. The expression data from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and Therapeutically Applicable Research to Generate Effective Treatments (TARGET) were collected as training and testing data. Based on a progression status, differentially expressed GTs were identified. We constructed a GTscore through support vector machine, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, and Cox regression in NB, which included four prognostic GTs and was an independent prognostic risk factor for NB. Patients in the high GTscore group had an older age, MYCN amplification, advanced International Neuroblastoma Staging System stage, and high risk. Samples with high GTscores revealed high disialoganglioside (GD2) and neuron-specific enolase expression levels. In addition, a lack of immune cell infiltration was observed in the high GTscore group. This GTscore was also associated with the expression of chemokines (CCL2, CXCL9, and CXCL10) and immune checkpoint genes (cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated protein 4, granzyme H, and granzyme K). A low GTscore was also linked to an enhanced response to anti–PD-1 immunotherapy in melanoma patients, and one type of tumor was also derived from neuroectodermal cells such as NB. In conclusion, the constructed GTscore revealed the relationship between GT expression and the NB outcome, GD2 phenotype, and immune infiltration and provided novel clues for the prediction of prognosis and immunotherapy response in NB.

The Clinical Value of Cyfra 21-1 Estimation for Lung Cancer Patients

Cytokeratin-19, one of the cytoskeletal proteins, is expressed both in bronchial epithelium and in lung cancer cells. The aim of our study was to establish the value of serum cytokeratin-19 soluble fragment (Cyfra 21-1) measurement in lung cancer patients. Cyfra 21-1 levels were estimated in 35 patients (pts) with benign lung diseases and in 116 lung cancer patients: 55 pts with squamous cell lung cancer, 38 pts with small cell lung cancer and 23 pts with adenocarcinoma. The cutoff level was set at 4 ng/ml with a specificity of 94% and a sensitivity of 40%. Elevated Cyfra 21-1 values were found in 44% of squamous cell lung cancer, 39% of adenocarcinoma and 34% of small cell lung cancer pts (the difference was not significant). In squamous cell lung cancer and in adenocarcinoma elevated Cyfra 21-1 values were observed more often in patients with advanced disease than in patients with limited disease. There was no significant correlation between the initial Cyfra 21-1 level and the response to chemotherapy. Cyfra 21-1 was hot a prognostic indicator, although in operable squamous cell lung cancer the proportion of survivors in the second year of observation was higher among the patients with normal preoperative Cyfra 21-1 levels.

Immunoradiometric Assay of Chromogranin a in the Diagnosis of Small Cell Lung Cancer: Comparative Evaluation with Neuron-Specific Enolase

The aims of our work were 1) to determine the diagnostic performance of an immunoradiometric assay of chromogranin A (CgA) in smal cell lung cancer and 2) to compare its discriminatory power with that of neuron-specific enolase (NSE), the marker currently used for SCLC. We selected 166 cases of small cell (64) and non-small cell (102) lung cancer and 106 cases of non-malignant lung diseases as controls. Both CgA and NSE were assayed by immunoradiometric methods and cutoff values were established on the basis of a pre-fixed specificity of 95% in non-malignant lung diseases. The CgA assay showed better diagnostic sensitivity than NSE in SCLC (61% versus 57%), especially in limited disease, and a low positivity rate in NSCLC with respect to NSE (14% versus 22%). By contrast, NSE reflected disease extent more accurately than CgA (U test: CgA p<0.05, NSE p<0.001). Finally, we found that the CgA assay was not affected by hemolysis whereas NSE serum levels greatly increased in hemolyzed sera. In conclusion, CgA assaying by an IRMA method is a reliable procedure in the diagnosis of SCLC. NSE remains the marker of choice in staging and monitoring of the disease. Further studies are needed to evaluate the prognostic significance of the marker and its role in therapy monitoring and patient follow-up.

