Closure of the patent foramen ovale in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source: A clinical expert opinion and consensus statement for the Asian-Pacific region

Influence of procedural timing on the preventive yield of percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure

BACKGROUND

The benefit of patent foramen ovale closure (PFOC) ≤9 months after a cryptogenic stroke has been demonstrated in several randomised clinical trials. There is, however, insufficient data to support PFOC in non-recent cryptogenic strokes.

AIMS

The objective of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of PFOC in relation to the time since the patient's most recent cryptogenic cerebrovascular event (CVE) or systemic embolism (SE).

METHODS

We conducted a multicentre, retrospective cohort study with international participation, to assess the results of an early closure (EC, <9 months) for secondary prevention versus a delayed closure (DC, ≥9 months). Recurrence of CVE/SE following PFOC was evaluated as the primary endpoint.

RESULTS

496 patients were included (65% in the EC and 35% in the DC group). With the exception of a larger defect size in the DC group (tunnel width 6 (4-14) vs 12 (6-16) mm, p=0.005), similar clinical and echocardiographic baseline features were observed between the groups. No differences were observed regarding the type of devices used for PFOC, procedural success rate (99.4 in EC vs 98.8% DC group) and periprocedural complications (2.1% vs 0.8%). Median follow-up was 2.0 (1.2-4.2) years in the whole study population. Recurrence of CVE/SE (3.9% vs 2.6%, p=0.443), death (1.4% vs 1.0%, p=0.697), residual shunt 12 months after PFOC, or antithrombotic treatment strategy were comparable in both groups during follow-up. A subanalysis comparing very delayed PFOC (≥24 months) also showed no differences in recurrence (4.2% in the <24-month vs 3.4% in the ≥24-month group, p=0.770).

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing PFOC before and after 9 months after the index event had a comparable recurrence rate of CVE/SE. These findings suggest that PFOC might be recommended in cryptogenic CVE/SE which are more remote than 9 months.

Only transesophageal echocardiography guided patent foramen ovale closure: A single-center experience

Background

An increasing number of studies have proved that patent foramen ovale (PFO) occlusion could reduce the incidence of recurrent stroke more than drug therapy alone under certain conditions. Which is the "best" guidance technique still remains to be discussed.

Methods

A single center retrospective study enrolled 120 patients (mean age 52.51 ± 14.29 years) who underwent PFO closure between April 2019 and March 2021. 87 patients (72.5%) had suffered cryptogenic stroke (CS) at least one time, and 24 patients (20%) had repetitive episodes of hemicrania unsourced. 65 patients were in the transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) guidance group (T-group), and the other 55 patients were in the angiographic guidance group (A-group).

Results

There were no significant differences in crucial clinical characteristics between the two groups. In T-group, the procedural success rate was higher (100% vs. 92.7%, P = 0.028), and the procedural time was shorter (23.15 ± 13.87 vs. 25.75 ± 7.19, P = 0.001). No difference was detected in the procedural complication rate. Follow-up were performed at least 12 months. At 12 months, new atrial fibrillation occurred in 1 patient (1.5%) in the T-group and in 1 patient (1.8%) in the A-group (P = 0.905). Residual shunt occurred in 1 patient (1.5%) in the T-group and in 3 patients (5.5%) in the A-group (P = 0.236). Recurrent cerebral ischemia occurred in 2 patient (3.1%) in the T-group and in 2 patients (3.6%) in the A-group (P = 0.865).

Conclusion

The use of only intra-procedural TEE guidance for PFO closure is safe and effective. The whole procedure can be performed without fluoroscopy and contrast medium. The short and medium follow-up results are satisfactory, especially in the residual shunt.

Clinical Experience of Percutaneous Patent Foramen Ovale Closure Using the Amplatzer PFO Occluder in Japanese Patients to Prevent the Recurrence of Cryptogenic Stroke

Objective Percutaneous patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure is a procedure widely used to prevent recurrence of cryptogenic stroke. Since December 2019, the Amplatzer PFO occluder device has been available in Japan through medical insurance. However, data on the clinical experience with this device are lacking, as it has been approved for use in only a limited number of institutions. This study assessed the clinical data of Japanese patients who underwent PFO closure using the Amplatzer PFO occluder. Methods Between February and October 2020, 14 patients at our institution underwent percutaneous PFO closure using the Amplatzer PFO occluder. The procedural characteristics, safety, and adverse events were retrospectively analyzed. Results The mean age of the patients was 52.4±13.3 years old, and 57.1% were women. Deep vein thrombosis was revealed in 2 patients, and the risk of paradoxical embolism score was 6.6±1.2 points. The PFO height and tunnel length were 2.3±1.4 mm and 11.5±4.1 mm. All patients had a PFO during the bubble study of grade >3 at the Valsalva maneuver on transthoracic echocardiography or transesophageal echocardiography. The average diameter of the PFO measured using a stiff guidewire and sizing balloon was 5.1±1.3 and 7.9±2.3 mm, respectively. Almost all cases (92.9%) were performed with a 25-mm device and without significant complications within approximately 1 hour. Conclusion Percutaneous closure using Amplatzer PFO occluder is a safe procedure for Japanese patients. However, further investigations with a larger sample and longer follow-up are needed to confirm this result.

Transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale: Current evidence and future perspectives

Recent prospective controlled studies have demonstrated that transcatheter closure of a patent foramen ovale (PFO) reduces recurrent stroke risk in select patients, especially in patients younger than 60 years with PFO and embolic-appearing infarct and where no other mechanism of stroke was identified. Detection of PFO depends on the intensity of the Valsalva maneuver, and not all PFOs can be diagnosed using transesophageal echocardiography. Transthoracic contrast echocardiography using abdominal compression during the Valsalva maneuver is an easy method that can increase the detection sensitivity of PFO shunt. PFO with two or more of the following factors is most likely considered a "high-risk PFO" and as such, has a significantly higher probability of cryptogenic stroke: (1) a long-tunnel PFO (≥10 mm in length), (2) atrial septal aneurysm and/or hypermobile interatrial septum, (3) prominent Eustachian valve or Chiari's network, (4) large right-to-left shunt at rest and during the Valsalva maneuver, and (5) low-angle PFO. In order to establish the benefit of catheter-based PFO closure as a safe and effective treatment in clinical practice, the degree of accuracy of PFO diagnosis and its long-term safety need to be confirmed.