Neuron-Specific Enolase as a Biomarker: Biochemical and Clinical Aspects

Neuron-specific enolase (NSE) is known to be a cell specific isoenzyme of the glycolytic enzyme enolase. In vertebrate organisms three isozymes of enolase, expressed by different genes, are present: enolase α is ubiquitous; enolase β is muscle-specific and enolase γ is neuron-specific. The expression of NSE, which occurs as γγ- and αγ-dimer, is a late event in neural differentiation, thus making it a useful index of neural maturation.NSE is a highly specific marker for neurons and peripheral neuroendocrine cells. As a result of the findings of NSE in specific tissues under normal conditions, increased body fluids levels of NSE may occur with malignant proliferation and thus can be of value in diagnosis, staging and treatment of related neuroendocrine tumours (NETs).NSE is currently the most reliable tumour marker in diagnosis, prognosis and follow-up of small cell lung cancer (SCLC), even though increased levels of NSE have been reported also in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The level of NSE correlates with tumour burden, number of metastatic sites and response to treatment.NSE can be also useful at diagnosis of NETs and gastroenteropancreatic (GEP)-NETs.Raised serum levels of NSE have been found in all stages of neuroblastoma, although the incidence of increased concentration is greater in widespread and metastatic disease. Moreover, NSE determination in cord blood offers an early postnatal possibility of confirming the diagnosis of neuroblastoma in newborns.NSE has been demonstrated to provide quantitative measures of brain damage and/or to improve the diagnosis and the outcome evaluation in ischaemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, seizures, comatose patients after cardiopulmonary resuscitation for cardiac arrest and traumatic brain injury.Increased NSE serum levels have also been found associated with melanoma, seminoma, renal cell carcinoma, Merkel cell tumour, carcinoid tumours, dysgerminomas and immature teratomas, malignant phaechromocytoma, Guillain-Barré syndrome and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.

Decline in serum carcinoembryonic antigen and cytokeratin 19 fragment during chemotherapy predicts objective response and survival in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The authors assessed the predictive and prognostic role of decline in the serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA 21-1) during chemotherapy in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Changes in serum levels of CEA and CYFRA 21-1 during first-line, conventional chemotherapy were studied prospectively with an immunometric assay at baseline and every 2 courses in 117 patients with advanced NSCLC. Data were correlated with radiologic objective response (OR) and survival.

RESULTS

One hundred seven patients were evaluable for radiologic and serologic response assessment after 2 chemotherapy courses. The radiologic OR rate was 44% overall. The CEA and CYFRA 21-1 responses (> or =20% reduction over baseline level; assessed after the second course of chemotherapy) were 38% and 61%, respectively. Statistically significant correlations were observed between CEA and CYFRA 21-1 responses and OR (P = .01 and P = .004, respectively). The median survival from response assessment (landmark analysis) was 9 months. In a univariate analysis, disease stage, performance status, baseline lactate dehydrogenase level (LDH), OR, CEA response, and CYFRA 21-1 response were correlated significantly with survival. In particular, the median survival was 13 months for patients who had a CEA response and 11 months for patients who had a CYFRA 21-1 response compared with 8 months and 6 months for patients who did not respond, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, performance status (P = .005), baseline LDH level (P = .02), CEA response (P = .03) and CYFRA 21-1 response (P = .01) were confirmed as independent prognostic factors for survival.

CONCLUSIONS

CEA and CYFRA 21-1 responses appeared to be reliable surrogate markers of chemotherapy efficacy in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Recommendations For Clinical Use Of Tumor Markers In Lung Cancer

Kancer pluća predstavlja jedan od najozbiljnijih problema moderne onkologije. Uprkos kontinuiranom napretku u dijagnostičkim metodama, kod 50-70% pacijenata s kancerom pluća, bolest se dijagnostikuje u uznapredovalom stadijumu, isključujuci na taj način mogućnost radikalne terapije. Određivanje tumorskih markera kod kancera pluća može biti od pomoći u postavljanju dijagnoze, praćenju pacijenta i terapije, a takođe može da pruži dodatne informacije u prognostičke svrhe. U daljem tekstu opisani su odgovarajući serumski markeri kod dve glavne forme tumora pluća-mikrocelularnog i nemikrocelularnog (SCLC i NSCLC), kao i abnormalne supstance identifikovane u tumorima pluća ili njihovim metastazama, kao što su molekularni markeri, markeri prognoze u primeni neoadjuvantne ili adjuvantne terapije i mikrometastazama koštane srži ili limfnom čvoru.

Lung tumor markers of cytokeratin origin: an overview

Lung tumor markers fall into several categories including oncofetal proteins, structural proteins and their fragments, enzymes, membrane antigens, peptide and non-peptide hormones. Cytokeratins (CK) are well known structural proteins whose degradation gives rise to soluble fragments, measurable in the blood of patients and capable of cancer marking. Among them, Tissue Polypeptide Antigen (TPA), Tissue Polypeptide-Specific Antigen (TPS) and Cytokeratin-19-Fragments (Cyfra 21-1) are the most studied CK fragments' complexes. This article will review biological characteristics and clinical properties of these substances, emphasizing as their concentration in the peripheral blood might reflect the mass of tumor, the rate of cancer cell lysis, and other potentially unfavorable tumor characteristics. Assaying the concentration of CK fragments in the blood is an easy and effective way to assess lung cancer and monitor its clinical evolution.

Tumour markers in serum, bronchoalveolar lavage and biopsy cytosol in lung carcinoma: what environment lends the optimum diagnostic yield?

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic yield of the tumour markers carbohydrate antigen (CA 125), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC) and specific tissue polypeptide antigen (TPS) in serum, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and biopsy cytosol in a group of patients with bronchogenic carcinoma.

METHODS

Serum, BAL and biopsy cytosol samples were collected in a group of 85 patients with benign or malignant pulmonary diseases. After appropriate processing, tumour markers were determined by enzyme immunoassay. The diagnostic yields (sensitivity, specificity and accuracy) in each environment (serum, BAL or biopsy) were obtained by using "ROC" curves.

RESULTS

Determined individually, CA 125, NSE and SCC show the greatest diagnostic accuracy in cytosol. CEA and TPS do so in BAL. CEA is the most relevant marker in serum and BAL, and CA 125 in cytosol. When the different tumour markers are associated, they offer better overall yields for all except TPS.

CONCLUSIONS

For the factors evaluated in this study, determination of CEA in BAL was clinically the most useful marker in comparison with serum and cytosol determinations, although the latter may also be helpful in certain situations. Although there is no specific tumour marker for lung cancer, the combination of several can be used to monitor most patients with lung cancer.

Tumor markers in lung cancer: does the method of obtaining the cut-off point and reference population influence diagnostic yield?

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical usefulness of the tumor markers CA125, CEA, NSE, SCC, and TPS in a group of patients with lung cancer. We estimated the influence of the method for choosing the cut-off point and of considering as a reference population either healthy controls or patients with some form of non-neoplastic pulmonary disease (NNPD).

DESIGN AND METHODS

The tumor markers were determined using enzyme immunoassay techniques, and their diagnostic yield was evaluated using ROC curves and their correlation with the percentages between false and true positives. The diagnostic parameters of the tumor markers are presented in 116 patients with lung cancer and compared with a group of 25 healthy controls and another group of 80 patients with some form of NNPD. We determined on the one hand the cut-off points resulting from the best sensitivity-specificity balance in the ROC curves and on the other those resulting from considering a specificity of 95%. With the two cut-offs we studied the different diagnostic parameters: sensitivity, specificity and accuracy or area below the ROC curve.

RESULTS

Optimum diagnostic yield is obtained when we choose the cut-off point determined by the best balance of sensitivity and specificity in the ROC curves and take a healthy population as a reference group. The cut-off values for CA125, CEA, NSE, SCC, and TPS were 24 U/mL, 2.8 ng/mL, 9.8 ng/mL, 1.6 ng/mL, and 67.8 U/L, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that in future studies on tumor markers, a group of healthy subjects should be used as a reference population and ROC curves should be used to obtain the optimum cut-offs.

Neuron-specific enolase, thymidine kinase, and tissue polypeptide-specific antigen in diagnosis and response to chemotherapy of small-cell lung cancer

The clinical usefulness of neuron-specific enolase (NSE), thymidine kinase (TK), and tissue polypeptide-specific antigen (TPS) was investigated in 41 patients (53-80 years old) with recently discovered small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Eleven patients exhibited limited disease (LD) and 30 extensive disease (ED). Serum samples for NSE, TPS (immunoradiometric assay), and TK (radioenzymatic assay) evaluations were drawn from all patients at the time of diagnosis and before each cycle of chemotherapy in the treated patients. Therapy consisted of i.v. carboplatin 300 mg/m2 on the first day and i.v. etoposide 120 mg/m2 from the first to the third day every 3 weeks. Nine patients refused or were not eligible for chemotherapy. Five patients received only one course and showed no response (NR); 9 patients received two courses; 18 patients received three or more courses. In the last group, complete remission (CR) was obtained in 9 cases, partial remission (PR) in 18 cases. The tumor markers studied did not show any significant difference in distinguishing LD from ED. NSE and TPS were significantly more often abnormal than TK, either at the time of diagnosis (p < 0.05) or in PR or NR patients (p < 0.05). In relation to chemotherapy response, NSE and TPS serum patterns were shown to be more reliable than TK in PR (p < 0.05) and NR patients (computed error between 10% and 15%). No significant difference was observed between serum NSE and TPS patterns. Serum NSE and TPS seem to be more useful in the diagnosis and follow-up of SCLC patients undergoing chemotherapy. Further trials are necessary to ascertain whether the associated assessment of NSE and TPS can add useful information to that provided by the assessment of NSE alone.

The usefulness of carcinoembryonic antigen testing in the overall management of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) testing is a valuable adjunct in the overall management of patients who have non-small-cell lung cancer, especially when selecting surgical candidates for curative lung resection and in cases where the diagnosis is in doubt. Carcinoembryonic antigen levels above 50 strongly suggest advanced-stage cancer and should discourage lung resections in otherwise suitable cases. Carcinoembryonic antigen testing can enhance problem solving in difficult cases and help prevent needless invasive interventions.